<?xmlversion='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?> <?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='http://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/authoring/rfc2629.xslt' ?>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM"rfc2629.dtd"> <?rfc toc="yes"?> <?rfc tocompact="yes"?> <?rfc tocdepth="4"?> <?rfc tocindent="yes"?> <?rfc symrefs="yes"?> <?rfc sortrefs="yes"?> <?rfc compact="yes"?> <?rfc subcompact="no"?>"rfc2629-xhtml.ent"> <rfccategory="std"xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" ipr="trust200902"docName="draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag-07">docName="draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag-07" number="8943" obsoletes="" updates="" submissionType="IETF" category="std" consensus="true" xml:lang="en" tocInclude="true" tocDepth="4" symRefs="true" sortRefs="true" version="3"> <!-- xml2rfc v2v3 conversion 3.1.1 --> <front> <title abbrev="CBORTagTags for Date">Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) Tags for Date</title> <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8943"/> <author fullname="Michael B. Jones" surname="Jones"initials="M.B.">initials="M."> <organization>Microsoft</organization> <address> <email>mbj@microsoft.com</email> <uri>https://self-issued.info/</uri> </address> </author> <author fullname="Anthony Nadalin" initials="A." surname="Nadalin"> <organization>Independent</organization> <address> <email>nadalin@prodigy.net</email> </address> </author> <author fullname="Jörg Richter" initials="J." surname="Richter"> <organization>pdv Financial Software GmbH</organization> <address> <email>joerg.richter@pdv-fs.de</email> </address> </author> <dateday="10" month="September" year="2020" />month="November" year="2020"/> <area>Applications</area> <workgroup>CBOR Working Group</workgroup> <keyword>Compact Binary Object Representation</keyword> <keyword>CBOR</keyword> <keyword>Tag</keyword> <keyword>Date</keyword><keyword>Internet-Draft</keyword><abstract> <t> The Concise Binary Object Representation(CBOR,(CBOR), as specified in RFC7049)7049, is a data format whose design goals include the possibility of extremely small code size, fairly small message size, and extensibility without the need for version negotiation. </t> <t> In CBOR, one point of extensibility is the definition of CBOR tags. RFC 7049 defines two tags for time: CBOR tag 0(RFC 3339 date/time string)(date/time string as per RFC 3339) and tag 1(Posix(POSIX "seconds since the epoch"). Since then, additional requirements have become known. This specification defines a CBOR tag foran RFC 3339a date textstring,string (as per RFC 3339) for applications needing a textual date representation within the Gregorian calendar without a time. It also defines a CBOR tag for days since the date 1970-01-01 in the Gregorian calendar for applications needing a numeric date representation without a time. This specification isintended asthe reference document for IANA registration of the CBOR tags defined. </t> </abstract> </front> <middle> <section anchor="Introduction"title="Introduction">numbered="true" toc="default"> <name>Introduction</name> <t> The Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) <xreftarget="RFC7049"/>target="RFC7049" format="default"/> provides for the interchange of structured data without a requirement for a pre-agreed schema. RFC 7049 defines a basic set of data types, as well as a tagging mechanism that enables extending the set of data types supported via an IANA registry. </t> <t> This specification defines a CBOR tag for a text string representing a date without a time. The tagged text string is represented as specified by the RFC 3339 <xreftarget="RFC3339"/> <spanx style="verb">full-date</spanx>target="RFC3339" format="default"/> <tt>full-date</tt> production. Per RFC 3339, this represents a date within the Gregorian calendar. </t> <t> This specification also defines a CBOR tag for an integer representing a date without a time. The tagged integer is an unsigned or negative value indicating the number of days since the Gregorian calendar date 1970-01-01. As an implementation note, this value has a constant offset from the Modified Julian Date value (which is defined by the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory as the number of days since November 17, 1858); this value is the Modified Julian Date minus 40587. </t> <t> Note that since both tags are for dates without times, times of day, time zones, and leap seconds are not applicable to these values. These tags are both for representations of Gregorian calendar dates. </t><!