wdiff rfc7994.alt-original rfc7994.txt

Internet Architecture Board (IAB) H. Flanagan
Internet-Draft
Request for Comments: 7994 RFC Editor
Intended status:
Category: Informational May 16, 2016
Expires: November 17, December 2016
ISSN: 2070-1721

Requirements for Plain-Text RFCs
draft-iab-rfc-plaintext-03

Abstract

In 2013, after a great deal of community discussion, the decision was
made to shift from the plain-text, ASCII-only canonical format for
RFCs to XML as the canonical format with more human-readable formats
rendered from that XML. The high-level requirements that informed
this change were defined in RFC6949, RFC 6949, "RFC Series Format Requirements
and Future Development." Development". Plain text remains an important format for
many in the IETF community, and it will be one of the publication
formats rendered from the XML. This draft documents document outlines the rendering
requirements for the plain-text RFC publication format. These
requirements do not apply to plain-text RFCs published before the
format transition.

Editorial Note (To be removed by the RFC Editor)

Discussion of this draft takes place on the rfc-interest mailing list
(rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org), which has its home page at
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft document is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
published for informational purposes.

This document is a product of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note Architecture Board (IAB)
and represents information that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list the IAB has deemed valuable to
provide for permanent record. It represents the consensus of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid the
Internet Architecture Board (IAB). Documents approved for
publication by the IAB are not a maximum candidate for any level of Internet
Standard; see Section 2 of six months RFC 7841.

Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents obtained at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on November 17, 2016.
http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7994.

This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 ....................................................2
2. Character Encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 ..............................................4
3. Figures and Artwork . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 .............................................4
4. General Page Format Layout . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 ......................................4
4.1. Headers and Footers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 ........................................5
4.2. Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 ..........................................5
4.3. Line Width . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 .................................................5
4.4. Line Spacing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 ...............................................5
4.5. Hyphenation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 ................................................5
5. Elements from the xml2rfc v3 vocabulary . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Vocabulary .........................5
6. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
8. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
10. .........................................6
7. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
10.1. ......................................................6
7.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
10.2. .......................................6
7.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 .....................................7
IAB Members at the Time of Approval ................................8
Acknowledgements ...................................................8
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 ...................................................8

1. Introduction

In 2013, after a great deal of community discussion, the decision was
made to shift from the plain-text, ASCII-only canonical format for
RFCs to XML as the canonical format [XML-ANNOUNCE]. The high-level
requirements that informed this change were defined in [RFC6949],
"RFC Series Format Requirements and Future Development." Development". Plain text
remains an important format for many in the IETF community, and it
will be one of the publication formats rendered from the XML. This draft
documents
document outlines the rendering requirements for the plain-text RFC
publication format. These requirements do not apply to plain-text
RFCs published before the format transition.

The Unicode Consortium defines 'plain text' "plain text" as "Computer-encoded text
that consists only of a sequence of code points from a given
standard, with no other formatting or structural information. Plain
text

Plain-text interchange is commonly used between computer systems that
do not share higher-level protocols." [UNICODE-GLOSSARY] [UNICODE-GLOSSARY]. In other
words, plain-text files cannot include embedded character formatting
or style information. The actual character encoding, however, is not
limited to any particular sequence of code points.

A plain-text output for RFCs will continue to be required for the
foreseeable future. The process of converting XML2RFC xml2rfc version 2
(xml2rfc v2) into text documents is well understood [RFC7749]. We
plan to rely on the practice to date to inform the requirements for
converting XML2RFC xml2rfc version 3 (xml2rfc v3) to text [I-D.iab-xml2rfc]. [RFC7991]. This
document calls out those requirements that are changed from v2 or
otherwise deserve special attention, such as the requirements around
the character encoding that may be used, used; changes in the page layout, layout;
and changes in handling how figures, artwork, and pagination. pagination may be handled.
For more details on general style, see "The RFC "RFC Style Guide." [RFC7322] Guide" [RFC7322].

The following assumptions drive the changes in the plain-text output
for RFCs:

o The existing tools used by the RFC Editor and many members of the
author community to create the text file are complicated to change
and support; manual manipulation is often required for the final
output. In particular, handling page breaks and associated widows
and orphans for paginated output is tricky [WIDOWS].

o Additional publication formats--for example: formats -- for example, PDF, HTML--will HTML -- will
be available that will offer features such as markup, markup and pretty
printing, etc.
printing.

o There is an extensive tool chain in existence among the community
to work with plain-text documents. Similar functionality may be
possible with other publication formats, but the workflow that
uses the existing tool chain should be supported as much as is
considered practical.

Where practical, the original guidance for the structure of a plain-
text
plain-text RFC has been kept, such as kept (e.g., with line lengths, with lines
per page,
etc. [INS2AUTH] page [INS2AUTH]). Other publication formats, such as HTML and
PDF, will include additional features that will not be present in the
plain text (e.g., paragraph numbering, typographical emphasis).

