rfc7432v2.txt | rfc7432.txt | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
skipping to change at page 1, line 17 | skipping to change at page 1, line 17 | |||
N. Bitar | N. Bitar | |||
Verizon | Verizon | |||
A. Isaac | A. Isaac | |||
Bloomberg | Bloomberg | |||
J. Uttaro | J. Uttaro | |||
AT&T | AT&T | |||
J. Drake | J. Drake | |||
Juniper Networks | Juniper Networks | |||
W. Henderickx | W. Henderickx | |||
Alcatel-Lucent | Alcatel-Lucent | |||
January 2015 | February 2015 | |||
BGP MPLS-Based Ethernet VPN | BGP MPLS-Based Ethernet VPN | |||
Abstract | Abstract | |||
This document describes procedures for BGP MPLS-based Ethernet VPNs | This document describes procedures for BGP MPLS-based Ethernet VPNs | |||
(EVPN). The procedures described here meet the requirements | (EVPN). The procedures described here meet the requirements | |||
specified in RFC 7209 -- "Requirements for Ethernet VPN (EVPN)". | specified in RFC 7209 -- "Requirements for Ethernet VPN (EVPN)". | |||
Status of This Memo | Status of This Memo | |||
skipping to change at page 2, line 33 | skipping to change at page 2, line 33 | |||
2. Specification of Requirements ...................................4 | 2. Specification of Requirements ...................................4 | |||
3. Terminology .....................................................4 | 3. Terminology .....................................................4 | |||
4. BGP MPLS-Based EVPN Overview ....................................6 | 4. BGP MPLS-Based EVPN Overview ....................................6 | |||
5. Ethernet Segment ................................................7 | 5. Ethernet Segment ................................................7 | |||
6. Ethernet Tag ID ................................................10 | 6. Ethernet Tag ID ................................................10 | |||
6.1. VLAN-Based Service Interface ..............................11 | 6.1. VLAN-Based Service Interface ..............................11 | |||
6.2. VLAN Bundle Service Interface .............................11 | 6.2. VLAN Bundle Service Interface .............................11 | |||
6.2.1. Port-Based Service Interface .......................11 | 6.2.1. Port-Based Service Interface .......................11 | |||
6.3. VLAN-Aware Bundle Service Interface .......................11 | 6.3. VLAN-Aware Bundle Service Interface .......................11 | |||
6.3.1. Port-Based VLAN-Aware Service Interface ............12 | 6.3.1. Port-Based VLAN-Aware Service Interface ............12 | |||
7. BGP EVPN Routes ................................................12 | 7. BGP EVPN Routes ................................................13 | |||
7.1. Ethernet Auto-discovery Route .............................13 | 7.1. Ethernet Auto-discovery Route .............................14 | |||
7.2. MAC/IP Advertisement Route ................................14 | 7.2. MAC/IP Advertisement Route ................................14 | |||
7.3. Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag Route ....................15 | 7.3. Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag Route ....................15 | |||
7.4. Ethernet Segment Route ....................................15 | 7.4. Ethernet Segment Route ....................................16 | |||
7.5. ESI Label Extended Community ..............................16 | 7.5. ESI Label Extended Community ..............................16 | |||
7.6. ES-Import Route Target ....................................16 | 7.6. ES-Import Route Target ....................................17 | |||
7.7. MAC Mobility Extended Community ...........................17 | 7.7. MAC Mobility Extended Community ...........................18 | |||
7.8. Default Gateway Extended Community ........................17 | 7.8. Default Gateway Extended Community ........................18 | |||
7.9. Route Distinguisher Assignment per EVI ....................18 | 7.9. Route Distinguisher Assignment per EVI ....................18 | |||
7.10. Route Targets ............................................18 | 7.10. Route Targets ............................................19 | |||
7.10.1. Auto-derivation from the Ethernet Tag ID ..........18 | 7.10.1. Auto-derivation from the Ethernet Tag ID ..........19 | |||
8. Multihoming Functions ..........................................18 | 8. Multihoming Functions ..........................................19 | |||
8.1. Multihomed Ethernet Segment Auto-discovery ................18 | 8.1. Multihomed Ethernet Segment Auto-discovery ................19 | |||
8.1.1. Constructing the Ethernet Segment Route ............19 | 8.1.1. Constructing the Ethernet Segment Route ............19 | |||
8.2. Fast Convergence ..........................................19 | 8.2. Fast Convergence ..........................................20 | |||
8.2.1. Constructing Ethernet A-D per Ethernet | 8.2.1. Constructing Ethernet A-D per Ethernet | |||
Segment Route ......................................20 | Segment Route ......................................21 | |||
8.2.1.1. Ethernet A-D Route Targets ................21 | 8.2.1.1. Ethernet A-D Route Targets ................21 | |||
8.3. Split Horizon .............................................21 | 8.3. Split Horizon .............................................22 | |||
8.3.1. ESI Label Assignment ...............................21 | 8.3.1. ESI Label Assignment ...............................22 | |||
8.3.1.1. Ingress Replication .......................22 | 8.3.1.1. Ingress Replication .......................22 | |||
8.3.1.2. P2MP MPLS LSPs ............................23 | 8.3.1.2. P2MP MPLS LSPs ............................24 | |||
8.4. Aliasing and Backup Path ..................................24 | 8.4. Aliasing and Backup Path ..................................25 | |||
8.4.1. Constructing Ethernet A-D per EVPN Instance Route ..25 | 8.4.1. Constructing Ethernet A-D per EVPN Instance Route ..26 | |||
8.5. Designated Forwarder Election .............................26 | 8.5. Designated Forwarder Election .............................27 | |||
8.6. Interoperability with Single-Homing PEs ...................28 | 8.6. Interoperability with Single-Homing PEs ...................29 | |||
9. Determining Reachability to Unicast MAC Addresses ..............28 | 9. Determining Reachability to Unicast MAC Addresses ..............30 | |||
9.1. Local Learning ............................................28 | 9.1. Local Learning ............................................30 | |||
9.2. Remote Learning ...........................................29 | 9.2. Remote Learning ...........................................30 | |||
9.2.1. Constructing MAC/IP Address Advertisement ..........29 | 9.2.1. Constructing MAC/IP Address Advertisement ..........31 | |||
9.2.2. Route Resolution ...................................31 | 9.2.2. Route Resolution ...................................32 | |||
10. ARP and ND ....................................................32 | 10. ARP and ND ....................................................33 | |||
10.1. Default Gateway ..........................................33 | 10.1. Default Gateway ..........................................34 | |||
11. Handling of Multi-destination Traffic .........................35 | 11. Handling of Multi-destination Traffic .........................36 | |||
11.1. Constructing Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag Route ......35 | 11.1. Constructing Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag Route ......36 | |||
11.2. P-Tunnel Identification ..................................35 | 11.2. P-Tunnel Identification ..................................37 | |||
12. Processing of Unknown Unicast Packets .........................36 | 12. Processing of Unknown Unicast Packets .........................38 | |||
12.1. Ingress Replication ......................................37 | 12.1. Ingress Replication ......................................38 | |||
12.2. P2MP MPLS LSPs ...........................................37 | 12.2. P2MP MPLS LSPs ...........................................39 | |||
13. Forwarding Unicast Packets ....................................38 | 13. Forwarding Unicast Packets ....................................39 | |||
13.1. Forwarding Packets Received from a CE ....................38 | 13.1. Forwarding Packets Received from a CE ....................39 | |||
13.2. Forwarding Packets Received from a Remote PE .............39 | 13.2. Forwarding Packets Received from a Remote PE .............41 | |||
13.2.1. Unknown Unicast Forwarding ........................39 | 13.2.1. Unknown Unicast Forwarding ........................41 | |||
13.2.2. Known Unicast Forwarding ..........................40 | 13.2.2. Known Unicast Forwarding ..........................41 | |||
14. Load Balancing of Unicast Packets .............................40 | 14. Load Balancing of Unicast Packets .............................41 | |||
14.1. Load Balancing of Traffic from a PE to Remote CEs ........40 | 14.1. Load Balancing of Traffic from a PE to Remote CEs ........41 | |||
14.1.1. Single-Active Redundancy Mode .....................40 | 14.1.1. Single-Active Redundancy Mode .....................42 | |||
14.1.2. All-Active Redundancy Mode ........................41 | 14.1.2. All-Active Redundancy Mode ........................42 | |||
14.2. Load Balancing of Traffic between a PE and a Local CE ....42 | 14.2. Load Balancing of Traffic between a PE and a Local CE ....44 | |||
14.2.1. Data-Plane Learning ...............................43 | 14.2.1. Data-Plane Learning ...............................44 | |||
14.2.2. Control-Plane Learning ............................43 | 14.2.2. Control-Plane Learning ............................44 | |||
15. MAC Mobility ..................................................43 | 15. MAC Mobility ..................................................45 | |||
15.1. MAC Duplication Issue ....................................45 | 15.1. MAC Duplication Issue ....................................47 | |||
15.2. Sticky MAC Addresses .....................................45 | 15.2. Sticky MAC Addresses .....................................47 | |||
16. Multicast and Broadcast .......................................46 | 16. Multicast and Broadcast .......................................47 | |||
16.1. Ingress Replication ......................................46 | 16.1. Ingress Replication ......................................47 | |||
16.2. P2MP LSPs ................................................46 | 16.2. P2MP LSPs ................................................48 | |||
16.2.1. Inclusive Trees ...................................46 | 16.2.1. Inclusive Trees ...................................48 | |||
