wdiff rfc9281v1.txt rfc9281.txt

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) R. Salz
Request for Comments: 9281 Akamai Technologies
BCP: 11 June 2022
Obsoletes: 2028
Category: Best Current Practice
ISSN: 2070-1721

Entities Involved in the IETF Standards Process

Abstract

This document describes the individuals and organizations involved in
the IETF standards process, as described in BCP 9. It includes brief
descriptions of the entities involved and the role they play in the
standards process.

The IETF and its structure have undergone many changes since RFC 2028
was published in 1996. This document reflects the changed
organizational structure of the IETF and obsoletes RFC 2028.

Status of This Memo

This memo documents an Internet Best Current Practice.

This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
received public review and has been approved for publication by the
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on
BCPs is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841.

Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9281.

This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the
Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described
in the Revised BSD License.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction
1.1. Terminology
1.2. Changes since RFC 2028
2. Key Individuals in the Process
2.1. The Document Editor or Author
2.2. The Working Group Chair
2.3. The Area Director
3. Key Organizations in the Process
3.1. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
3.2. Working Groups (WGs)
3.3. Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG)
3.4. Internet Architecture Board (IAB)
3.5. The RFC Production Center (RPC)
3.6. Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA)
3.7. Internet Research Task Force (IRTF)
3.8. The IETF Trust
3.9. IETF Administration LLC (IETF LLC)
3.10. IETF Secretariat
3.11. Internet Society (ISOC)
4. Security Considerations
5. IANA Considerations
6. Informative References
Acknowledgements
Author's Address

1. Introduction

The process used by the IETF community for the standardization of
protocols and procedures is described in BCP 9 [IETFPROCS]. That document BCP 9
defines the stages in the standardization process, the requirements
for moving a document between stages, and the types of documents used
during this process. This document identifies some of the key
individual roles and organizations in that process.

1.1. Terminology

This document refers to individual roles in the singular, such as "a
document editor." In reality, many roles are filled by more than one
person at the same time. For clarity, this document does not use
phrases like "chair (or co-chair)."

1.2. Changes since RFC 2028

The following changes have been made, in no particular order:

* Added the role of responsible area director (AD) and reordered
Section 2 to follow the typical workflow.

* Added the IETF Administration LLC and the IETF Trust to Section 3.

* Changed "RFC Editor" to "RFC Production Center" to reflect the
changes made by [RFCEDMODEL].

* Added the Acknowledgements Terminology and Section 1.1. Acknowledgements sections.

* Cleaned up some wording throughout the document.

2. Key Individuals in the Process

This section describes the individual roles involved in the process.
It attempts to list the roles in the order in which they are involved
in the process, without otherwise expressing significance.

2.1. The Document Editor or Author

Most working groups (WGs) focus their efforts on one or more
documents that capture their work results. The WG chair designates
one or more people to serve as the editor(s) for a particular
document. The editor is responsible for ensuring that the contents
of the document accurately reflect the decisions that have been made
by the working group. WG.

When a document is composed and edited mainly by one or more
individuals, they may be referred to as "document authors". The
distinction is not significant for the standards process. This
document uses the term "document editor".

When a document editor is a chair of the same working group, WG, another chair
should manage the process around the document. If another chair is
not available, the WG and AD must monitor the process especially
carefully to ensure that the resulting documents accurately reflect
the consensus of the working group WG and that all processes are followed. This is
the collective obligation of all parties involved in the document.

2.2. The Working Group Chair

Each working group WG is headed by a chair who has the responsibility for
facilitating the group's activities, presiding over the group's
meetings, and ensuring that the commitments of the group with respect
to its role in the Internet standards process are met. In
particular, the WG chair is the formal point of contact between the
WG and the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG), via the AD of
the area to which the WG belongs.

The details on the selection and responsibilities of a WG chair can
be found in [WGPROCS].

