Network Working GroupInternet Engineering Task Force (IETF) H. AsaedaInternet-DraftRequest for Comments: 7244 NICTIntended status:Category: Standards Track Q. WuExpires: August 30, 2014ISSN: 2070-1721 R. Huang HuaweiFebruary 26,May 2014 RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Blocks for Synchronization Delay and Offset Metrics Reportingdraft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-09Abstract This document defines two RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR)Blocksblocks that allow the reporting of initial synchronization delay and synchronization offset metrics for use in a range of RTP applications. Status ofthisThis Memo ThisInternet-Draftissubmitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documentsan Internet Standards Track document. This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The listIt represents the consensus ofcurrent Internet- Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents validthe IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved fora maximumpublication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 ofsix monthsRFC 5741. Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may beupdated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documentsobtained atany time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on August 30, 2014.http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7244. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3....................................................2 1.1. Synchronization Delay and Offset Metrics Reporting Blocks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3..2 1.2. RTCP and RTCP XR Reports. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3...................................3 1.3. Performance Metrics Framework. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3..............................3 1.4. Applicability. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3..............................................3 2. Terminology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.....................................................4 2.1. Standards Language. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.........................................4 3. RTPFlowsFlow Initial Synchronization Delay Report Block. . . . . 5.............4 3.1. Metric Block Structure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.....................................5 3.2. Definition of Fields in RTP Flow Initial Synchronization Delay Metrics Block. . . . . . . . . . . 5........................5 4. RTPFlowsFlow Synchronization Offset Metrics Block. . . . . . . . 7...................6 4.1. Metric Block Structure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.....................................7 4.2. Definition of Fields in RTP Flow General Synchronization Offset Metrics Block. . . . . . . . . . . 8.......................7 5. SDP Signaling. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9...................................................9 5.1. SDP rtcp-xr-attrib Attribute Extension. . . . . . . . . . 9.....................9 5.2. Offer/Answer Usage. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.........................................9 6. IANA Considerations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.............................................9 7. Security Considerations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11........................................10 8. Acknowledgements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11...............................................10 9. References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11.....................................................10 9.1. Normative References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11......................................10 9.2. Informative References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12....................................11 Appendix A. Metricsrepresented using RFC6390Represented Using the Template. . . . . 12 Appendix B. Change Log . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 B.1. draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-syncronization-09 . . . . . . . 14 B.2. draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-syncronization-08 . . . . . . . 14 B.3. draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-syncronization-07 . . . . . . . 14 B.4. draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-syncronization-06 . . . . . . . 14 B.5. draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-syncronization-05 . . . . . . . 14 B.6. draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-syncronization-04 . . . . . . . 14 B.7. draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-syncronization-03 . . . . . . . 14 B.8. draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-syncronization-02 . . . . . . . 15 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15from RFC 6390 ..12 1. Introduction 1.1. Synchronization Delay and Offset Metrics Reporting Blocks This document defines two new block types to augment those defined in [RFC3611], for use in a range of RTP applications. The first new block type supports reporting of the Initial Synchronization Delay to establish a multimedia session. Information is recorded about the time difference between the start of RTP sessions and the time the RTP receiver acquires all components of RTP sessions in the multimedia session [RFC6051]. The second new block type supports reporting of the relative synchronization offset time of two arbitrary streams (e.g., between audio and video streams), with the same RTCP CNAME included in RTCP Source description items (SDES) packets [RFC3550]. These metrics belong to the class oftransport leveltransport-level metrics defined in [RFC6792]. 