17. Convergence ...................................................47 | 17. Convergence ...................................................49 | |||
17.1. Transit Link and Node Failures between PEs ...............47 | 17.1. Transit Link and Node Failures between PEs ...............49 | |||
17.2. PE Failures ..............................................47 | 17.2. PE Failures ..............................................49 | |||
17.3. PE-to-CE Network Failures ................................47 | 17.3. PE-to-CE Network Failures ................................49 | |||
18. Frame Ordering ................................................48 | 18. Frame Ordering ................................................50 | |||
19. Security Considerations .......................................48 | 19. Security Considerations .......................................50 | |||
20. IANA Considerations ...........................................50 | 20. IANA Considerations ...........................................52 | |||
21. References ....................................................50 | 21. References ....................................................52 | |||
21.1. Normative References .....................................50 | 21.1. Normative References .....................................52 | |||
21.2. Informative References ...................................51 | 21.2. Informative References ...................................53 | |||
Acknowledgements ..................................................52 | Acknowledgements ..................................................54 | |||
Contributors ......................................................53 | Contributors ......................................................55 | |||
Authors' Addresses ................................................53 | Authors' Addresses ................................................55 | |||
1. Introduction | 1. Introduction | |||
Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS), as defined in [RFC4664], | Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS), as defined in [RFC4664], | |||
[RFC4761], and [RFC4762], is a proven and widely deployed technology. | [RFC4761], and [RFC4762], is a proven and widely deployed technology. | |||
However, the existing solution has a number of limitations when it | However, the existing solution has a number of limitations when it | |||
comes to multihoming and redundancy, multicast optimization, | comes to multihoming and redundancy, multicast optimization, | |||
provisioning simplicity, flow-based load balancing, and multipathing; | provisioning simplicity, flow-based load balancing, and multipathing; | |||
these limitations are important considerations for Data Center (DC) | these limitations are important considerations for Data Center (DC) | |||
deployments. [RFC7209] describes the motivation for a new solution | deployments. [RFC7209] describes the motivation for a new solution | |||
skipping to change at page 4, line 47 | skipping to change at page 4, line 47 | |||
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. | document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. | |||
3. Terminology | 3. Terminology | |||
Broadcast Domain: In a bridged network, the broadcast domain | Broadcast Domain: In a bridged network, the broadcast domain | |||
corresponds to a Virtual LAN (VLAN), where a VLAN is typically | corresponds to a Virtual LAN (VLAN), where a VLAN is typically | |||
represented by a single VLAN ID (VID) but can be represented | represented by a single VLAN ID (VID) but can be represented | |||
by several VIDs where Shared VLAN Learning (SVL) is used | by several VIDs where Shared VLAN Learning (SVL) is used | |||
per [802.1Q]. | per [802.1Q]. | |||
Bridge Domain: An instantiation of a broadcast domain on a | Bridge Table: An instantiation of a broadcast domain on a MAC-VRF. | |||
bridge node. | ||||
CE: Customer Edge device, e.g., a host, router, or switch. | CE: Customer Edge device, e.g., a host, router, or switch. | |||
EVI: An EVPN instance spanning the Provider Edge (PE) devices | EVI: An EVPN instance spanning the Provider Edge (PE) devices | |||
participating in that EVPN. | participating in that EVPN. | |||
MAC-VRF: A Virtual Routing and Forwarding table for Media Access | MAC-VRF: A Virtual Routing and Forwarding table for Media Access | |||
Control (MAC) addresses on a PE for an EVI. | Control (MAC) addresses on a PE. | |||
Ethernet Segment (ES): When a customer site (device or network) is | Ethernet Segment (ES): When a customer site (device or network) is | |||
connected to one or more PEs via a set of Ethernet links, then | connected to one or more PEs via a set of Ethernet links, then | |||
that set of links is referred to as an 'Ethernet segment'. | that set of links is referred to as an 'Ethernet segment'. | |||
Ethernet Segment Identifier (ESI): A unique non-zero identifier that | Ethernet Segment Identifier (ESI): A unique non-zero identifier that | |||
identifies an Ethernet segment is called an 'Ethernet Segment | identifies an Ethernet segment is called an 'Ethernet Segment | |||
Identifier'. | Identifier'. | |||
Ethernet Tag: An Ethernet tag identifies a particular broadcast | Ethernet Tag: An Ethernet tag identifies a particular broadcast | |||
skipping to change at page 7, line 7 | skipping to change at page 7, line 7 | |||
(ARP), management plane, or other protocols. | (ARP), management plane, or other protocols. | |||
It is a local decision as to whether the Layer 2 forwarding table on | It is a local decision as to whether the Layer 2 forwarding table on | |||
a PE is populated with all the MAC destination addresses known to the | a PE is populated with all the MAC destination addresses known to the | |||
control plane, or whether the PE implements a cache-based scheme. | control plane, or whether the PE implements a cache-based scheme. | |||
For instance, the MAC forwarding table may be populated only with the | For instance, the MAC forwarding table may be populated only with the | |||
MAC destinations of the active flows transiting a specific PE. | MAC destinations of the active flows transiting a specific PE. | |||
The policy attributes of EVPN are very similar to those of IP-VPN. | The policy attributes of EVPN are very similar to those of IP-VPN. | |||
An EVPN instance requires a Route Distinguisher (RD) that is unique | An EVPN instance requires a Route Distinguisher (RD) that is unique | |||
per PE and one or more globally unique Route Targets (RTs). A CE | per MAC-VRF and one or more globally unique Route Targets (RTs). A | |||
attaches to a MAC-VRF on a PE, on an Ethernet interface that may be | CE attaches to a MAC-VRF on a PE, on an Ethernet interface that may | |||
configured for one or more Ethernet tags, e.g., VLAN IDs. Some | be configured for one or more Ethernet tags, e.g., VLAN IDs. Some | |||
deployment scenarios guarantee uniqueness of VLAN IDs across EVPN | deployment scenarios guarantee uniqueness of VLAN IDs across EVPN | |||
instances: all points of attachment for a given EVPN instance use the | instances: all points of attachment for a given EVPN instance use the | |||
same VLAN ID, and no other EVPN instance uses this VLAN ID. This | same VLAN ID, and no other EVPN instance uses this VLAN ID. This | |||
document refers to this case as a "Unique VLAN EVPN" and describes | document refers to this case as a "Unique VLAN EVPN" and describes | |||
simplified procedures to optimize for it. | simplified procedures to optimize for it. | |||
5. Ethernet Segment | 5. Ethernet Segment | |||
As indicated in [RFC7209], each Ethernet segment needs a unique | As indicated in [RFC7209], each Ethernet segment needs a unique | |||
identifier in an EVPN. This section defines how such identifiers are | identifier in an EVPN. This section defines how such identifiers are | |||
skipping to change at page 11, line 15 | skipping to change at page 11, line 15 | |||
The following Ethernet Tag ID value is reserved: | The following Ethernet Tag ID value is reserved: | |||
- Ethernet Tag ID {0xFFFFFFFF} is known as MAX-ET. | - Ethernet Tag ID {0xFFFFFFFF} is known as MAX-ET. | |||
6.1. VLAN-Based Service Interface | 6.1. VLAN-Based Service Interface | |||
With this service interface, an EVPN instance consists of only a | With this service interface, an EVPN instance consists of only a | |||
single broadcast domain (e.g., a single VLAN). Therefore, there is a | single broadcast domain (e.g., a single VLAN). Therefore, there is a | |||
one-to-one mapping between a VID on this interface and a MAC-VRF. | one-to-one mapping between a VID on this interface and a MAC-VRF. | |||
Since a MAC-VRF corresponds to a single VLAN, it consists of a single | Since a MAC-VRF corresponds to a single VLAN, it consists of a single | |||
bridge domain corresponding to that VLAN. If the VLAN is represented | bridge table corresponding to that VLAN. If the VLAN is represented | |||
by multiple VIDs (e.g., a different VID per Ethernet segment per PE), | by multiple VIDs (e.g., a different VID per Ethernet segment per PE), | |||
then each PE needs to perform VID translation for frames destined to | then each PE needs to perform VID translation for frames destined to | |||
its Ethernet segment(s). In such scenarios, the Ethernet frames | its Ethernet segment(s). In such scenarios, the Ethernet frames | |||
transported over an MPLS/IP network SHOULD remain tagged with the | transported over an MPLS/IP network SHOULD remain tagged with the | |||
originating VID, and a VID translation MUST be supported in the data | originating VID, and a VID translation MUST be supported in the data | |||
path and MUST be performed on the disposition PE. The Ethernet Tag | path and MUST be performed on the disposition PE. The Ethernet Tag | |||
ID in all EVPN routes MUST be set to 0. | ID in all EVPN routes MUST be set to 0. | |||
6.2. VLAN Bundle Service Interface | 6.2. VLAN Bundle Service Interface | |||
With this service interface, an EVPN instance corresponds to several | With this service interface, an EVPN instance corresponds to multiple | |||
broadcast domains (e.g., several VLANs); however, only a single | broadcast domains (e.g., multiple VLANs); however, only a single | |||
bridge domain is maintained per MAC-VRF, which means multiple VLANs | bridge table is maintained per MAC-VRF, which means multiple VLANs | |||
share the same bridge domain. This implies that MAC addresses MUST | share the same bridge table. This implies that MAC addresses MUST be | |||
be unique across different VLANs for this service to work. In other | unique across all VLANs for that EVI in order for this service to | |||
words, there is a many-to-one mapping between VLANs and a MAC-VRF, | work. In other words, there is a many-to-one mapping between VLANs | |||
