<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="rfc2629.xslt" ?>
<!-- generated by https://github.com/cabo/kramdown-rfc version 1.6.10 (Ruby 3.0.2) --> version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629-xhtml.ent"> [
 <!ENTITY nbsp    "&#160;">
 <!ENTITY zwsp   "&#8203;">
 <!ENTITY nbhy   "&#8209;">
 <!ENTITY wj     "&#8288;">
]>

<rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" ipr="trust200902" docName="draft-ietf-quic-manageability-18" submissionType="IETF" category="info" consensus="true" docName="draft-ietf-quic-manageability-18" number="9312" tocInclude="true" sortRefs="true" symRefs="true" updates="" obsoletes="" xml:lang="en" version="3">
  <!-- xml2rfc v2v3 conversion 3.5.0 -->

  <front>
    <title abbrev="QUIC Manageability">Manageability of the QUIC Transport Protocol</title>
    <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-quic-manageability-18"/> name="RFC" value="9312"/>
    <author initials="M." surname="Kuehlewind" surname="Kühlewind" fullname="Mirja Kuehlewind"> Kühlewind">
      <organization>Ericsson</organization>
      <address>
        <email>mirja.kuehlewind@ericsson.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author initials="B." surname="Trammell" fullname="Brian Trammell">
      <organization>Google Switzerland GmbH</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>Gustav-Gull-Platz 1</street>
          <city>8004 Zurich</city>
          <city>Zurich</city>
          <code>8004</code>
	  <country>Switzerland</country>
        </postal>
        <email>ietf@trammell.ch</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <date year="2022" month="July" day="15"/>
    <keyword>Internet-Draft</keyword> month="September"/>
     <area>tsv</area>
     <workgroup>quic</workgroup>

<keyword>network management</keyword>
<keyword>wire image</keyword>

    <abstract>
      <t>This document discusses manageability of the QUIC transport protocol, focusing protocol and focuses
on the implications of QUIC's design and wire image on network operations
involving QUIC traffic. It is intended as a "user's manual" for the wire image,
providing image to
provide guidance for network operators and equipment vendors who rely on the
use of transport-aware network functions.</t>
    </abstract>
  </front>
  <middle>
    <section anchor="introduction">
      <name>Introduction</name>
      <t>QUIC <xref target="QUIC-TRANSPORT"/> target="RFC9000"/> is a new transport protocol
that is encapsulated in UDP. QUIC integrates TLS
<xref target="QUIC-TLS"/> target="RFC9001"/> to encrypt all payload data and most control
information. QUIC version 1 was designed primarily as a transport for HTTP, HTTP with
the resulting protocol being known as HTTP/3 <xref target="QUIC-HTTP"/>.</t> target="RFC9114"/>.</t>
      <t>This document provides guidance for network operations that manage QUIC
traffic. This includes guidance on how to interpret and utilize information that
is exposed by QUIC to the network, requirements and assumptions of the QUIC
design with respect to network treatment, and a description of how common
network management practices will be impacted by QUIC.</t>
      <t>QUIC is an end-to-end transport protocol; therefore, no information in
the protocol header is intended to be mutable by the network. This
property is
enforced through integrity protection of the wire image <xref target="WIRE-IMAGE"/>. target="RFC8546"/>.
Encryption of most transport-layer control signaling means that less information
is visible to the network than is the case with in comparison to TCP.</t>
      <t>Integrity protection can also simplify troubleshooting at the end points as none
of the nodes on the network path can modify transport layer information.
However, it means in-network operations that depend on modification of data
(for examples, see <xref target="RFC9065"/>) are not possible without the cooperation of
a QUIC endpoint. Such cooperation might be possible with the introduction of
a proxy which that authenticates as an endpoint. Proxy operations are not in scope
for this document.</t>
      <t>Network management is not a one-size-fits-all endeavour: endeavor; for example, practices considered
necessary or even mandatory within enterprise networks with certain compliance
requirements, for example,
requirements would be impermissible on other networks without
those requirements. The Therefore, presence of a particular practice in this document
should therefore not be construed as a recommendation to apply it. For each
practice, this document describes what is and is not possible with the QUIC
transport protocol as defined.</t>
      <t>This document focuses solely on network management practices that observe
traffic on the wire. Replacement For example, replacement of troubleshooting based on observation
with active measurement techniques, for example, techniques is therefore out of scope.
A more generalized treatment of network management operations on encrypted
transports is given in <xref target="RFC9065"/>.</t>
      <t>QUIC-specific terminology used in this document is defined
in <xref target="QUIC-TRANSPORT"/>.</t> target="RFC9000"/>.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="sec-wire-image">
      <name>Features of the QUIC Wire Image</name>
      <t>This section discusses those aspects of the QUIC transport protocol that
have an impact on the design and operation of devices that forward QUIC packets.
This
Therefore, this section is therefore primarily considering the unencrypted part of QUIC's
wire image <xref target="WIRE-IMAGE"/>, target="RFC8546"/>, which is defined as the information available in the
packet header in each QUIC packet, and the dynamics of that information. Since
QUIC is a versioned protocol, the wire image of the header format can also
change from version to version. However, the field that identifies the QUIC
version in some packets, packets and the format of the Version Negotiation Packet, packet
are both inspectable and invariant
<xref target="QUIC-INVARIANTS"/>.</t> target="RFC8999"/>.</t>
      <t>This document addresses version 1 of the QUIC protocol, whose wire image
is fully defined in <xref target="QUIC-TRANSPORT"/> target="RFC9000"/> and <xref target="QUIC-TLS"/>. target="RFC9001"/>. Features of the wire
image described herein may change in future versions of the protocol, protocol except
when specified as an invariant <xref target="QUIC-INVARIANTS"/>, target="RFC8999"/>
and cannot be used to identify QUIC as a protocol or
to infer the behavior of future versions of QUIC.</t>
      <section anchor="public-header">
        <name>QUIC Packet Header Structure</name>
        <t>QUIC packets may have either a long header or a short header. The first bit
of the QUIC header is the Header Form bit, bit and indicates which type of header
is present. The purpose of this bit is invariant across QUIC versions.</t>
        <t>The long header exposes more information. It contains a version number, as well
as source Source and destination connection Destination Connection IDs for associating packets with a QUIC
connection. The definition and location of these fields in the QUIC long header
are invariant for future versions of QUIC, although future versions of QUIC may
provide additional fields in the long header <xref target="QUIC-INVARIANTS"/>.</t> target="RFC8999"/>.</t>
        <t>In version 1 of QUIC, the long header is used during connection establishment
to transmit crypto CRYPTO handshake data, perform version negotiation, retry, and
send 0-RTT data.</t>
        <t>Short headers are used after a connection establishment in version 1 of QUIC, QUIC
and expose only an optional destination connection Destination Connection ID and the initial flags
byte with the spin bit for RTT measurement.</t>
        <t>The following information is exposed in QUIC packet headers in all versions of
QUIC (as specified in <xref target="QUIC-INVARIANTS"/>):</t>
        <ul target="RFC8999"/>):</t>
        <dl spacing="normal">
          <li>version number: the
          <dt>version number:</dt>
	  <dd>The version number is present in the long header, header and
identifies the version used for that packet. During Version
Negotiation (see <xref section="17.2.1" sectionFormat="of" target="QUIC-TRANSPORT"/> target="RFC9000"/> and <xref target="version"/>), the
version number
Version field has a special value (0x00000000) that identifies the
packet as a Version Negotiation packet. QUIC
version 1 uses version 0x00000001. Operators should expect to observe
packets with other version numbers as a result of various Internet
experiments, future standards, and greasing (<xref target="RFC7801"/>). <xref target="RFC7801"/>. An IANA registry
contains the values of all standardized versions of QUIC, and may contain some
proprietary versions (see <xref section="22.2" sectionFormat="of" target="QUIC-TRANSPORT"/>). target="RFC9000"/>).
However, other versions of QUIC can be expected to be seen in the Internet at any given time.</li>
          <li>source time.</dd>
          <dt>Source and destination connection ID: short Destination Connection ID:</dt> <dd>Short and long headers carry a
destination connection
Destination Connection ID, which is a variable-length field which, if field. If the Destination Connection ID is not zero-length, zero length,
it can be used to
identify the connection associated with a QUIC packet, packet for load-balancing load balancing and
NAT rebinding purposes; see Sections <xref target="sec-loadbalancing"/> target="sec-loadbalancing" format="counter"/> and <xref target="rebinding"/>. target="rebinding" format="counter"/>. Long
packet headers additionally carry a source connection Source Connection ID. The source
connection ID corresponds to the destination connection Source
Connection ID the source would
like to have on packets sent to it, and is only present on long
headers.
headers and indicates the Destination Connection
ID that the other endpoint should use when sending packets.
On long header packets, the length of the connection
IDs is also present; on short header packets, the length of the destination
connection Destination
Connection ID is implicit and implicit, as such need to be it is known from the preceding long header
packets.</li>
        </ul>
packets.</dd>
        </dl>
        <t>In version 1 of QUIC, the following additional information is exposed:</t>
        <ul
        <dl spacing="normal">
          <li>"fixed bit": The
          <dt>"Fixed Bit":</dt> <dd>In version 1 of QUIC, the second-most-significant bit of the first octet
is set to 1, unless the packet is a Version Negotiation packet or
an extension is used that modifies the usage of most QUIC
packets of this bit.
