IDR Working Group

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                          C. Loibl
Internet-Draft
Request for Comments: 9184                       next layer Telekom GmbH
Updates: 7153 7153, 8955 (if approved)                        16 December 2021
Intended status:                                         January 2022
Category: Standards Track
Expires: 19 June 2022
ISSN: 2070-1721

                BGP Extended Community Registries Update
                 draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-05

Abstract

   This document updates several BGP Extended Community registries in
   order to replace the "Experimental Use" registration procedure in
   some entries, since their use is clearly not experimental and is thus
   misleading.

   This document updates RFC7153 RFCs 7153 and RFC8955. 8955.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents an Internet Standards Track document.

   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
   (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list  It represents the consensus of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid the IETF community.  It has
   received public review and has been approved for a maximum publication by the
   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
   Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of six months RFC 7841.

   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
   and how to provide feedback on it may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents obtained at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on 19 June 2022.
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9184.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2021 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
   license-info)
   (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the
   Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described
   in the Revised BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
     2.1.  Registry: BGP Transitive Extended Community Types . . . .   3
     2.2.  Registry: Generic Transitive Experimental Use Extended
           Community Sub-Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     2.3.  Registry: Generic Transitive Experimental Use Extended
           Community Part 2 Sub-Types  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     2.4.  Registry: Generic Transitive Experimental Use Extended
           Community Part 3 Sub-Types  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   3.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   4.  Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   5.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     5.1.
     4.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     5.2.
     4.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   Acknowledgements
   Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5

1.  Introduction

   [RFC7153] reorganizes the

   The IANA registries for the type values and sub-type values of the
   BGP Extended Communities attribute. attribute were reorganized by [RFC7153].  As
   a
   result the result, IANA maintained maintains a registry entitled "BGP Transitive Extended
   Community Types" Types", which includes a range of Type Values type values (0x80-0x8F)
   reserved for Experimental Use. Use [RFC8126].  Out of this experimental range the
   range, types 0x80, 0x81, and 0x82 have been used in [RFC5575] and
   [RFC7674] (both documents were rendered Obsolete obsolete by [RFC8955]).  The
   primary use for those types and the sub-type registries is non non-
   experimental.

   Section 2 of this document requests describes updates to the registry cleanup to reflect the actual use
   of those code-points (removing "Experimental Use" from
   the sub-type registry names) and changes code points by changing the registration procedure
   of the types 0x80, 0x81, 0x82 from
   "Experimental Use" to use the First "First Come First Served
   policy Served" [RFC8126] and thus updates for the
   types 0x80-0x82 (and removing "Experimental Use" from the sub-type
   registry names), thereby updating [RFC7153] and [RFC8955].

2.  IANA Considerations

2.1.  Registry: BGP Transitive Extended Community Types

   IANA maintains a registry entitled "BGP Transitive Extended Community
   Types".  IANA is requested to add [this document] has added RFC 9184 to the Reference reference of this registry, update registry.
   They have also updated the Name name of the Type Values type values according to
   Table 1 and append added RFC 9184 as a reference to [this document] to for the existing
   references. entries.

   +=======+==============================================+===========+
   | Type  | Name                                         | Reference |
   | Value |                                              |           |
   +=======+==============================================+===========+
   | 0x80  | Generic Transitive Extended Community (Sub-  | [add this RFC 9184  |
   |       | Types are defined in the "Generic Transitive | document]           |
   |       | Extended Community Sub-Types" registry)      |           |
   +-------+----------------------------------------------+-----------+
   | 0x81  | Generic Transitive Extended Community Part 2 | [add this RFC 9184  |
   |       | (Sub-Types are defined in the "Generic       | document]           |
   |       | Transitive Extended Community Part 2 Sub-    |           |
   |       | Types" registry)                             |           |
   +-------+----------------------------------------------+-----------+
   | 0x82  | Generic Transitive Extended Community Part 3 | [add this RFC 9184  |
   |       | (Sub-Types are defined in the "Generic       | document]           |
   |       | Transitive Extended Community Part 3 Sub-    |           |
   |       | Types" registry)                             |           |
   +-------+----------------------------------------------+-----------+

        Table 1: Registry: BGP Transitive Extended Community Types

   Furthermore

   Furthermore, IANA is requested to change has changed the registration procedures of this
   registry of Type Values for type values 0x80 thru through 0x82 to First Come First Served
   [RFC8126].  The resulting Registration Procedures registration procedures should read as in
   Table 2.

