Payload Working Group VictorInternet Engineering Task Force (IETF) V. DemjanenkoInternet-Draft DavidRequest for Comments: 8130 D. SatterleeIntended Status:Category: Standards Track VOCAL Technologies, Ltd.Expires: August 11, 2017 February 7,ISSN: 2070-1721 March 2017 RTP Payload Format forMELPethe Mixed Excitation Linear Prediction Enhanced (MELPe) Codecdraft-ietf-payload-melpe-06Abstract This document describes the RTP payload format for the Mixed Excitation Linear Prediction Enhanced (MELPe) speech coder. MELPe's three different speech encoding rates and sampleframesframe sizes are supported. Comfort noise procedures and packet loss concealment aredetailed.described in detail. Status ofthisThis Memo This is an Internet Standards Track document. This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841. Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8130. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. ThisInternet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Thisdocument is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."Table of Contents11. Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.1 Conventions, Definitions and Acronyms . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2....................................................2 1.1. Conventions ................................................2 2. Background. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3......................................................3 3. Payload Format. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3.1..................................................4 3.1. MELPe BitstreamDefinition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.1.1Definitions ................................5 3.1.1. 2400 bps Bitstream Structure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.1.2........................6 3.1.2. 1200 bps Bitstream Structure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3.1.3........................9 3.1.3. 600 bps Bitstream Structure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 3.2........................13 3.2. MELPe Comfort Noise Bitstream Definition. . . . . . . . . 15 3.3..................18 3.3. Multiple MELPeframesFrames inaan RTPpacket . . . . . . . . . . . 17 3.4Packet ....................20 3.4. Congestion Control Considerations. . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 4.........................21 4. Payload Format Parameters. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 4.1......................................22 4.1. Media TypeDefinition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 4.2Definitions ....................................22 4.2. Mapping to SDP. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 4.3............................................23 4.3. Declarative SDP Considerations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 4.4............................25 4.4. Offer/Answer SDP Considerations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 5 Discontinious Transmission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 6...........................25 5. Discontinuous Transmissions ....................................26 6. Packet Loss Concealment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 7........................................26 7. IANA Considerations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 8............................................26 8. Security Considerations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 9 RFC Editor Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 10........................................27 9. References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 10.1.....................................................27 9.1. Normative References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 10.2......................................27 9.2. Informative References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29....................................29 Authors' Addresses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 1................................................30 1. Introduction This document describes how compressedMELPeMixed Excitation Linear Prediction Enhanced (MELPe) speech as produced by the MELPe codec may be formatted for use as an RTP payload. Details are provided to packetize the three different codecbit-ratebitrate data frames (2400, 1200, and 600) into RTP packets. The sender may send one or more codec data frames per packet, depending on the application scenario or based onthetransport networkcondition,conditions, bandwidthrestriction,restrictions, delayrequirementsrequirements, andpacket-losspacket loss tolerance.1.1 Conventions, Definitions and Acronyms1.1. Conventions The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119]. Best current practices for writing an RTP payload format[RFC2736]specification werefollowed. 2followed [RFC2736]. 2. Background The MELP speech coder was developed by the US military as an upgrade from the LPC-based CELP standard vocoder forlow bit-ratelow-bitrate communications [MELP]. ("LPC" stands for "Linear-Predictive Coding", and "CELP" stands for "Code-Excited Linear Prediction".) MELP was further enhanced and subsequently adopted by NATO as MELPe for use by its members and Partnership for Peace countries for military and other governmental communications [MELPE]. The MELP speech coder algorithm was developed by Atlanta Signal Processing (ASPI), Texas Instruments (TI), SignalCom (nowMicrosoft)Microsoft), and ThalesCommunicationsCommunications, with noise preprocessor contributions fromAT&TAT&T, under contract with NSA/DOD as international NATO Standard STANAG4591.4591 [MELPE]. Commercial/civilian applications have arisen because of thelow bit- ratelow-bitrate property of MELPe with its (relatively) high intelligibility. Assuchsuch, MELPe is being used in a variety of wired and radio communications systems.VoIP/SIPVoice over IP (VoIP) / SIP systems need to transport MELPe without decoding and re-encoding in order to preserve its intelligibility.HenceHence, it is desirable and necessary to define the proper payload formatting and use conventions of MELPe in RTP payloads. The MELPe codec [MELPE] supports three different vocoderbit rates;bitrates: 2400, 1200, and 600 bps. The basic 2400 