If the current version bit is set to 1, enabling it enables endpoints to easily demultiplex
with other UDP-encapsulated protocols. Even though this bit is fixed in the
version 1 specification, endpoints might use an extension that varies the bit
<xref target="QUIC-GREASE"/>. target="RFC9287"/>. Therefore, observers cannot reliably use it as an identifier
for QUIC.</li>
          <li>latency QUIC.</dd>
          <dt>latency spin bit: The bit:</dt> <dd>The third-most-significant bit of the first octet in the
short header for version 1. The spin bit is set by endpoints such that
tracking edge transitions can be used to passively observe end-to-end RTT. See
<xref target="spin-usage"/> for further details.</li>
          <li>header type: The details.</dd>
          <dt>header type:</dt> <dd>The long header has a 2 bit 2-bit packet type field following the
Header Form and fixed bits. Fixed Bits. Header types correspond to stages of the
handshake; see <xref section="17.2" sectionFormat="of" target="QUIC-TRANSPORT"/> target="RFC9000"/> for details.</li>
          <li>length: The details.</dd>
          <dt>length:</dt> <dd>The length of the remaining QUIC packet after the length field, Length field
present on long headers. This field is used to implement coalesced packets
during the handshake (see <xref target="coalesced"/>).</li>
          <li>token: target="coalesced"/>).</dd>
          <dt>token:</dt> <dd> Initial packets may contain a token, a variable-length opaque value
optionally sent from client to server, used for validating the client's
address. Retry packets also contain a token, which can be used by the client
in an Initial packet on a subsequent connection attempt. The length of the
token is explicit in both cases.</li>
        </ul> cases.</dd>
        </dl>
        <t>Retry (<xref section="17.2.5" sectionFormat="of" target="QUIC-TRANSPORT"/>) target="RFC9000"/>) and Version Negotiation (<xref section="17.2.1" sectionFormat="of" target="QUIC-TRANSPORT"/>) target="RFC9000"/>) packets are not encrypted. Retry packets are
(forgibly)
integrity protected.  Transport parameters are used to
authenticate the contents of Retry packets later in the handshake. For other
kinds of packets, version 1 of QUIC cryptographically protects other
information in the packet headers:</t>
        <ul
        <dl spacing="normal">
          <li>packet number: All
          <dt>Packet Number:</dt> <dd>All packets except Version Negotiation and
Retry packets have an associated packet number; however, this packet number
is encrypted, and therefore not of use to on-path observers. The offset of the
packet number can be decoded in long headers, headers while it
is implicit (depending on destination connection Destination Connection ID length) in short headers.
The length of the packet number is cryptographically protected.</li>
          <li>key phase: The protected.</dd>
          <dt>Key Phase:</dt> <dd>The Key Phase bit, present bit (present in short headers, headers) specifies the keys
used to encrypt the packet to support key rotation. The Key Phase bit is
cryptographically protected.</li>
        </ul> protected.</dd>
        </dl>
      </section>
      <section anchor="coalesced">
        <name>Coalesced Packets</name>
        <t>Multiple QUIC packets may be coalesced into a single UDP datagram, datagram
with a datagram
carrying one or more long header packets followed by zero or one short header
packets. When packets are coalesced, the Length fields in the long headers are
used to separate QUIC packets; see <xref section="12.2" sectionFormat="of" target="QUIC-TRANSPORT"/>. target="RFC9000"/>.
The Length field is variable length, a variable-length field, and its position in the header is
also variable varies depending on the length lengths of the source Source and destination connection
ID; Destination Connection
IDs; see <xref section="17.2" sectionFormat="of" target="QUIC-TRANSPORT"/>.</t> target="RFC9000"/>.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="use-of-port-numbers">
        <name>Use of Port Numbers</name>
        <t>Applications that have a mapping for TCP as well as and QUIC are expected to
use the same port number for both services. However, as for all other IETF
transports <xref target="RFC7605"/>, there is no guarantee that a specific application
will use a given registered port, port or that a given port carries traffic belonging
to the respective registered service, especially when application layer
information is encrypted. For example, <xref target="QUIC-HTTP"/> target="RFC9114"/> specifies the use of the
HTTP Alternative Services mechanism <xref target="RFC7838"/> for discovery of HTTP/3
services on other ports.</t>
        <t>Further, as QUIC has a connection ID, it is also possible to maintain multiple
QUIC connections over one 5-tuple (protocol, source source, and destination IP address, address and
source and destination port). However, if the connection ID is zero-length, zero length,
all packets of the 5-tuple likely belong to the same QUIC connection.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="handshake">
        <name>The QUIC Handshake</name>
        <t>New QUIC connections are established using a handshake, which handshake that is distinguishable
on the wire (see <xref target="sec-identifying"/> for details), details) and contains some information
that can be passively observed.</t>
        <t>To illustrate the information visible in the QUIC wire image during the
handshake, we first show the general communication pattern visible in the UDP
datagrams containing the QUIC handshake, then handshake. Then, we examine each of the datagrams in
detail.</t>
        <t>The QUIC handshake can normally be recognized on the wire through four flights
of datagrams labelled labeled "Client Initial", "Server Initial", "Client Completion",
and "Server Completion", Completion" as illustrated in <xref target="fig-handshake"/>.</t>
        <t>A handshake starts with the client sending one or more datagrams containing
Initial packets, detailed packets (detailed in <xref target="fig-client-initial"/>, target="fig-client-initial"/>), which elicits the
Server Initial response detailed (detailed in <xref target="fig-server-initial"/> target="fig-server-initial"/>), which typically containing contains three types of packets: Initial packet(s) with the beginning of the server's
side of the TLS handshake, Handshake packet(s) with the rest of the server's
portion of the TLS handshake, and 1-RTT packet(s), if present.</t>
        <figure anchor="fig-handshake">
          <name>General communication pattern visible Communication Pattern Visible in the QUIC handshake</name> Handshake</name>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
Client                                    Server
  |                                          |
  +----Client Initial----------------------->|
  +----(zero or more 0-RTT)----------------->|
  |                                          |
  |<-----------------------Server Initial----+
  |<--------(1-RTT encrypted data starts)----+
  |                                          |
  +----Client Completion-------------------->|
  +----(1-RTT encrypted data starts)-------->|
  |                                          |
  |<--------------------Server Completion----+
  |                                          |
]]></artwork>                                          |]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t>As shown here, the client can send 0-RTT data as soon as it has sent its Client
Hello,
ClientHello and the server can send 1-RTT data as soon as it has sent its Server
Hello. ServerHello.
The Client Completion flight contains at least one Handshake packet and
could also include an Initial packet. During the handshake, QUIC packets in separate contexts during
the handshake can be coalesced (see <xref target="coalesced"/>) in order to reduce the
number of UDP datagrams sent during the handshake.</t>
        <t>Handshake packets can arrive out-of-order without impacting the handshake as
long as the reordering was not accompanied by extensive delays that trigger a
spurious Probe Timeout ({Section 6.2 of RFC9002}). (<xref section="6.2" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC9002"/>).
If QUIC packets get lost or reordered, packets belonging
to the same flight might not be observed in close time succession, though
the sequence of the flights will not change, change because one flight depends
upon the peer's previous flight.</t>
        <t>Datagrams that contain an Initial packet (Client Initial, Server
Initial, and some Client Completion) contain at least 1200 octets of UDP
payload. This protects against amplification attacks and verifies that the
network path meets the requirements for the minimum QUIC IP packet size;
see <xref section="14" sectionFormat="of" target="QUIC-TRANSPORT"/>. target="RFC9000"/>. This is accomplished by either adding
PADDING frames within the Initial packet, coalescing other packets with the
Initial packet, or leaving unused payload in the UDP packet after the Initial
packet. A network path needs to be able to forward packets of at least this size of
packet
for QUIC to be used.</t>
        <t>The content of Initial packets is encrypted using Initial Secrets,
which are derived from a per-version constant and the client's
destination connection
Destination Connection ID. That content is therefore observable by
any on-path device that knows the per-version constant and is
considered visible in this illustration.  The content of QUIC
Handshake packets is encrypted using keys established during the
initial handshake exchange, exchange and is therefore not visible.</t>
        <t>Initial, Handshake, and 1-RTT packets belong to different cryptographic and
transport contexts. The Client Completion (<xref target="fig-init-complete"/>) and the
Server Completion (<xref target="fig-hs-complete"/>) flights conclude the Initial
and Handshake contexts, contexts by sending final acknowledgments and
CRYPTO frames.</t>
        <figure anchor="fig-client-initial">
          <name>Example Client Initial datagram without Datagram Without 0-RTT</name>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
+----------------------------------------------------------+
| UDP header (source and destination UDP ports)            |
+----------------------------------------------------------+
| QUIC long header (type = Initial, Version, DCID, SCID) (Length)
+----------------------------------------------------------+  |
| QUIC CRYPTO frame header                                 |  |
+----------------------------------------------------------+  |
| | TLS Client Hello ClientHello (incl. TLS SNI)                     |  |  |
+----------------------------------------------------------+  |
| QUIC PADDING frames                                      |  |
+----------------------------------------------------------+<-+
]]></artwork>
+----------------------------------------------------------+<-+]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t>A Client Initial packet exposes the version, source Version, Source, and destination
connection Destination
Connection IDs without encryption. The payload of the Initial
packet is protected using the Initial secret.  The complete TLS
Client Hello,
ClientHello, including any TLS Server Name Indication (SNI)
present, is sent in one or more CRYPTO frames across one or more
QUIC Initial packets.</t>
        <figure anchor="fig-server-initial">
          <name>Coalesced Server Initial datagram pattern</name> Datagram Pattern</name>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| UDP header (source and destination UDP ports)              |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| QUIC long header (type = Initial, Version, DCID, SCID)   (Length)
+------------------------------------------------------------+  |
| QUIC CRYPTO frame header                                   |  |
+------------------------------------------------------------+  |
| TLS Server Hello ServerHello                                            |  |
+------------------------------------------------------------+  |
| QUIC ACK frame (acknowledging client hello)                |  |
+------------------------------------------------------------+<-+
| QUIC long header (type = Handshake, Version, DCID, SCID) (Length)
+------------------------------------------------------------+  |
| encrypted payload (presumably CRYPTO frames)               |  |
+------------------------------------------------------------+<-+
| QUIC short header                                          |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| 1-RTT encrypted payload                                    |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
]]></artwork>
+------------------------------------------------------------+]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t>The Server Initial datagram also exposes the version number, source number and destination
connection the Source and Destination
Connection IDs in the clear; the payload of the Initial packet(s) packet is
protected using the Initial secret.</t>
        <figure anchor="fig-init-complete">
          <name>Coalesced Client Completion datagram pattern</name> Datagram Pattern</name>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| UDP header (source and destination UDP ports)              |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| QUIC long header (type = Initial, Version, DCID, SCID)   (Length)
+------------------------------------------------------------+  |
| QUIC ACK frame (acknowledging Server Initial)              |  |
+------------------------------------------------------------+<-+
| QUIC long header (type = Handshake, Version, DCID, SCID) (Length)
+------------------------------------------------------------+  |
| encrypted payload (presumably CRYPTO/ACK frames)           |  |
+------------------------------------------------------------+<-+
| QUIC short header                                          |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| 1-RTT encrypted payload                                    |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
]]></artwork>