and the MAC-VRF consists of a single bridge domain. Furthermore, a | and a MAC-VRF, and the MAC-VRF consists of a single bridge table. | |||
single VLAN must be represented by a single VID -- e.g., no VID | Furthermore, a single VLAN must be represented by a single VID -- | |||
translation is allowed for this service interface type. The MPLS | e.g., no VID translation is allowed for this service interface type. | |||
encapsulated frames MUST remain tagged with the originating VID. Tag | The MPLS-encapsulated frames MUST remain tagged with the originating | |||
translation is NOT permitted. The Ethernet Tag ID in all EVPN routes | VID. Tag translation is NOT permitted. The Ethernet Tag ID in all | |||
MUST be set to 0. | EVPN routes MUST be set to 0. | |||
6.2.1. Port-Based Service Interface | 6.2.1. Port-Based Service Interface | |||
This service interface is a special case of the VLAN bundle service | This service interface is a special case of the VLAN bundle service | |||
interface, where all of the VLANs on the port are part of the same | interface, where all of the VLANs on the port are part of the same | |||
service and map to the same bundle. The procedures are identical to | service and map to the same bundle. The procedures are identical to | |||
those described in Section 6.2. | those described in Section 6.2. | |||
6.3. VLAN-Aware Bundle Service Interface | 6.3. VLAN-Aware Bundle Service Interface | |||
With this service interface, an EVPN instance consists of several | With this service interface, an EVPN instance consists of multiple | |||
broadcast domains (e.g., several VLANs) with each VLAN having its own | broadcast domains (e.g., multiple VLANs) with each VLAN having its | |||
bridge domain -- i.e., multiple bridge domains (one per VLAN) are | own bridge table -- i.e., multiple bridge tables (one per VLAN) are | |||
maintained by a single MAC-VRF corresponding to the EVPN instance. | maintained by a single MAC-VRF corresponding to the EVPN instance. | |||
Broadcast, unknown unicast, or multicast (BUM) traffic is sent only | ||||
to the CEs in a given broadcast domain; however, the broadcast | ||||
domains within an EVI either MAY each have their own P-Tunnel or MAY | ||||
share P-Tunnels -- e.g., all of the broadcast domains in an EVI MAY | ||||
share a single P-Tunnel. | ||||
In the case where a single VLAN is represented by a single VID and | ||||
thus no VID translation is required, an MPLS-encapsulated packet MUST | ||||
carry that VID. The Ethernet Tag ID in all EVPN routes MUST be set | ||||
to that VID. The advertising PE MAY advertise the MPLS Label1 in the | ||||
MAC/IP Advertisement route representing ONLY the EVI or representing | ||||
both the Ethernet Tag ID and the EVI. This decision is only a local | ||||
matter by the advertising PE (which is also the disposition PE) and | ||||
doesn't affect any other PEs. | ||||
In the case where a single VLAN is represented by different VIDs on | In the case where a single VLAN is represented by different VIDs on | |||
different CEs and thus VID translation is required, a normalized | different CEs and thus VID translation is required, a normalized | |||
Ethernet Tag ID (VID) MUST be carried in the MPLS-encapsulated | Ethernet Tag ID (VID) MUST be carried in the EVPN BGP routes. | |||
frames, and an Ethernet Tag ID translation function MUST be supported | Furthermore, the advertising PE advertises the MPLS Label1 in the | |||
in the data path. This translation MUST be performed in the data | MAC/IP Advertisement route representing both the Ethernet Tag ID and | |||
path on both the imposition and disposition PEs (translating to a | the EVI, so that upon receiving an MPLS-encapsulated packet, it can | |||
normalized Ethernet Tag ID on the imposition PE and translating to a | identify the corresponding bridge table from the MPLS EVPN label and | |||
local Ethernet Tag ID on the disposition PE). The Ethernet Tag ID in | perform Ethernet Tag ID translation ONLY at the disposition PE -- | |||
all EVPN routes MUST be set to the normalized value assigned by the | i.e., the Ethernet frames transported over the MPLS/IP network MUST | |||
remain tagged with the originating VID, and VID translation is | ||||
performed on the disposition PE. The Ethernet Tag ID in all EVPN | ||||
routes MUST be set to the normalized Ethernet Tag ID assigned by the | ||||
EVPN provider. | EVPN provider. | |||
6.3.1. Port-Based VLAN-Aware Service Interface | 6.3.1. Port-Based VLAN-Aware Service Interface | |||
This service interface is a special case of the VLAN-aware bundle | This service interface is a special case of the VLAN-aware bundle | |||
service interface, where all of the VLANs on the port are part of the | service interface, where all of the VLANs on the port are part of the | |||
same service and are mapped to a single bundle but without any VID | same service and are mapped to a single bundle but without any VID | |||
translation. The procedures are a subset of those described in | translation. The procedures are a subset of those described in | |||
Section 6.3. | Section 6.3. | |||
skipping to change at page 14, line 35 | skipping to change at page 15, line 10 | |||
| MPLS Label1 (3 octets) | | | MPLS Label1 (3 octets) | | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +---------------------------------------+ | |||
| MPLS Label2 (0 or 3 octets) | | | MPLS Label2 (0 or 3 octets) | | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +---------------------------------------+ | |||
For the purpose of BGP route key processing, only the Ethernet Tag | For the purpose of BGP route key processing, only the Ethernet Tag | |||
ID, MAC Address Length, MAC Address, IP Address Length, and IP | ID, MAC Address Length, MAC Address, IP Address Length, and IP | |||
Address fields are considered to be part of the prefix in the NLRI. | Address fields are considered to be part of the prefix in the NLRI. | |||
The Ethernet Segment Identifier, MPLS Label1, and MPLS Label2 fields | The Ethernet Segment Identifier, MPLS Label1, and MPLS Label2 fields | |||
are to be treated as route attributes as opposed to being part of the | are to be treated as route attributes as opposed to being part of the | |||
"route". The IP address length is in bits. | "route". Both the IP and MAC address lengths are in bits. | |||
For procedures and usage of this route, please see Sections 9 | For procedures and usage of this route, please see Sections 9 | |||
("Determining Reachability to Unicast MAC Addresses") and 14 ("Load | ("Determining Reachability to Unicast MAC Addresses") and 14 ("Load | |||
Balancing of Unicast Packets"). | Balancing of Unicast Packets"). | |||
7.3. Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag Route | 7.3. Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag Route | |||
An Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag route type specific EVPN NLRI | An Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag route type specific EVPN NLRI | |||
consists of the following: | consists of the following: | |||
skipping to change at page 16, line 36 | skipping to change at page 17, line 10 | |||
"Single-Active" bit. A value of 0 means that the multihomed site | "Single-Active" bit. A value of 0 means that the multihomed site | |||
is operating in All-Active redundancy mode, and a value of 1 means | is operating in All-Active redundancy mode, and a value of 1 means | |||
that the multihomed site is operating in Single-Active redundancy | that the multihomed site is operating in Single-Active redundancy | |||
mode. | mode. | |||
7.6. ES-Import Route Target | 7.6. ES-Import Route Target | |||
This is a new transitive Route Target extended community carried with | This is a new transitive Route Target extended community carried with | |||
the Ethernet Segment route. When used, it enables all the PEs | the Ethernet Segment route. When used, it enables all the PEs | |||
connected to the same multihomed site to import the Ethernet Segment | connected to the same multihomed site to import the Ethernet Segment | |||
routes. The value is derived automatically from the ESI by encoding | routes. The value is derived automatically for the ESI Types 1, 2, | |||
the high-order 6-octet portion of the 9-octet ESI Value in the | and 3, by encoding the high-order 6-octet portion of the 9-octet ESI | |||
ES-Import Route Target. The high-order 6-octet portion of the ESI | Value, which corresponds to a MAC address, in the ES-Import Route | |||
incorporates the MAC address of the ESI (for Types 1, 2, and 3); when | Target. The format of this Extended Community is as follows: | |||
encoded in this RT and used in the RT Constraint feature, it enables | ||||
proper route-target filtering. The format of this Extended Community | ||||
is as follows: | ||||
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 | |||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | |||
| Type=0x06 | Sub-Type=0x02 | ES-Import | | | Type=0x06 | Sub-Type=0x02 | ES-Import | | |||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | |||
| ES-Import Cont'd | | | ES-Import Cont'd | | |||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | |||
This document expands the definition of the Route Target extended | This document expands the definition of the Route Target extended | |||
community to allow the value of the high-order octet (Type field) to | community to allow the value of the high-order octet (Type field) to | |||
skipping to change at page 17, line 48 | skipping to change at page 18, line 36 | |||
used to ensure that PEs retain the correct MAC/IP Advertisement route | used to ensure that PEs retain the correct MAC/IP Advertisement route | |||
when multiple updates occur for the same MAC address. | when multiple updates occur for the same MAC address. | |||
7.8. Default Gateway Extended Community | 7.8. Default Gateway Extended Community | |||
The Default Gateway community is an Extended Community of an Opaque | The Default Gateway community is an Extended Community of an Opaque | |||
Type (see Section 3.3 of [RFC4360]). It is a transitive community, | Type (see Section 3.3 of [RFC4360]). It is a transitive community, | |||
which means that the first octet is 0x03. The value of the second | which means that the first octet is 0x03. The value of the second | |||
octet (Sub-Type) is 0x0d (Default Gateway) as assigned by IANA. The | octet (Sub-Type) is 0x0d (Default Gateway) as assigned by IANA. The | |||
Value field of this community is reserved (set to 0 by the senders, | Value field of this community is reserved (set to 0 by the senders, | |||
ignored by the receivers). | ignored by the receivers). For procedures and usage of this | |||