bpsbit-ratebitrate vocoder uses a 22.5 ms frame of speech consisting of 1808000 Hz,8000-Hz, 16-bit speech samples. The 1200 and 600 bpsbit-ratebitrate vocodersuses respectivelyeach use three and four 22.5 ms frames ofspeech each.speech, respectively. Thesereduced bit-ratereduced-bitrate vocoders internally use multiple 2400 bps parameter sets with further processing to strategically remove redundancy. The payload sizes for each of the bitrates are 54, 81, and 54 bitsrespectivelyfor the 2400, 1200, and 600 bpsframes.frames, respectively. Dynamicbit-ratebitrate switching is permitted but only if supported by both endpoints. The MELPe algorithm distinguishes between voiced andun-voicedunvoiced speech and encodes each differently. Unvoiced speech can be coded with fewer information bits for the same quality. Forward error correction (FEC) is applied to the 2400 bps codec unvoiced speech for better protection of the subtle differences in signal reconstruction. Thelower bit-ratelower-bitrate coders do not allocate any bits for FEC and rely on strong error protection and correction in the communications channel. Comfort noise handling for MELPe follows the procedures inSCIP-210Appendix B of SCIP-210 [SCIP210]. AfterVADVoice Activity Detection (VAD) no longer indicates the presence of speech/voice, agrace period of aminimum of two comfort noise vocoderfamesframes (serving as a grace period) are to be transmitted. The contents of the comfort noise framesisare described in the next section. Packet loss concealment (PLC) exploits the FEC(and(and, more precisely, any combination of two set bits in the pitch/voicing parameter) of the 2400 bps speech coder. The pitch/voicing parameter has a sparse set of permitted values. A value of zero indicates a non-voiced frame. At least three bits are set for all valid pitch parameters. The PLC erasure indication utilizes any errored/erasure encodings of the pitch/voicing parameter with exactly twobitseterrored/erasure encodings of a non-voiced framebits, aswill bedescribedinfra. 3below. 3. Payload Format The MELPe codec uses 22.5,67.567.5, or 90 ms frames with a sampling rate clock of 8 kHz, so the RTP timestamp MUST be in units of 1/8000 of a second. The RTP payload for MELPe has the format shown in Figure 1. No additional header specific to this payload format is needed. This format is intended forthesituations where the sender and the receiver send one or more codec data frames per packet. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | RTP Header | +=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+ | | + one or more frames of MELPe | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Figure1 -1: Packetformat diagramFormat Diagram The RTP header of the packetized encoded MELPe speech has the expected values as described in [RFC3550]. The usage of the M bit SHOULD be as specified in the applicable RTPprofile,profile -- for example,RFC 3551[RFC3551], where [RFC3551] specifies that if the sender does not suppress silence (i.e., sends a frame on every frame interval), the M bit will always be zero. When morethenthan one codec data frame is present in a single RTP packet, the timestamp is, as always, that of the oldest data frame represented in the RTP packet. The assignment of an RTP payload type for this new packet format is outside the scope of thisdocument,document and will not be specified here. It is expected that the RTP profile for a particular class of applications will assign a payload type for this encoding, or if that is not done, then a payload type in the dynamic range shall be chosen by the sender.3.13.1. MELPe BitstreamDefinitionDefinitions The total number of bits used to describe one frame of 2400 bps speech is 54, which fits in 7 octets (with two unused bits). Forthe1200 bpsspeechspeech, the total number of bits used is 81, which fits in 11 octets (with seven unused bits). Forthe600 bpsspeechspeech, the total number of bits used is 54, which fits in 7 octets (with two unused bits). Unused bits, shown below as RSVA, RSVB, etc., are coded as described in Section 3.3 in support of dynamicbit-ratebitrate switching. In the MELPe bitstreamdefinition,definitions, the most significant bits are considered priority bits. The intention was that these bits receive greater protection in the underlying communications channel. For IP networks, such additional protection is irrelevant. However, for the convenience of interoperable gateway devices, the bitstreams will be presented identically in IP networks.3.1.13.1.1. 2400 bps Bitstream Structure According to Table 3 of [MELPE], the 2400bit/sbps MELPe bit transmission order(bit(for clarity, the bit priority is notshown for clarity)shown) isthe following:as follows: +--------+-------------+-------------+ | Bit | Voiced | Unvoiced | +--------+-------------+-------------+ | B_01 | g20 | g20 | | B_02 | BP0 | FEC10 | | B_03 | P0 | P0 | | B_04 | LSF20 | LSF20 | | B_05 | LSF30 | LSF30 | | B_06 | g23 | g23 | | B_07 | g24 | g24 | | B_08 | LSF35 | LSF35 | +--------+-------------+-------------+ | B_09 | g21 | g21 | | B_10 | g22 | g22 | | B_11 | P4 | P4 | | B_12 | LSF34 | LSF34 | | B_13 | P5 | P5 | | B_14 | P1 | P1 | | B_15 | P2 | P2 | | B_16 | LSF40 | LSF40 | +--------+-------------+-------------+ | B_17 | P6 | P6 | | B_18 | LSF10 | LSF10 | | B_19 | LSF16 | LSF16 | | B_20 | LSF45 | LSF45 | | B_21 | P3 | P3 | | B_22 | LSF15 | LSF15 | | B_23 | LSF14 | LSF14 | | B_24 | LSF25 | LSF25 | +--------+-------------+-------------+ | B_25 | BP3 | FEC13 | | B_26 | LSF13 | LSF13 | | B_27 | LSF12 | LSF12 | | B_28 | LSF24 | LSF24 | | B_29 | LSF44 | LSF44 | | B_30 | FM0 | FEC40 | | B_31 | LSF11 | LSF11 | | B_32 | LSF23 | LSF23 | +--------+-------------+-------------+ | B_33 | FM7 | FEC22 | | B_34 | FM6 | FEC21 | | B_35 | FM5 | FEC20 | | B_36 | g11 | g11 | | B_37 | g10 | g10 | | B_38 | BP2 | FEC12 | | B_39 | BP1 | FEC11 | | B_40 | LSF21 | LSF21 | +--------+-------------+-------------+ | B_41 | LSF33 | LSF33 | | B_42 | LSF22 | LSF22 | | B_43 | LSF32 | LSF32 | | B_44 | LSF31 | LSF31 | | B_45 | LSF43 | LSF43 | | B_46 | LSF42 | LSF42 | | B_47 | AF | FEC42 | | B_48 | LSF41 | LSF41 | +--------+-------------+-------------+ | B_49 | FM4 | FEC32 | | B_50 | FM3 | FEC31 | | B_51 | FM2 | FEC30 | | B_52 | FM1 | FEC41 | | B_53 | g12 | g12 | | B_54 | SYNC | SYNC | +--------+-------------+-------------+NOTES:Notes: g = Gain BP = Bandpass Voicing P = Pitch/Voicing LSF = Line Spectral Frequencies FEC = Forward Error Correction Parity Bits FM = Fourier Magnitudes AF = Aperiodic Flag B_01 = least significant bit of data set Table3.1 - The bitstream definition1: Bitstream Definition for MELPe 2400bps.bps The 2400 bps MELPe RTP payload is constructed as per Figure 2. Note that bit B_01 is placed in theLSBleast significant bit (LSB) of the first byte with all other bits in sequence. When filling octets, the least significant bits of the seventh octet are filled with bits B_49 toB_54B_54, respectively. MSB LSB 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | B_08 | B_07 | B_06 | B_05 | B_04 | B_03 | B_02 | B_01 | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | B_16 | B_15 | B_14 | B_13 | B_12 | B_11 | B_10 | B_09 | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | B_24 | B_23 | B_22 | B_21 | B_20 | B_19 | B_18 | B_17 | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | B_32 | B_31 | B_30 | B_29 | B_28 | B_27 | B_26 | B_25 | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | B_40 | B_39 | B_38 | B_37 | B_36 | B_35 | B_34 | B_33 | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | B_48 | B_47 | B_46 | B_45 | B_44 | B_43 | B_42 | B_41 | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | RSVA | RSVB | B_54 | B_53 | B_52 | B_51 | B_50 | B_49 | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ Figure2 -2: Packed MELPe 2400 bpspayload octets. 3.1.2Payload Octets 3.1.2. 1200 bps Bitstream Structure According to TablesD9aD-9a andD9bD-9b of [MELPE], the 1200bit/sbps MELPe bit transmission order isthe following:as follows: +--------+-------------+-------------+ | Bit | Modes 1-4 | Mode 5 | | | (Voiced) | (Unvoiced) | +--------+-------------+-------------+ | B_01 | Syn | Syn | | B_02 | Pitch&UV0 | Pitch&UV0 | | B_03 | Pitch&UV1 | Pitch&UV1 | | B_04 | Pitch&UV2 | Pitch&UV2 | | B_05 | Pitch&UV3 | Pitch&UV3 | | B_06 | Pitch&UV4 | Pitch&UV4 | | B_07 | Pitch&UV5 | Pitch&UV5 | | B_08 | Pitch&UV6 | Pitch&UV6 | +--------+-------------+-------------+ | B_09 | Pitch&UV7 | Pitch&UV7 | | B_10 | Pitch&UV8 | Pitch&UV8 | | B_11 | Pitch&UV9 | Pitch&UV9 | | B_12 | Pitch&UV10 | Pitch&UV10 | | B_13 | Pitch&UV11 | Pitch&UV11 | | B_14 | LSP0 | LSP0 | | B_15 | LSP1 | LSP1 | | B_16 | LSP2 | LSP2 | +--------+-------------+-------------+ | B_17 | LSP3 | LSP3 | | B_18 | LSP4 | LSP4 | | B_19 | LSP5 | LSP5 | | B_20 | LSP6 | LSP6 | | B_21 | LSP7 | LSP7 | | B_22 | LSP8 | LSP8 | | B_23 | LSP9 | LSP9 | | B_24 | LSP10 | LSP10 | +--------+-------------+-------------+ | B_25 | LSP11 | LSP11 | | B_26 | LSP12 | LSP12 | | B_27 | LSP13 | LSP13 | | B_28 | LSP14 | LSP14 | | B_29 | LSP15 | LSP15 | | B_30 | LSP16 | LSP16 | | B_31 | LSP17 | LSP17 | | B_32 | LSP18 | LSP18 | +--------+-------------+-------------+ | B_33 | LSP19 | LSP19 | | B_34 | LSP20 | LSP20 | | B_35 | LSP21 | LSP21 | | B_36 | LSP22 | LSP22 | | B_37 | LSP23 | LSP23 | | B_38 | LSP24 | LSP24 | | B_39 | LSP25 | LSP25 | | B_40 | LSP26 | LSP26 | +--------+-------------+-------------+ | B_41 | LSP27 | GAIN0 | | B_42 | LSP28 | GAIN1 | | B_43 | LSP29 | GAIN2 | | B_44 | LSP30 | GAIN3 | | B_45 | LSP31 | GAIN4 | | B_46 | LSP32 | GAIN5 | | B_47 | LSP33 | GAIN6 | | B_48 | LSP34 | GAIN7 | +--------+-------------+-------------+ | B_49 | LSP35 | GAIN8 | | B_50 | LSP36 | GAIN9 | | B_51 | LSP37 | | | B_52 | LSP38 | | | B_53 | LSP39 | | | B_54 | LSP40 | | | B_55 | LSP41 | | | B_56 | LSP42 | | +--------+-------------+-------------+ | B_57 | GAIN0 | | | B_58 | GAIN1 | | | B_59 | GAIN2 | | | B_60 | GAIN3 | | | B_61 | GAIN4 | | | B_62 | GAIN5 | | | B_63 | GAIN6 | | | B_64 | GAIN7 | | +--------+-------------+-------------+ | B_65 | GAIN8 | | | B_66 | GAIN9 | | | B_67 | BP0 | | | B_68 | BP1 | | | B_69 | BP2 | | | B_70 | BP3 | | | B_71 | BP4 | | | B_72 | BP5 | | +--------+-------------+-------------+ | B_73 | JITTER | | | B_74 | FS0 | | | B_75 | FS1 | | | B_76 | FS2 | | | B_77 | FS3 | | | B_78 | FS4 | | | B_79 | FS5 | | | B_80 | FS6 | | +--------+-------------+-------------+ | B_81 | FS7 | | +--------+-------------+-------------+NOTES:Notes: BP =Band passBandpass voicing FS = Fourier magnitudes LSP = Line Spectral Pair Pitch&UV = Pitch/voicing GAIN = Gain JITTER = Jitter Table3.2 - The bitstream definition2: Bitstream Definition for MELPe 1200bps.bps The 1200 bps MELPe RTP payload is constructed as per Figure 3. Note that bit B_01 is placed in the LSB of the first byte with all other bits in sequence. When filling octets, the least significant bit of the eleventh octet is filled with bit B_81. MSB LSB 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | B_08 | B_07 | B_06 | B_05 | B_04 | B_03 | B_02 | B_01 | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | B_16 | B_15 | B_14 | B_13 | B_12 | B_11 | B_10 | B_09 | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | B_24 | B_23 | B_22 | B_21 | B_20 | B_19 | B_18 | B_17 | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | B_32 | B_31 | B_30 | B_29 | B_28 | B_27 | B_26 | B_25 | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | B_40 | B_39 | B_38 | B_37 | B_36 | B_35 | B_34 | B_33 | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | B_48 | B_47 | B_46 | B_45 | B_44 | B_43 | B_42 | B_41 | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | B_56 | B_55 | B_54 | B_53 | B_52 | B_51 | B_50 | B_49 | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | B_64 | B_63 | B_62 | B_61 | B_60 | B_59 | B_58 | B_57 | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | B_72 | B_71 | B_70 | B_69 | B_68 | B_67 | B_66 | B_65 | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | B_80 | B_79 | B_78 | B_77 | B_76 | B_75 | B_74 | B_73 | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | RSVA | RSVB | RSVC | RSV0 | RSV0 | RSV0 | RSV0 | B_81 | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ Figure3 -3: Packed MELPe 1200 bpspayload octets. 3.1.3Payload Octets 3.1.3. 