+------------------------------------------------------------+]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t>The Client Completion flight does not expose any additional information;
however, as the destination connection Destination Connection ID is server-selected, it usually
is not the same ID that is sent in the Client Initial. Client Completion
flights contain 1-RTT packets which that indicate the handshake has completed
(see <xref target="sec-confirm"/>) on the client, client and for three-way handshake RTT
estimation as in <xref target="sec-rtt"/>.</t>
        <figure anchor="fig-hs-complete">
          <name>Coalesced Server Completion datagram pattern</name> Datagram Pattern</name>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| UDP header (source and destination UDP ports)              |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| QUIC long header (type = Handshake, Version, DCID, SCID) (Length)
+------------------------------------------------------------+  |
| encrypted payload (presumably ACK frame)                   |  |
+------------------------------------------------------------+<-+
| QUIC short header                                          |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| 1-RTT encrypted payload                                    |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
]]></artwork>
+------------------------------------------------------------+]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t>Similar to Client Completion, Server Completion also exposes no does not expose additional
information; observing it serves only to determine that the handshake has
completed.</t>
        <t>When the client uses 0-RTT data, the Client Initial
flight can also include one or more 0-RTT packets, packets as shown in
<xref target="fig-client-initial-0rtt"/>.</t>
        <figure anchor="fig-client-initial-0rtt">
          <name>Coalesced 0-RTT Client Initial datagram</name> Datagram</name>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
+----------------------------------------------------------+
| UDP header (source and destination UDP ports)            |
+----------------------------------------------------------+
| QUIC long header (type = Initial, Version, DCID, SCID) (Length)
+----------------------------------------------------------+  |
| QUIC CRYPTO frame header                                 |  |
+----------------------------------------------------------+  |
| TLS Client Hello ClientHello (incl. TLS SNI)                          |  |
+----------------------------------------------------------+<-+
| QUIC long header (type = 0-RTT, Version, DCID, SCID)   (Length)
+----------------------------------------------------------+  |
| 0-RTT encrypted payload                                  |  |
+----------------------------------------------------------+<-+
]]></artwork>
+----------------------------------------------------------+<-+]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t>When a 0-RTT packet is coalesced with an Initial packet, the datagram
will be padded to 1200 bytes. Additional datagrams containing only 0-RTT
packets with long headers can be sent after the client Initial packet(s),
containing packet, which contains more 0-RTT data. The amount of 0-RTT protected data that
can be sent in the first flight is limited by the initial congestion
window, typically to around 10 packets (see <xref section="7.2" sectionFormat="of" target="QUIC-RECOVERY"/>).</t> target="RFC9002"/>).</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="wire-integrity">
        <name>Integrity Protection of the Wire Image</name>
        <t>As soon as the cryptographic context is established, all information in the QUIC
header, including exposed information, is integrity protected. Further,
information that was exposed in packets sent before the cryptographic context
was established is validated during the cryptographic handshake. Therefore,
devices on path cannot alter any information or bits in QUIC packets. Such
alterations would cause the integrity check to fail, which results in the
receiver discarding the packet. Some parts of Initial packets could be altered
by removing and re-applying reapplying the authenticated encryption without immediate
discard at the receiver. However, the cryptographic handshake validates most
fields and any modifications in those fields will result in a connection
establishment failing failure later.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="rebinding">
        <name>Connection ID and Rebinding</name>
        <t>The connection ID in the QUIC packet headers allows association of QUIC
packets using information independent of the 5-tuple. This allows
rebinding of a connection after one of the endpoints - usually (usually the
client -
client) has experienced an address change. Further Further, it can be used by
in-network devices to ensure that related 5-tuple flows are appropriately
balanced together (see Section <xref target="sec-loadbalancing"/>).</t>
        <t>Client and server each choose a connection ID during the handshake; for
example, a server might request that a client use a connection ID, whereas the
client might choose a zero-length value. Connection IDs for either endpoint may
change during the lifetime of a connection, with the new connection ID being
supplied via encrypted frames (see <xref section="5.1" sectionFormat="of" target="QUIC-TRANSPORT"/>). target="RFC9000"/>).
Therefore, observing a new connection ID does not necessarily indicate a new
connection.</t>
        <t><xref target="QUIC-LB"/> target="I-D.ietf-quic-load-balancers"/> specifies algorithms for
encoding the server mapping in a connection ID in order to share this
information with selected on-path devices such as load balancers. Server
mappings should only be exposed to selected entities. Uncontrolled exposure
would allow linkage of multiple IP addresses to the same host if the server
also supports migration that opens an attack vector on specific servers or
pools. The best way to obscure an encoding is to appear random to any other
observers, which is most rigorously achieved with encryption. As a result,
any attempt to infer information from specific parts of a connection ID is
unlikely to be useful.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="packetnumber">
        <name>Packet Numbers</name>
        <t>The Packet Number field is always present in the QUIC packet header in version
1; however, it is always encrypted. The encryption key for packet number
protection on Initial packets -- which (which are sent before cryptographic context
establishment --
establishment) is specific to the QUIC version, version while packet number protection
on subsequent packets uses secrets derived from the end-to-end cryptographic
context. Packet numbers are therefore not part of the wire image that is visible
to on-path observers.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="version">
        <name>Version Negotiation and Greasing</name>
        <t>Version Negotiation packets are used by the server to indicate that a requested
version from the client is not supported (see <xref section="6" sectionFormat="of" target="QUIC-TRANSPORT"/>. target="RFC9000"/>).
Version Negotiation packets are not intrinsically protected, but future QUIC
versions could use later encrypted messages to verify that they were authentic.
Therefore, any modification of this list will be detected and may cause the
endpoints to terminate the connection attempt.</t>
        <t>Also note that the list of versions in the Version Negotiation packet may
contain reserved versions. This mechanism is used to avoid ossification in the
implementation of the selection mechanism. Further, a client may send an Initial
packet with a reserved version number to trigger version negotiation. In
the Version Negotiation packet, the connection IDs of the client's
Initial packet
are reflected to provide a proof of return-routability. Therefore, changing this
information will also cause the connection to fail.</t>
        <t>QUIC is expected to evolve rapidly, so rapidly. Therefore, new versions, both versions (both experimental and IETF
standard versions, versions) will be deployed on the Internet more often than with
other commonly deployed Internet- Internet and transport-layer protocols. Use
of the version number Version field for traffic recognition will therefore behave
differently than with these protocols. Using a particular version number
to recognize valid QUIC traffic is likely to persistently miss a fraction of
QUIC flows, flows
and completely fail in the near future. Reliance on the version number Version field for the purposes purpose of
admission control is similarly also likely to rapidly lead to
unintended failure modes. Admission of QUIC traffic regardless of version
avoids these failure modes, avoids unnecessary deployment delays, and
supports continuous version-based evolution.</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="network-visible-information-about-quic-flows">
      <name>Network-Visible Information about QUIC Flows</name>
      <t>This section addresses the different kinds of observations and inferences that
can be made about QUIC flows by a passive observer in the network based on the
wire image in <xref target="sec-wire-image"/>. Here Here, we assume a bidirectional observer (one
that can see packets in both directions in the sequence in which they are
carried on the wire) unless noted, but typically without access to any keying
information.</t>
      <section anchor="sec-identifying">
        <name>Identifying QUIC Traffic</name>
        <t>The QUIC wire image is not specifically designed to be distinguishable
from other UDP traffic by a passive observer in the network. While certain
QUIC applications may be heuristically identifiable on a per-application
basis, there is no general method for distinguishing QUIC traffic from
otherwise-unclassifiable
otherwise unclassifiable UDP traffic on a given link. Any Therefore, any unrecognized UDP
traffic may therefore be QUIC traffic.</t>
        <t>At the time of writing, two application bindings for QUIC have been published
or adopted by the IETF: HTTP/3 <xref target="QUIC-HTTP"/> target="RFC9114"/> and DNS over Dedicated QUIC
Connections <xref target="I-D.ietf-dprive-dnsoquic"/>. target="RFC9250"/>. These are both known at the time
of writing to have active Internet deployments, so an assumption that all
QUIC traffic is HTTP/3 is not valid. HTTP/3 uses UDP port 443 by
convention but various methods can be used to specify alternate port numbers.
Other applications (e.g., Microsoft's SMB over QUIC) also use UDP port 443 by
default. Therefore, simple assumptions about whether a given flow is using
QUIC, or
QUIC (or indeed which application it might be using QUIC, QUIC) based solely upon
a UDP port number may not hold; see also <xref section="5" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC7605"/>.</t>
        <t>While the second-most-significant bit (0x40) of the first octet is set to 1 in
most QUIC packets of the current version (see <xref target="public-header"/> and <xref section="17" sectionFormat="of" target="QUIC-TRANSPORT"/>), target="RFC9000"/>), this method of recognizing QUIC traffic is not reliable.
First, it only provides one bit of information and is prone to collision with
UDP-based protocols other than those considered in <xref target="RFC7983"/>. Second, this
feature of the wire image is not invariant <xref target="QUIC-INVARIANTS"/> target="RFC8999"/> and may change in
future versions of the protocol, protocol or even be negotiated during the handshake via
the use of an extension <xref target="QUIC-GREASE"/>.</t> target="RFC9287"/>.</t>
        <t>Even though transport parameters transmitted in the client's Initial packet are
observable by the network, they cannot be modified by the network without
causing a connection failure. Further, the reply from the server cannot be
observed, so observers on the network cannot know which parameters are actually
in use.</t>
        <section anchor="identifying-negotiated-version">
          <name>Identifying Negotiated Version</name>
          <t>An in-network observer assuming that a set of packets belongs to a QUIC flow
might infer the version number in use by observing the handshake. If the
version number in an Initial packet of the server response is subsequently
seen in a packet from the client, that version has been accepted by both
endpoints to be used for the rest of the connection (see
<xref section="2" sectionFormat="of" target="I-D.ietf-quic-version-negotiation"/>).</t>
          <t>The negotiated version cannot be identified for flows for in which a handshake is
not observed, such as in the case of connection migration; however, migration. However, it might be
possible to associate a flow with a flow for which a version has been
identified; see <xref target="sec-flow-association"/>.</t>
        </section>
        <section anchor="sec-garbage">
          <name>First Packet Identification for Garbage Rejection</name>
          <t>A related question is whether the first packet of a given flow on a port known
to be associated with QUIC is a valid QUIC packet.  This determination supports
in-network filtering of garbage UDP packets (reflection attacks, random
backscatter, etc.). While heuristics based on the first byte of the packet
(packet type) could be used to separate valid from invalid first packet types,
the deployment of such heuristics is not recommended, recommended as bits in the first byte
may have different meanings in future versions of the protocol.</t>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec-confirm">
        <name>Connection Confirmation</name>
        <t>This document focuses on QUIC version 1, and this Connection Confirmation
section applies only to packets belonging to QUIC version 1 flows; for purposes
of on-path observation, it assumes that these packets have been identified as
such through the observation of a version number exchange as described above.</t>
        <t>Connection establishment uses Initial and Handshake packets containing a
TLS handshake, handshake and Retry packets that do not contain parts of the handshake.
