<?xml version="1.0"encoding="US-ASCII"?>encoding="UTF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM"rfc2629.dtd"> <?rfc toc="yes"?> <?rfc tocompact="yes"?> <?rfc tocdepth="3"?> <?rfc tocindent="yes"?> <?rfc symrefs="yes"?> <?rfc sortrefs="yes"?> <?rfc comments="yes"?> <?rfc inline="yes"?> <?rfc compact="yes"?> <?rfc subcompact="no"?>"rfc2629-xhtml.ent"> <rfccategory="std"xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" docName="draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-15"ipr="trust200902">number="9089" ipr="trust200902" obsoletes="" updates="" submissionType="IETF" category="std" consensus="true" xml:lang="en" tocInclude="true" tocDepth="3" symRefs="true" sortRefs="true" version="3"> <front> <title abbrev="Signaling ELC and ERLDusingUsing OSPF">Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label Depth Using OSPF</title> <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9089"/> <author fullname="Xiaohu Xu"initials="X.X."initials="X." surname="Xu"><organization>Alibaba Inc</organization><organization>Capitalonline</organization> <address><!-- <postal> <street></street> --> <!-- Reorder these if your country does things differently --> <!-- <city>Soham</city> <region></region> <code></code> <country>UK</country> </postal> <phone>+44 7889 488 335</phone> --> <email>xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com</email> <!-- uri and facsimile elements may also be added --><email>xiaohu.xu@capitalonline.net</email> </address> </author> <author fullname="Sriganesh Kini"initials="S.K"initials="S." surname="Kini"> <organization/> <address><postal> <street/> <city/> <region/> <code/> <country/> </postal> <phone/> <facsimile/><email>sriganeshkini@gmail.com</email> <uri/> </address> </author> <author fullname="Peter Psenak" initials="P." surname="Psenak"> <organization>Cisco Systems, Inc.</organization> <address> <postal><street>Eurovea<extaddr>Eurovea Centre, Central3</street>3</extaddr> <street>Pribinova Street 10</street> <city>Bratislava</city> <code>81109</code> <country>Slovakia</country> </postal> <email>ppsenak@cisco.com</email> </address> </author> <author fullname="Clarence Filsfils" initials="C." surname="Filsfils"> <organization>Cisco Systems, Inc.</organization> <address> <postal> <street/> <city>Brussels</city> <region/> <code/> <country>Belgium</country> </postal> <email>cfilsfil@cisco.com</email> </address> </author> <author fullname="Stephane Litkowski"initials="S.L."initials="S." surname="Litkowski"> <organization>Cisco Systems, Inc.</organization> <address> <postal> <street>La Rigourdiere</street> <city>Cesson Sevigne</city> <code/> <country>France</country> </postal> <email>slitkows@cisco.com</email> <uri/> </address> </author> <author fullname="Matthew Bocci"initials="M.B."initials="M." surname="Bocci"> <organization>Nokia</organization> <address> <postal><street>Shoppenhangers Road</street> <city>Maidenhead, Berks</city> <code/> <country>UK</country><street>Aztec West Business Park</street> <city>Bristol</city> <extaddr>740 Waterside Drive</extaddr> <code>BS32 4UF</code> <country>United Kingdom</country> </postal> <email>matthew.bocci@nokia.com</email> <uri/> </address> </author><date/> <area>Routing Area</area> <workgroup>LSR Working Group</workgroup> <keyword>Sample</keyword> <keyword>Draft</keyword><date year="2021" month="August"/> <area>RTG</area> <workgroup>LSR</workgroup> <abstract> <t>Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) has defined a mechanism to load-balance traffic flows using Entropy Labels (EL). An ingress Label Switching Router (LSR) cannot insert ELs for packets going into a given Label Switched Path (LSP) unless an egress LSR has indicated via signaling that it has the capability to process ELs, referred to as the Entropy Label Capability (ELC), on that LSP. In addition, it would be useful for ingress LSRs to know each LSR's capability for reading the maximum label stack depth and performing EL-based load-balancing, referred to as Entropy Readable Label Depth (ERLD). This document defines a mechanism to signal these two capabilities using OSPFv2 andOSPFv3OSPFv3, andBGP-LS.</t>Border Gateway Protocol - Link State (BGP-LS).</t> </abstract> </front> <middle> <sectiontitle="Introduction">numbered="true" toc="default"> <name>Introduction</name> <t><xreftarget="RFC6790"/>target="RFC6790" format="default"/> describes a method to load-balance Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) traffic flows using Entropy Labels (EL). It also introduces the concept of Entropy Label Capability (ELC) and defines the signaling of this capability via MPLS signaling protocols. Recently, mechanisms have been defined to signal labels via link-state Interior Gateway Protocols (IGP) such as OSPFv2 <xreftarget="RFC8665"/>target="RFC8665" format="default"/> and OSPFv3 <xreftarget="RFC8666"/>.target="RFC8666" format="default"/>. Thisdraftdocument defines a mechanism to signal the ELC using OSPFv2 and OSPFv3.