600 bps Bitstream Structure According to Tables M-11 to M-16 of [MELPE], the 600bit/sbps MELPe bit transmission order(bit(for clarity, the bit priority is notshown for clarity)shown) isthe following:as follows: +--------+-------------+-------------+-------------+ | Bit | Mode 1 | Mode 2 | Mode 3 | | | (Voiced) | (voiced) | (voiced) | +--------+-------------+-------------+-------------+ | B_01 | Voicing (4) | Voicing (4) | Voicing (4) | | B_02 | Voicing (3) | Voicing (3) | Voicing (3) | | B_03 | Voicing (2) | Voicing (2) | Voicing (2) | | B_04 | Voicing (1) | Voicing (1) | Voicing (1) | | B_05 | Voicing (0) | Voicing (0) | Voicing (0) | | B_06 | LSF1,4 (3) | Pitch (5) | Pitch (7) | | B_07 | LSF1,4 (2) | Pitch (4) | Pitch (6) | | B_08 | LSF1,4 (1) | Pitch (3) | Pitch (5) | +--------+-------------+-------------+-------------+ | B_09 | LSF1,4 (0) | Pitch (2) | Pitch (4) | | B_10 | LSF1,3 (3) | Pitch (1) | Pitch (3) | | B_11 | LSF1,3 (2) | Pitch (0) | Pitch (2) | | B_12 | LSF1,3 (1) | LSF1,3 (3) | Pitch (1) | | B_13 | LSF1,3 (0) | LSF1,3 (2) | Pitch (0) | | B_14 | LSF1,2 (3) | LSF1,3 (1) | LSF1,3 (3) | | B_15 | LSF1,2 (2) | LSF1,3 (0) | LSF1,3 (2) | | B_16 | LSF1,2 (1) | LSF1,2 (3) | LSF1,3 (1) | +--------+-------------+-------------+-------------+ | B_17 | LSF1,2 (0) | LSF1,2 (2) | LSF1,3 (0) | | B_18 | LSF1,1 (5) | LSF1,2 (1) | LSF1,2 (4) | | B_19 | LSF1,1 (4) | LSF1,2 (0) | LSF1,2 (3) | | B_20 | LSF1,1 (3) | LSF1,1 (5) | LSF1,2 (2) | | B_21 | LSF1,1 (2) | LSF1,1 (4) | LSF1,2 (1) | | B_22 | LSF1,1 (1) | LSF1,1 (3) | LSF1,2 (0) | | B_23 | LSF1,1 (0) | LSF1,1 (2) | LSF1,1 (5) | | B_24 | LSF2,4 (3) | LSF1,1 (1) | LSF1,1 (4) | +--------+-------------+-------------+-------------+ | B_25 | LSF2,4 (2) | LSF1,1 (0) | LSF1,1 (3) | | B_26 | LSF2,4 (1) | LSF2,3 (3) | LSF1,1 (2) | | B_27 | LSF2,4 (0) | LSF2,3 (2) | LSF1,1 (1) | | B_28 | LSF2,3 (3) | LSF2,3 (1) | LSF1,1 (0) | | B_29 | LSF2,3 (2) | LSF2,3 (0) | LSF2,3 (3) | | B_30 | LSF2,3 (1) | LSF2,2 (4) | LSF2,3 (2) | | B_31 | LSF2,3 (0) | LSF2,2 (3) | LSF2,3 (1) | | B_32 | LSF2,2 (3) | LSF2,2 (2) | LSF2,3 (0) | +--------+-------------+-------------+-------------+ | B_33 | LSF2,2 (2) | LSF2,2 (1) | LSF2,2 (4) | | B_34 | LSF2,2 (1) | LSF2,2 (0) | LSF2,2 (3) | | B_35 | LSF2,2 (0) | LSF2,1 (6) | LSF2,2 (2) | | B_36 | LSF2,1 (5) | LSF2,1 (5) | LSF2,2 (1) | | B_37 | LSF2,1 (4) | LSF2,1 (4) | LSF2,2 (0) | | B_38 | LSF2,1 (3) | LSF2,1 (3) | LSF2,1 (5) | | B_39 | LSF2,1 (2) | LSF2,1 (2) | LSF2,1 (4) | | B_40 | LSF2,1 (1) | LSF2,1 (1) | LSF2,1 (3) | +--------+-------------+-------------+-------------+ | B_41 | LSF2,1 (0) | LSF2,1 (0) | LSF2,1 (2) | | B_42 | GAIN2 (5) | GAIN2 (5) | LSF2,1 (1) | | B_43 | GAIN2 (4) | GAIN2 (4) | LSF2,1 (0) | | B_44 | GAIN2 (3) | GAIN2 (3) | GAIN2 (4) | | B_45 | GAIN2 (2) | GAIN2 (2) | GAIN2 (3) | | B_46 | GAIN2 (1) | GAIN2 (1) | GAIN2 (2) | | B_47 | GAIN2 (0) | GAIN2 (0) | GAIN2 (1) | | B_48 | GAIN1 (6) | GAIN1 (6) | GAIN2 (0) | +--------+-------------+-------------+-------------+ | B_49 | GAIN1 (5) | GAIN1 (5) | GAIN1 (5) | | B_50 | GAIN1 (4) | GAIN1 (4) | GAIN1 (4) | | B_51 | GAIN1 (3) | GAIN1 (3) | GAIN1 (3) | | B_52 | GAIN1 (2) | GAIN1 (2) | GAIN1 (2) | | B_53 | GAIN1 (1) | GAIN1 (1) | GAIN1 (1) | | B_54 | GAIN1 (0) | GAIN1 (0) | GAIN1 (0) | +--------+-------------+-------------+-------------+ Table3.3a - The bitstream definition3: Bitstream Definition for MELPe 600 bps(part(Part 1 of2).2) +--------+-------------+-------------+-------------+ | Bit | Mode 4 | Mode 5 | Mode 6 | | | (voiced) | (voiced) | (voiced) | +--------+-------------+-------------+-------------+ | B_01 | Voicing (4) | Voicing (4) | Voicing (4) | | B_02 | Voicing (3) | Voicing (3) | Voicing (3) | | B_03 | Voicing (2) | Voicing (2) | Voicing (2) | | B_04 | Voicing (1) | Voicing (1) | Voicing (1) | | B_05 | Voicing (0) | Voicing (0) | Voicing (0) | | B_06 | Pitch (7) | Pitch (7) | Pitch (7) | | B_07 | Pitch (6) | Pitch (6) | Pitch (6) | | B_08 | Pitch (5) | Pitch (5) | Pitch (5) | +--------+-------------+-------------+-------------+ | B_09 | Pitch (4) | Pitch (4) | Pitch (4) | | B_10 | Pitch (3) | Pitch (3) | Pitch (3) | | B_11 | Pitch (2) | Pitch (2) | Pitch (2) | | B_12 | Pitch (1) | Pitch (1) | Pitch (1) | | B_13 | Pitch (0) | Pitch (0) | Pitch (0) | | B_14 | LSF1,3 (3) | LSF1,3 (3) | LSF1,3 (3) | | B_15 | LSF1,3 (2) | LSF1,3 (2) | LSF1,3 (2) | | B_16 | LSF1,3 (1) | LSF1,3 (1) | LSF1,3 (1) | +--------+-------------+-------------+-------------+ | B_17 | LSF1,3 (0) | LSF1,3 (0) | LSF1,3 (0) | | B_18 | LSF1,2 (3) | LSF1,2 (4) | LSF1,2 (4) | | B_19 | LSF1,2 (2) | LSF1,2 (3) | LSF1,2 (3) | | B_20 | LSF1,2 (1) | LSF1,2 (2) | LSF1,2 (2) | | B_21 | LSF1,2 (0) | LSF1,2 (1) | LSF1,2 (1) | | B_22 | LSF1,1 (5) | LSF1,2 (0) | LSF1,2 (0) | | B_23 | LSF1,1 (4) | LSF1,1 (5) | LSF1,1 (6) | | B_24 | LSF1,1 (3) | LSF1,1 (4) | LSF1,1 (5) | +--------+-------------+-------------+-------------+ | B_25 | LSF1,1 (2) | LSF1,1 (3) | LSF1,1 (4) | | B_26 | LSF1,1 (1) | LSF1,1 (2) | LSF1,1 (3) | | B_27 | LSF1,1 (0) | LSF1,1 (1) | LSF1,1 (2) | | B_28 | LSF2,3 (3) | LSF1,1 (0) | LSF1,1 (1) | | B_29 | LSF2,3 (2) | LSF2,3 (3) | LSF1,1 (0) | | B_30 | LSF2,3 (1) | LSF2,3 (2) | LSF2,3 (3) | | B_31 | LSF2,3 (0) | LSF2,3 (1) | LSF2,3 (2) | | B_32 | LSF2,2 (4) | LSF2,3 (0) | LSF2,3 (1) | +--------+-------------+-------------+-------------+ | B_33 | LSF2,2 (3) | LSF2,2 (4) | LSF2,3 (0) | | B_34 | LSF2,2 (2) | LSF2,2 (3) | LSF2,2 (4) | | B_35 | LSF2,2 (1) | LSF2,2 (2) | LSF2,2 (3) | | B_36 | LSF2,2 (0) | LSF2,2 (1) | LSF2,2 (2) | | B_37 | LSF2,1 (6) | LSF2,2 (0) | LSF2,2 (1) | | B_38 | LSF2,1 (5) | LSF2,1 (5) | LSF2,2 (0) | | B_39 | LSF2,1 (4) | LSF2,1 (4) | LSF2,1 (6) | | B_40 | LSF2,1 (3) | LSF2,1 (3) | LSF2,1 (5) | +--------+-------------+-------------+-------------+ | B_41 | LSF2,1 (2) | LSF2,1 (2) | LSF2,1 (4) | | B_42 | LSF2,1 (1) | LSF2,1 (1) | LSF2,1 (3) | | B_43 | LSF2,1 (0) | LSF2,1 (0) | LSF2,1 (2) | | B_44 | GAIN2 (4) | GAIN2 (4) | LSF2,1 (1) | | B_45 | GAIN2 (3) | GAIN2 (3) | LSF2,1 (0) | | B_46 | GAIN2 (2) | GAIN2 (2) | GAIN1 (8) | | B_47 | GAIN2 (1) | GAIN2 (1) | GAIN1 (7) | | B_48 | GAIN2 (0) | GAIN2 (0) | GAIN1 (6) | +--------+-------------+-------------+-------------+ | B_49 | GAIN1 (5) | GAIN1 (5) | GAIN1 (5) | | B_50 | GAIN1 (4) | GAIN1 (4) | GAIN1 (4) | | B_51 | GAIN1 (3) | GAIN1 (3) | GAIN1 (3) | | B_52 | GAIN1 (2) | GAIN1 (2) | GAIN1 (2) | | B_53 | GAIN1 (1) | GAIN1 (1) | GAIN1 (1) | | B_54 | GAIN1 (0) | GAIN1 (0) | GAIN1 (0) | +--------+-------------+-------------+-------------+ Notes: xxxx (0) = LSB xxxx (nbits-1) = MSB LSF1,p =MSVQ indiceMSVQ* index of the pth stage of the two first frames LSF2,p = MSVQindiceindex of the pth stage of the two last frames GAIN1 = VQ/MSVQindiceindex of the 1st stage