attribute, please see Section 10.1 ("Default Gateway"). | ||||
7.9. Route Distinguisher Assignment per EVI | 7.9. Route Distinguisher Assignment per MAC-VRF | |||
The Route Distinguisher (RD) MUST be set to the RD of the EVI that is | The Route Distinguisher (RD) MUST be set to the RD of the MAC-VRF | |||
advertising the NLRI. An RD MUST be assigned for a given EVI on a | that is advertising the NLRI. An RD MUST be assigned for a given | |||
PE. This RD MUST be unique across all EVIs on a PE. It is | MAC-VRF on a PE. This RD MUST be unique across all MAC-VRFs on a PE. | |||
RECOMMENDED to use the Type 1 RD [RFC4364]. The value field | It is RECOMMENDED to use the Type 1 RD [RFC4364]. The value field | |||
comprises an IP address of the PE (typically, the loopback address) | comprises an IP address of the PE (typically, the loopback address) | |||
followed by a number unique to the PE. This number may be generated | followed by a number unique to the PE. This number may be generated | |||
by the PE. Or, in the Unique VLAN EVPN case, the low-order 12 bits | by the PE. Or, in the Unique VLAN EVPN case, the low-order 12 bits | |||
may be the 12-bit VLAN ID, with the remaining high-order 4 bits set | may be the 12-bit VLAN ID, with the remaining high-order 4 bits set | |||
to 0. | to 0. | |||
7.10. Route Targets | 7.10. Route Targets | |||
The EVPN route MAY carry one or more Route Target (RT) attributes. | The EVPN route MAY carry one or more Route Target (RT) attributes. | |||
RTs may be configured (as in IP VPNs) or may be derived | RTs may be configured (as in IP VPNs) or may be derived | |||
automatically. | automatically. | |||
If a PE uses RT Constraint, the PE advertises all such RTs using RT | If a PE uses RT Constraint, the PE advertises all such RTs using RT | |||
Constraints per [RFC4684]. The use of RT Constraints allows each | Constraints per [RFC4684]. The use of RT Constraints allows each | |||
Ethernet A-D route to reach only those PEs that are configured to | EVPN route to reach only those PEs that are configured to import at | |||
import at least one RT from the set of RTs carried in the EVPN route. | least one RT from the set of RTs carried in the EVPN route. | |||
7.10.1. Auto-derivation from the Ethernet Tag ID | 7.10.1. Auto-derivation from the Ethernet Tag ID | |||
For the "Unique VLAN EVPN" scenario, it is highly desirable to | For the "Unique VLAN EVPN" scenario, it is highly desirable to | |||
auto-derive the RT from the Ethernet Tag ID (VLAN ID) for that EVPN | auto-derive the RT from the Ethernet Tag ID (VLAN ID) for that EVPN | |||
instance. The procedure for performing such auto-derivation is as | instance. The procedure for performing such auto-derivation is as | |||
follows: | follows: | |||
+ The Global Administrator field of the RT MUST be set to the | + The Global Administrator field of the RT MUST be set to the | |||
Autonomous System (AS) number with which the PE is associated. | Autonomous System (AS) number with which the PE is associated. | |||
+ The 12-bit VLAN ID MUST be encoded in the lowest 12 bits of the | + The 12-bit VLAN ID MUST be encoded in the lowest 12 bits of the | |||
Local Administrator field. | Local Administrator field, with the remaining bits set to zero. | |||
8. Multihoming Functions | 8. Multihoming Functions | |||
This section discusses the functions, procedures, and associated BGP | This section discusses the functions, procedures, and associated BGP | |||
routes used to support multihoming in EVPN. This covers both | routes used to support multihoming in EVPN. This covers both | |||
multihomed device (MHD) and multihomed network (MHN) scenarios. | multihomed device (MHD) and multihomed network (MHN) scenarios. | |||
8.1. Multihomed Ethernet Segment Auto-discovery | 8.1. Multihomed Ethernet Segment Auto-discovery | |||
PEs connected to the same Ethernet segment can automatically discover | PEs connected to the same Ethernet segment can automatically discover | |||
each other with minimal to no configuration through the exchange of | each other with minimal to no configuration through the exchange of | |||
the Ethernet Segment route. | the Ethernet Segment route. | |||
8.1.1. Constructing the Ethernet Segment Route | 8.1.1. Constructing the Ethernet Segment Route | |||
The Route Distinguisher (RD) MUST be a Type 1 RD [RFC4364]. The | The Route Distinguisher (RD) MUST be a Type 1 RD [RFC4364]. The | |||
value field comprises an IP address of the PE (typically, the | value field comprises an IP address of the PE (typically, the | |||
loopback address) followed by zeroes. | loopback address) followed by a number unique to the PE. | |||
The Ethernet Segment Identifier (ESI) MUST be set to the 10-octet | The Ethernet Segment Identifier (ESI) MUST be set to the 10-octet | |||
value described in Section 5. | value described in Section 5. | |||
The BGP advertisement that advertises the Ethernet Segment route MUST | The BGP advertisement that advertises the Ethernet Segment route MUST | |||
also carry an ES-Import route target, as defined in Section 7.6. | also carry an ES-Import Route Target, as defined in Section 7.6. | |||
The Ethernet Segment route filtering MUST be done such that the | The Ethernet Segment route filtering MUST be done such that the | |||
Ethernet Segment route is imported only by the PEs that are | Ethernet Segment route is imported only by the PEs that are | |||
multihomed to the same Ethernet segment. To that end, each PE that | multihomed to the same Ethernet segment. To that end, each PE that | |||
is connected to a particular Ethernet segment constructs an import | is connected to a particular Ethernet segment constructs an import | |||
filtering rule to import a route that carries the ES-Import extended | filtering rule to import a route that carries the ES-Import Route | |||
community, constructed from the ESI. | Target, constructed from the ESI. | |||
8.2. Fast Convergence | 8.2. Fast Convergence | |||
In EVPN, MAC address reachability is learned via the BGP control | In EVPN, MAC address reachability is learned via the BGP control | |||
plane over the MPLS network. As such, in the absence of any fast | plane over the MPLS network. As such, in the absence of any fast | |||
protection mechanism, the network convergence time is a function of | protection mechanism, the network convergence time is a function of | |||
the number of MAC/IP Advertisement routes that must be withdrawn by | the number of MAC/IP Advertisement routes that must be withdrawn by | |||
the PE encountering a failure. For highly scaled environments, this | the PE encountering a failure. For highly scaled environments, this | |||
scheme yields slow convergence. | scheme yields slow convergence. | |||
skipping to change at page 20, line 6 | skipping to change at page 20, line 42 | |||
of RTs. Each Ethernet A-D per ES route is differentiated from the | of RTs. Each Ethernet A-D per ES route is differentiated from the | |||
other routes in the set by a different Route Distinguisher (RD). | other routes in the set by a different Route Distinguisher (RD). | |||
Upon a failure in connectivity to the attached segment, the PE | Upon a failure in connectivity to the attached segment, the PE | |||
withdraws the corresponding set of Ethernet A-D per ES routes. This | withdraws the corresponding set of Ethernet A-D per ES routes. This | |||
triggers all PEs that receive the withdrawal to update their next-hop | triggers all PEs that receive the withdrawal to update their next-hop | |||
adjacencies for all MAC addresses associated with the Ethernet | adjacencies for all MAC addresses associated with the Ethernet | |||
segment in question. If no other PE had advertised an Ethernet A-D | segment in question. If no other PE had advertised an Ethernet A-D | |||
route for the same segment, then the PE that received the withdrawal | route for the same segment, then the PE that received the withdrawal | |||
simply invalidates the MAC entries for that segment. Otherwise, the | simply invalidates the MAC entries for that segment. Otherwise, the | |||
PE updates the next-hop adjacencies to point to the backup PE(s). | PE updates its next-hop adjacencies accordingly. | |||
8.2.1. Constructing Ethernet A-D per Ethernet Segment Route | 8.2.1. Constructing Ethernet A-D per Ethernet Segment Route | |||
This section describes the procedures used to construct the Ethernet | This section describes the procedures used to construct the Ethernet | |||
A-D per ES route, which is used for fast convergence (as discussed | A-D per ES route, which is used for fast convergence (as discussed | |||
above) and for advertising the ESI label used for split-horizon | above) and for advertising the ESI label used for split-horizon | |||
filtering (as discussed in Section 8.3). Support of this route is | filtering (as discussed in Section 8.3). Support of this route is | |||
REQUIRED. | REQUIRED. | |||
The Route Distinguisher (RD) MUST be a Type 1 RD [RFC4364]. The | The Route Distinguisher (RD) MUST be a Type 1 RD [RFC4364]. The | |||
skipping to change at page 24, line 51 | skipping to change at page 25, line 45 | |||
Note that the Ethernet A-D per EVI route may be received by a remote | Note that the Ethernet A-D per EVI route may be received by a remote | |||
PE before it receives the set of Ethernet A-D per ES routes. | PE before it receives the set of Ethernet A-D per ES routes. | |||
Therefore, in order to handle corner cases and race conditions, the | Therefore, in order to handle corner cases and race conditions, the | |||
Ethernet A-D per EVI route MUST NOT be used for traffic forwarding by | Ethernet A-D per EVI route MUST NOT be used for traffic forwarding by | |||
a remote PE until it also receives the associated set of Ethernet A-D | a remote PE until it also receives the associated set of Ethernet A-D | |||
per ES routes. | per ES routes. | |||
The backup path is a closely related function, but it is used in | The backup path is a closely related function, but it is used in | |||
Single-Active redundancy mode. In this case, a PE also advertises | Single-Active redundancy mode. In this case, a PE also advertises | |||
that it has reachability to a give EVI/ES using the same combination | that it has reachability to a given EVI/ES using the same combination | |||
of Ethernet A-D per EVI route and Ethernet A-D per ES route as | of Ethernet A-D per EVI route and Ethernet A-D per ES route as | |||
discussed above, but with the "Single-Active" bit in the flags of the | discussed above, but with the "Single-Active" bit in the flags of the | |||
ESI Label extended community set to 1. A remote PE that receives a | ESI Label extended community set to 1. A remote PE that receives a | |||