</t> <t>In cases where Segment Routing (SR) is used with the MPLSData Planedata plane (e.g., SR-MPLS <xreftarget="RFC8660"/>),target="RFC8660" format="default"/>), it would be useful for ingress LSRs to know each intermediate LSR's capability of reading the maximum label stack depth and performing EL-based load-balancing. This capability, referred to as Entropy Readable Label Depth (ERLD) as defined in <xreftarget="RFC8662"/>,target="RFC8662" format="default"/>, may be used by ingress LSRs to determine the position of the EL label in the stack, and whether it is necessary to insert multiple ELs at different positions in the label stack. This document defines a mechanism to signal the ERLD using OSPFv2 and OSPFv3.</t> </section> <section anchor="Teminology"title="Terminology">numbered="true" toc="default"> <name>Terminology</name> <t>This memo makes use of the terms defined in <xreftarget="RFC6790"/>,target="RFC6790" format="default"/> and <xreftarget="RFC8662"/>.</t>target="RFC8662" format="default"/>.</t> <t>The key words"MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY","<bcp14>MUST</bcp14>", "<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>NOT RECOMMENDED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>MAY</bcp14>", and"OPTIONAL""<bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14>" in this document are to be interpreted as described inBCP 14BCP 14 <xreftarget="RFC2119"/>target="RFC2119" format="default"/> <xreftarget="RFC8174"/>target="RFC8174" format="default"/> when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.</t> <t>The key word OSPF is used throughout the document to refer to both OSPFv2 and OSPFv3.</t> </section> <section anchor="ELC_ADV"title="Advertisingnumbered="true" toc="default"> <name>Advertising ELC UsingOSPF">OSPF</name> <t>Even though ELC is a property of the node, in some cases it is advantageous to associate and advertise the ELC with a prefix. In multi-area networks, routers may not know the identity of the prefix originator in a remotearea,area or may not know the capabilities of such an originator. Similarly, in amulti domainmulti-domain network, the identity of the prefix originator and its capabilities may not be known to the ingress LSR.</t> <t>If a router has multiple interfaces, the routerMUST NOT<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> announce ELC unless all of its interfaces are capable of processing ELs.</t> <t>If the router supports ELs on all of its interfaces, itSHOULD<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> advertise the ELC with every local host prefix it advertises in OSPF.</t> <section anchor="Advertising_OSPFv2"title="Advertisingnumbered="true" toc="default"> <name>Advertising ELC UsingOSPFv2">OSPFv2</name> <t><xreftarget="RFC7684"/>target="RFC7684" format="default"/> defines the OSPFv2 Extended Prefix TLV to advertise additional attributes associated with a prefix. The OSPFv2 Extended Prefix TLV includes a one-octet Flags field. A new flag in the Flags field is used to signal the ELC for the prefix:<list style="hanging"> <t>0x20</t> <dl newline="true" spacing="normal"> <dt>0x20 - E-Flag (ELCFlag):Flag):</dt><dd> Set by the advertising router to indicate that the prefix originator is capable of processingELs.</t> </list></t>ELs.</dd> </dl> <t>The ELC signalingMUST<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be preserved when an OSPF Area Border Router (ABR) distributes information between areas. To do so, an ABRMUST<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> originate an OSPFv2 Extended Prefix OpaqueLSALink State Advertisement (LSA) <xreftarget="RFC7684"/>target="RFC7684" format="default"/> including the received ELC setting.</t> <t>When an OSPF Autonomous SystemBoundaryBorder Router (ASBR) redistributes a prefix from another instance of OSPF or from some other protocol, itSHOULD<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> preserve the ELC signaling for the prefix if it exists. To do so, an ASBRSHOULD<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> originate an Extended Prefix Opaque LSA <xreftarget="RFC7684"/>target="RFC7684" format="default"/> including the ELC setting of the redistributed prefix. The flooding scope of the Extended Prefix Opaque LSAMUST<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> match the flooding scope of the LSA that an ASBR originates as a result of the redistribution. The exact mechanism used to exchange ELC between protocol instances on an ASBR is outside of the scope of this document.</t> </section> <section anchor="Advertising_OSPFv3"title="Advertisingnumbered="true" toc="default"> <name>Advertising ELC UsingOSPFv3">OSPFv3</name> <t><xreftarget="RFC5340"/>target="RFC5340" format="default"/> defines the OSPFv3 PrefixOptions field to indicate capabilities associated with a prefix. A new bit in the OSPFv3 PrefixOptions field is used to signal the ELC for the prefix:<list style="hanging"> <t>0x40</t> <dl newline="true" spacing="normal"> <dt> 0x40 - E-Flag (ELCFlag):Flag):</dt><dd> Set by the advertising router to indicate that the prefix originator is capable of processingELs.</t>ELs.</dd> </dl> <t>The ELC signalingMUST<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be preserved when an OSPFv3 Area Border Router (ABR) distributes information between areas. The setting of the ELC Flag in the Inter-Area-Prefix-LSA <xreftarget="RFC5340"/>target="RFC5340" format="default"/> or in the Inter-Area-Prefix TLV <xreftarget="RFC8362"/>,target="RFC8362" format="default"/>, generated by an ABR,MUST<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be the same as the value the ELC Flag associated with the prefix in the source area.