GAIN2 = MSVQindiceindex of the 2nd stage * MSVQ: Multi-Stage Vector Quantizer Table3.3b - The bitstream definition4: Bitstream Definition for MELPe 600 bps(part(Part 2 of2).2) The 600 bps MELPe RTP payload is constructed as per Figure 4. Note that bit B_01 is placed in the LSB of the first byte with all other bits in sequence. When filling octets, the least significant bits of the seventh octet are filled with bits B_49 toB_54B_54, respectively. MSB LSB 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | B_08 | B_07 | B_06 | B_05 | B_04 | B_03 | B_02 | B_01 | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | B_16 | B_15 | B_14 | B_13 | B_12 | B_11 | B_10 | B_09 | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | B_24 | B_23 | B_22 | B_21 | B_20 | B_19 | B_18 | B_17 | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | B_32 | B_31 | B_30 | B_29 | B_28 | B_27 | B_26 | B_25 | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | B_40 | B_39 | B_38 | B_37 | B_36 | B_35 | B_34 | B_33 | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | B_48 | B_47 | B_46 | B_45 | B_44 | B_43 | B_42 | B_41 | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | RSVA | RSVB | B_54 | B_53 | B_52 | B_51 | B_50 | B_49 | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ Figure4 -4: Packed MELPe 600 bpspayload octets. 3.2Payload Octets 3.2. MELPe Comfort Noise Bitstream Definition Table B.3-1 of [SCIP210] identifies the usage of MELPe 2400 bps parameters for conveying comfort noise. +-------------------------------------+----------------+ | MELPe Parameter | Value | +-------------------------------------+----------------+ | msvq[0] (line spectral frequencies) | * See Note | +-------------------------------------+----------------+ | msvq[1] (line spectral frequencies) | Set to 0 | +-------------------------------------+----------------+ | msvq[2] (line spectral frequencies) | Set to 0 | +-------------------------------------+----------------+ | msvq[3] (line spectral frequencies) | Set to 0 | +-------------------------------------+----------------+ | fsvq (Fourier magnitudes) | Set to 0 | +-------------------------------------+----------------+ | gain[0] (gain) | Set to 0 | +-------------------------------------+----------------+ | gain[1] (gain) | * See Note | +-------------------------------------+----------------+ | pitch (pitch - overall voicing) | Set to 0 | +-------------------------------------+----------------+ | bp (bandpass voicing) | Set to 0 | +-------------------------------------+----------------+ | af (aperiodic flag/jitter index) | Set to 0 | +-------------------------------------+----------------+ | sync (sync bit) | Alternations | +-------------------------------------+----------------+ Note: The default values are the respective parameters from the vocoder frame. It is preferred that msvq[0] and gain[1] values be derived by averaging the respective parameter from some number of previous vocoder frames. Table3.4 -5: MELPe Comfort Noise Parameters Since only msvq[0] (also known as LSF1x or the first LSP) and gain[1] (also known as g2x or the second gain) are needed, the following bit order is used for comfort noiseframes.frames: +--------+-------------+ | Bit | Comfort | | | Noise | +--------+-------------+ | B_01 | LSF10 | | B_02 | LSF11 | | B_03 | LSF12 | | B_04 | LSF13 | | B_05 | LSF14 | | B_06 | LSF15 | | B_07 | LSF16 | | B_08 | g20 | +--------+-------------+ | B_09 | g21 | | B_10 | g22 | | B_11 | g23 | | B_12 | g24 | | B_13 | SYNC | +--------+-------------+NOTES:Notes: g = Gain LSF = Line Spectral Frequencies Table3.5 - The bitstream definition6: Bitstream Definition for MELPe ComfortNoise. The ComfortNoise The comfort noise MELPe RTP payload is constructed as per Figure 5. Note that bit B_01 is placed in the LSB of the first byte with all other bits in sequence. WhenWhenfilling octets, the least significant bits of the second octet are filled with bits B_09 toB_13B_13, respectively. MSB LSB 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | B_08 | B_07 | B_06 | B_05 | B_04 | B_03 | B_02 | B_01 | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | RSVA | RSVB | RSVC | B_13 | B_12 | B_11 | B_10 | B_09 | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ Figure5 -5: Packed MELPe Comfort Noisepayload octets. 3.3Payload Octets 3.3. Multiple MELPeframesFrames inaan RTPpacketPacket A MELPe RTP packet MAY consist of zero or more MELPe coderframes,frames followed by zero or one MELPeComfort Noise frames.comfort noise frame. The presence of a comfort noise frame can be deduced from the length of the RTP payload. The default packetization interval is one coder frame (22.5,67.567.5, or 90 ms) according to the coderbit ratebitrate (2400,12001200, or 600 bps). For some applications, a longer packetization interval is used to reduce the packet rate. A MELPe RTP packet comprised of no coder frame and no comfort noise frame MAY be used periodically by anend pointendpoint to indicate connectivity by an otherwise idle receiver. All MELPe frames in a single RTP packet MUST be of the same coderbit rate.bitrate. Dynamic switching between frame rates within an RTP stream may be permitted (if supported by both ends) provided that reservedbits,bits RSVA, RSVB, and RSVC are filled in as per Table3.6.7. Ifbit-ratebitrate switching is not used, all reserved bits are encoded as 0 by the sender and ignored by the receiver. (RSV0 is always coded as0).0.) +-------------------+------+------+------+ | CoderBit RateBitrate | RSVA | RSVB | RSVC | +-------------------+------+------+------+ | 2400 bps | 0 | 0 | N/A | +-------------------+------+------+------+ | 1200 bps | 1 | 0 | 0 | +-------------------+------+------+------+ | 600 bps | 0 | 1 | N/A | +-------------------+------+------+------+ | Comfort Noise | 1 | 0 | 1 | +-------------------+------+------+------+ | (reserved) | 1 | 1 | N/A | +-------------------+------+------+------+ Table3.6 -7: MELPe FrameBit Rate Indicators.Bitrate Indicators It is important to observe that senders have the following additional restrictions: Senders SHOULD NOT include more MELPe frames in a single RTP packet than will fit in the MTU of the RTP transport protocol. Frames MUST NOT be split between RTP packets. It is RECOMMENDED that the number of frames contained within an RTP packetisbe consistent with the