The details described in this document are expected to change based
on experience gained in implementing the RFC production center's
toolset. new publication toolsets.
Revised documents will be published capturing those changes as the toolset is
toolsets are completed. Other implementers must not expect those
changes to remain backwards-compatible with the details described in
this document.

2. Character Encoding

Plain-text files for RFCs will use the UTF-8 [RFC3629] character
encoding. That said, the use of non-ASCII characters will be only
allowed in a limited and controlled fashion.

Many elements within the xml2rfc v3 vocabulary have an attribute for
the ASCII equivalent to a non-ASCII character string. The ASCII
equivalent will be rendered within the plain-text plain text as per the guidance
in "The Use of Non-ASCII Characters in RFCs" [I-D.iab-rfc-nonascii].
Please [RFC7997]; please view
the PDF version of that draft. document.

The plain-text file will include a byte order mark Byte Order Mark (BOM) to provide
text reader software with in-band information about the character
encoding scheme used.

3. Figures and Artwork

Artwork, such as network diagrams or performance graphs, must be
tagged by the XML <artwork> element (see Section 2.5 of "The
'XML2RFC' version
'xml2rfc' Version 3 Vocabulary" [I-D.iab-xml2rfc]. [RFC7991]. Where this artwork is
comprised of an ASCII art diagram, it must be tagged as
'type=ascii-art'.
"type='ascii-art'". The plain-text format will only include
ASCII art. If the canonical format includes figures or artwork other
than ASCII- ASCII art, then the plain-text output must include a pointer to
the relevant figure in the HTML version of the RFC to allow readers
to see the relevant artwork.

Authors who wish to include ASCII-art ASCII art for the plain-text file and
SVG art for the other outputs may do so, but they should be aware of
the potential for confusion to individuals reading the RFC with two
unique diagrams describing the same content. If there is conflicting
information between the publication formats, please review the XML
and PDF files to resolve the conflict.

4. General Page Format Layout

One plain-text output will be created during the publication process
with basic pagination that includes a form feed instruction every
58 lines at most, including blank lines. Instructions or a script
will be made available by and for the community to strip out
pagination as per individual preference.

4.1. Headers and Footers

The front matter on the front page (such as the RFC number and
category),
category) and the back matter on the last page (the author's authors' full
names and contact information) will continue with the structure
described in RFC 5741 [RFC5741], 7841 [RFC7841], "RFC Streams, Headers, and
Boilerplates". Running headers and footers will no longer be added.

4.2. Table of Contents

In order to retain similar content wherever possible between the
various publication formats, the Table table of Contents contents will list section
and subsection numbers and titles, titles but will not include page numbers.

4.3. Line Width

Each line must be limited to 72 characters followed by the character
sequence that denotes an end-of-line (EOL). The EOL sequence used by
the RFC Editor will be the two-character sequence CR LF (Carriage
Return followed by Line Feed). This limit includes any left-side
indentation.

Note that the EOL used by the RFC Editor may change with different
transports and as displayed in different display software.

4.4. Line Spacing

Use single-spaced text within a paragraph, and one blank line between
paragraphs.

4.5. Hyphenation

Hyphenated words (e.g., "Internet-Draft"), "Internet-Draft") should not be split across
successive lines.

5. Elements from the xml2rfc v3 vocabulary Vocabulary

The plain-text formatter uses the relevant tags from the xml2rfcv3 xml2rfc v3
source file to build a document conforming to the layout and
structure described by the full RFC Style Guide [RFC7322] (including
the updates in the web portion of the Style Guide). [STYLEWEB]

7. IANA Considerations

This memo includes no requests to IANA.

8. Guide) [STYLEWEB].

6. Security Considerations

The requirements of the plaintext plain-text format involve no significant
security considerations. As part of the larger format project,
however, unintended changes to the text as a result of the
transformation from the base XML file could in turn corrupt a
standard, practice practice, or critical piece of information about a
protocol.

9. Change Log for the Draft

9.1. draft-iab-rfc-plaintext-02 to -03

Figures and Artwork: clarified the state specifically around ASCII
art

Elements from the xml2rfc v3: removed confusing sentence that called
out particular elements for creation of front/back matter

9.2. draft-iab-rfc-plantext-01 to -02

nits fixed

9.3. draft-iab-rfc-plaintext-00 to -01

Introduction: removed sentence restricting this format to RFCs only;
clarified that plaintext will be based on existing practice (except
where otherwise called out)

Elements from the xml2rfc v3 vocabulary: clarified what xml2rfcv3
tags will render the front and back matter of a document.

9.4. draft-flanagan-plaintext-09 to draft-iab-rfc-plaintext-00

Figures and Artwork, Character Encoding: included additional detail
regarding how these items will be flagged within the XML.

9.5. -08 to -09

Security Considerations: added text

9.6. -07 to -08

Change log: forgot to update the change log for the -06 to -07
changes.