2.3. The Area Director

Each working group WG is assigned a single responsible area director (AD). The AD
can assist the WG chair in assessing consensus and executing process.
The AD also reviews documents after the WG has approved them, and
when satisfied, the AD coordinates the IESG review and IETF Last Call
of the document.

An AD can also sponsor an Internet-Draft directly, but this is not
very common. When this is done, a working group WG is not involved.

Except for the General Area, IETF areas traditionally have multiple
area directors.
ADs.

3. Key Organizations in the Process

The following organizations and organizational roles are involved in
the Internet standards process.

3.1. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)

The IETF is an open international community of network designers,
operators, implementors, researchers, and other interested parties
who are concerned with the evolution of the Internet architecture and
the smooth operation of the Internet. It is the principal body
engaged in the development of new Internet Standard specifications
and related documents.

3.2. Working Groups (WGs)

The technical work of the IETF is done in its working groups, WGs, which are
organized by topics into several areas
(https://www.ietf.org/topics/areas/), (https://www.ietf.org/topics/
areas/), each under the coordination of an area director. Working groups AD. WGs typically have a
narrow focus and a lifetime bounded by completion of specific tasks
as defined in their charter and milestones. Some working groups WGs are long-lived
and intended to conduct ongoing maintenance on IETF protocol(s).
There are also "dispatch" working groups WGs that assess where new work in the IETF
should be done but do not directly produce standards.

For all purposes relevant to the Internet Standards development
process, membership in the IETF and its working groups WGs is defined to be
established solely and entirely by individuals who participate in
IETF and working group WG activities. These individuals do not formally represent
any organizations they may be affiliated with, although affiliations
are often used for identification.

Anyone with the time and interest to do so is entitled and urged to
participate actively in one or more working groups WGs and to attend IETF meetings,
which are usually held three times a year [MEETINGS]. A WG may also
schedule interim meetings (virtual, in-person, or hybrid). These are
scheduled and announced to the entire WG. Active working
group WG participation is
possible without attending any in-person meetings.

Participants in the IETF and its working groups WGs must disclose any relevant
current or pending intellectual property rights that are reasonably
and personally known to the participant if they participate in
discussions about a specific technology. The full intellectual
property policy is defined in [IPRRIGHTS1] and [IPRRIGHTS2].

New working groups WGs are established by the IESG and almost always have a specific
and explicit charter. The charter can be modified as the
working group WG
progresses. The guidelines and procedures for the formation and
operation of working groups WGs are described in detail in [WGPROCS].

A working group WG is managed by a WG chair, as described in Section 2.2.
Documents produced by the group have an editor, as described in
Section 2.1. Further details of working group WG operation can be found in
[WGPROCS].

Working groups

WGs ideally display a spirit of cooperation as well as a high degree
of technical maturity; IETF participants recognize that the greatest
benefit for all members of the Internet community results from
cooperative development of technically excellent protocols and
services.

3.3. Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG)

The IESG is responsible for the management of the IETF technical
activities. It administers the Internet Standards process according
to the rules and procedures defined in [IETFPROCS]. The IESG is
responsible for the actions associated with the progression of
documents along the IETF Stream, including the initial approval of
new working groups, WGs, any subsequent rechartering, and the final approval of
documents. The IESG is composed of the area directors ADs and the IETF Chair. The
IETF Chair also chairs the IESG and is the
area director AD for the General Area.
The Chair of the Internet Architecture Board (IAB) is an ex officio
member of the IESG. Various other bodies have liaisons with the IESG.
IESG; the full list can be found at
<https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/members/>.

All members of the IESG are nominated by a Nominations Committee
(colloquially, "NomCom") and are confirmed by the IAB. See [NOMCOM]
for a detailed description of the NomCom procedures. Other matters
concerning the organization and operation of the NomCom are described
in the IESG Charter [IESG].