application. For example, inatelephony and otherreal timereal-time applications where delay is important, then the fewer frames per packet the lower the delay, whereas forbandwidthbandwidth- constrained links ordelay insensitivedelay-insensitive streaming messagingapplication,applications, more than one frame per packet or many frames per packet would be acceptable. Information describing the number of frames contained in an RTP packet is not transmitted as part of the RTP payload. The way to determine the number of MELPe frames is to count the total number of octets within the RTPpacket,packet and divide the octet count by the number of expected octets per frame (7/11/7 per frame). Keep in mind that the last frame can be a2 octet2-octet comfort noise frame. When dynamicbit-ratebitrate switching is used and more than one frame is contained inaan RTP packet, it is RECOMMENDEDto inspectthat the coder rate bits contained in the lastoctet.octet be inspected. If the coderbit ratebitrate indicates aComfort Noisecomfort noise frame, then inspect the third last octet for the coderbit rate.bitrate. All MELPe speech frames in the RTP packet will be of this same coderbit rate. 3.4bitrate. 3.4. Congestion Control Considerations The target bitrate of MELPe can be adjusted at any point in time, thus allowing congestion management. Furthermore, the amount of encoded speech or audio data encoded in a single packet can be used for congestion control, since the packet rate is inversely proportional to the packet duration. A lower packet transmission rate reduces the amount of headeroverhead,overhead but at the same time increases latency and loss sensitivity, so it ought to be used with care. Since UDP does not provide congestion control, applications that use RTP over UDP SHOULD implement their own congestion control above the UDP layer [RFC8085] and MAYas wellalso implement a transport circuit breaker[RFC8083] (formerly [draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-circuit- breakers]).[RFC8083]. Work in the RMCAT working group[rmcat][RMCAT] describes the interactions and conceptual interfaces necessary between the application components that relate to congestion control, including the RTP layer, the higher-level media codec control layer, and the lower-level transport interface, as well as components dedicated to congestion control functions.44. Payload Format Parameters This RTP payload format is identified using the MELP, MELP2400, MELP1200, and MELP600 mediatypessubtypes, whichisare registered in accordance with RFC 4855 [RFC4855] andusingper the media type registration templateoffrom RFC 6838 [RFC6838].4.14.1. Media TypeDefinitionDefinitions Typenames:name: audio Subtypename:names: MELP, MELP2400, MELP1200, and MELP600 Required parameters: N/A Optional parameters: ptime: the recommended length of time (in milliseconds) represented by the media in a packet. It SHALL use the nearest rounded-up ms integer packet duration. For MELPe, this corresponds to the following values: 23, 45, 68, 90, 112, 135, 156, and 180. Larger values can be used as long as they are properly rounded. See Section 6 of RFC 4566 [RFC4566]. maxptime: the maximum length of time (in milliseconds) that can be encapsulated in a packet. It SHALL use the nearestrounded- uprounded-up ms integer packet duration. For MELPe, this corresponds to the following values: 23, 45, 68, 90, 112, 135, 156, and 180. Larger values can be used as long as they are properly rounded. See Section 6 of RFC 4566 [RFC4566]. bitrate: specifies the MELPe coderbit ratesbitrates supported. Possible values are a comma-separated list of rates from the following set: 2400, 1200, 600. The modes are listed in order of preference; first is preferred. If "bitrate" is not present, the fixed coderbit ratebitrate of 2400 MUST be used. The alternate encodingnames,names "MELP2400", "MELP1200", and "MELP600" directly specify the MELPe coderbit ratebitrates of 2400, 1200, and600 respectively600, respectively, and MUST NOT specify a "bitrate" parameter. Encoding considerations:ThisThese mediatype issubtypes are framed andbinary,binary; seesectionSection 4.8in RFC6838of RFC 6838 [RFC6838]. Security considerations: Please seethe security considerations in sectionSection 8 ofRFCxxxx (this RFC).RFC 8130. Interoperability considerations: Early implementations used MELP2400, MELP1200, and MELP600 to indicate both coder type andbit rate.bitrate. These media type names should be preserved with this registration. Published specification: N/A Applications that use this media type: N/A Additional information: N/A Deprecated alias names for this type: N/A Magic number(s): N/A File extension(s): N/A Macintosh file type code(s): N/A Person & email address to contact for further information: Victor Demjanenko, Ph.D. VOCAL Technologies, Ltd. 520 Lee Entrance, Suite 202 Buffalo, NY 14228USAUnited States of America Phone: +1 716 688 4675 Email: victor.demjanenko@vocal.com Intended usage: COMMON Restrictions on usage:ThisThese mediatype dependssubtypes depend on RTPframing,framing and henceisare only defined for transfer via RTP [RFC3550]. Transport within other framing protocols is not defined at this time. Author: Victor Demjanenko Change controller: IETF Payload working group delegated from the IESG. Provisional registration? (standards tree only): No4.24.2. Mapping to SDP The mapping of theabove definedabove-defined payload format mediatypesubtypes anditstheir parameters SHALL be done according to Section 3 of RFC 4855 [RFC4855]. The information carried in the media type specification has a specific mapping to fields in the Session Description Protocol (SDP) [RFC4566], which is commonly used to describe RTP sessions. When SDP is used to specify sessions employing the MELPe codec, the mapping is as follows: o The media type ("audio") goes in SDP "m=" as the media name. o The media subtype (payload format name) goes in SDP "a=rtpmap" as the encoding name. o The parameter "bitrate" goes in the SDP "a=fmtp" attribute by copying it as a "bitrate=<value>" string. o The parameters "ptime" and "maxptime" go in the SDP "a=ptime" and "a=maxptime" attributes, respectively. When conveying informationbyvia SDP, the encoding name SHALL be "MELP" (the same as the media subtype).AlternativeAlternate encoding nametypes,subtypes "MELP2400", "MELP1200", and"MELP600","MELP600" MAY be used in SDP to conveyfixed bit-ratefixed-bitrate configurations. These names have been observed in systems that do not support dynamicframe rateframe-rate switching as specified by theparameter,parameter "bitrate". An example of the media representation in SDP for describing MELPe might be: m=audio 49120 RTP/AVP 97 a=rtpmap:97 MELP/8000 An alternative example of SDP forfixed bit-ratefixed-bitrate configurations might be: m=audio 49120 RTP/AVP 97 100 101 102 a=rtpmap:97 MELP/8000 a=rtpmap:100 MELP2400/8000 a=rtpmap:101 MELP1200/8000 a=rtpmap:102 MELP600/8000 If the encoding name "MELP" is received without a "bitrate" parameter, the fixed coderbit ratebitrate of 2400 MUST be used. The alternate encodingnames,names "MELP2400", "MELP1200", and "MELP600" directly specify the MELPe coderbit ratebitrates of 2400, 1200, and600 respectively600, respectively, and MUST NOT specify a "bitrate" parameter. The optional media typeparameter,parameter "bitrate", when present, MUST be included in the "a=fmtp" attribute in the SDP, expressed as a media type string in the form of a semicolon-separated list of parameter=value pairs. Thestring, "value",string "value" can be one or more of 2400, 1200, and600600, separated by commas (where eachbit-ratebitrate value indicates the corresponding MELPe coder). An example of the media representation in SDP for describing MELPe when all three coderbit ratesbitrates are supported might be: m=audio 49120 RTP/AVP 97 a=rtpmap:97 MELP/8000 a=fmtp:97 bitrate=2400,600,1200 Parameterptime can not"ptime" cannot be used for the purpose of specifying the MELPe operating mode, due to the fact that forthecertain values it will be impossible to distinguish which mode is about to be used(e.g.(e.g., when ptime=68, it would be impossible to distinguish if the packet is carrying1 framesone frame of 67.5 ms or3three frames of 22.5ms etc.).ms). Note that the payload format (encoding) names are commonly shown in upper case. Media subtypes are commonly shown in lower case. These names arecase-insensitivecase insensitive in both places. Similarly, parameter names arecase-insensitive bothcase insensitive in both the media subtype name andinthe default mapping to the SDP a=fmtpattribute 4.3attribute. 4.3. Declarative SDP Considerations For declarative media, the "bitrate" parameterspecifesspecifies the possiblebit ratesbitrates used by the sender. Multiple MELPe rtpmap values (such as 97, 98, and9999, as used below) MAY be used to conveyMELPe codedMELPe-coded voice at differentbit rates.bitrates. The receiver can then select an appropriate MELPe codec by using 97, 98, or 99. m=audio 49120 RTP/AVP 97 98 99 a=rtpmap:97 MELP/8000 a=fmtp:97 bitrate=2400 a=rtpmap:98 MELP/8000 a=fmtp:98 bitrate=1200 a=rtpmap:99 MELP/8000 a=fmtp:99 bitrate=6004.44.4. Offer/Answer SDP Considerations Inanthe Offer/Answermodemodel [RFC3264], "bitrate" is abi-directionalbidirectional parameter. Both sides MUST use a common "bitrate" value or values. The offer contains thebit ratesbitrates supported by theoffererofferer, listed in its preferred order. The answerer MAY agree to anybit ratebitrate by listing thebit ratebitrate first in the answerer response.AdditionallyAdditionally, the answerer MAY indicate any secondarybit ratebitrate orbit ratesbitrates that it supports. The initialbit ratebitrate used by both parties SHALL be the firstbit ratebitrate specified in the answerer response. Forexampleexample, if offererbit ratesbitrates are"2400,600","2400,600" and answerbit ratesbitrates are "600,2400", the initialbit ratebitrate is 600. If otherbit ratesbitrates are provided by the answerer, any commonbit ratebitrate between the offer and answer MAY be used at any time in the future. Activation of these other commonbit ratesbitrates is beyond the scope of this document. The use of a lowerbit ratebitrate is often important for a case such as when oneend pointendpoint utilizes abandwidth constrainedbandwidth-constrained link(e.g.(e.g., 1200 bps radio link or slower), where only the lower coderbit ratebitrate will work.5 Discontinious Transmission5. Discontinuous Transmissions A primary application of MELPe is for radio communications of voiceconversationsconversations, and discontinuous transmissions are normal. When MELPe is used in an IP network, MELPe RTP packet transmissions may cease and resume frequently. RTPSSRCsynchronization source (SSRC) sequence number gaps indicate lost packets to be filled byPLCPLC, while abrupt loss of RTP packetsindicateindicates intended discontinuoustransmission.transmissions. If a MELPe coder so desires, it may send a comfort noise frame as perSCIP-210Appendix B of [SCIP210] prior to ceasing transmission. A receiver may optionally use comfort noise during its silence periods. No SDP negotiations are required.66. Packet Loss Concealment MELPe packet loss concealment (PLC) uses the special properties and coding for the pitch/voicing parameter of the MELPe 2400 bps coder. The PLC erasure indication utilizes any of the errored encodings of a non-voiced frame as identified in Table 1 of [MELPE]. For the sake ofsimplicitysimplicity, it is preferredto usethat a code value of 3 for the pitch/voicing parameter (represented by the bits P6 to P0 in Table3.1).1 of this document) be used. Hence, set bits P0 and P1 to one and bits P2, P3, P4, P5, and P6 to zero. When using PLC ina1200 bps or 600 bps mode, the MELPe 2400 bps decoder is called three or fourtimes respectivelytimes, respectively, to cover the loss of a MELPe frame.77. IANA ConsiderationsThis memo requests thatIANAregistershas registered MELP, MELP2400, MELP1200, and MELP600 as specified in Section 4.1.The media type isIANA has alsorequested to beadded these media subtypes to theIANA registry for"RTP Payload FormatMIMEmedia types" registry (http://www.iana.org/assignments/rtp-parameters).88. Security Considerations RTP packets using the payload format defined in this specification are subject to the security considerations discussed in the RTP specification[RFC3550],[RFC3550] and in any applicable RTP profile such as RTP/AVP [RFC3551], RTP/AVPF[RFC4855],[RFC4585], RTP/SAVP[RFC3711][RFC3711], or RTP/SAVPF [RFC5124]. However, as"Securing the RTP Protocol Framework: Why RTP Does Not Mandate a Single Media Security Solution" [RFC7202] discusses,discussed