       +===========+===============================================+
       | Range     | Registration Procedures                       |
       +===========+===============================================+
       | 0x00-0x3f | First Come First Served                       |
       +-----------+-----------------------------------------------+
       | 0x80-0x82 | First Come First Served (see [this document]) RFC 9184)        |
       +-----------+-----------------------------------------------+
       | 0x83-0x8f | Reserved for Experimental Use (see [RFC3692]) |
       +-----------+-----------------------------------------------+
       | 0x90-0xbf | Standards Action                              |
       +-----------+-----------------------------------------------+

         Table 2: Registration Procedures: BGP Transitive Extended
                              Community Types

2.2.  Registry: Generic Transitive Experimental Use Extended Community
      Sub-Types

   IANA maintains a registry entitled "Generic Transitive Experimental
   Use Extended Community Sub-Types".  IANA is requested to add [this
   document] has added RFC 9184 to the Reference
   reference of this registry and update updated the registry title to:

      "Generic Transitive Extended Community Sub-Types"

2.3.  Registry: Generic Transitive Experimental Use Extended Community
      Part 2 Sub-Types

   IANA maintains a registry entitled "Generic Transitive Experimental
   Use Extended Community Part 2 Sub-Types".  IANA is requested to add
   [this document] has added RFC 9184 to
   the Reference reference of this registry and update updated the registry title to:

      "Generic Transitive Extended Community Part 2 Sub-Types"

2.4.  Registry: Generic Transitive Experimental Use Extended Community
      Part 3 Sub-Types

   IANA maintains a registry entitled "Generic Transitive Experimental
   Use Extended Community Part 3 Sub-Types".  IANA is requested to add
   [this document] has added RFC 9184 to
   the Reference reference of this registry and update updated the registry title to:

      "Generic Transitive Extended Community Part 3 Sub-Types"

3.  Security Considerations

   There are no direct security considerations arising from this
   document.

4.  Acknowledgements

   The author wants to thank Alvaro Retana who pointed out, that the
   IANA registry contains misleading entries in this context.

5.  References

5.1.

4.1.  Normative References

   [RFC7153]  Rosen, E. and Y. Rekhter, "IANA Registries for BGP
              Extended Communities", RFC 7153, DOI 10.17487/RFC7153,
              March 2014, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7153>.

   [RFC8126]  Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for
              Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26,
              RFC 8126, DOI 10.17487/RFC8126, June 2017,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8126>.

5.2.

4.2.  Informative References

   [RFC3692]  Narten, T., "Assigning Experimental and Testing Numbers
              Considered Useful", BCP 82, RFC 3692,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC3692, January 2004,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3692>.

   [RFC5575]  Marques, P., Sheth, N., Raszuk, R., Greene, B., Mauch, J.,
              and D. McPherson, "Dissemination of Flow Specification
              Rules", RFC 5575, DOI 10.17487/RFC5575, August 2009,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5575>.

   [RFC7674]  Haas, J., Ed., "Clarification of the Flowspec Redirect
              Extended Community", RFC 7674, DOI 10.17487/RFC7674,
              October 2015, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7674>.

   [RFC8955]  Loibl, C., Hares, S., Raszuk, R., McPherson, D., and M.
              Bacher, "Dissemination of Flow Specification Rules",
              RFC 8955, DOI 10.17487/RFC8955, December 2020,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8955>.

Acknowledgements

   The author wants to thank Alvaro Retana, who pointed out that the
   IANA registry contains misleading entries in this context.

Author's Address

   Christoph Loibl
   next layer Telekom GmbH
   Mariahilfer Guertel 37/7
   1150 Vienna
   Austria

   Phone: +43 664 1176414
   Email: cl@tix.at