Connection establishment can therefore be detected using heuristics similar to
those used to detect TLS over TCP. A client initiating a connection may
also send data in 0-RTT packets directly after the Initial
packet containing the TLS Client Hello. ClientHello. Since packets may be reordered or lost
in the network, 0-RTT packets could be seen before the Initial
packet.</t>
        <t>Note that in this version of QUIC, clients send Initial packets before servers
do, servers send Handshake packets before clients do, and only clients send
Initial packets with tokens. Therefore, an endpoint can be identified as a
client or server by an on-path observer. An attempted connection after Retry can
be detected by correlating the contents of the Retry packet with the Token and
the Destination Connection ID fields of the new Initial packet.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="distinguishing-acknowledgment-traffic">
        <name>Distinguishing Acknowledgment Traffic</name>
        <t>Some deployed in-network functions distinguish packets that carry only
acknowledgment (ACK-only) information
from packets carrying upper-layer data in order to attempt to enhance
performance, for example
performance (for example, by queueing queuing ACKs differently or manipulating ACK
signaling <xref target="RFC3449"/>. target="RFC3449"/>). Distinguishing ACK packets is possible in TCP,
but is not supported by
QUIC,
QUIC since acknowledgment signaling is carried inside QUIC's encrypted payload, payload
and ACK manipulation is impossible. Specifically, heuristics attempting to
distinguish ACK-only packets from payload-carrying packets based on packet size
are likely to fail, fail and are not recommended to use as a way to construe
internals of QUIC's operation as those mechanisms can change, e.g., due to the
use of extensions.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec-server">
        <name>Server Name Indication (SNI)</name>
        <t>The client's TLS ClientHello may contain a Server Name Indication (SNI)
extension <xref target="RFC6066"/> extension, by which the client reveals the name of the server it
intends to connect to, to in order to allow the server to present a certificate
based on that name. If present, SNI information is available to unidirectional observers
on the client-to-server path, path if present.</t> it.</t>
        <t>The TLS ClientHello may also contain an Application-Layer Protocol
Negotiation (ALPN) extension <xref target="RFC7301"/> extension, target="RFC7301"/>, by which the client exposes the names
of application-layer protocols it supports; an observer can deduce that one of
those protocols will be used if the connection continues.</t>
        <t>Work is currently underway in the TLS working group to encrypt the contents of
the ClientHello in TLS 1.3 <xref target="TLS-ECH"/>. target="I-D.ietf-tls-esni"/>. This would make
SNI-based application identification impossible by on-path observation for QUIC
and other protocols that use TLS.</t>
        <section anchor="extracting-server-name-indication-sni-information">
          <name>Extracting Server Name Indication (SNI) Information</name>
          <t>If the ClientHello is not encrypted, SNI can be derived from the client's
Initial packet(s) packets by calculating the Initial secret to decrypt the packet
payload and parsing the QUIC CRYPTO frame(s) frames containing the TLS ClientHello.</t>
          <t>As both the derivation of the Initial secret and the structure of the Initial
packet itself are version-specific, version specific, the first step is always to parse the
version number (the second through fifth bytes of the long header). Note that
only long header packets carry the version number, so it is necessary to also
check if the first bit of the QUIC packet is set to 1, indicating which indicates a long header.</t>
          <t>Note that proprietary QUIC versions, versions that have been deployed before
standardization,
standardization might not set the first bit in a QUIC long header packet to
1. However, it is expected that these versions will
gradually disappear over time and therefore do not require any special
consideration or treatment.</t>
          <t>When the version has been identified as QUIC version 1, the packet type needs to
be verified as an Initial packet by checking that the third and fourth bits of
the header are both set to 0. Then Then, the Destination Connection ID needs to be
extracted from the packet. The Initial secret is calculated using the
version-specific Initial salt, salt as described in <xref section="5.2" sectionFormat="of" target="QUIC-TLS"/>. target="RFC9001"/>.
The length of the connection ID is indicated in the 6th byte of the header
followed by the connection ID itself.</t>
          <t>Note that subsequent Initial packets might contain a Destination Connection ID
other than the one used to generate the Initial secret. Therefore, attempts to
decrypt these packets using the procedure above might fail unless the Initial
secret is retained by the observer.</t>
          <t>To determine the end of the packet header and find the start of the payload,
the packet number length, Packet Number Length, the source connection Source Connection ID length, Length, and the token length Token Length
need to be extracted. The packet number length Packet Number Length is defined by the seventh and
eight
eighth bits of the header as described in <xref section="17.2" sectionFormat="of" target="QUIC-TRANSPORT"/>, target="RFC9000"/>,
but is protected as described in <xref section="5.4" sectionFormat="of" target="QUIC-TLS"/>. target="RFC9001"/>. The source
connection Source
Connection ID length Length is specified in the byte after the destination
connection Destination
Connection ID. The token length, Token Length, which follows the source connection Source Connection ID, is
a variable-length integer as specified in <xref section="16" sectionFormat="of" target="QUIC-TRANSPORT"/>.</t> target="RFC9000"/>.</t>
          <t>After decryption, the client's Initial packet(s) packets can be parsed to detect the
CRYPTO frame(s) frames that contains contain the TLS ClientHello, which then can be parsed
similarly to TLS over TCP connections. Note that there can be multiple CRYPTO
frames spread out over one or more Initial packets, packets and they might not be in
order, so reassembling the CRYPTO stream by parsing offsets and lengths is
required. Further, the client's Initial packet(s) packets may contain other frames,
so the first bytes of each frame need to be checked to identify the frame
type and determine whether the frame can be skipped over. Note that the
length of the frames is dependent on the frame type; see
<xref section="18" sectionFormat="of" target="QUIC-TRANSPORT"/>.
E.g., target="RFC9000"/>.
For example, PADDING frames, each frames (each consisting of a single zero byte, byte) may occur before,
after, or between CRYPTO frames. However, extensions might define additional
frame types. If an unknown frame type is encountered, it is impossible to
know the length of that frame frame, which prevents skipping over it, and therefore it; therefore,
parsing fails.</t>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec-flow-association">
        <name>Flow Association</name>
        <t>The QUIC connection ID (see <xref target="rebinding"/>) is designed to allow a coordinating
on-path device, such as a load-balancer, load balancer, to associate two flows when one of the
endpoints changes address.  This change can be due to NAT rebinding or address
migration.</t>
        <t>The connection ID must change upon intentional address change by an endpoint, endpoint
and connection ID negotiation is encrypted, so encrypted; therefore, it is not possible for a
passive observer to link intended changes of address using the connection ID.</t>
        <t>When one endpoint's address unintentionally changes, as is the case with NAT
rebinding, an on-path observer may be able to use the connection ID to
associate the flow on the new address with the flow on the old address.</t>
        <t>A network function that attempts to use the connection ID to associate flows
must be robust to the failure of this technique. Since the connection ID may
change multiple times during the lifetime of a connection, packets with the
same 5-tuple but different connection IDs might or might not belong to
the same connection. Likewise, packets with the same connection ID but
different 5-tuples might not belong to the same connection, connection either.</t>
        <t>Connection IDs should be treated as opaque; see <xref target="sec-loadbalancing"/>
for caveats regarding connection ID selection at servers.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec-teardown">
        <name>Flow Teardown</name>
        <t>QUIC does not expose the end of a connection; the only indication to on-path
devices that a flow has ended is that packets are no longer observed. Stateful Therefore, stateful
devices on path such as NATs and firewalls must therefore use idle timeouts to
determine when to drop state for QUIC flows; see <xref target="sec-stateful"/>.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec-symmetry">
        <name>Flow Symmetry Measurement</name>
        <t>QUIC explicitly exposes which side of a connection is a client and which side is
a server during the handshake. In addition, the symmetry of a flow (whether it is
primarily client-to-server, primarily server-to-client, or roughly
bidirectional, as input to basic traffic classification techniques) can be
inferred through the measurement of data rate in each direction.
Note that QUIC packets containing only control frames (such as
ACK-only packets) may be padded. Padding, though optional,
may conceal connection roles or flow symmetry information.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec-rtt">
        <name>Round-Trip Time (RTT) Measurement</name>
        <t>The round-trip time (RTT) of QUIC flows can be inferred
by observation once per flow, flow
during the handshake, as handshake in passive TCP measurement; this requires parsing of
the QUIC packet header and recognition of the handshake, as illustrated in
<xref target="handshake"/>. It can also be inferred during the flow's lifetime, lifetime if the
endpoints use the spin bit facility described below and in <xref section="17.3.1" sectionFormat="of" target="QUIC-TRANSPORT"/>. target="RFC9000"/>. RTT measurement is available to unidirectional observers
when the spin bit is enabled.</t>
        <section anchor="measuring-initial-rtt">
          <name>Measuring Initial RTT</name>
          <t>In the common case, the delay between the client's Initial packet (containing
the TLS ClientHello) and the server's Initial packet (containing the TLS
ServerHello) represents the RTT component on the path between the observer and
the server. The delay between the server's first Handshake packet and the
Handshake packet sent by the client represents the RTT component on the path
between the observer and the client. While the client may send 0-RTT packets
after the Initial packet during connection re-establishment, these can be
ignored for RTT measurement purposes.</t>
          <t>Handshake RTT can be measured by adding the client-to-observer and
observer-to-server RTT components together. This measurement necessarily
includes all transport- and application-layer delay at both endpoints.</t>
        </section>
        <section anchor="spin-usage">
          <name>Using the Spin Bit for Passive RTT Measurement</name>
          <t>The spin bit provides a version-specific method to measure per-flow RTT from
observation points on the network path throughout the duration of a connection.