in [RFC7202], it is not an RTP payload format's responsibility to discuss or mandate what solutions are used to meetthesuch basic security goalslikeas confidentiality,integrityintegrity, and source authenticity for RTP in general. This responsibilitylays onlies with anyone using RTP in an application. They can find guidance on available security mechanisms and important considerations inOptions for Securing RTP Sessions[RFC7201]. Applications SHOULD use one or more appropriate strong security mechanisms. The rest of thissecurity considerationsection discusses thesecurity impactingsecurity-impacting properties of the payload format itself. This RTP payload format and the MELPe decoder do not exhibit any significant non-uniformity in the receiver-side computational complexity for packetprocessing,processing and thus are unlikely to pose a denial-of-service threat due to the receipt of pathological data.Nor doesAdditionally, the RTP payload format does not contain any active content.With respect toPlease see the security considerations discussed in [RFC6562] regarding VAD and its effect onbit rate, please see security consideration in RFC6562 [RFC6562]. 9 RFC Editor Considerations Note to RFC Editor: This section may be removed after carrying out all the instructions of this section. 10bitrates. 9. References10.19.1. Normative References[draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-circuit-breakers] Perkins, C. and V. Singh, "Multimedia Congestion Control: Circuit Breakers for Unicast RTP Sessions", draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-circuit-breakers-18 (work in progress), August 18, 2016.[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to IndicaterequirementRequirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March1997.1997, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. [RFC2736] Handley, M. and C. Perkins,C.,"Guidelines for Writers of RTP Payload Format Specifications", BCP 36, RFC 2736, DOI 10.17487/RFC2736, December1999.1999, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2736>. [RFC3264] Rosenberg, J. and H. Schulzrinne,H.,"An Offer/Answer Model withtheSession Description Protocol(SDP)" IETF(SDP)", RFC 3264, DOI 10.17487/RFC3264, June2002.2002, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3264>. [RFC3550] Schulzrinne, H., Casner, S., Frederick,R.R., and V. Jacobson,V.,"RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications",IETFSTD 64, RFC 3550, DOI 10.17487/RFC3550, July2003.2003, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3550>. [RFC3551] Schulzrinne,H.,H. and S. Casner,S.,"RTP Profile for Audio and Video Conferences with MinimalControl" IETFControl", STD 65, RFC 3551, DOI 10.17487/RFC3551, July2003.2003, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3551>. [RFC3711] Baugher,et al.,M., McGrew, D., Naslund, M., Carrara, E., and K. Norrman, "The SecureReal TimeReal-time TransportProtocol", IETFProtocol (SRTP)", RFC 3711, DOI 10.17487/RFC3711, March2004.2004, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3711>. [RFC4566] Handley, M., Jacobson,V.V., and C. Perkins,C.,"SDP: Session Description Protocol",IETFRFCRFC4566,4566, DOI 10.17487/RFC4566, July2006.2006, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4566>. [RFC4855] Casner, S., "Media Type Registration of RTP Payload Formats", RFC 4855, DOI 10.17487/RFC4855, February2007.2007, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4855>. [RFC5124] Ott, J. and E. Carrara,E.,"Extended Secure RTP Profile for Real-time Transport Control Protocol (RTCP)-BasedFeedback(RTP/SAVPF)",Feedback (RTP/SAVPF)", RFC 5124, DOI 10.17487/RFC5124, February2008.2008, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5124>. [RFC6562] Perkins, C. and JM. Valin,J. M.,"Guidelines for the Use of Variable Bit Rate Audio with Secure RTP", RFC 6562, DOI 10.17487/RFC6562, March2012.2012, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6562>. [RFC6838] Freed, N., Klensin,J.J., and T. Hansen,T.,"Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures", BCP 13, RFC 6838, DOI 10.17487/RFC6838, January2013.2013, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6838>. [RFC8083] Perkins, C. and V. Singh, "Multimedia Congestion Control: Circuit Breakers for Unicast RTP Sessions", RFC 8083,January 2017.DOI 10.17487/RFC8083, March 2017, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8083>. [RFC8085] Eggert, L., Fairhurst,G.G., and G. Shepherd,G.,"UDP Usage Guidelines", RFC 8085,February 2017.DOI 10.17487/RFC8085, March 2017, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8085>. [MELP] Department of Defense Telecommunications Standard,"Analog-to- Digital"Analog-to-Digital Conversion of Voice by 2,400 Bit/Second Mixed Excitation Linear Prediction (MELP)", MIL-STD-3005, December 1999. [MELPE] North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), "The 600 Bit/S, 1200 Bit/S and 2400 Bit/S NATO Interoperable Narrow Band Voice Coder", STANAG No. 4591, January 2006. [SCIP210] National Security Agency, "SCIP Signaling Plan", SCIP-210, December 2007.10.29.2. Informative References [RFC4585] Ott, J., Wenger, S., Sato, N., Burmeister, C., and J. Rey, "Extended RTP Profile for Real-time Transport Control Protocol (RTCP)-Based Feedback (RTP/AVPF)", RFC 4585, DOI 10.17487/RFC4585, July 2006, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4585>. [RFC7201] Westerlund, M. and C. Perkins,C.,"Options for Securing RTP Sessions", RFC 7201, DOI 10.17487/RFC7201, April2014.2014, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7201>. [RFC7202] Perkins, C. and M. Westerlund,M.,"Securing the RTP Framework: Why RTP Does Not Mandate a Single Media Security Solution", RFC 7202, DOI 10.17487/RFC7202, April2014.2014, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7202>. [RMCAT] IETF, RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques (rmcat) Working Group, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/rmcat/about/>. Authors' Addresses Victor Demjanenko, Ph.D. VOCAL Technologies, Ltd. 520 Lee Entrance, Suite 202 Buffalo, NY 14228USAUnited States of America Phone: +1 716 688 4675 Email: victor.demjanenko@vocal.com David Satterlee VOCAL Technologies, Ltd. 520 Lee Entrance, Suite 202 Buffalo, NY 14228USAUnited States of America Phone: +1 716 688 4675 Email: david.satterlee@vocal.com