1.2. RTCP and RTCP XR Reports The use of RTCP for reporting is defined in [RFC3550]. [RFC3611] defined an extensible structure for reportingusing an-- the RTCP Extended Report (XR). This document defines a new Extended Report block for use with [RFC3550] and [RFC3611]. 1.3. Performance Metrics FrameworkThe"Guidelines for Considering New Performance Metric Development" [RFC6390] provides guidance on the definition and specification of performance metrics. "Guidelines for Use of the RTP MonitoringArchitecturesFramework" [RFC6792] providesguidelineguidance for reporting block format using RTCP XR. Thenew reportmetrics block described in thismemodocument is incomplianceaccordance with themonitoring architecture specifiedguidelines in [RFC6390] and [RFC6792]. 1.4. Applicability When joining each session in layered video sessions [RFC6190] or the multimedia session, a receiver may not synchronize playout across the multimedia session or layered video session until RTCP Sender Report (SR) packets have been received on all components of RTP sessions. Thecomponentcomponents of RTPsessionsessions arereferred to as eachper-media-type RTPsessionsessions foreach media type inthe multimediasessionsessions orseparateper-layer RTPsessionsessions foreach layer inthe layered videosession.sessions. For multicastsession,sessions, theinitial synchronization delayInitial Synchronization Delay metric varies with the session bandwidth, the number of members, and the number of senders in the session. The RTPflowFlow Initialsynchronization delay blockSynchronization Delay Metrics Block defined in this document can be used to report such a metric, i.e., theinitial synchronization delayInitial Synchronization Delay to receive all the RTP streams belonging to the same multimedia session or layered video session. In the absence of packet loss, theinitial synchronization delay equalsInitial Synchronization Delay is equal to the average time taken to receive the first RTCP packet in the RTP session with the longest RTCP reporting interval. In the presence of packet loss, the media synchronization should rely on the in-band mapping of RTP and NTP-format timestamps [RFC6051] or wait until the reporting interval has passed, and the next RTCP SR packet is sent. Receivers of the RTPflow initial synchronization delay blockFlow Initial Synchronization Delay Metrics Block could use this metric to compare with targets (i.e., Service Level Agreement or thresholds of the system) to help ensure the quality of real-time application performance. In an RTP multimedia session, there can be an arbitrary number of streams carried in different RTP sessions, with the same RTCP CNAME. These streams may be not synchronized with each other. For example, one audio stream and one video stream belong to the same session, and the audio stream is transmitted lagging behind the video stream for multiple tens of milliseconds [TR-126]. The RTPFlowsFlow Synchronization Offset block can be used to report such synchronization offset between videostreamand audiostream.streams. This block is also applied to the case where an RTP session can contain media streams with media from multiple media types. The metrics defined in the RTPflows synchronizationFlow Synchronization OffsetblockMetrics Block can be used by the network manager fortrouble shootingtroubleshooting and dealing withuser experienceuser-experience issues. 2. Terminology 2.1. Standards Language The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119]. In addition, the following terms are defined: Initial Synchronization Delay: A multimedia session comprises a set of concurrent RTP sessions among a common group of participants, using one RTP session for each media type. Theinitial synchronizationInitial Synchronization Delay is the average time for the receiver to synchronize all components of a multimedia session [RFC6051]. Synchronization Offset: Synchronization between two media streams must be maintained to ensure satisfactory Quality of Experience (QoE). Two media streams can be of the same or different mediatypetypes belonging to one RTPsessionsession, orinof different media types belonging to one multimedia session. The Synchronization Offset is the relative time difference of the two media streams that need to be synchronized. 3. RTPFlowsFlow Initial Synchronization DelayReportMetrics Block This block is sent by RTP receivers and reports the Initialsynchronization delaySynchronization Delay beyond the information carried in the standard RTCP packet format. Information is recorded about the time difference between the start of the multimedia session and the time when the RTP receiver acquires all components of RTP sessions [RFC6051] measured at the receiving end of the RTP stream. This block needsonlyto be exchanged only occasionally, forexampleexample, sent once at the start of the RTP session. 