MAC/IP Advertisement route with a non-reserved ESI SHOULD consider | MAC/IP Advertisement route with a non-reserved ESI SHOULD consider | |||
the advertised MAC address to be reachable via any PE that has | the advertised MAC address to be reachable via any PE that has | |||
advertised this combination of Ethernet A-D routes, and it SHOULD | advertised this combination of Ethernet A-D routes, and it SHOULD | |||
install a backup path for that MAC address. | install a backup path for that MAC address. | |||
8.4.1. Constructing Ethernet A-D per EVPN Instance Route | 8.4.1. Constructing Ethernet A-D per EVPN Instance Route | |||
This section describes the procedures used to construct the Ethernet | This section describes the procedures used to construct the Ethernet | |||
A-D per EVPN instance (EVI) route, which is used for aliasing (as | A-D per EVPN instance (EVI) route, which is used for aliasing (as | |||
discussed above). Support of this route is OPTIONAL. | discussed above). Support of this route is OPTIONAL. | |||
The Route Distinguisher (RD) MUST be set to the RD of the EVI that is | The Route Distinguisher (RD) MUST be set per Section 7.9. | |||
advertising the NLRI, per Section 7.9. | ||||
The Ethernet Segment Identifier MUST be a 10-octet entity as | The Ethernet Segment Identifier MUST be a 10-octet entity as | |||
described in Section 5 ("Ethernet Segment"). The Ethernet A-D route | described in Section 5 ("Ethernet Segment"). The Ethernet A-D route | |||
is not needed when the Segment Identifier is set to 0. | is not needed when the Segment Identifier is set to 0. | |||
The Ethernet Tag ID is the identifier of an Ethernet tag on the | The Ethernet Tag ID is the identifier of an Ethernet tag on the | |||
Ethernet segment. This value may be a 12-bit VLAN ID, in which case | Ethernet segment. This value may be a 12-bit VLAN ID, in which case | |||
the low-order 12 bits are set to the VLAN ID and the high-order | the low-order 12 bits are set to the VLAN ID and the high-order | |||
20 bits are set to 0. Or, it may be another Ethernet tag used by the | 20 bits are set to 0. Or, it may be another Ethernet tag used by the | |||
EVPN. It MAY be set to the default Ethernet tag on the Ethernet | EVPN. It MAY be set to the default Ethernet tag on the Ethernet | |||
segment or to the value 0. | segment or to the value 0. | |||
Note that the above allows the Ethernet A-D route to be advertised | Note that the above allows the Ethernet A-D route to be advertised | |||
with one of the following granularities: | with one of the following granularities: | |||
+ One Ethernet A-D route for a given <ESI, Ethernet Tag ID> tuple per | + One Ethernet A-D route per <ESI, Ethernet Tag ID> tuple per MAC- | |||
EVI. This is applicable when the PE uses MPLS-based disposition. | VRF. This is applicable when the PE uses MPLS-based disposition | |||
with VID translation or may be applicable when the PE uses MAC- | ||||
based disposition with VID translation. | ||||
+ One Ethernet A-D route per <ESI, EVI> (where the Ethernet Tag ID is | + One Ethernet A-D route for each <ESI> per MAC-VRF (where the | |||
set to 0). This is applicable when the PE uses MAC-based | Ethernet Tag ID is set to 0). This is applicable when the PE uses | |||
disposition, or when the PE uses MPLS-based disposition when no | MAC-based disposition or MPLS-based disposition without VID | |||
VLAN translation is required. | translation. | |||
The usage of the MPLS label is described in Section 14 ("Load | The usage of the MPLS label is described in Section 14 ("Load | |||
Balancing of Unicast Packets"). | Balancing of Unicast Packets"). | |||
The Next Hop field of the MP_REACH_NLRI attribute of the route MUST | The Next Hop field of the MP_REACH_NLRI attribute of the route MUST | |||
be set to the IPv4 or IPv6 address of the advertising PE. | be set to the IPv4 or IPv6 address of the advertising PE. | |||
The Ethernet A-D route MUST carry one or more Route Target (RT) | The Ethernet A-D route MUST carry one or more Route Target (RT) | |||
attributes, per Section 7.10. | attributes, per Section 7.10. | |||
skipping to change at page 26, line 22 | skipping to change at page 27, line 22 | |||
- Sending multicast and broadcast traffic, on a given Ethernet tag on | - Sending multicast and broadcast traffic, on a given Ethernet tag on | |||
a particular Ethernet segment, to the CE. | a particular Ethernet segment, to the CE. | |||
- Flooding unknown unicast traffic (i.e., traffic for which a PE does | - Flooding unknown unicast traffic (i.e., traffic for which a PE does | |||
not know the destination MAC address), on a given Ethernet tag on a | not know the destination MAC address), on a given Ethernet tag on a | |||
particular Ethernet segment to the CE, if the environment requires | particular Ethernet segment to the CE, if the environment requires | |||
flooding of unknown unicast traffic. | flooding of unknown unicast traffic. | |||
Note that this behavior, which allows selecting a DF at the | Note that this behavior, which allows selecting a DF at the | |||
granularity of <ESI, EVI> for multicast, broadcast, and unknown | granularity of <ES, VLAN> or <ES, VLAN bundle> for multicast, | |||
unicast traffic, is the default behavior in this specification. | broadcast, and unknown unicast traffic, is the default behavior in | |||
this specification. | ||||
Note that a CE always sends packets belonging to a specific flow | Note that a CE always sends packets belonging to a specific flow | |||
using a single link towards a PE. For instance, if the CE is a host, | using a single link towards a PE. For instance, if the CE is a host, | |||
then, as mentioned earlier, the host treats the multiple links that | then, as mentioned earlier, the host treats the multiple links that | |||
it uses to reach the PEs as a Link Aggregation Group (LAG). The CE | it uses to reach the PEs as a Link Aggregation Group (LAG). The CE | |||
employs a local hashing function to map traffic flows onto links in | employs a local hashing function to map traffic flows onto links in | |||
the LAG. | the LAG. | |||
If a bridged network is multihomed to more than one PE in an EVPN | If a bridged network is multihomed to more than one PE in an EVPN | |||
network via switches, then the support of All-Active redundancy mode | network via switches, then the support of All-Active redundancy mode | |||
requires the bridged network to be connected to two or more PEs using | requires the bridged network to be connected to two or more PEs using | |||
a LAG. | a LAG. | |||
If a bridged network does not connect to the PEs using a LAG, then | If a bridged network does not connect to the PEs using a LAG, then | |||
only one of the links between the switched bridged network and the | only one of the links between the bridged network and the PEs must be | |||
PEs must be the active link for a given EVPN instance. In this case, | the active link for a given <ES, VLAN> or <ES, VLAN bundle>. In this | |||
the set of Ethernet A-D per ES routes advertised by each PE MUST have | case, the set of Ethernet A-D per ES routes advertised by each PE | |||
the "Single-Active" bit in the flags of the ESI Label extended | MUST have the "Single-Active" bit in the flags of the ESI Label | |||
community set to 1. | extended community set to 1. | |||
The default procedure for DF election at the granularity of <ESI, | The default procedure for DF election at the granularity of <ES, | |||
EVI> is referred to as "service carving". With service carving, it | VLAN> for VLAN-based service or <ES, VLAN bundle> for VLAN-(aware) | |||
is possible to elect multiple DFs per Ethernet segment (one per EVI) | bundle service is referred to as "service carving". With service | |||
in order to perform load balancing of multi-destination traffic | carving, it is possible to elect multiple DFs per Ethernet segment | |||
destined to a given segment. The load-balancing procedures carve up | (one per VLAN or VLAN bundle) in order to perform load balancing of | |||
the EVI space among the PE nodes evenly, in such a way that every PE | multi-destination traffic destined to a given segment. The load- | |||
is the DF for a disjoint set of EVIs. The procedure for service | balancing procedures carve up the VLAN space per ES among the PE | |||
nodes evenly, in such a way that every PE is the DF for a disjoint | ||||
set of VLANs or VLAN bundles for that ES. The procedure for service | ||||
carving is as follows: | carving is as follows: | |||
1. When a PE discovers the ESI of the attached Ethernet segment, it | 1. When a PE discovers the ESI of the attached Ethernet segment, it | |||
advertises an Ethernet Segment route with the associated ES-Import | advertises an Ethernet Segment route with the associated ES-Import | |||
extended community attribute. | extended community attribute. | |||
2. The PE then starts a timer (default value = 3 seconds) to allow | 2. The PE then starts a timer (default value = 3 seconds) to allow | |||
the reception of Ethernet Segment routes from other PE nodes | the reception of Ethernet Segment routes from other PE nodes | |||
connected to the same Ethernet segment. This timer value should | connected to the same Ethernet segment. This timer value should | |||
be the same across all PEs connected to the same Ethernet segment. | be the same across all PEs connected to the same Ethernet segment. | |||
3. When the timer expires, each PE builds an ordered list of the IP | 3. When the timer expires, each PE builds an ordered list of the IP | |||
addresses of all the PE nodes connected to the Ethernet segment | addresses of all the PE nodes connected to the Ethernet segment | |||
(including itself), in increasing numeric value. Each IP address | (including itself), in increasing numeric value. Each IP address | |||
in this list is extracted from the "Originator Router's IP | in this list is extracted from the "Originating Router's IP | |||
address" field of the advertised Ethernet Segment route. Every PE | address" field of the advertised Ethernet Segment route. Every PE | |||
is then given an ordinal indicating its position in the ordered | is then given an ordinal indicating its position in the ordered | |||
list, starting with 0 as the ordinal for the PE with the | list, starting with 0 as the ordinal for the PE with the | |||
numerically lowest IP address. The ordinals are used to determine | numerically lowest IP address. The ordinals are used to determine | |||
which PE node will be the DF for a given EVPN instance on the | which PE node will be the DF for a given EVPN instance on the | |||
Ethernet segment, using the following rule: | Ethernet segment, using the following rule: | |||
Assuming a redundancy group of N PE nodes, the PE with ordinal i | Assuming a redundancy group of N PE nodes, for VLAN-based service, | |||