-- No RFC 2119 keywords are used in this document. <section anchor="rnc" title="Requirements Notation and Conventions"> <t> The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 <xref target="RFC2119"/> <xref target="RFC8174"/> when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. </t> </section> --><section anchor="CalendarDates"title="Calendar Dates">numbered="true" toc="default"> <name>Calendar Dates</name> <t> Calendar dates are used for numerous human use cases, such as marking the dates of significant events. For instance, John Lennon was born on October 9, 1940 and died on December 8, 1980. One such use case is driver's licenses, which typically include a date of birth. The dates used in this specification use the Gregorian calendar, as do those in RFC 3339 <xreftarget="RFC3339"/>.target="RFC3339" format="default"/>. The time zones and actual times of these events are intentionally not represented in the calendar date. </t> <t> The epoch chosen for the second tag, which represents days since the Gregorian calendar date 1970-01-01, is related to the<xref target="POSIX.1">IEEEIEEE Std 1003.1, 2013Edition</xref>Edition <xref target="POSIX.1" format="default"></xref> time epoch 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z UTC only insofar as both contain the date 1970-01-01. This should not be construed as indicating that dates using this tag represent either a specific time of day and/or time zone. </t> <t> The day of the week (Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, etc.) is not explicitly represented in either of these date formats. However, deterministic algorithms that are beyond the scope of this specification can be used to derive the day of the week in the Gregorian calendar from dates represented in both of these formats. </t> <section anchor="Examples"title="Examplenumbered="true" toc="default"> <name>Example DateRepresentations">Representations</name> <t> This table contains example representations for dates using both tags. </t><texttable> <ttcol align="left">Date</ttcol> <ttcol<table align="center"> <thead> <tr> <th align="left">Date</th> <th align="left">Tag1004</ttcol> <ttcol1004</th> <th align="left">Tag100</ttcol> <c>October100</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td align="left">October 9,1940</c> <c>"1940-10-09"</c> <c>-10676</c> <c>December1940</td> <td align="left">"1940-10-09"</td> <td align="left">-10676</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="left">December 8,1980</c> <c>"1980-12-08"</c> <c>3994</c> </texttable>1980</td> <td align="left">"1980-12-08"</td> <td align="left">3994</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </section> </section> <section anchor="ComparingDates"title="Comparing Dates">numbered="true" toc="default"> <name>Comparing Dates</name> <t> Comparison of dates in<spanx style="verb">full-date</spanx><tt>full-date</tt> format can be accomplished by normal string comparison,sincesince, by design, the digits representing the date are in fixed format and ordered from most significant to least significant. Comparison of numeric dates representing days since 1970-01-01 can be performed by normal integer comparison. Comparison of dates in other formats or using other calendars require conversions that are beyond the scope of this specification. </t> <t> Note that different dates may correspond to the same moment in time, depending upon the time zone in which the date was determined. For instance, at many times of the day, a conference call occurring on a particular date in Japan will simultaneously occur on the previous date in Hawaii; at many times of the day, Japan's Friday corresponds with Hawaii's Thursday. </t> </section> <section anchor="ComparingDatesAndTimes"title="Comparingnumbered="true" toc="default"> <name>Comparing Dates and Date/TimeValues">Values</name> <t> Comparing dates with date/time values, which represent a particular moment in time, is beyond the scope of this specification. That said, if a date is augmented with a time zone and time of day, a specific date/time value can bedetermineddetermined, and comparing that date/time value to others becomes possible. For instance, if one were to augment John Lennon's birth date of October 9, 1940 with the time of day and time zone of his birth, then it would be possible to derive a date/time at which he was born that could be compared with other date/time values. </t> </section> </section> <section anchor="IANA"title="IANA Considerations">numbered="true" toc="default"> <name>IANA Considerations</name> <section anchor="cose-algorithms-registrations"title="Concisenumbered="true" toc="default"> <name>Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) TagsRegistrations">Registrations</name> <t> This section registers the following values in the IANA "Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) Tags" registry <xreftarget="IANA.cbor-tags"/>.target="IANA.cbor-tags" format="default"/>. </t><t> <?rfc subcompact="yes"?> <list style='symbols'> <t> Tag: 1004 </t> <t> Data Item: UTF-8<dl newline="false" spacing="compact"> <dt>Tag:</dt> <dd>1004</dd> <dt>Data Item:</dt> <dd>UTF-8 textstring </t> <t> Semantics: RFC 3339string</dd> <dt>Semantics:</dt> <dd><xref target="RFC3339"/> full-datestring </t> <t> Reference: [[ this specification ]] </t> </list> </t> <t> <list style='symbols'> <t> Tag: 100string</dd> <dt>Reference:</dt> <dd>RFC 8943</dd> </dl> <dl newline="false" spacing="compact"> <dt>Tag:</dt> <dd>100 (ASCII'd') </t> <t> Data Item: Unsigned'd')</dd> <dt>Data Item:</dt> <dd>Unsigned or negativeinteger </t> <t> Semantics: Numberinteger</dd> <dt>Semantics:</dt> <dd>Number of days since the epoch date1970-01-01 </t> <t> Reference: [[ this specification ]] </t> </list> </t> <?rfc subcompact="no"?