3.1. Metric Block Structure The RTPFlowsFlow Initial Synchronization DelayReportMetrics Block has the following format: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |BT=RFISDBT=27 | Reserved | Block length=2 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | SSRC of Source | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Initial Synchronization Delay | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Figure 1: Report Block Structure 3.2. Definition of Fields in RTP Flow Initial Synchronization Delay Metrics Block Block type (BT): 8 bits The RTPFlowsFlow Initial Synchronization DelayReportMetrics Block is identified by the constant<RFISD>. [Note to RFC Editor: please replace RFISD with the IANA provided RTCP XR block type for this block.]27. Reserved: 8 bits This field is reserved for future definition. In the absence of such a definition, the bits in this field MUST be set to zero and ignored by the receiver. Block length: 16 bits The constant 2, in accordance with the definition of this field in Section 3 of RFC 3611 [RFC3611]. SSRC of source: 32 bits The SSRC of the media source SHALL be set to the value of the SSRC identifier carried in any arbitrary component of RTP sessions belonging to the same multimedia session. Initial Synchronization Delay: 32 bits The average delay, expressed in units of 1/65536 seconds, from the beginning of the multimedia session [RFC6051] to the time when RTCP packets are received on all of thecomponentscomponent RTP sessions. It is recommended that the beginning of the multimedia session is chosen as the time when the receiver has joined the first RTP session of the multimedia session. The value of theinitial synchronization delayInitial Synchronization Delay is calculated based on received RTCP SR packets or the RTP header extension containing the in-band mapping of RTP and NTP-format timestamps [RFC6051]. If there is no packet loss, theinitial synchronization delayInitial Synchronization Delay is expected to be equal to the average time taken to receive the first RTCP packet in the RTP session with the longest RTCP reporting interval or to the average time taken to receive the first RTP header extension containing the in-band mapping of RTP and NTP-format timestamps. If the measurement is unavailable, the value of this field with all bits set to 1 MUST be reported. 4. RTPFlowsFlow Synchronization Offset Metrics Block In the RTP multimedia sessions or one RTP session, there can be an arbitrary number ofMediamedia streams and each media stream (e.g., audio stream or video stream) is sent in a separate RTP stream. In case of one RTP session, each media stream or each medium uses a different SSRC. The receiverassociates RTPcorrelates these media streams that need to be synchronized by means of the RTCP CNAME contained in the RTCP Source Description (SDES) packets [RFC3550]. This block is sent by RTP receivers and reports the synchronization offset of two arbitrary RTP streams thatneedsneed to be synchronized in the RTP multimedia session. Information is recorded about the relative average time difference between two arbitrary RTP streams(one is(the reportingstream,stream and theother isreference stream) with the same CNAME and measured at the receiving end of the RTP stream. In order to tell what the offset of the reporting stream is relative to, the block for the reference stream with synchronization offset of zero should be reported. Instances of thisBlockblock refer bySynchronizationsynchronization source (SSRC) to the separate auxiliary Measurement Information block[RFC6776][RFC6776], which describes measurement periods in use (see[RFC6776] section 4.2).Section 4.2 of [RFC6776]). This metrics block relies on the measurement period in the Measurement Information block indicating the span of the report and SHOULD be sent in the same compound RTCP packet as themeasurement information block.Measurement Information Block. If the measurement period is not received in the same compound RTCP packet as thisBlock,block, thisBlockblock MUST be discarded. 4.1. Metric Block Structure The RTP Flow General Synchronization OffsetReportMetrics Block has the following format: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |BT=RFSOBT=28 | I | Reserved | Block length=3 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | SSRC of source | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Synchronization Offset, most significant word | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Synchronization Offset, least significant word | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Figure 2: Report Block Structure 4.2. Definition of Fields in RTP Flow General Synchronization Offset Metrics Block Block type (BT): 8 bits The RTP Flow General Synchronization OffsetReportMetrics Block is identified by the constant<RFSO>. [Note to RFC Editor: please replace RFSO with the IANA provided RTCP XR block type for this block.]28. Interval Metric Flag (I): 2 bits This field is used to indicate whether the Burst/Gap Discard Summary Statistics metrics are Sampled,IntervalInterval, or Cumulative metrics: I=10: Interval Duration - the reported value applies to the most recent measurement interval duration between successive metrics reports. I=11: Cumulative Duration - the reported value applies to the accumulation period characteristic of cumulative measurements. I=01: Sampled Value - the reported value is a sampled instantaneous value. In this document, the value I=00 is the reserved value and MUST NOT be used. If the value I=00 is received, then the XR block MUST be ignored by the receiver. Reserved: 6 bits This field is reserved for future definition. In the