See <xref section="17.4" sectionFormat="of" target="QUIC-TRANSPORT"/> target="RFC9000"/> for the definition of the spin bit in
Version 1 of QUIC. Endpoint participation in spin bit signaling is optional.
That is, while While its location is fixed in this version of QUIC, an endpoint can
unilaterally choose to not support "spinning" the bit.</t>
          <t>Use of the spin bit for RTT measurement by devices on path is only possible when
both endpoints enable it. Some endpoints may disable use of the spin bit by
default, others only in specific deployment scenarios, e.g., for servers and
clients where the RTT would reveal the presence of a VPN or proxy. To avoid
making these connections identifiable based on the usage of the spin bit, all
endpoints randomly disable "spinning" for at least one eighth of connections,
even if otherwise enabled by default. An endpoint not participating in spin bit
signaling for a given connection can use a fixed spin value for the duration of
the connection, connection or can set the bit randomly on each packet sent.</t>
          <t>When in use, the latency spin bit in each direction changes value once per
RTT any time that both endpoints are sending packets
continuously. An on-path observer can observe the time difference between edges
(changes from 1 to 0 or 0 to 1) in the spin bit signal in a single direction to
measure one sample of end-to-end RTT. This mechanism follows the principles of
protocol measurability laid out in <xref target="IPIM"/>.</t>
          <t>Note that this measurement, as with passive RTT measurement for TCP, includes
all transport protocol delay (e.g., delayed sending of acknowledgments) and/or
application layer delay (e.g., waiting for a response to be generated). It
therefore provides devices on path a good instantaneous estimate of the RTT as
experienced by the application.</t>
          <t>However, application-limited and flow-control-limited senders can have
application
application- and transport layer transport-layer delay, respectively, that are much greater than
network RTT. When For example, if the sender is application-limited and e.g., only sends small
amount
amounts of periodic application traffic, traffic periodically, where that period the periodicity is longer than the
RTT, measuring the spin bit provides measurements provide information about the application period,
not the period rather
than network RTT.</t>
          <t>Since the spin bit logic at each endpoint considers only samples from packets
that advance the largest packet number, signal generation itself is
resistant to reordering. However, reordering can cause problems at an observer
by causing spurious edge detection and therefore inaccurate (i.e., lower) RTT
estimates, if reordering occurs across a spin-bit spin bit flip in the stream.</t>
          <t>Simple heuristics based on the observed data rate per flow or changes in the RTT
series can be used to reject bad RTT samples due to lost or reordered edges in
the spin signal, as well as application or flow control limitation; for example,
QoF <xref target="TMA-QOF"/> rejects component RTTs significantly higher than RTTs over the
history of the flow. These heuristics may use the handshake RTT as an initial
RTT estimate for a given flow. Usually such heuristics would also detect if
the spin is either constant or randomly set for a connection.</t>
          <t>An on-path observer that can see traffic in both directions (from client to
server and from server to client) can also use the spin bit to measure
"upstream" and "downstream" component RTT; i.e, the component of the
end-to-end RTT attributable to the paths between the observer and the server
and between the observer and the client, respectively. It does this by measuring the
delay between a spin edge observed in the upstream direction and that observed
in the downstream direction, and vice versa.</t>
          <t>Raw RTT samples generated using these techniques can be processed in various
ways to generate useful network performance metrics. A simple linear smoothing
or moving minimum filter can be applied to the stream of RTT samples to get a
more stable estimate of application-experienced RTT. RTT samples measured from
the spin bit can also be used to generate RTT distribution information,
including minimum RTT (which approximates network RTT over longer time windows)
and RTT variance (which approximates one-way packet delay variance as seen
by an application end-point).</t>
        </section>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="specific-network-management-tasks">
      <name>Specific Network Management Tasks</name>
      <t>In this section, we review specific network management and measurement
techniques and how QUIC's design impacts them.</t>
      <section anchor="passive-network-performance-measurement-and-troubleshooting">
        <name>Passive Network Performance Measurement and Troubleshooting</name>
        <t>Limited RTT measurement is possible by passive observation of QUIC traffic;
see <xref target="sec-rtt"/>. No passive measurement of loss is possible with the present
wire image. Limited observation of upstream congestion may be
possible via the observation of Congestion Experienced (CE) markings in the
IP header <xref target="RFC3168"/> on ECN-enabled QUIC traffic.</t>
        <t>On-path devices can also make measurements of RTT, loss loss, and other
performance metrics when information is carried in an additional network-layer
packet header (Section 6 of
<xref target="RFC9065"/> (<xref target="RFC9065" sectionFormat="of" section="6"/> describes the use of operations,
administration Operations,
Administration, and management Management (OAM) information).
Using network-layer approaches also has the advantage that common observation
and analysis tools can be consistently used for multiple transport protocols, protocols;
however, these techniques are often limited to measurements within one or
multiple cooperating domains.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec-stateful">
        <name>Stateful Treatment of QUIC Traffic</name>
        <t>Stateful treatment of QUIC traffic (e.g., at a firewall or NAT middlebox) is
possible through QUIC traffic and version identification (<xref target="sec-identifying"/>)
and observation of the handshake for connection confirmation (<xref target="sec-confirm"/>).
The lack of any visible end-of-flow signal (<xref target="sec-teardown"/>) means that this
state must be purged either through timers or through least-recently-used
eviction,
eviction depending on application requirements.</t>
        <t>While QUIC has no clear network-visible end-of-flow signal and therefore
does require timer-based state removal, the QUIC handshake indicates
confirmation by both ends of a valid bidirectional transmission. As soon
as the handshake completed, timers should be set long enough to also
allow for short idle time during a valid transmission.</t>
        <t><xref target="RFC4787"/> requires a network state timeout that is not less than 2 minutes
for most UDP traffic.  However, in practice, a QUIC endpoint can experience
lower timeouts, timeouts in the range of 30 to 60 seconds <xref target="QUIC-TIMEOUT"/>.</t>
        <t>In contrast, <xref target="RFC5382"/> recommends a state timeout of more than 2
hours for TCP, TCP given that TCP is a connection-oriented protocol with
well-defined closure semantics.
Even though QUIC has explicitly been designed to tolerate NAT rebindings,
decreasing the NAT timeout is not recommended, recommended as it may negatively impact
application performance or incentivize endpoints to send very frequent
keep-alive packets.</t>
        <t>The recommendation
        <t>Therefore,
a state timeout of at least two minutes is therefore that, recommended for
QUIC traffic, even when lower state timeouts
are used for other UDP traffic, a state timeout of at least two minutes
ought to be used for QUIC traffic.</t>
        <t>If state is removed too early, this could lead to black-holing of incoming
packets after a short idle period. To detect this situation, a timer at the
client needs to expire before a re-establishment can happen (if at all), which
would lead to unnecessarily long delays in an otherwise working connection.</t>
        <t>Furthermore, not all endpoints use routing architectures where connections
will survive a port or address change. So even Even when the client revives the
connection, a NAT rebinding can cause a routing mismatch where a packet
is not even delivered to the server that might support address migration.
For these reasons, the limits in <xref target="RFC4787"/> are important to avoid
black-holing of packets (and hence avoid interrupting the flow of data to the
client), especially where devices are able to distinguish QUIC traffic from
other UDP payloads.</t>
        <t>The QUIC header optionally contains a connection ID ID, which could provide
additional entropy beyond the 5-tuple. The QUIC handshake needs
to be observed in order to understand whether the connection ID is present and
what length it has. However, connection IDs may be renegotiated
after the handshake, and this renegotiation is not visible to the path.
Therefore, using the connection ID as a flow key field for stateful treatment
of flows is not recommended as connection ID changes will cause undetectable
and unrecoverable loss of state in the middle of a connection. In particular,
the use of the connection ID for functions that require state to make a
forwarding decision is not viable as it will break connectivity, or at minimum minimum,
cause long timeout-based delays before this problem is detected by the
endpoints and the connection can potentially be re-established.</t>
        <t>Use of connection IDs is specifically discouraged for NAT applications.
If a NAT hits an operational limit, it is recommended to rather drop the
initial packets of a flow (see also <xref target="sec-filtering"/>),
which potentially triggers TCP fallback. Use of the connection ID to
multiplex multiple connections on the same IP address/port pair is not a
viable solution as it risks connectivity breakage, breakage in case the connection
ID changes.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="address-rewriting-to-ensure-routing-stability">
        <name>Address Rewriting to Ensure Routing Stability</name>
        <t>While QUIC's migration capability makes it possible for a connection to survive
client address changes, this does not work if the routers or switches in the
server infrastructure route using the address-port 4-tuple. If infrastructure
routes on addresses only, NAT rebinding or address migration will cause packets
to be delivered to the wrong server. <xref target="QUIC-LB"/> target="I-D.ietf-quic-load-balancers"/> describes a way to addresses
this problem by coordinating the selection and use of connection IDs between
load-balancers
load balancers and servers.</t>
        <t>Applying address translation at a middlebox to maintain a stable
address-port mapping for flows based on connection ID might seem like a solution to this problem. However, hiding information about the
change of the IP address or port conceals important and security-relevant
information from QUIC endpoints endpoints, and as such such, would facilitate amplification
attacks (see <xref section="8" sectionFormat="of" target="QUIC-TRANSPORT"/>). target="RFC9000"/>). A NAT function that hides
peer address changes prevents the other end from
detecting and mitigating attacks as the endpoint cannot verify connectivity
to the new address using QUIC PATH_CHALLENGE and PATH_RESPONSE frames.</t>
        <t>In addition, a change of IP address or port is also an input signal to other
internal mechanisms in QUIC. When a path change is detected, path-dependent
variables like congestion control parameters will be reset protecting reset, which protects
the new path from overload.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec-loadbalancing">
        <name>Server Cooperation with Load Balancers</name>
        <t>In the case of networking architectures that include load balancers,
the connection ID can be used as a way for the server to signal information
about the desired treatment of a flow to the load balancers. Guidance on
assigning connection IDs is given in
<xref target="QUIC-APPLICABILITY"/>. target="RFC9308"/>. <xref target="QUIC-LB"/> target="I-D.ietf-quic-load-balancers"/>
describes a system for coordinating selection and use of connection IDs between
load-balancers
load balancers and servers.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec-filtering">
        <name>Filtering Behavior</name>
<t><xref target="RFC4787"/> describes
        possible packet filtering packet-filtering behaviors that relate to NATs but is are often
        also used is in other scenarios where packet filtering is desired.