3.4. Internet Architecture Board (IAB)

The IAB provides oversight of the architecture of the Internet and
its protocols. The IAB approves IESG candidates put forward by the
NomCom. It also reviews all proposed IETF WG charters.

The IAB provides oversight of the standards process and serves as an
appeal board for related complaints about improper execution
[IETFPROCS]. In general, it acts as a source of advice about
technical, architectural, procedural, and policy matters pertaining
to the Internet and its enabling technologies.

The members of the IAB are nominated by the NomCom and are confirmed
by the Board of the Internet Society (ISOC). The IETF Chair is also
a member of the IAB, and the Chair of the Internet Research Task
Force (IRTF) is an ex officio member. Other matters concerning the
IAB's organization and operation are described in the IAB Charter
[IAB].

3.5. The RFC Production Center (RPC)

Publication

Editorial preparation and publication of RFCs is are handled by the RFC
Production Center (RPC),
including editorial preparation and publication. (RPC). RFC policy is defined by the RFC Series
Working Group (RSWG), an open group (similar to IETF working groups), WGs), and
approved by the RFC Series Advisory Board (RSAB), which has appointed
members. The RFC Series Consulting Editor (RSCE) is a position
funded by the IETF Administration LLC, with responsibilities to consult with all parties
and be a member of the RSAB. defined
in [RFCEDMODEL].

Full details on the roles and responsibilities of the RPC are
specified in [RFCEDMODEL], in particular Section 4.

3.6. Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA)

Many protocol specifications include parameters that must be uniquely
assigned. Examples of this include port numbers, option identifiers
within a protocol, and so on. The Internet Assigned Numbers
Authority (IANA) is responsible for assigning values to these
protocol parameters, maintained in parameters and maintaining parameter registries. These registries are maintained online
(https://www.iana.org/protocols). Assignments are coordinated by
writing an "IANA Considerations" section for a given document, as
described in [IANADOCS]. The IETF's relationship with IANA is
defined by formal agreements, including [IANAMOU].

IANA is also responsible for operating and maintaining several
aspects of the DNS (https://www.iana.org/domains) and coordinating of
IP address assignments (https://www.iana.org/numbers).

3.7. Internet Research Task Force (IRTF)

The IRTF focuses on longer-term research issues related to the
Internet as a parallel organization to the IETF, which focuses on the
shorter-term issues of engineering, operations, and specification of
standards.

The IRTF consists of a number of research groups (RGs) chartered to
research various aspects related to the broader Internet. The
products of these RGs are typically research results that are often
published in scholarly conferences and journals, but they can also be
published as RFCs on the IRTF Stream. RGs also sometimes develop
experimental protocols or technologies, some of which may be suitable
for possible standardization in IETF. Similarly, IETF working groups WGs sometimes
ask RGs for advice or other input. However, contributions from RGs
generally carry no more weight in the IETF than other community input
and go through the same standards-setting process as any other
proposal.

The IRTF is managed by the IRTF Chair in consultation with the
Internet Research Steering Group (IRSG). The IRSG membership
includes the IRTF Chair, the chairs of the various RGs, and possibly
other individuals ("members at large") from the community. Details
of the organization and operation of the IRTF, the ISRG, and its RGs
may be found in [IRTF], [IABIRTF], [IRTFPRIMER], and [IRTFCHAIR].

3.8. The IETF Trust

The IETF Trust is the legal owner of intellectual property for the
IETF, IRTF, and IAB. This includes their trademarks, the copyrights
to RFCs and to works of the IETF such as the IETF website, and
copyright licenses for IETF contributions including Internet-Drafts.
The principles for the copyright licenses granted to and from the
Trust are described in [IPRRIGHTS1] and [COPYRIGHT], and the licenses
themselves are in the Trust Legal Provisions
(https://trustee.ietf.org/documents/trust-legal-provisions/).

The Trust also currently owns IANA's domain names and trademarks
through an agreement with the IANA clients. IANA.

