IDRInternet Engineering Task Force (IETF) J. HaasInternet-DraftRequest for Comments: 7300 Juniper NetworksUpdates: 1930 (if approved)BCP: 6 J. MitchellIntended status:Updates: 1930 Microsoft Corporation Category: Best Current PracticeMicrosoft Corporation Expires: November 22, 2014 May 21,July 2014 ISSN: 2070-1721 Reservation of Last Autonomous System (AS) Numbersdraft-ietf-idr-last-as-reservation-07Abstract This document reserves two Autonomous SystemnumbersNumbers (ASNs) at the end of the16 bit16-bit and32 bit32-bit ranges, described in this document as "LastASNs"ASNs", and provides guidance to implementers and operators on their use. This document updatessectionSection 10 of RFC 1930. Status of This Memo ThisInternet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are workingmemo documents an Internet Best Current Practice. This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The listIt has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on BCPs is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741. Information about the currentInternet- Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximumstatus ofsix monthsthis document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may beupdated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documentsobtained atany time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on November 22, 2014.http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7300. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. 1. Introduction Over a decade ago, IANAhasreserved the last Autonomous System Number(ASN), 65535,(ASN) of the16 bit autonomous system number range for over a decade16-bit ASN range, 65535, with the intention that it not be used by network operators running BGP [RFC4271]. Since the introduction ofBGP"BGP Support for Four-OctetASAutonomous System (AS) NumberSpaceSpace" [RFC6793], IANA has also reserved the last ASN of the32 bit32-bit autonomous system number range, 4294967295. This reservation has been documented in the IANAAutonomous"Autonomous SystemNumbers Registry(AS) Numbers" registry [IANA.AS]. Although these "Last ASNs" border on Private Use ASN [RFC6996] ranges, they are not defined or reserved as Private Use ASNs by [IANA.AS]. This document describes the reasoning for reservingtheseLast ASNs and provides guidance both to operators and to implementers on their use. 2. Requirements Language The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119]. 3. Reasons for Reservation of the Last ASNsReservationA subset of the BGP communities of ASN 65535, the last ASN of the16 bit16-bit range, are reserved for use by Well-knowncommunitiesCommunities as described in [RFC1997] and [IANA.WK]. Although this is not currently true of ASN 4294967295, if there is a future need for another Special Use ASN that is not designed to be globally routable, or for the associated BGP communities of such an ASN, ASN 4294967295 could be a valid candidate for such purpose. This document does not prescribe any such Special Use to this ASN at the time of publication. 4. Operational Considerations Operators SHOULD NOT use these Last ASNs for any other purpose or as Private Use ASNs. Operational use of these Last ASNs could have undesirable results. For example; use of AS 65535 as if it were a Private Use ASN, may result in inadvertent use of BGP Well-known Community values [IANA.WK], causing undesirable routing behavior.These lastLast ASNs MUST NOT be advertised to the global Internet within AS_PATH or AS4_PATH attributes. Operators SHOULD filter Last ASNs within the AS_PATH and AS4_PATH attributes. 5. Implementation Considerations WhiletheseLast ASNs are reserved, they remain valid ASNs from a BGPprotocolperspective. Therefore, implementations of BGP [RFC4271] SHOULD NOT treat the use oftheseLast ASNs as any type of protocol error. However, if a Last ASN is configured as the local AS, implementations MAY generate alocalwarning message indicating improper use of a reserved ASN. Implementations that provide tools that filter Private Use ASNs within the AS_PATH and AS4_PATH attributes MAY also includetheseLast ASNs. 6. IANA Considerations[Note to IANA, TO BE REMOVED BEFORE PUBLICATION: IANA please update the reservations for values 65535 and 4294967295 in the registries mentioned below to reference this document.]IANA has reserved last Autonomous System number 65535 from the "16-bit Autonomous System Numbers" registry for the reasons described in this document. IANA has also reserved last Autonomous System number 4294967295 from the "32-bit Autonomous System Numbers" registry for the reasons described in this document. These reservations have been documented in the IANAAutonomous"Autonomous SystemNumbers Registry(AS) Numbers" registry [IANA.AS] and the IANASpecial-Purpose AS Numbers Registry"Special-Purpose Autonomous System (AS) Numbers" registry [IANA.SpecialAS]. 7. Security Considerations This document does not introduce any additional security concerns in regards to usage of Last ASNs. Although the BGPprotocolis designed to allow usage oftheseLast ASNs, security issues related to BGP implementation errors could be triggered by Last ASN usage. 8. References 8.1. Normative References [IANA.AS] IANA,,"Autonomous System (AS) Numbers",May 2014,<http://www.iana.org/assignments/as-numbers/>. [IANA.SpecialAS] IANA,,"Special-Purpose Autonomous System (AS) Numbers",May 2014,<http://www.iana.org/assignments/ iana-as-numbers-special-registry/>. [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC4271] Rekhter, Y., Li, T., and S. Hares, "A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)", RFC 4271, January 2006. [RFC6793] Vohra, Q. and E. Chen, "BGP Support for Four-Octet Autonomous System (AS) Number Space", RFC 6793, December 2012. 8.2. Informative References [IANA.WK] IANA,,"Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) Well-known Communities",May 2014,<http://www.iana.org/assignments/ bgp-well-known-communities/>. [RFC1997] Chandrasekeran, R., Traina, P., and T. Li, "BGP Communities Attribute", RFC 1997, August 1996. [RFC6996] Mitchell, J., "Autonomous System (AS) Reservation for Private Use", BCP 6, RFC 6996, July 2013. Appendix A. Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank Michelle Cotton and ElwynDavisDavies for encouraging the proper documentation of the reservation of theseASNsASNs, and David Farmer for his contributions to the document. Authors' Addresses Jeffrey Haas Juniper NetworksEmail:EMail: jhaas@juniper.net Jon Mitchell Microsoft Corporation One Microsoft Way Redmond, WA 98052 USAEmail:EMail: Jon.Mitchell@microsoft.com