is the DF for an EVPN instance with an associated Ethernet tag | the PE with ordinal i is the DF for an <ES, VLAN V> when (V mod N) | |||
value V when (V mod N) = i. In the case where multiple Ethernet | = i. In the case of VLAN-(aware) bundle service, then the | |||
tags are associated with a single EVPN instance, then the | numerically lowest VLAN value in that bundle on that ES MUST be | |||
numerically lowest Ethernet tag value in that EVPN instance on | used in the modulo function. | |||
that ES MUST be used in the modulo function. | ||||
It should be noted that using the "Originator Router's IP address" | It should be noted that using the "Originating Router's IP | |||
field in the Ethernet Segment route to get the PE IP address | address" field in the Ethernet Segment route to get the PE IP | |||
needed for the ordered list allows for a CE to be multihomed | address needed for the ordered list allows for a CE to be | |||
across different ASes if such a need ever arises. | multihomed across different ASes if such a need ever arises. | |||
4. The PE that is elected as a DF for a given EVPN instance will | 4. The PE that is elected as a DF for a given <ES, VLAN> or <ES, VLAN | |||
unblock traffic for the Ethernet tags associated with that EVPN | bundle> will unblock multi-destination traffic for that VLAN or | |||
instance. Note that the DF PE unblocks multi-destination traffic | VLAN bundle on the corresponding ES. Note that the DF PE unblocks | |||
in the egress direction towards the segment. All non-DF PEs | multi-destination traffic in the egress direction towards the | |||
continue to drop multi-destination traffic (for the associated | segment. All non-DF PEs continue to drop multi-destination | |||
EVPN instances) in the egress direction towards the segment. | traffic in the egress direction towards that <ES, VLAN> or <ES, | |||
VLAN bundle>. | ||||
In the case of link or port failure, the affected PE withdraws its | In the case of link or port failure, the affected PE withdraws its | |||
Ethernet Segment route. This will re-trigger the service carving | Ethernet Segment route. This will re-trigger the service carving | |||
procedures on all the PEs in the redundancy group. For PE node | procedures on all the PEs in the redundancy group. For PE node | |||
failure, or upon PE commissioning or decommissioning, the PEs | failure, or upon PE commissioning or decommissioning, the PEs | |||
re-trigger the service carving. In the case of Single-Active | re-trigger the service carving. In the case of Single-Active | |||
multihoming, when a service moves from one PE in the redundancy | multihoming, when a service moves from one PE in the redundancy | |||
group to another PE as a result of re-carving, the PE, which ends | group to another PE as a result of re-carving, the PE, which ends | |||
up being the elected DF for the service, SHOULD trigger a MAC | up being the elected DF for the service, SHOULD trigger a MAC | |||
address flush notification towards the associated Ethernet | address flush notification towards the associated Ethernet | |||
skipping to change at page 29, line 45 | skipping to change at page 31, line 10 | |||
control plane. In order to achieve this, each PE advertises the MAC | control plane. In order to achieve this, each PE advertises the MAC | |||
addresses it learns from its locally attached CEs in the control | addresses it learns from its locally attached CEs in the control | |||
plane, to all the other PEs in that EVPN instance, using MP-BGP and, | plane, to all the other PEs in that EVPN instance, using MP-BGP and, | |||
specifically, the MAC/IP Advertisement route. | specifically, the MAC/IP Advertisement route. | |||
9.2.1. Constructing MAC/IP Address Advertisement | 9.2.1. Constructing MAC/IP Address Advertisement | |||
BGP is extended to advertise these MAC addresses using the MAC/IP | BGP is extended to advertise these MAC addresses using the MAC/IP | |||
Advertisement route type in the EVPN NLRI. | Advertisement route type in the EVPN NLRI. | |||
The RD MUST be the RD of the EVI that is advertising the NLRI. The | The RD MUST be set per Section 7.9. | |||
procedures for setting the RD for a given EVI are described in | ||||
Section 7.9. | ||||
The Ethernet Segment Identifier is set to the 10-octet ESI described | The Ethernet Segment Identifier is set to the 10-octet ESI described | |||
in Section 5 ("Ethernet Segment"). | in Section 5 ("Ethernet Segment"). | |||
The Ethernet Tag ID may be zero or may represent a valid Ethernet | The Ethernet Tag ID may be zero or may represent a valid Ethernet | |||
Tag ID. This field may be non-zero when there are multiple bridge | Tag ID. This field may be non-zero when there are multiple bridge | |||
domains in the MAC-VRF (i.e., the PE needs to perform qualified | tables in the MAC-VRF (i.e., the PE needs to support VLAN-aware | |||
learning for the VLANs in that MAC-VRF). | bundle service for that EVI). | |||
When the Ethernet Tag ID in the NLRI is set to a non-zero value for a | When the Ethernet Tag ID in the NLRI is set to a non-zero value for a | |||
particular bridge domain, then this Ethernet Tag ID may be either the | particular broadcast domain, then this Ethernet Tag ID may be either | |||
CE's Ethernet tag value (e.g., CE VLAN ID) or the EVPN provider's | the CE's Ethernet tag value (e.g., CE VLAN ID) or the EVPN provider's | |||
Ethernet tag value (e.g., provider VLAN ID). The latter would be the | Ethernet tag value (e.g., provider VLAN ID). The latter would be the | |||
case if the CE Ethernet tags (e.g., CE VLAN ID) for a particular | case if the CE Ethernet tags (e.g., CE VLAN ID) for a particular | |||
bridge domain are different on different CEs. | broadcast domain are different on different CEs. | |||
The MAC Address Length field is in bits, and it is set to 48. MAC | The MAC Address Length field is in bits, and it is set to 48. MAC | |||
address length values other than 48 bits are outside the scope of | address length values other than 48 bits are outside the scope of | |||
this document. The encoding of a MAC address MUST be the 6-octet MAC | this document. The encoding of a MAC address MUST be the 6-octet MAC | |||
address specified by [802.1Q] and [802.1D-REV]. | address specified by [802.1Q] and [802.1D-REV]. | |||
The IP Address field is optional. By default, the IP Address Length | The IP Address field is optional. By default, the IP Address Length | |||
field is set to 0, and the IP Address field is omitted from the | field is set to 0, and the IP Address field is omitted from the | |||
route. When a valid IP address needs to be advertised, it is then | route. When a valid IP address needs to be advertised, it is then | |||
encoded in this route. When an IP address is present, the IP Address | encoded in this route. When an IP address is present, the IP Address | |||
skipping to change at page 30, line 43 | skipping to change at page 32, line 6 | |||
The MPLS Label1 field is encoded as 3 octets, where the high-order | The MPLS Label1 field is encoded as 3 octets, where the high-order | |||
20 bits contain the label value. The MPLS Label1 MUST be downstream | 20 bits contain the label value. The MPLS Label1 MUST be downstream | |||
assigned, and it is associated with the MAC address being advertised | assigned, and it is associated with the MAC address being advertised | |||
by the advertising PE. The advertising PE uses this label when it | by the advertising PE. The advertising PE uses this label when it | |||
receives an MPLS-encapsulated packet to perform forwarding based on | receives an MPLS-encapsulated packet to perform forwarding based on | |||
the destination MAC address toward the CE. The forwarding procedures | the destination MAC address toward the CE. The forwarding procedures | |||
are specified in Sections 13 and 14. | are specified in Sections 13 and 14. | |||
A PE may advertise the same single EVPN label for all MAC addresses | A PE may advertise the same single EVPN label for all MAC addresses | |||
in a given EVI. This label assignment is referred to as a per EVI | in a given MAC-VRF. This label assignment is referred to as a per | |||
label assignment. Alternatively, a PE may advertise a unique EVPN | MAC-VRF label assignment. Alternatively, a PE may advertise a unique | |||
EVPN label per <MAC-VRF, Ethernet tag> combination. This label | ||||
assignment is referred to as a per <MAC-VRF, Ethernet tag> label | ||||
assignment. As a third option, a PE may advertise a unique EVPN | ||||
label per <ESI, Ethernet tag> combination. This label assignment is | label per <ESI, Ethernet tag> combination. This label assignment is | |||
referred to as a per <ESI, Ethernet tag> label assignment. As a | referred to as a per <ESI, Ethernet tag> label assignment. As a | |||
third option, a PE may advertise a unique EVPN label per MAC address. | fourth option, a PE may advertise a unique EVPN label per MAC | |||
This label assignment is referred to as a per MAC label assignment. | address. This label assignment is referred to as a per MAC label | |||
All of these label assignment methods have their trade-offs. The | assignment. All of these label assignment methods have their trade- | |||
choice of a particular label assignment methodology is purely local | offs. The choice of a particular label assignment methodology is | |||
to the PE that originates the route. | purely local to the PE that originates the route. | |||
An assignment per EVI label requires the least number of EVPN labels | An assignment per MAC-VRF label requires the least number of EVPN | |||
but requires a MAC lookup in addition to an MPLS lookup on an egress | labels but requires a MAC lookup in addition to an MPLS lookup on an | |||
PE for forwarding. On the other hand, a unique label per <ESI, | egress PE for forwarding. On the other hand, a unique label per | |||
Ethernet tag> or a unique label per MAC allows an egress PE to | <ESI, Ethernet tag> or a unique label per MAC allows an egress PE to | |||
forward a packet that it receives from another PE, to the connected | forward a packet that it receives from another PE, to the connected | |||
CE, after looking up only the MPLS labels without having to perform a | CE, after looking up only the MPLS labels without having to perform a | |||
MAC lookup. This includes the capability to perform appropriate VLAN | MAC lookup. This includes the capability to perform appropriate VLAN | |||
ID translation on egress to the CE. | ID translation on egress to the CE. | |||
The MPLS Label2 field is an optional field. If it is present, then | The MPLS Label2 field is an optional field. If it is present, then | |||