The Trustees that govern the Trust are selected from the IETF
community, as described in [TRUSTEES] and the rationale given in
[TRUSTRAT].

3.9. IETF Administration LLC (IETF LLC)

The IETF Administration Limited Liability Company (colloquially, the
"IETF LLC") provides the corporate legal home for the IETF, the IAB,
and the IRTF.

The IETF LLC is responsible for supporting the ongoing operations of
the IETF, managing its finances and budget, and raising money. It
regularly reports to the community. The IETF LLC is the legal entity
that signs contracts for the IETF Secretariat, meeting hotels, tools
development contractors, among many others. The IETF LLC also
responds to legal requests; these are often subpoenas in patent
lawsuits.

Selection of the IETF LLC Board of Directors is defined in [NOMCOM].

The IETF Executive Director handles the IETF's daily tasks and
management and is overseen by the IETF LLC Board of Directors.

Section 6 of [ISOCIETF] describes the legal relationship between the
IETF LLC and the Internet Society.

3.10. IETF Secretariat

The administrative functions necessary to support the activities of
the IETF and its various related boards and organizations are
performed by a Secretariat contracted by the IETF LLC. The IETF
Secretariat handles much of the logistics of running the in-person
meetings and is responsible for maintaining the formal public record
of the Internet standards process [IETFPROCS].

3.11. Internet Society (ISOC)

ISOC plays an important role in the standards process. In addition
to being the legal entity that hosts the IETF LLC, ISOC appoints the
NomCom Chair, confirms IAB candidates selected by the NomCom, and
acts as the final authority in the appeals process. This is
described in [ISOCIETF].

The way in which the ISOC leadership is selected and other matters
concerning the operation of the Internet Society are described in
[ISOC].

4. Security Considerations

This document introduces no new security considerations.

5. IANA Considerations

This document has no IANA actions.

6. Informative References

[COPYRIGHT]
Halpern, J., Ed., "Advice to the Trustees of the IETF
Trust on Rights to Be Granted in IETF Documents",
RFC 8721, DOI 10.17487/RFC8721, February 2020,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8721>.

[IAB] Internet Architecture Board and B. Carpenter, Ed.,
"Charter of the Internet Architecture Board (IAB)",
BCP 39, RFC 2850, May 2000.

<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/bcp39>

[IABIRTF] Floyd, S., Ed., Paxson, V., Ed., Falk, A., Ed., and IAB,
"IAB Thoughts on the Role of the Internet Research Task
Force (IRTF)", RFC 4440, DOI 10.17487/RFC4440, March 2006,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4440>.

[IANADOCS] Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for
Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26,
RFC 8126, June 2017.

<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/bcp26>

[IANAMOU] Carpenter, B., Baker, F., and M. Roberts, "Memorandum of
Understanding Concerning the Technical Work of the
Internet Assigned Numbers Authority", RFC 2860,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2860, June 2000,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2860>.

[IESG] Alvestrand, H., "An IESG charter", RFC 3710,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3710, February 2004,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3710>.

[IETFPROCS]
Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision
3", BCP 9, RFC 2026, October 1996.

Dusseault, L. and R. Sparks, "Guidance on Interoperation
and Implementation Reports for Advancement to Draft
Standard", BCP 9, RFC 5657, September 2009.

Housley, R., Crocker, D., and E. Burger, "Reducing the
Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels", BCP 9, RFC 6410,
October 2011.

Resnick, P., "Retirement of the "Internet Official
Protocol Standards" Summary Document", BCP 9, RFC 7100,
December 2013.

Kolkman, O., Bradner, S., and S. Turner, "Characterization
of Proposed Standards", BCP 9, RFC 7127, January 2014.

Dawkins, S., "Increasing the Number of Area Directors in
an IETF Area", BCP 9, RFC 7475, March 2015.

Halpern, J., Ed. and E. Rescorla, Ed., "IETF Stream
Documents Require IETF Rough Consensus", BCP 9, RFC 8789,
June 2020.