</t> <t>When an OSPFv3 Autonomous SystemBoundaryBorder Router (ASBR) redistributes a prefix from another instance of OSPFv3 or from some other protocol, itSHOULD<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> preserve the ELC signaling for the prefix if it exists. The setting of the ELC Flag in the AS-External-LSA,NSSA-LSANot-So-Stubby Area LSA (NSSA-LSA) <xreftarget="RFC5340"/>target="RFC5340" format="default"/>, or in the External-Prefix TLV <xreftarget="RFC8362"/>,target="RFC8362" format="default"/>, generated by an ASBR,MUST<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be the same as the value of the ELC Flag associated with the prefix in the source domain. The exact mechanism used to exchange ELC between protocol instances on the ASBR is outside of the scope of this document.</t></list></t></section> </section> <section anchor="ERLD_ADV"title="Advertisingnumbered="true" toc="default"> <name>Advertising ERLD UsingOSPF">OSPF</name> <t>The ERLD is advertised in a NodeMSDMaximum SID Depth (MSD) TLV[RFC8476]<xref target="RFC8476"/> using the ERLD-MSD type defined in <xreftarget="I-D.ietf-isis-mpls-elc"/>.</t>target="RFC9088" format="default"/>.</t> <t>If a router has multiple interfaces with different capabilities of reading the maximum label stack depth, the routerMUST<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> advertise the smallest value found across all of its interfaces.</t> <t>The absence of ERLD-MSD advertisements indicates only that the advertising node does not support advertisement of this capability.</t> <t>When the ERLD-MSD type is received in the OSPFv2 or OSPFv3 Link MSDSub-TLVsub-TLV <xreftarget="RFC8476"/>,target="RFC8476" format="default"/>, itMUST<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored.</t> <t>The considerations for advertising the ERLD are specified in <xreftarget="RFC8662"/>.</t>target="RFC8662" format="default"/>.</t> </section> <section anchor="BGPLS"title="Signalingnumbered="true" toc="default"> <name>Signaling ELC and ERLD inBGP-LS">BGP-LS</name> <t>The OSPF extensions defined in this document can be advertised via BGP-LS(Distribution(distribution of Link-State and TEInformation Usinginformation using BGP) <xreftarget="RFC7752"/>target="RFC7752" format="default"/> using existing BGP-LS TLVs.</t> <t>The ELC is advertised using the Prefix Attribute Flags TLV as defined in <xreftarget="I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext"/>.</t>target="RFC9085" format="default"/>.</t> <t>The ERLD-MSD is advertised using the Node MSD TLV as defined in <xreftarget="I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd"/>.</t>target="RFC8814" format="default"/>.</t> </section> <section anchor="IANA"title="IANA Considerations"> <t>Early allocationnumbered="true" toc="default"> <name>IANA Considerations</name> <t>IANA hasbeen done by IANAcompleted the following actions for thisdocument as follows: <list style="hanging"> <t>-document: </t> <ul> <li> Flag 0x20 in theOSPFv2"OSPFv2 Extended Prefix TLVFlagsFlags" registry has been allocatedby IANAto the E-Flag (ELCFlag).</t> <t>-Flag).</li> <li> Bit 0x40 in the "OSPFv3 Prefix Options (8 bits)" registry has been allocatedby IANAto the E-Flag (ELCFlag).</t> </list></t>Flag).</li> </ul> </section> <section anchor="Security"title="Security Considerations">numbered="true" toc="default"> <name>Security Considerations</name> <t>This document specifies the ability to advertise additional node capabilities using OSPF and BGP-LS. As such, the security considerations as described in <xreftarget="RFC5340"/>,target="RFC5340" format="default"/>, <xreftarget="RFC7770"/>,target="RFC7684" format="default"/>, <xreftarget="RFC7752"/>,target="RFC7752" format="default"/>, <xreftarget="RFC7684"/>,target="RFC7770" format="default"/>, <xreftarget="RFC8476"/>,target="RFC8476" format="default"/>, <xreftarget="RFC8662"/>,target="RFC8662" format="default"/>, <xreftarget="I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext"/>target="RFC8814" format="default"/>, and <xreftarget="I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd"/>target="RFC9085" format="default"/> are applicable to this document.</t> <t>Incorrectly setting theE flagE-Flag during origination,propagationpropagation, or redistribution may lead to poor or no load-balancing of the MPLS traffic orblack-holing ofto the MPLS traffic being discarded on the egressnode.</t>node. </t> <t>Incorrectly setting of the ERLD value may lead to poor or no load-balancing of the MPLS traffic.