absence of such a definition, the bits in this field MUST be set to zero and MUST be ignored by the receiver. Block length: 16 bits The constant 3, in accordance with the definition of this field in Section 3 of RFC 3611 [RFC3611]. SSRC of Source: 32 bits The SSRC of the media source SHALL be set to the value of the SSRC identifier of the reporting RTP stream to which the XR relates. Synchronization Offset: 64 bits The synchronization offset of the reporting RTP stream relative to the reference stream with the same CNAME. The calculation of Synchronization Offset is similar to the Difference D calculation in theRFC3550.RFC 3550. That is to say, if Si is the NTP timestamp from the reporting RTP packet i,andRi is the time of arrival in NTP timestamp units for reporting RTP packet i, Sj is the NTP timestamp from the reference RTP packet j, and Rj is the time of arrival in NTP timestamp units for reference RTP packet j, then the value of thesynchronization offsetSynchronization Offset D may be expressed as D(i,j) = (Rj - Ri) - (Sj - Si) = (Rj - Sj) - (Ri - Si) If in-band delivery of NTP-format timestamps is supported [RFC6051], Si and Sj should be obtained directly from the RTP packets where NTP timestamps are available. If not, Si and Sj should be calculated from their corresponding RTP timestamps. The value of thesynchronization offsetSynchronization Offset is represented using a 64-bit signed NTP-format timestamp as defined in [RFC5905], which is64- bita 64-bit signed fixed-point number with the integer part in the first 32 bits and the fractional part in the last 32 bits. A positive value of thesynchronization offsetSynchronization Offset means that the reporting stream leads before the reference stream, while a negative one means the reporting stream lags behind the reference stream. Thesynchronization offsetSynchronization Offset of zero means the stream is the reference stream. If the measurement is unavailable, the value of this field with all bits set to 1 MUST be reported. 5. SDP Signaling [RFC3611] defines the use of SDP (Session Description Protocol) [RFC4566] for signaling the use of XR blocks. XR blocks MAY be used without prior signaling. 5.1. SDP rtcp-xr-attrib Attribute ExtensionTwoUsing the Augmented Backus-Naur Form (ABNF) [RFC5234], two new parameters are defined for the two report blocks defined in this document to be used withSession Description Protocol (SDP) [RFC4566] using the Augmented Backus-Naur Form (ABNF) [RFC5234].SDP [RFC4566]. They have the following syntax within the "rtcp-xr" attribute [RFC3611]: xr-format==/ xr-rfisd-block / xr-rfso-block xr-rfisd-block = "rtp-flow-init-syn-delay" xr-rfso-block = "rtp-flow-syn-offset" Refer to Section 5.1 of RFC 3611 [RFC3611] for a detailed description and the full syntax of the "rtcp-xr" attribute. 5.2. Offer/Answer Usage When SDP is used inoffer-answerthe offer/answer context, the SDP Offer/Answer usage defined in [RFC3611] applies. 6. IANA Considerations New report block types for RTCP XR are subject to IANA registration. For general guidelines on IANA allocations for RTCP XR, refer to Section 6.2 of [RFC3611]. This document assigns two new block type values in the RTCP XR Block Type Registry: Name: RFISD Long Name: RTPFlowsFlow Initial Synchronization Delay Value<RFISD>27 Reference: Section 3 Name: RFSO Long Name: RTPFlowsFlow Synchronization OffsetMetrics BlockValue<RFSO>28 Reference: Section 4 This document also registers two new SDP [RFC4566] parameters for the "rtcp-xr" attribute in the RTCP XR SDP Parameters Registry: * "rtp-flow-init-syn-delay " * "rtp-flow-syn-offset" The contact information for the registrations is: RAI Area Directors <rai-ads@tools.ietf.org> 7. Security Considerations When using Secure RTP [RFC3711], or othermedia layermedia-layer security, reporting accuratesynchronisationsynchronization offset information can expose some details about the timing of the cryptographic operations that are used to protect the media. There is a possibility that this timing information might enable a side-channel attack on the encryption. For environments where this attack is a concern, implementations need to take care to ensure cryptographic processing and media compression take the same amount of time irrespective of the media content, to avoid the potential attack. Besides this, it is believed that this RTCP XR block introduces no new security considerations beyond those described in [RFC3611]. 8. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Bill Ver Steeg, DavidRR. Oran, Ali Begen, Colin Perkins, Roni Even, Kevin Gross, Jing Zhao, Fernando Boronat Segui, Mario Montagud Climent, Youqing Yang, WenxiaoYu andYu, YinliangHu,JonathanHu, Jonathan Lennox, and Stephen Farrel for their valuable comments and suggestions on this document. 9. References 9.1. Normative References [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC3550] Schulzrinne, H., Casner, S., Frederick, R., and V. Jacobson, "RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications", STD 64, RFC 3550, July 2003. [RFC3611] Friedman, T., Caceres, R., and A. Clark, "RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR)", RFC 3611, November 2003. [RFC3711] Baugher, M., McGrew, D., Naslund, M., Carrara, E., and K. Norrman, "The Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP)", RFC 3711, March 2004. [RFC4566] Handley, M., Jacobson, V., and C. Perkins, "SDP: Session Description Protocol", RFC 4566, July 2006. [RFC5234] Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234, January 2008. [RFC5905] Mills, D., Martin, J., Burbank, J., and W. Kasch, "Network Time Protocol Version 4: Protocol and Algorithms Specification", RFC 5905, June 2010. [RFC6051] Perkins, C. and T. Schierl, "Rapid Synchronisation of RTP Flows", RFC 6051, November 2010. [RFC6190] Wenger, S., Wang, Y., Schierl, T., and A. Eleftheriadis, "RTP Payload Format for Scalable Video Coding", RFC 6190, May 2011. [RFC6776] Wu, Q., "Measurement Identity and information Reporting using SDES item and XR Block", RFC 6776, August 2012. 