        Though the guidance there holds, a particularly unwise behavior admits
        a handful of UDP packets and then makes a decision to whether or not
        filter later packets in the same connection.  QUIC applications are
        encouraged to fall back to TCP if early packets do not arrive at their
        destination <xref target="QUIC-APPLICABILITY"/>, target="RFC9308"/>, as QUIC is
        based on UDP and there are known blocks of UDP traffic (see <xref
        target="sec-udp-1312"/>).  Admitting a few packets allows the QUIC
        endpoint to determine that the path accepts QUIC. Sudden drops
        afterwards will result in slow and costly timeouts before abandoning
        the connection.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec-udp-1312">
        <name>UDP Blocking, Throttling, and NAT Binding</name>
        <t>Today, UDP is the most prevalent DDoS vector, since it is easy for compromised
non-admin applications to send a flood of large UDP packets (while with TCP the
attacker gets throttled by the congestion controller) or to craft reflection and
amplification attacks. Some attacks; therefore, some networks therefore block UDP traffic.
With increased deployment of QUIC, there is also an increased need to allow
UDP traffic on ports used for QUIC. However, if UDP is generally enabled on
these ports, UDP flood attacks may also use the same ports. One possible
response to this threat is to throttle UDP traffic on the network, allocating a
fixed portion of the network capacity to UDP and blocking UDP datagrams over
that cap. As the portion of QUIC traffic compared to TCP is also expected to
increase over time, using such a limit is not recommended but recommended; if this is done,
limits might need to be adapted dynamically.</t>
        <t>Further, if UDP traffic is desired to be throttled, it is recommended to
block individual
QUIC flows entirely rather than dropping packets indiscriminately.
When the handshake is blocked, QUIC-capable applications may fall back
to TCP. However, blocking a random fraction of QUIC packets across
4-tuples will allow many QUIC handshakes to complete, preventing TCP fallback, but
these connections will suffer from
severe packet loss (see also <xref target="sec-filtering"/>). Therefore, UDP throttling
should be realized by per-flow policing, policing as opposed to per-packet
policing. Note that this per-flow policing should be stateless to avoid
problems with stateful treatment of QUIC flows (see <xref target="sec-stateful"/>),
for example example, blocking a portion of the space of values of a hash function
over the addresses and ports in the UDP datagram.
While QUIC endpoints are often able to survive address changes, e.g., by NAT
rebindings, blocking a portion of the traffic based on 5-tuple hashing increases
the risk of black-holing an active connection when the address changes.</t>
        <t>Note that some source ports are assumed to be reflection attack vectors by some
servers; see <xref section="8.1" sectionFormat="of" target="QUIC-APPLICABILITY"/>. target="RFC9308"/>. As a result, NAT
binding to these source ports can result in that traffic being blocked.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec-ddos-dec">
        <name>DDoS Detection and Mitigation</name>
        <t>On-path observation of the transport headers of packets can be used for various
security functions. For example, Denial of Service (DoS) and Distributed DoS
(DDoS) attacks against the infrastructure or against an endpoint can be
detected and mitigated by characterising characterizing anomalous traffic.
Other uses include support for security audits (e.g., verifying the
compliance with ciphersuites); cipher suites), client and application fingerprinting for
inventory;
inventory, and to provide providing alerts for network intrusion detection and other
next generation
next-generation firewall functions.</t>
        <t>Current practices in detection and mitigation of DDoS
attacks generally involve classification of incoming traffic (as
packets, flows, or some other aggregate) into "good" (productive) and "bad"
(DDoS) traffic, and then differential treatment of this traffic to forward only
good traffic. This operation is often done in a separate specialized mitigation
environment through which all traffic is filtered; a generalized architecture
for separation of concerns in mitigation is given in
<xref target="DOTS-ARCH"/>.</t> target="RFC8811"/>.</t>
        <t>Efficient classification of this DDoS traffic in the mitigation environment
is key to the success of this approach. Limited first-packet first packet garbage detection
as in <xref target="sec-garbage"/> and stateful tracking of QUIC traffic as mentioned in
<xref target="sec-stateful"/> above may be useful during classification.</t>
        <t>Note that the use of using a connection ID to support connection migration renders
5-tuple based
5-tuple-based filtering insufficient to detect active flows and requires more
state to be maintained by DDoS defense systems if support of migration of QUIC
flows is desired. For the common case of NAT rebinding, where the client's
address changes without the client's intent or knowledge, DDoS defense systems
can detect a change in the client's endpoint address by linking flows based on
the server's connection IDs. However, QUIC's linkability resistance ensures that
a deliberate connection migration is accompanied by a change in the connection
ID. In this case, the connection ID can not cannot be used to distinguish valid, active
traffic from new attack traffic.</t>
        <t>It is also possible for
endpoints to directly support security functions such as DoS
classification and mitigation.
Endpoints can cooperate with an in-network device directly by e.g.,
sharing information about connection IDs.</t>
        <t>Another potential method could use an
on-path network device that relies on pattern inferences in the traffic and
heuristics or machine learning instead of processing observed header
information.</t>
        <t>However, it is questionable whether connection migrations must be supported
during a DDoS attack. While unintended migration without a connection ID
change can be more easily supported, supported much easier, it might be acceptable to not
support migrations of active QUIC connections that are not visible to
the network functions performing the DDoS detection.
As soon as the connection blocking is detected by the client,
the client may be able to rely on the 0-RTT data mechanism
provided by QUIC. When clients migrate to a new path, they should be prepared
for the migration to fail and attempt to reconnect quickly.</t>
        <t>Beyond in-network DDoS protection mechanisms, TCP syncookies SYN cookies <xref target="RFC4937"/> target="RFC4987"/>
are a well-established method of mitigating some
kinds of TCP DDoS attacks. QUIC Retry packets are the functional analogue to
syncookies,
SYN cookies, forcing clients to prove possession of their IP address before
committing server state.  However, there are safeguards in QUIC against
unsolicited injection of these packets by intermediaries who do not have consent
of the end server. See <xref target="QUIC-RETRY"/> target="I-D.ietf-quic-retry-offload"/> for standard
ways for intermediaries to send Retry packets on behalf of consenting servers.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="quality-of-service-handling-and-ecmp-routing">
        <name>Quality of Service Handling and ECMP Routing</name>
        <t>It is expected that any QoS handling in the network, e.g., based on use of
DiffServ
Diffserv Code Points (DSCPs) <xref target="RFC2475"/> as well as Equal-Cost
Multi-Path (ECMP) routing, is applied on a per flow-basis per-flow basis (and not per-packet)
and as such that all packets belonging to the same active QUIC connection
get uniform treatment.</t>
        <t>Using ECMP to distribute packets from a single flow across multiple
network paths or any other non-uniform nonuniform treatment of packets belong to the same
connection could result in variations in order, delivery rate, and drop rate.
As feedback about loss or delay of each packet is used as input to
the congestion controller, these variations could adversely affect performance.
Depending on the loss recovery mechanism that is implemented, QUIC may be
more tolerant of packet re-ordering reordering than typical TCP traffic (see
<xref target="packetnumber"/>). However, the recovery mechanism used by a flow cannot be
known by the network and therefore reordering tolerance should be
considered as unknown.</t>
        <t>Note that the 5-tuple of a QUIC connection can change due to migration.
In this case different flows are observed by the path and maybe may be treated
differently, as congestion control is usually reset on migration (see also
<xref target="sec-flow-association"/>).</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="handling-icmp-messages">
        <name>Handling ICMP Messages</name>
        <t>Datagram Packetization Layer PMTU Discovery (PLPMTUD) (DPLPMTUD) can be used by QUIC to
probe for the supported PMTU. PLPMTUD DPLPMTUD optionally uses ICMP messages (e.g.,
IPv6 Packet Too Big (PTB) messages). Given known attacks with the use of ICMP
messages, the use of PLPMTUD DPLPMTUD in QUIC has been designed to safely use but
not rely on receiving ICMP feedback (see
<xref section="14.2.1." section="14.2.1" sectionFormat="of" target="QUIC-TRANSPORT"/>).</t> target="RFC9000"/>).</t>
        <t>Networks are recommended to forward these ICMP messages and retain as much of
the original packet as possible without exceeding the minimum MTU for the IP
version when generating ICMP messages as recommended in <xref target="RFC1812"/>
and <xref target="RFC4443"/>.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="guiding-path-mtu">
        <name>Guiding Path MTU</name>
        <t>Some network segments support 1500-byte packets,
but can only do so by fragmenting at a
lower layer before traversing a network segment with a smaller MTU,
and then reassembling within the network segment.
This is permissible even when the IP layer is IPv6 or IPv4 with the DF Don't Fragment (DF) bit set,
because fragmentation occurs below the IP layer.
However, this process can add to compute
and memory costs, leading to a bottleneck that limits network capacity. In such
networks
networks, this generates a desire to influence a majority of senders to use
smaller packets, packets to avoid exceeding limited reassembly capacity.</t>
        <t>For TCP, MSS Maximum Segment Size (MSS) clamping (<xref section="3.2" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC4459"/>) is often used to change
the sender's TCP maximum segment size, but QUIC requires a different approach.
<xref section="14" sectionFormat="of" target="QUIC-TRANSPORT"/> target="RFC9000"/> advises senders to probe larger sizes using
Datagram Packetization Layer PMTU Discovery (<xref target="DPLPMTUD"/>) DPLPMTUD <xref target="RFC8899"/> or Path
Maximum Transmission Unit Discovery (PMTUD: (PMTUD) <xref target="RFC1191"/> and <xref target="RFC8201"/>). target="RFC8201"/>.
This mechanism encourages senders to approach the maximum packet size, which
could then cause fragmentation within a network segment of which
they may not be aware.</t>
        <t>If path performance is limited when forwarding larger packets, an on-path
device should support a maximum packet size for a specific transport flow
and then consistently drop all packets that exceed the configured size
when the inner IPv4 packet has DF set, set or IPv6 is used.</t>
        <t>Networks with configurations that would lead to fragmentation of large
packets within a network segment should drop such packets rather than
fragmenting them. Network operators who plan to implement a more
selective policy may start by focusing on QUIC.</t>
        <t>QUIC flows cannot always be easily distinguished from other UDP traffic, but
we assume at least some portion of QUIC traffic can be identified
(see <xref target="sec-identifying"/>). For networks supporting QUIC, it is recommended
that a path drops any packet larger than the fragmentation size.
