A central use of EQ-5D data is the assessment and reporting of change in health over time, for example before and after treatment or intervention. Because EQ-5D describes health across multiple dimensions using ordinal response levels, appropriate reporting of change requires methods that preserve this multidimensional structure.
This vignette describes the change analysis methods available in
eq5d and how they can be used to report changes in EQ-5D
over time. It builds on earlier vignettes covering descriptive system
reporting and other EQ-5D summaries.
Change in EQ-5D profiles may involve improvement in some dimensions, deterioration in others, or no change at all. Even when overall utility index scores improve on average, individual patterns of change may be heterogeneous or mixed.
For this reason the change analysis functions in eq5d
focus on:
Longitudinal EQ-5D data are most commonly stored in long format, with one row per observation and repeated observations for each individual. A clear definition of pre- and post-intervention health states is required before change analysis can be performed.
The change-analysis functions in eq5d support a formula
interface that makes this pairing explicit, specifying both the EQ-5D
dimensions and the variable that defines time ordering.
suppressPackageStartupMessages(library(eq5d))
## Example EQ-5D-3L data included with the package
dat <- read.csv(
system.file("extdata", "eq5d3l_example.csv", package = "eq5d")
)
## Construct a simple long-format example
## (for illustration only)
dat_long <- dat
dat_long$id <- rep(seq_len(nrow(dat_long) / 2), each = 2)
dat_long$visit <- dat_long$GroupThe Paretian Classification of Health Change (PCHC) classifies individual changes in EQ-5D profiles between two time points into mutually exclusive categories, including improvement, deterioration, mixed change, and no change.
PCHC preserves the multidimensional structure of EQ-5D and summarises individual change between two observations.
The example below uses the formula interface introduced above.
pchc(
MO + SC + UA + PD + AD ~ visit | id,
data = dat_long,
version = "3L"
)
#> Number Percent
#> No change 14 14
#> Improve 59 59
#> Worsen 14 14
#> Mixed change 13 13
#> Total with problems 100 100
#> No problems 0 0If the time variable contains exactly two observed levels, pre- and
post-intervention states are inferred automatically. When the ordering
is ambiguous, the pre.level and post.level
arguments should be supplied explicitly.
The package supports both long-format longitudinal data and explicitly paired pre- and post-intervention datasets. For simplicity, the examples below use paired datasets; the same summaries can be obtained from long-format data using the formula interface shown above.
## Prepare paired pre/post datasets
pre <- dat[dat$Group == "Group1", ]
post <- dat[dat$Group == "Group2", ]
pchc_res <- pchc(pre, post, version = "3L", summary = TRUE)
pchc_res
#> Number Percent
#> No change 14 14
#> Improve 59 59
#> Worsen 14 14
#> Mixed change 13 13
#> Total with problems 100 100
#> No problems 0 0The resulting table summarises the overall pattern of change within the study population and can be reported alongside descriptive system summaries at baseline and follow-up.
Probability of Superiority (PS) provides a population-level summary of change by comparing pre- and post-intervention responses on each EQ-5D dimension and quantifying the balance between improvement and deterioration.
Unlike PCHC, PS is returned as a separate estimate for each EQ-5D dimension and can be presented using reporting tables where required.
ps_res <- ps(pre, post, version = "3L")
ps_res
#> $MO
#> [1] 0.6
#>
#> $SC
#> [1] 0.62
#>
#> $UA
#> [1] 0.69
#>
#> $PD
#> [1] 0.66
#>
#> $AD
#> [1] 0.55
table_ps(ps_res)
#> Dimension PS
#> 1 MO 0.60
#> 2 SC 0.62
#> 3 UA 0.69
#> 4 PD 0.66
#> 5 AD 0.55PS should be interpreted as a comparative probability rather than as an individual-level effect measure. Unlike PCHC, it does not classify individual change trajectories and should therefore be viewed as complementary to, rather than a replacement for, profile-based classifications.
PCHC and PS provide different perspectives on change:
Reporting both summaries together provides a richer account of longitudinal EQ-5D change than either approach alone.
Visualisation can support the interpretation of change summaries. The
Health Profile Grid (HPG) provides a two-dimensional representation of
ranked EQ-5D profiles before and after intervention. In
eq5d, HPG data are generated using hpg() and
visualised with plot_hpg().
hpg_obj <- hpg(
pre,
post,
country = "UK",
version = "3L",
type = "TTO"
)
plot_hpg(hpg_obj, version = "3L")Visualisations are most informative when interpreted alongside multidimensional change summaries.