</t> </section> </middle> <back> <references> <name>References</name> <references> <name>Normative References</name> <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml"/> <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6790.xml"/> <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7770.xml"/> <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7684.xml"/> <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5340.xml"/> <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7752.xml"/> <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8174.xml"/> <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8476.xml"/> <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8662.xml"/> <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8362.xml"/> <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8814.xml"/> <reference anchor='RFC9088' target='https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9088'> <front> <title>Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label Depth Using IS-IS</title> <author initials='X' surname='Xu' fullname='Xiaohu Xu'> <organization /> </author> <author initials='S' surname='Kini' fullname='Sriganesh Kini'> <organization /> </author> <author initials='P' surname='Psenak' fullname='Peter Psenak'> <organization /> </author> <author initials='C' surname='Filsfils' fullname='Clarence Filsfils'> <organization /> </author> <author initials='S' surname='Litkowski' fullname='Stephane Litkowski'> <organization /> </author> <author initials='M' surname='Bocci' fullname='Matthew Bocci'> <organization /> </author> <date month='August' year='2021' /> </front> <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9088"/> <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9088"/> </reference> <reference anchor='RFC9085' target='https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9085'> <front> <title>Border Gateway Protocol - Link State (BGP-LS) Extensions for Segment Routing</title> <author initials='S' surname='Previdi' fullname='Stefano Previdi'> <organization /> </author> <author initials='K' surname='Talaulikar' fullname='Ketan Talaulikar' role='editor'> <organization /> </author> <author initials='C' surname='Filsfils' fullname='Clarence Filsfils'> <organization /> </author> <author initials='H' surname='Gredler' fullname='Hannes Gredler'> <organization /> </author> <author initials='M' surname='Chen' fullname='Mach(Guoyi) Chen'> <organization /> </author> <date month='August' year='2021' /> </front> <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9085"/> <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9085"/> </reference> </references> <references> <name>Informative References</name> <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8660.xml"/> <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8665.xml"/> <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8666.xml"/> </references> </references> <section anchor="Acknowledgements" numbered="false" toc="default"> <name>Acknowledgements</name> <t>The authors would like to thank <contact fullname="Yimin Shen"/>, <contact fullname="George Swallow"/>, <contact fullname="Acee Lindem"/>, <contact fullname="Les Ginsberg"/>, <contact fullname="Ketan Talaulikar"/>, <contact fullname="Jeff Tantsura"/> , <contact fullname="Bruno Decraene"/>, and <contact fullname="Carlos Pignataro"/> for their valuable comments.</t> </section> <section anchor="CONTR"title="Contributors">numbered="false" toc="default"> <name>Contributors</name> <t>The following people contributed to the content of this document and should be consideredas co-authors:</t> <t><figure> <artwork><![CDATA[ Guntercoauthors:</t> <contact fullname="Gunter Van de Velde(editor) Nokia Antwerp BE Email: gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com Wim Henderickx Nokia Belgium Email: wim.henderickx@nokia.com Keyur Patel Arrcus USA Email: keyur@arrcus.com ]]></artwork> </figure></t> </section> <section anchor="Acknowledgements" title="Acknowledgements"> <t>The authors would like to thank Yimin Shen, George Swallow, Acee Lindem, Les Ginsberg, Ketan Talaulikar, Jeff Tantsura , Bruno Decraene and Carlos Pignataro for their valuable comments.</t> <!---->(editor)"> <organization>Nokia</organization> <address> <postal> <city>Antwerp</city> <country>Belgium</country> </postal> <email>gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com</email> </address> </contact> <contact fullname="Wim Henderickx"> <organization>Nokia</organization> <address> <postal> <country>Belgium</country> </postal> <email>wim.henderickx@nokia.com</email> </address> </contact> <contact fullname="Keyur Patel"> <organization>Arrcus</organization> <address> <postal> <country>United States of America</country> </postal> <email>keyur@arrcus.com</email> </address> </contact> </section></middle> <back> <references title="Normative References"> <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2119"?> <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6790"?> <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7770"?> <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7684"?> <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5340"?> <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7752"?> <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8174"?> <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8476"?> <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8662"?> <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8362"?> <?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-isis-mpls-elc"?> <?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext"?> <?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd"?> </references> <references title="Informative References"> <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8660"?> <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8665"?> <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8666"?> </references></back> </rfc>