it is encoded as 3 octets, where the high-order 20 bits contain the | it is encoded as 3 octets, where the high-order 20 bits contain the | |||
label value. | label value. | |||
The Next Hop field of the MP_REACH_NLRI attribute of the route MUST | The Next Hop field of the MP_REACH_NLRI attribute of the route MUST | |||
skipping to change at page 35, line 25 | skipping to change at page 36, line 31 | |||
P2MP LSPs, or MP2MP LSPs to send unknown unicast, broadcast, or | P2MP LSPs, or MP2MP LSPs to send unknown unicast, broadcast, or | |||
multicast traffic to other PEs. | multicast traffic to other PEs. | |||
Each PE MUST advertise an "Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag route" to | Each PE MUST advertise an "Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag route" to | |||
enable the above. The following subsection provides the procedures | enable the above. The following subsection provides the procedures | |||
to construct the Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag route. Subsequent | to construct the Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag route. Subsequent | |||
subsections describe its usage in further detail. | subsections describe its usage in further detail. | |||
11.1. Constructing Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag Route | 11.1. Constructing Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag Route | |||
The RD MUST be the RD of the EVI that is advertising the NLRI. The | The RD MUST be set per Section 7.9. | |||
procedures for setting the RD for a given EVPN instance on a PE are | ||||
described in Section 7.9. | ||||
The Ethernet Tag ID is the identifier of the Ethernet tag. It may be | The Ethernet Tag ID is the identifier of the Ethernet tag. It may be | |||
set to 0 or to a valid Ethernet tag value. | set to 0 or to a valid Ethernet tag value. | |||
The Originating Router's IP Address field value MUST be set to an IP | The Originating Router's IP Address field value MUST be set to an IP | |||
address of the PE that should be common for all the EVIs on the PE | address of the PE that should be common for all the EVIs on the PE | |||
(e.g., this address may be the PE's loopback address). The IP | (e.g., this address may be the PE's loopback address). The IP | |||
Address Length field is in bits. | Address Length field is in bits. | |||
The Next Hop field of the MP_REACH_NLRI attribute of the route MUST | The Next Hop field of the MP_REACH_NLRI attribute of the route MUST | |||
be set to the same IP address as the one carried in the Originating | be set to the IPv4 or IPv6 address of the advertising PE. | |||
Router's IP Address field. | ||||
The BGP advertisement for the Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag route | The BGP advertisement for the Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag route | |||
MUST also carry one or more Route Target (RT) attributes. The | MUST also carry one or more Route Target (RT) attributes. The | |||
assignment of RTs as described in Section 7.10 MUST be followed. | assignment of RTs as described in Section 7.10 MUST be followed. | |||
11.2. P-Tunnel Identification | 11.2. P-Tunnel Identification | |||
In order to identify the P-tunnel used for sending broadcast, unknown | In order to identify the P-tunnel used for sending broadcast, unknown | |||
unicast, or multicast traffic, the Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag | unicast, or multicast traffic, the Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag | |||
route MUST carry a Provider Multicast Service Interface (PMSI) Tunnel | route MUST carry a Provider Multicast Service Interface (PMSI) Tunnel | |||
skipping to change at page 38, line 51 | skipping to change at page 40, line 20 | |||
If the MAC address is unknown and if the administrative policy on the | If the MAC address is unknown and if the administrative policy on the | |||
PE requires flooding of unknown unicast traffic, then: | PE requires flooding of unknown unicast traffic, then: | |||
- The PE MUST flood the packet to other PEs. The PE MUST first | - The PE MUST flood the packet to other PEs. The PE MUST first | |||
encapsulate the packet in the ESI MPLS label as described in | encapsulate the packet in the ESI MPLS label as described in | |||
Section 8.3. If ingress replication is used, the packet MUST be | Section 8.3. If ingress replication is used, the packet MUST be | |||
replicated to each remote PE, with the VPN label being an MPLS | replicated to each remote PE, with the VPN label being an MPLS | |||
label determined as follows: This is the MPLS label advertised by | label determined as follows: This is the MPLS label advertised by | |||
the remote PE in a PMSI Tunnel attribute in the Inclusive Multicast | the remote PE in a PMSI Tunnel attribute in the Inclusive Multicast | |||
Ethernet Tag route for an <EVPN instance, Ethernet tag> | Ethernet Tag route for a <MAC-VRF> or <MAC-VRF, Ethernet tag> | |||
combination. The Ethernet tag in the route may be the same as the | combination. | |||
Ethernet tag associated with the interface on which the ingress PE | ||||
receives the packet. If P2MP LSPs are being used, the packet MUST | The Ethernet tag in the route may be the same as the Ethernet tag | |||
be sent on the P2MP LSP of which the PE is the root, for the | associated with the interface on which the ingress PE receives the | |||
Ethernet tag in the EVPN instance. If the same P2MP LSP is used | packet. If P2MP LSPs are being used, the packet MUST be sent on | |||
for all Ethernet tags, then all the PEs in the EVPN instance MUST | the P2MP LSP of which the PE is the root, for the Ethernet tag in | |||
be the leaves of the P2MP LSP. If a distinct P2MP LSP is used for | the EVPN instance. If the same P2MP LSP is used for all Ethernet | |||
a given Ethernet tag in the EVPN instance, then only the PEs in the | tags, then all the PEs in the EVPN instance MUST be the leaves of | |||
Ethernet tag MUST be the leaves of the P2MP LSP. The packet MUST | the P2MP LSP. If a distinct P2MP LSP is used for a given Ethernet | |||
be encapsulated in the P2MP LSP label stack. | tag in the EVPN instance, then only the PEs in the Ethernet tag | |||
MUST be the leaves of the P2MP LSP. The packet MUST be | ||||
encapsulated in the P2MP LSP label stack. | ||||
If the MAC address is unknown, then, if the administrative policy on | If the MAC address is unknown, then, if the administrative policy on | |||
the PE does not allow flooding of unknown unicast traffic: | the PE does not allow flooding of unknown unicast traffic: | |||
- the PE MUST drop the packet. | - the PE MUST drop the packet. | |||
13.2. Forwarding Packets Received from a Remote PE | 13.2. Forwarding Packets Received from a Remote PE | |||
This section describes the procedures for forwarding known and | This section describes the procedures for forwarding known and | |||
unknown unicast packets received from a remote PE. | unknown unicast packets received from a remote PE. | |||
skipping to change at page 40, line 20 | skipping to change at page 41, line 49 | |||
the label or does a destination MAC address lookup to forward the | the label or does a destination MAC address lookup to forward the | |||
packet to a CE. | packet to a CE. | |||
14. Load Balancing of Unicast Packets | 14. Load Balancing of Unicast Packets | |||
This section specifies the load-balancing procedures for sending | This section specifies the load-balancing procedures for sending | |||
known unicast packets to a multihomed CE. | known unicast packets to a multihomed CE. | |||
14.1. Load Balancing of Traffic from a PE to Remote CEs | 14.1. Load Balancing of Traffic from a PE to Remote CEs | |||
Whenever a remote PE imports a MAC advertisement for a given <ESI, | Whenever a remote PE imports a MAC/IP Advertisement route for a given | |||
Ethernet tag> in an EVI, it MUST examine all imported Ethernet A-D | <ESI, Ethernet tag> in a MAC-VRF, it MUST examine all imported | |||
routes for that ESI in order to determine the load-balancing | Ethernet A-D routes for that ESI in order to determine the load- | |||
characteristics of the Ethernet segment. | balancing characteristics of the Ethernet segment. | |||
14.1.1. Single-Active Redundancy Mode | 14.1.1. Single-Active Redundancy Mode | |||
For a given ES, if the remote PE has imported the set of Ethernet A-D | For a given ES, if the remote PE has imported the set of Ethernet A-D | |||
per ES routes from at least one PE, where the "Single-Active" flag in | per ES routes from at least one PE, where the "Single-Active" flag in | |||
the ESI Label extended community is set, then the remote PE MUST | the ESI Label extended community is set, then the remote PE MUST | |||
deduce that the ES is operating in Single-Active redundancy mode. As | deduce that the ES is operating in Single-Active redundancy mode. As | |||
such, the MAC address will be reachable only via the PE announcing | such, the MAC address will be reachable only via the PE announcing | |||
the associated MAC/IP Advertisement route -- this is referred to as | the associated MAC/IP Advertisement route -- this is referred to as | |||
the primary PE. The other PEs advertising the set of Ethernet A-D | the primary PE. The other PEs advertising the set of Ethernet A-D | |||
per ES routes for the same ES provide backup paths for that ES, in | per ES routes for the same ES provide backup paths for that ES, in | |||
case the primary PE encounters a failure, and are referred to as | case the primary PE encounters a failure, and are referred to as | |||
backup PEs. It should be noted that the primary PE for a given <ES, | backup PEs. It should be noted that the primary PE for a given <ES, | |||
EVI> is the DF for that <ES, EVI>. | VLAN> (or <ES, VLAN bundle>) is the DF for that <ES, VLAN> (or <ES, | |||
VLAN bundle>). | ||||
If the primary PE encounters a failure, it MAY withdraw its set of | If the primary PE encounters a failure, it MAY withdraw its set of | |||
Ethernet A-D per ES routes for the affected ES prior to withdrawing | Ethernet A-D per ES routes for the affected ES prior to withdrawing | |||
its set of MAC/IP Advertisement routes. | its set of MAC/IP Advertisement routes. | |||
If there is only one backup PE for a given ES, the remote PE MAY use | If there is only one backup PE for a given ES, the remote PE MAY use | |||
the primary PE's withdrawal of its set of Ethernet A-D per ES routes | the primary PE's withdrawal of its set of Ethernet A-D per ES routes | |||
as a trigger to update its forwarding entries, for the associated MAC | as a trigger to update its forwarding entries, for the associated MAC | |||
addresses, to point towards the backup PE. As the backup PE starts | addresses, to point towards the backup PE. As the backup PE starts | |||