<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/bcp9>

[IPRRIGHTS1]
Bradner, S., Ed. and J. Contreras, Ed., "Rights
Contributors Provide to the IETF Trust", BCP 78, RFC 5378,
November 2008.

<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/bcp78>

[IPRRIGHTS2]
Bradner, S. and J. Contreras, "Intellectual Property
Rights in IETF Technology", BCP 79, RFC 8179, May 2017.

<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/bcp79>

[IRTF] Weinrib, A. and J. Postel, "IRTF Research Group Guidelines
and Procedures", BCP 8, RFC 2014, DOI 10.17487/RFC2014,
October 1996, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2014>.

[IRTFCHAIR]
Eggert, L., "The Role of the IRTF Chair", RFC 7827,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7827, March 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7827>.

[IRTFPRIMER]
Dawkins, S., Ed., "An IRTF Primer for IETF Participants",
RFC 7418, DOI 10.17487/RFC7418, December 2014,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7418>.

[ISOC] Internet Society, "Amended and restated By-Laws of the
Internet Society", May 2021,
<https://www.internetsociety.org/about-internet-society/
governance-policies/by-laws/>.

[ISOCIETF] Camarillo, G. and J. Livingood, "The IETF-ISOC
Relationship", RFC 8712, DOI 10.17487/RFC8712, February
2020, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8712>.

[MEETINGS] Krishnan, S., "High-Level Guidance for the Meeting Policy
of the IETF", BCP 226, RFC 8719, DOI 10.17487/RFC8719,
February 2020, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8719>.

[NOMCOM] Kucherawy, M., Ed., Hinden, R., Ed., and J. Livingood,
Ed., "IAB, IESG, IETF Trust, and IETF LLC Selection,
Confirmation, and Recall Process: Operation of the IETF
Nominating and Recall Committees", BCP 10, RFC 8713,
February 2020.

Leiba, B., "Eligibility for the 2020-2021 Nominating
Committee", BCP 10, RFC 8788, May 2020.

<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/bcp10>

[RFC2028] Hovey, R. and S. Bradner, "The Organizations Involved in
the IETF Standards Process", BCP 11, RFC 2028,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2028, October 1996,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2028>.

[RFCEDMODEL]
Saint-Andre, P., Ed., "RFC Editor Model (Version 3)",
RFC 9280, DOI 10.17487/RFC9280, June 2022,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9280>.

[TRUSTEES] Arkko, J. and T. Hardie, "Update to the Process for
Selection of Trustees for the IETF Trust", BCP 101,
RFC 8714, DOI 10.17487/RFC8714, February 2020,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8714>.

[TRUSTRAT] Arkko, J., "IETF Administrative Support Activity 2.0:
Update to the Process for Selection of Trustees for the
IETF Trust", RFC 8715, DOI 10.17487/RFC8715, February
2020, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8715>.

[WGPROCS] Bradner, S., "IETF Working Group Guidelines and
Procedures", BCP 25, RFC 2418, September 1998.

Wasserman, M., "Updates to RFC 2418 Regarding the
Management of IETF Mailing Lists", BCP 25, RFC 3934,
October 2004.

Resnick, P. and A. Farrel, "IETF Anti-Harassment
Procedures", BCP 25, RFC 7776, March 2016.

Resnick, P. and A. Farrel, "Update to the IETF Anti-
Harassment Procedures for the Replacement of the IETF
Administrative Oversight Committee (IAOC) with the IETF
Administration LLC", BCP 25, RFC 8716, February 2020.

<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/bcp25>

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the authors of [RFC2028] -- Richard Hovey and
Scott Bradner.

Barry Lieba, Leiba, Colin Perkins, Eric Auerswald, John Levine, and Lars
Eggert provided useful feedback and corrections to this document.

Author's Address

Rich Salz
Akamai Technologies
Email: rsalz@akamai.com