When a QUIC endpoint uses DPLPMTUD, it will use a QUIC probe packet to
discover the PMTU. If this probe is lost, it will not impact the flow of
QUIC data.</t>
        <t>IPv4 routers generate an ICMP message when a packet is dropped because the
link MTU was exceeded. <xref target="RFC8504"/> specifies how an IPv6 node generates an
ICMPv6 Packet Too Big message (PTB) PTB in this case. PMTUD relies upon an
endpoint receiving such PTB messages <xref target="RFC8201"/>, whereas DPLPMTUD does not
reply upon these messages, but still can still optionally use these to improve
performance <xref section="4.6" sectionFormat="of" target="DPLPMTUD"/>.</t> target="RFC8899"/>.</t>
        <t>A network cannot know in advance which discovery method is used by a QUIC
endpoint, so it should send a PTB message in addition to dropping an
oversized packet. A generated PTB message should be compliant with the
validation requirements of <xref section="14.2.1" sectionFormat="of" target="QUIC-TRANSPORT"/>, target="RFC9000"/>, otherwise
it will be ignored for PMTU discovery. This provides a signal to the
endpoint to prevent the packet size from growing too large, which can
entirely avoid network segment fragmentation for that flow.</t>
        <t>Endpoints can cache PMTU information, information in the IP-layer cache. This short-term
consistency between the PMTU for flows can help avoid an endpoint using a
PMTU that is inefficient. The IP cache can also influence the PMTU value of
other IP flows that use the same path <xref target="RFC8201"/><xref target="DPLPMTUD"/>, target="RFC8201"/> <xref target="RFC8899"/>,
including IP packets carrying
protocols other than QUIC. The representation of an IP path is
implementation-specific
implementation specific <xref target="RFC8201"/>.</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="iana-considerations">
      <name>IANA Considerations</name>
      <t>This document has no actions for IANA.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="security-considerations">
      <name>Security Considerations</name>
      <t>QUIC is an encrypted and authenticated transport. That means, means once the
cryptographic handshake is complete, QUIC endpoints discard most packets that
are not authenticated, greatly limiting the ability of an attacker to interfere
with existing connections.</t>
      <t>However, some information is still observable, observable as supporting manageability of
QUIC traffic inherently involves tradeoffs trade-offs with the confidentiality of QUIC's
control information; this entire document is therefore security-relevant.</t>
      <t>More security considerations for QUIC are discussed in <xref target="QUIC-TRANSPORT"/> target="RFC9000"/>
and <xref target="QUIC-TLS"/>, target="RFC9001"/>, which generally considering consider active or passive attackers in the
network as well as attacks on specific QUIC mechanism.</t>
      <t>Version Negotiation packets do not contain any mechanism to prevent version
downgrade attacks. However, future versions of QUIC that use Version Negotiation
packets are required to define a mechanism that is robust against version
downgrade attacks. Therefore, a network node should not attempt to impact
version selection, as version downgrade may result in connection failure.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="contributors">
      <name>Contributors</name>
      <t>The following people have contributed significant text to and/or
feedback on this document:</t>
      <ul spacing="normal">
        <li>Chris Box</li>
        <li>Dan Druta</li>
        <li>David Schinazi</li>
        <li>Gorry Fairhurst</li>
        <li>Ian Swett</li>
        <li>Igor Lubashev</li>
        <li>Jana Iyengar</li>
        <li>Jared Mauch</li>
        <li>Lars Eggert</li>
        <li>Lucas Purdue</li>
        <li>Marcus Ihlar</li>
        <li>Mark Nottingham</li>
        <li>Martin Duke</li>
        <li>Martin Thomson</li>
        <li>Matt Joras</li>
        <li>Mike Bishop</li>
        <li>Nick Banks</li>
        <li>Thomas Fossati</li>
        <li>Sean Turner</li>
      </ul>
    </section>
    <section anchor="acknowledgments">
      <name>Acknowledgments</name>
      <t>Special thanks to last call reviewers Elwyn Davies, Barry Leiba,
Al Morton, and Peter Saint-Andre.</t>
      <t>This work was partially supported by the European Commission under Horizon 2020
grant agreement no. 688421 Measurement and Architecture for a Middleboxed
Internet (MAMI), and by the Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research, and
Innovation under contract no. 15.0268. This support does not imply endorsement.</t>
    </section>
  </middle>
  <back>
    <displayreference target="RFC9000" to="QUIC-TRANSPORT"/>
    <displayreference target="RFC9001" to="QUIC-TLS"/>
    <displayreference target="RFC9002" to="QUIC-RECOVERY"/>
    <displayreference target="RFC9287" to="QUIC-GREASE"/>
    <displayreference target="RFC9114" to="QUIC-HTTP"/>
    <displayreference target="RFC8546" to="WIRE-IMAGE"/>
    <displayreference target="RFC8999" to="QUIC-INVARIANTS"/>
    <displayreference target="I-D.ietf-quic-load-balancers" to="QUIC-LB"/>
    <displayreference target="I-D.ietf-tls-esni" to="TLS-ECH"/>
    <displayreference target="RFC9308" to="QUIC-APPLICABILITY"/>
    <displayreference target="RFC8811" to="DOTS-ARCH"/>
    <displayreference target="I-D.ietf-quic-retry-offload" to="QUIC-RETRY"/>
    <displayreference target="RFC8899" to="DPLPMTUD"/>
    <displayreference target="I-D.ietf-quic-version-negotiation" to="QUIC-VERSION-NEGOTIATION"/>
    <references>
      <name>References</name>
      <references>
        <name>Normative References</name>
        <reference anchor="QUIC-TRANSPORT">
          <front>
            <title>QUIC: A UDP-Based Multiplexed and Secure Transport</title>
            <author fullname="J. Iyengar" initials="J." role="editor" surname="Iyengar">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="M. Thomson" initials="M." role="editor" surname="Thomson">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="May" year="2021"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document defines the core of the QUIC transport protocol.  QUIC provides applications with flow-controlled streams for structured communication, low-latency connection establishment, and network path migration. QUIC includes security measures that ensure confidentiality, integrity, and availability in a range of deployment circumstances.  Accompanying documents describe the integration of TLS for key negotiation, loss detection, and an exemplary congestion control algorithm.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9000"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9000"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="QUIC-TLS">
          <front>
            <title>Using TLS to Secure QUIC</title>
            <author fullname="M. Thomson" initials="M." role="editor" surname="Thomson">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="S. Turner" initials="S." role="editor" surname="Turner">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="May" year="2021"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes how Transport Layer Security (TLS) is used to secure QUIC.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9001"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9001"/>
        </reference>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9000.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9001.xml"/>
      </references>
      <references>
        <name>Informative References</name>
        <reference anchor="TMA-QOF"> anchor="TMA-QOF" target="https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-54999-1_2">
          <front>
            <title>Inline Data Integrity Signals for Passive Measurement (in Proc. TMA 2014)</title> Measurement</title>
            <author initials="B." surname="Trammell">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author initials="D." surname="Gugelmann">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author initials="N." surname="Brownlee">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date year="2014" month="April"/>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.1007/978-3-642-54999-1_2"/>
	  <refcontent>Traffic Measurement and Analysis, TMA 2014, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8406, pp. 15-25</refcontent>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="IPIM" target="https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.02902">
          <front>
            <title>In-Protocol Internet Measurement (arXiv preprint 1612.02902)</title>
            <title>Principles for Measurability in Protocol Design</title>
            <author initials="M." surname="Allman">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author initials="R." surname="Beverly">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author initials="B." surname="Trammell">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date year="2016" month="December" day="09"/>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="QUIC-TIMEOUT" target="https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/88/slides/slides-88-tsvarea-10.pdf">
          <front>
            <title>QUIC (IETF-88 TSV Area Presentation)</title>
            <title>QUIC</title>
            <author initials="J." surname="Roskind">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date year="2013" month="November" day="07"/>
          </front>
          <refcontent>IETF-88 TSV Area Presentation</refcontent>
        </reference>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7605.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9002.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4459.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9114.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8546.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9065.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8999.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7801.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7838.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.ietf-quic-load-balancers.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9250.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7983.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.ietf-quic-version-negotiation.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3449.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6066.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7301.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.ietf-tls-esni.xml"/>

        <reference anchor="RFC7605">
          <front>
            <title>Recommendations on Using Assigned Transport Port Numbers</title>
            <author fullname="J. Touch" initials="J." surname="Touch">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="August" year="2015"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document provides recommendations to designers of application and service protocols on how to use the transport protocol port number space and when to request a port assignment from IANA.  It provides designer guidance to requesters or users of port numbers on how to interact with IANA using the processes defined in RFC 6335; thus, this document complements (but does not update) that document.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="165"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7605"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7605"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="QUIC-RECOVERY">
          <front>
            <title>QUIC Loss Detection and Congestion Control</title>
            <author fullname="J. Iyengar" initials="J." role="editor" surname="Iyengar">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="I. Swett" initials="I." role="editor" surname="Swett">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="May" year="2021"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes loss detection and congestion control mechanisms for QUIC.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9002"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9002"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="QUIC-GREASE">
          <front>
            <title>Greasing the QUIC Bit</title>
            <author fullname="Martin Thomson">
              <organization>Mozilla</organization>
            </author>
            <date day="8" month="June" year="2022"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>   This document describes a method for negotiating the ability to send
   an arbitrary value for the second-to-most significant bit in QUIC
   packets.

              </t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-quic-bit-grease-04"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC4459">
          <front>
            <title>MTU and Fragmentation Issues with In-the-Network Tunneling</title>
            <author fullname="P. Savola" initials="P." surname="Savola">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="April" year="2006"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>Tunneling techniques such as IP-in-IP when deployed in the middle of the network, typically between routers, have certain issues regarding how large packets can be handled: whether such packets would be fragmented and reassembled (and how), whether Path MTU Discovery would be used, or how this scenario could be operationally avoided. This memo justifies why this is a common, non-trivial problem, and goes on to describe the different solutions and their characteristics at some length.  This memo provides information for the Internet community.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="4459"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC4459"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="QUIC-HTTP">
          <front>
            <title>HTTP/3</title>
            <author fullname="Mike Bishop">
              <organization>Akamai</organization>
            </author>
            <date day="2" month="February" year="2021"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>The QUIC transport protocol has several features that are desirable in a transport for HTTP, such as stream multiplexing, per-stream flow control, and low-latency connection establishment.  This document describes a mapping of HTTP semantics over QUIC.  This document also identifies HTTP/2 features that are subsumed by QUIC and describes how HTTP/2 extensions can be ported to HTTP/3.