learning the MAC addresses over its attached ES, it will start | learning the MAC addresses over its attached ES, it will start | |||
skipping to change at page 46, line 19 | skipping to change at page 47, line 50 | |||
16.1. Ingress Replication | 16.1. Ingress Replication | |||
The PEs may use ingress replication for flooding BUM traffic as | The PEs may use ingress replication for flooding BUM traffic as | |||
described in Section 11 ("Handling of Multi-destination Traffic"). A | described in Section 11 ("Handling of Multi-destination Traffic"). A | |||
given broadcast packet must be sent to all the remote PEs. However, | given broadcast packet must be sent to all the remote PEs. However, | |||
a given multicast packet for a multicast flow may be sent to only a | a given multicast packet for a multicast flow may be sent to only a | |||
subset of the PEs. Specifically, a given multicast flow may be sent | subset of the PEs. Specifically, a given multicast flow may be sent | |||
to only those PEs that have receivers that are interested in the | to only those PEs that have receivers that are interested in the | |||
multicast flow. Determining which of the PEs have receivers for a | multicast flow. Determining which of the PEs have receivers for a | |||
given multicast flow is done using explicit tracking, as described | given multicast flow is done using explicit tracking per [RFC7117]. | |||
below. | ||||
16.2. P2MP LSPs | 16.2. P2MP LSPs | |||
A PE may use an "Inclusive" tree for sending a BUM packet. This | A PE may use an "Inclusive" tree for sending a BUM packet. This | |||
terminology is borrowed from [RFC7117]. | terminology is borrowed from [RFC7117]. | |||
A variety of transport technologies may be used in the service | A variety of transport technologies may be used in the service | |||
provider (SP) network. For Inclusive P-multicast trees, these | provider (SP) network. For Inclusive P-multicast trees, these | |||
transport technologies include point-to-multipoint LSPs created by | transport technologies include point-to-multipoint LSPs created by | |||
RSVP-TE or Multipoint LDP (mLDP). | RSVP-TE or Multipoint LDP (mLDP). | |||
skipping to change at page 47, line 41 | skipping to change at page 49, line 30 | |||
session. This failure detection can be in the sub-second range if | session. This failure detection can be in the sub-second range if | |||
Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) is used to detect BGP | Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) is used to detect BGP | |||
session failures. PE3 can update its forwarding state to start | session failures. PE3 can update its forwarding state to start | |||
sending all traffic for CE1 to only PE2. | sending all traffic for CE1 to only PE2. | |||
17.3. PE-to-CE Network Failures | 17.3. PE-to-CE Network Failures | |||
If the connectivity between the multihomed CE and one of the PEs to | If the connectivity between the multihomed CE and one of the PEs to | |||
which it is attached fails, the PE MUST withdraw the set of Ethernet | which it is attached fails, the PE MUST withdraw the set of Ethernet | |||
A-D per ES routes that had been previously advertised for that ES. | A-D per ES routes that had been previously advertised for that ES. | |||
When the MAC entry on the PE ages out, the PE MUST withdraw the MAC | This enables the remote PEs to remove the MPLS next hop to this | |||
address from BGP. Note that to aid convergence, the Ethernet A-D per | particular PE from the set of MPLS next hops that can be used to | |||
EVI routes MAY be withdrawn before the MAC routes. This enables the | forward traffic to the CE. When the MAC entry on the PE ages out, | |||
remote PEs to remove the MPLS next hop to this particular PE from the | the PE MUST withdraw the MAC address from BGP. | |||
set of MPLS next hops that can be used to forward traffic to the CE. | ||||
When an Ethernet tag is decommissioned on an Ethernet segment, then | When an Ethernet tag is decommissioned on an Ethernet segment, then | |||
the PE MUST withdraw the Ethernet A-D per EVI route(s) announced for | the PE MUST withdraw the Ethernet A-D per EVI route(s) announced for | |||
the <ESI, Ethernet tags> that are impacted by the decommissioning. | the <ESI, Ethernet tags> that are impacted by the decommissioning. | |||
In addition, the PE MUST also withdraw the MAC/IP Advertisement | In addition, the PE MUST also withdraw the MAC/IP Advertisement | |||
routes that are impacted by the decommissioning. | routes that are impacted by the decommissioning. | |||
The Ethernet A-D per ES routes should be used by an implementation to | The Ethernet A-D per ES routes should be used by an implementation to | |||
optimize the withdrawal of MAC/IP Advertisement routes. When a PE | optimize the withdrawal of MAC/IP Advertisement routes. When a PE | |||
receives a withdrawal of a particular Ethernet A-D route from an | receives a withdrawal of a particular Ethernet A-D route from an | |||
skipping to change at page 48, line 34 | skipping to change at page 50, line 25 | |||
the destination out of order. This out-of-order delivery can happen | the destination out of order. This out-of-order delivery can happen | |||
during steady state in the absence of any failures, resulting in | during steady state in the absence of any failures, resulting in | |||
significant impact on network operations. | significant impact on network operations. | |||
In order to avoid any such misordering, the following rules are | In order to avoid any such misordering, the following rules are | |||
applied: | applied: | |||
- If a network uses deep packet inspection for its ECMP, then the | - If a network uses deep packet inspection for its ECMP, then the | |||
"Preferred PW MPLS Control Word" [RFC4385] SHOULD be used with the | "Preferred PW MPLS Control Word" [RFC4385] SHOULD be used with the | |||
value 0 (e.g., a 4-octet field with a value of zero) when sending | value 0 (e.g., a 4-octet field with a value of zero) when sending | |||
EVPN encapsulated packets over an MP2P LSP. | EVPN-encapsulated packets over an MP2P LSP. | |||
- If a network uses entropy labels [RFC6790], then the control word | - If a network uses entropy labels [RFC6790], then the control word | |||
SHOULD NOT be used when sending EVPN encapsulated packets over an | SHOULD NOT be used when sending EVPN-encapsulated packets over an | |||
MP2P LSP. | MP2P LSP. | |||
- When sending EVPN encapsulated packets over a P2MP LSP or P2P LSP, | - When sending EVPN-encapsulated packets over a P2MP LSP or P2P LSP, | |||
then the control word SHOULD NOT be used. | then the control word SHOULD NOT be used. | |||
19. Security Considerations | 19. Security Considerations | |||
Security considerations discussed in [RFC4761] and [RFC4762] apply to | Security considerations discussed in [RFC4761] and [RFC4762] apply to | |||
this document for MAC learning in the data plane over an Attachment | this document for MAC learning in the data plane over an Attachment | |||
Circuit (AC) and for flooding of unknown unicast and ARP messages | Circuit (AC) and for flooding of unknown unicast and ARP messages | |||
over the MPLS/IP core. Security considerations discussed in | over the MPLS/IP core. Security considerations discussed in | |||
[RFC4364] apply to this document for MAC learning in the control | [RFC4364] apply to this document for MAC learning in the control | |||
plane over the MPLS/IP core. This section describes additional | plane over the MPLS/IP core. This section describes additional | |||
skipping to change at page 50, line 20 | skipping to change at page 52, line 16 | |||
This document defines a new NLRI, called "EVPN", to be carried in BGP | This document defines a new NLRI, called "EVPN", to be carried in BGP | |||
using multiprotocol extensions. This NLRI uses the existing AFI of | using multiprotocol extensions. This NLRI uses the existing AFI of | |||
25 (L2VPN). IANA has assigned BGP EVPNs a SAFI value of 70. | 25 (L2VPN). IANA has assigned BGP EVPNs a SAFI value of 70. | |||
IANA has allocated the following EVPN Extended Community sub-types in | IANA has allocated the following EVPN Extended Community sub-types in | |||
[RFC7153], and this document is the only reference for them. | [RFC7153], and this document is the only reference for them. | |||
0x00 MAC Mobility [RFC7432] | 0x00 MAC Mobility [RFC7432] | |||
0x01 ESI Label [RFC7432] | 0x01 ESI Label [RFC7432] | |||
0x02 ES-Import Route Targe [RFC7432] | 0x02 ES-Import Route Target [RFC7432] | |||
This document creates a registry called "EVPN Route Types". New | This document creates a registry called "EVPN Route Types". New | |||
registrations will be made through the "RFC Required" procedure | registrations will be made through the "RFC Required" procedure | |||
defined in [RFC5226]. The registry has a maximum value of 255. | defined in [RFC5226]. The registry has a maximum value of 255. | |||
Initial registrations are as follows: | Initial registrations are as follows: | |||
0 Reserved [RFC7432] | 0 Reserved [RFC7432] | |||
1 Ethernet Auto-discovery [RFC7432] | 1 Ethernet Auto-discovery [RFC7432] | |||
2 MAC/IP Advertisement [RFC7432] | 2 MAC/IP Advertisement [RFC7432] | |||
3 Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag [RFC7432] | 3 Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag [RFC7432] | |||
skipping to change at page 54, line 8 | skipping to change at page 55, line 16 | |||
Vohra, Kireeti Kompella, and Apurva Mehta for their contributions to | Vohra, Kireeti Kompella, and Apurva Mehta for their contributions to | |||
this document. | this document. | |||
Last but not least, special thanks to Giles Heron (our WG chair) for | Last but not least, special thanks to Giles Heron (our WG chair) for | |||
his detailed review of this document in preparation for WG Last Call | his detailed review of this document in preparation for WG Last Call | |||
and for making many valuable suggestions. | and for making many valuable suggestions. | |||
Contributors | Contributors | |||
In addition to the authors listed on the front page, the following | In addition to the authors listed on the front page, the following | |||
individuals have also helped to shape this document: | co-authors have also contributed to this document: | |||
Keyur Patel | Keyur Patel | |||
Samer Salam | Samer Salam | |||
Sami Boutros | Sami Boutros | |||
Cisco | Cisco | |||
Yakov Rekhter | Yakov Rekhter | |||
Ravi Shekhar | Ravi Shekhar | |||
Juniper Networks | Juniper Networks | |||
End of changes. 58 change blocks. | ||||
208 lines changed or deleted | 227 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.41. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/ |