9.7. -06 to -07

Introduction: updated to state that this document does not require
backwards compatibility.

9.8. -05 to -06

Abstract: Changed "cut over" to "transition"

Elements from xml2rfc v3: emphasized that doc structure is guided by
the RFC Style Guide

9.9. -04 to -05

Abstract and Introduction: Revised for better readability; clarified
the definition and implications of the term "plain-text"

General Page Format Layout: Added explicit EOL detail and added some
clarification regarding pagination

Elements from the xml2rfc v3 vocabulary: section added

9.10. -03 to -04

Change Log for the Draft: forgot to complete the change log between
the various revisions of the draft

9.11. -02 to -03

Abstract: expanded

Introduction: adjusted language of assumptions
Figures and Artwork: adjusted to indicate where to go in case
information for the images conflicts between different formats

General Page Layout: switched back to producing one basic paginated
format, with an expectation of instructions and/or a script to create
local, unpaginated copies for individual use.

9.12. -01 to -02

Introduction: added pointer to original page layout information

Character encoding: clarified language around encoding and use of
BOMs

General Page Format Layout: removed increased line width requirement;
added sections on Line Width, Line Spacing, and Hyphenation (pulled
from 2223-bis

10.

7. References

10.1.

7.1. Normative References

[I-D.iab-rfc-nonascii]
Flanagan, H., "The Use of Non-ASCII Characters in RFCs",
draft-iab-rfc-nonascii-02 (work in progress), April 2016.

[I-D.iab-xml2rfc]
Hoffman, P., "The "xml2rfc" version 3 Vocabulary", draft-
iab-xml2rfc-03 (work in progress), February 2016.

[RFC3629] Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of
ISO 10646", STD 63, RFC 3629, DOI 10.17487/RFC3629,
November 2003, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3629>.

[RFC5741] Daigle, L., Ed., Kolkman, O., Ed., and IAB, "RFC Streams,
Headers, and Boilerplates", RFC 5741,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5741, December 2009,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5741>.

[RFC6949] Flanagan, H. and N. Brownlee, "RFC Series Format
Requirements and Future Development", RFC 6949,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6949, May 2013,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6949>.

[RFC7322] Flanagan, H. and S. Ginoza, "RFC Style Guide", RFC 7322,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7322, September 2014,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7322>.

[RFC7749] Reschke, J., "The "xml2rfc" Version 2 Vocabulary",
RFC 7749, DOI 10.17487/RFC7749, February 2016,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7749>.

10.2.

[RFC7841] Halpern, J., Ed., Daigle, L., Ed., and O. Kolkman, Ed.,
"RFC Streams, Headers, and Boilerplates", RFC 7841,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7841, May 2016,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7841>.

[RFC7991] Hoffman, P., "The "xml2rfc" Version 3 Vocabulary",
RFC 7991, DOI 10.17487/RFC7991, December 2016,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7991>.

[RFC7997] Flanagan, H., Ed., "The Use of Non-ASCII Characters in
RFCs", RFC 7997, DOI 10.17487/RFC7997, December 2016,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7997>.

7.2. Informative References

[INS2AUTH]
RFC Editor, "Instructions to Request for Comments (RFC)
Authors", August 2004, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-
editor/instructions2authors.txt>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/
materials/instructions2authors.txt>.

[STYLEWEB]
RFC Editor, "Web Portion of the Style Guide", May 2015,
February 2016,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/styleguide/part2/>.

[UNICODE-GLOSSARY]
The Unicode Consortium, "Glossary of Unicode Terms", 2014,
September 2016, <http://www.unicode.org/glossary/>.

[WIDOWS] Wikipedia, "Widows and orphans", October 2014,
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Widows_and_orphans>. September 2016,
<https://en.wikipedia.org/w/
index.php?title=Widows_and_orphans&oldid=738356204>.

[XML-ANNOUNCE]
Flanagan, H., "Subject: Direction of the RFC Format
Development effort", May 2013, <http://www.rfc-
editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/2013-May/005584.html >.

6.
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/
rfc-interest/2013-May/005584.html>.

IAB Members at the Time of Approval

The IAB members at the time this memo was approved were
(in alphabetical order):

Jari Arkko
Ralph Droms
Ted Hardie
Joe Hildebrand
Russ Housley
Lee Howard
Erik Nordmark
Robert Sparks
Andrew Sullivan
Dave Thaler
Martin Thomson
Brian Trammell
Suzanne Woolf

Acknowledgements

This draft document owes a great deal of thanks to the efforts of the RFC
Format Design Team: Nevil Brownlee, Tony Hansen, Joe Hildebrand, Paul
Hoffman, Ted Lemon, Julian Reschke, Adam Roach, Alice Russo, Robert
Sparks, and David Thaler.

Author's Address

Heather Flanagan
RFC Editor

Email: rse@rfc-editor.org
URI: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2647-2220