>1970-01-01</dd> <dt>Reference:</dt> <dd>RFC 8943</dd> </dl> </section> </section> <section anchor="Security"title="Security Considerations">numbered="true" toc="default"> <name>Security Considerations</name> <t> The security considerations of RFC 7049 apply; the tags introduced here are not expected to raise security considerations beyond those. </t> <t> A date, of course, has significant security considerations. These include the exploitation of ambiguities where the date is security relevant or where the date is used in access control decisions. </t> <t> When using a calendar date for decisionmaking, for examplemaking (for example, accesscontrol,control), it needs to be noted that since calendar dates do not represent a specific point in time, the results of the evaluation can differ depending upon where the decision is made. For instance, a person may have reached their 21st birthday in Japan while simultaneously being a day short of their 21st birthday in Hawaii. Similarly, it would be inappropriate to use only a date to trigger certificate expiration, since a date corresponds to a range of timesworldwide,worldwide rather than a specific point in time that is independent of geographic location. </t> </section> </middle> <back><references title="Normative References"> <!-- <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2119.xml"?> --> <?rfc include="reference.RFC.3339.xml"?> <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7049.xml"?> <!-- <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8174.xml"?> --><displayreference target="I-D.bormann-cbor-time-tag" to="TIME-TAGS"/> <references> <name>References</name> <references> <name>Normative References</name> <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3339.xml"/> <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7049.xml"/> </references><references title="Informative References"><references> <name>Informative References</name> <reference anchor="IANA.cbor-tags"target="http://www.iana.org/assignments/cbor-tags">target="https://www.iana.org/assignments/cbor-tags"> <front> <title>Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) Tags</title> <author> <organization>IANA</organization> </author><date/></front> </reference> <reference anchor="POSIX.1"target="http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap04.html#tag_04_15">target="https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799.2013edition"> <front> <title>The Open Group Base Specifications Issue 7</title> <author> <organization>IEEE</organization> </author> <date year="2013"/> </front> <seriesInfo name="IEEE" value="Std1003.1, 2013 Edition"/>1003.1"/> <refcontent>2013 Edition</refcontent> </reference> <!-- draft-bormann-cbor-time-tag-03: Expired Internet Draft--> <xi:include href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.bormann-cbor-time-tag-03.xml"/> </references> </references> <sectiontitle="Acknowledgements"anchor="Acknowledgements"numbered="no">numbered="false" toc="default"> <name>Acknowledgements</name> <t> Thanks toCarsten Bormann<contact fullname="Carsten Bormann"/> for supporting creation of this specification. Parts of the explanatory text in this specification come fromdraft-bormann-cbor-time-tag-02.<xref target="I-D.bormann-cbor-time-tag"></xref>. </t> <t> Thanks to these people for reviews of the specification:Henk Birkholz, Carsten Bormann, Samita Chakrabarti, Roman Danyliw, Linda Dunbar, Benjamin Kaduk, Erik Kline, Warren Kumari, Barry Leiba, Thiago Macieira, Francesca Palombini, Michael Richardson, Kyle Rose, Jim Schaad, Jürgen Schönwälder, Éric Vyncke, Robert Wilton, and Dale Worley. </t> </section> <section title="Document History" anchor="History"> <t> [[ to be removed by the RFC Editor before publication as an RFC ]] </t> <t> -07 <list style='symbols'> <t> Acknowledged Linda Dunbar for her GenArt review and Samita Chakrabarti for her IOT-Dir review, as well as IESG reviewers. </t> </list> </t> <t> -06 <list style='symbols'> <t> Addressed SecDir review comments by Kyle Rose. </t> <t> Updated Tony Nadalin's affiliation and contact information. </t> </list> </t> <t> -05 <list style='symbols'> <t> Incorporated additional suggestions by Carsten Bormann and Juergen Schoenwaelder. </t> </list> </t> <t> -04 <list style='symbols'> <t> Addressed shepherd comments by Francesca Palombini. </t> <t> Addressed additional review comments by Jim Schaad<contact fullname="Henk Birkholz"/>, <contact fullname="Carsten Bormann"/>, <contact fullname="Samita Chakrabarti"/>, <contact fullname="Roman Danyliw"/>, <contact fullname="Linda Dunbar"/>, <contact fullname="Benjamin Kaduk"/>, <contact fullname="Erik Kline"/>, <contact fullname="Warren Kumari"/>, <contact fullname="Barry Leiba"/>, <contact fullname="Thiago Macieira"/>, <contact fullname="Francesca Palombini"/>, <contact fullname="Michael Richardson"/>, <contact fullname="Kyle Rose"/>, <contact fullname="Jim Schaad"/>, <contact fullname="Juergen Schoenwaelder"/>, <contact fullname="Éric Vyncke"/>, <contact fullname="Robert Wilton"/>, andMichael Richardson. </t> </list> </t> <t> -03 <list style='symbols'> <t> Added statement that these tags are both for representations of calendar dates. </t> <t> Described consequences of using calendar dates in access control decisions. </t> </list> </t> <t> -02 <list style='symbols'> <t> Addressed working group last call comments, including stating that time zones are not applicable to these values. </t> </list> </t> <t> -01 <list style='symbols'> <t> Changed "positive or negative" to "unsigned or negative". </t> <t> Added an implementation note about the relationship to Modified Julian Dates. </t> </list> </t> <t> -00 <list style='symbols'> <t> Initial working group version based on draft-jones-cbor-date-tag-01 with no normative changes. </t> </list><contact fullname="Dale Worley"/>. </t> </section> </back> </rfc>