9.2. Informative References [RFC6390] Clark, A. and B. Claise, "Guidelines for Considering New Performance Metric Development", RFC 6390, October 2011. [RFC6792] Wu, Q., "Guidelines for Use of the RTP Monitoring Framework", RFC 6792, November 2012. [TR-126]BBFBroadband Forum, "Triple-play Services Quality of Experience (QoE) Requirements", Technical Report TR-126, December 2006. [Y.1540] ITU-T,"ITU-T Rec. Y.1540, IP"IP packet transfer and availability performance parameters", ITU-T Recommendation Y.1540, November 2007. Appendix A. Metricsrepresented using RFC6390 Template RFC EDITOR NOTE: please change XXXX in [RFCXXXX] byRepresented Using thenewTemplate from RFCnumber, when assigned.6390 a. Initial Synchronization Delay Metric * Metric Name: RTP Initial Synchronization Delay * Metric Description: SeeSection 2.1,Initialthe definition of "Initial SynchronizationDelay term [RFCXXXX].Delay" in Section 2.1. * Method of Measurement or Calculation: Seesection 3.2, Initial Synchronization Delaythe definition[RFCXXXX].of the "Initial Synchronization Delay" field in Section 3.2. * Units of Measurement: Seesection 3.2, Initial Synchronization Delaythe definition[RFCXXXX].of the "Initial Synchronization Delay" field in Section 3.2. * Measurement Point(s) with Potential Measurement Domain: Seesection 3, 1stthe first paragraph[RFCXXXX].of Section 3. * Measurement Timing: Seesection 3, 2ndthe second paragraph[RFCXXXX] for measurement timing.of Section 3. * Use and applications: Seesection 1.4 [RFCXXXX].Section 1.4. * Reporting model: SeeRFC3611.RFC 3611. b. Synchronization Offset Metric * Metric Name: RTP Synchronization Offset Delay * Metric Description: See the definition of "Synchronization Offset" in Section2.1, Synchronization Offset term [RFCXXXX].1.2. * Method of Measurement or Calculation: Seesection 4.2, Initial Synchronization Delaythe definition[RFCXXXX].of the "Synchronization Offset" field in Section 4.2. * Units of Measurement: Seesection 4.2, Initial Synchronization Delaythe definition[RFCXXXX].of the "Synchronization Offset" field in Section 4.2. * Measurement Point(s) with Potential Measurement Domain: Seesection 4, 2ndthe second paragraph[RFCXXXX].of Section 4. * Measurement Timing: Seesection 4, 3rdthe third paragraph[RFCXXXX]of Section 4.2 for measurement timing andsection 4.2 [RFCXXXX] forthe Interval Metric flag. * Use and applications: Seesection 1.4 [RFCXXXX].Section 1.4. * Reporting model: SeeRFC3611. Appendix B. Change Log Note to the RFC-Editor: please remove this section prior to publication as an RFC. B.1. draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-syncronization-09 The following are the major changes compared to previous version: Some Editorial changes based on IESG Review comments. B.2. draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-syncronization-08 The following are the major changes compared to previous version: Some Editorial changes based on Gen-Art Reviewer comments. B.3. draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-syncronization-07 The following are the major changes compared to previous version: Minor Editorial changes. B.4. draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-syncronization-06 The following are the major changes compared to previous version: Some Editorial changes. B.5. draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-syncronization-05 The following are the major changes compared to previous version: Editorial changes and typo fixed. B.6. draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-syncronization-04 The following are the major changes compared to previous version: Additional text to clarify on how to distinguish report stream from reference stream. Other Editorial changes. B.7. draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-syncronization-03 The following are the major changes compared to previous version: Remove the need to signal the reference source in the synchronisation offset metrics RTCP XR report. Apply RFC6390 template to metrics in the appendix. Other editorial changes to get inline with other XRBLOCK drafts. B.8. draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-syncronization-02 The following are the major changes compared to previous version: Editorial change based on comments raised on the list and in the IETF85 meetingRFC 3611. Authors' Addresses Hitoshi Asaeda National Institute of Information and Communications Technology 4-2-1 Nukui-Kitamachi Koganei, Tokyo 184-8795 JapanEmail:EMail: asaeda@nict.go.jp Qin Wu Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. 101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District Nanjing, Jiangsu 210012 ChinaEmail:EMail: bill.wu@huawei.com Rachel Huang Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. 101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District Nanjing, Jiangsu 210012 ChinaEmail:EMail: Rachel@huawei.com