              </t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-quic-http-34"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="WIRE-IMAGE">
          <front>
            <title>The Wire Image of a Network Protocol</title>
            <author fullname="B. Trammell" initials="B." surname="Trammell">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="M. Kuehlewind" initials="M." surname="Kuehlewind">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="April" year="2019"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document defines the wire image, an abstraction of the information available to an on-path non-participant in a networking protocol.  This abstraction is intended to shed light on the implications that increased encryption has for network functions that use the wire image.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8546"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8546"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC9065">
          <front>
            <title>Considerations around Transport Header Confidentiality, Network Operations, and the Evolution of Internet Transport Protocols</title>
            <author fullname="G. Fairhurst" initials="G." surname="Fairhurst">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="C. Perkins" initials="C." surname="Perkins">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="July" year="2021"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>To protect user data and privacy, Internet transport protocols have supported payload encryption and authentication for some time. Such encryption and authentication are now also starting to be applied to the transport protocol headers. This helps avoid transport protocol ossification by middleboxes, mitigate attacks against the transport protocol, and protect metadata about the communication. Current operational practice in some networks inspect transport header information within the network, but this is no longer possible when those transport headers are encrypted.</t>
              <t>This document discusses the possible impact when network traffic uses a protocol with an encrypted transport header. It suggests issues to consider when designing new transport protocols or features.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9065"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9065"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="QUIC-INVARIANTS">
          <front>
            <title>Version-Independent Properties of QUIC</title>
            <author fullname="M. Thomson" initials="M." surname="Thomson">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="May" year="2021"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document defines the properties of the QUIC transport protocol that are common to all versions of the protocol.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8999"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8999"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC7801">
          <front>
            <title>GOST R 34.12-2015: Block Cipher "Kuznyechik"</title>
            <author fullname="V. Dolmatov" initials="V." role="editor" surname="Dolmatov">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="March" year="2016"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document is intended to be a source of information about the Russian Federal standard GOST R 34.12-2015 describing the block cipher with a block length of n=128 bits and a key length of k=256 bits, which is also referred to as "Kuznyechik".  This algorithm is one of the set of Russian cryptographic standard algorithms (called GOST algorithms).</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7801"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7801"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC7838">
          <front>
            <title>HTTP Alternative Services</title>
            <author fullname="M. Nottingham" initials="M." surname="Nottingham">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="P. McManus" initials="P." surname="McManus">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="J. Reschke" initials="J." surname="Reschke">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="April" year="2016"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document specifies "Alternative Services" for HTTP, which allow an origin's resources to be authoritatively available at a separate network location, possibly accessed with a different protocol configuration.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7838"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7838"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="QUIC-LB">
          <front>
            <title>QUIC-LB: Generating Routable QUIC Connection IDs</title>
            <author fullname="Martin Duke">
              <organization>Google</organization>
            </author>
            <author fullname="Nick Banks">
              <organization>Microsoft</organization>
            </author>
            <author fullname="Christian Huitema">
              <organization>Private Octopus Inc.</organization>
            </author>
            <date day="11" month="July" year="2022"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>   QUIC address migration allows clients to change their IP address
   while maintaining connection state.  To reduce the ability of an
   observer to link two IP addresses, clients and servers use new
   connection IDs when they communicate via different client addresses.
   This poses a problem for traditional "layer-4" load balancers that
   route packets via the IP address and port 4-tuple.  This
   specification provides a standardized means of securely encoding
   routing information in the server's connection IDs so that a properly
   configured load balancer can route packets with migrated addresses
   correctly.  As it proposes a structured connection ID format, it also
   provides a means of connection IDs self-encoding their length to aid
   some hardware offloads.

              </t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-quic-load-balancers-14"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="I-D.ietf-dprive-dnsoquic">
          <front>
            <title>DNS over Dedicated QUIC Connections</title>
            <author fullname="Christian Huitema">
              <organization>Private Octopus Inc.</organization>
            </author>
            <author fullname="Sara Dickinson">
              <organization>Sinodun IT</organization>
            </author>
            <author fullname="Allison Mankin">
              <organization>Salesforce</organization>
            </author>
            <date day="20" month="April" year="2022"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes the use of QUIC to provide transport confidentiality for DNS.  The encryption provided by QUIC has similar properties to those provided by TLS, while QUIC transport eliminates the head-of-line blocking issues inherent with TCP and provides more efficient packet-loss recovery than UDP.  DNS over QUIC (DoQ) has privacy properties similar to DNS over TLS (DoT) specified in RFC 7858, and latency characteristics similar to classic DNS over UDP.  This specification describes the use of DoQ as a general-purpose transport for DNS and includes the use of DoQ for stub to recursive, recursive to authoritative, and zone transfer scenarios.
              </t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-12"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC7983">
          <front>
            <title>Multiplexing Scheme Updates for Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP) Extension for Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS)</title>
            <author fullname="M. Petit-Huguenin" initials="M." surname="Petit-Huguenin">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="G. Salgueiro" initials="G." surname="Salgueiro">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="September" year="2016"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document defines how Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS), Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP), RTP Control Protocol (RTCP), Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN), Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN), and ZRTP packets are multiplexed on a single receiving socket.  It overrides the guidance from RFC 5764 ("SRTP                Extension for DTLS"), which suffered from four issues described and fixed in this document.</t>
              <t>This document updates RFC 5764.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7983"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7983"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="I-D.ietf-quic-version-negotiation">
          <front>
            <title>Compatible Version Negotiation for QUIC</title>
            <author fullname="David Schinazi">
              <organization>Google LLC</organization>
            </author>
            <author fullname="Eric Rescorla">
              <organization>Mozilla</organization>
            </author>
            <date day="11" month="July" year="2022"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>   QUIC does not provide a complete version negotiation mechanism but
   instead only provides a way for the server to indicate that the
   version the client chose is unacceptable.  This document describes a
   version negotiation mechanism that allows a client and server to
   select a mutually supported version.  Optionally, if the client's
   chosen version and the negotiated version share a compatible first
   flight format, the negotiation can take place without incurring an
   extra round trip.

              </t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-quic-version-negotiation-09"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC3449">
          <front>
            <title>TCP Performance Implications of Network Path Asymmetry</title>
            <author fullname="H. Balakrishnan" initials="H." surname="Balakrishnan">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="V. Padmanabhan" initials="V." surname="Padmanabhan">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="G. Fairhurst" initials="G." surname="Fairhurst">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="M. Sooriyabandara" initials="M." surname="Sooriyabandara">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="December" year="2002"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes TCP performance problems that arise because of asymmetric effects.  These problems arise in several access networks, including bandwidth-asymmetric networks and packet radio subnetworks, for different underlying reasons.  However, the end result on TCP performance is the same in both cases: performance often degrades significantly because of imperfection and variability in the ACK feedback from the receiver to the sender. The document details several mitigations to these effects, which have either been proposed or evaluated in the literature, or are currently deployed in networks.  These solutions use a combination of local link- layer techniques, subnetwork, and end-to-end mechanisms, consisting of: (i) techniques to manage the channel used for the upstream bottleneck link carrying the ACKs, typically using header compression or reducing the frequency of TCP ACKs, (ii) techniques to handle this reduced ACK frequency to retain the TCP sender's acknowledgment-triggered self- clocking and (iii) techniques to schedule the data and ACK packets in the reverse direction to improve performance in the presence of two-way traffic.  Each technique is described, together with known issues, and recommendations for use.  A summary of the recommendations is provided at the end of the document.  This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="69"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="3449"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC3449"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC6066">
          <front>
            <title>Transport Layer Security (TLS) Extensions: Extension Definitions</title>
            <author fullname="D. Eastlake 3rd" initials="D." surname="Eastlake 3rd">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="January" year="2011"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document provides specifications for existing TLS extensions.  It is a companion document for RFC 5246, "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2".  The extensions specified are server_name, max_fragment_length, client_certificate_url, trusted_ca_keys, truncated_hmac, and status_request.  [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6066"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC6066"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC7301">
          <front>
            <title>Transport Layer Security (TLS) Application-Layer Protocol Negotiation Extension</title>
            <author fullname="S. Friedl" initials="S." surname="Friedl">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="A. Popov" initials="A." surname="Popov">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="A. Langley" initials="A." surname="Langley">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="E. Stephan" initials="E." surname="Stephan">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="July" year="2014"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes a Transport Layer Security (TLS) extension for application-layer protocol negotiation within the TLS handshake. For instances in which multiple application protocols are supported on the same TCP or UDP port, this extension allows the application layer to negotiate which protocol will be used within the TLS connection.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7301"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7301"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="TLS-ECH">
          <front>
            <title>TLS Encrypted Client Hello</title>
            <author fullname="Eric Rescorla">
              <organization>RTFM, Inc.</organization>
            </author>
            <author fullname="Kazuho Oku">
              <organization>Fastly</organization>
            </author>
            <author fullname="Nick Sullivan">
              <organization>Cloudflare</organization>
            </author>
            <author fullname="Christopher A. Wood">
              <organization>Cloudflare</organization>
            </author>
            <date day="13" month="February" year="2022"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>   This document describes a mechanism in Transport Layer Security (TLS)
   for encrypting a ClientHello message under a server public key.

Discussion Venues

   This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.

   Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at
   https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni
   (https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni).

              </t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-tls-esni-14"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC3168">
          <front>
            <title>The Addition of Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) to IP</title>
            <author fullname="K. Ramakrishnan" initials="K." surname="Ramakrishnan">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="S. Floyd" initials="S." surname="Floyd">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="D. Black" initials="D." surname="Black">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="September" year="2001"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This memo specifies the incorporation of ECN (Explicit Congestion Notification) to TCP and IP, including ECN's use of two bits in the IP header.  [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="3168"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC3168"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC4787">
          <front>
            <title>Network Address Translation (NAT) Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP</title>
            <author fullname="F. Audet" initials="F." role="editor" surname="Audet">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="C. Jennings" initials="C." surname="Jennings">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="January" year="2007"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document defines basic terminology for describing different types of Network Address Translation (NAT) behavior when handling Unicast UDP and also defines a set of requirements that would allow many applications, such as multimedia communications or online gaming, to work consistently.  Developing NATs that meet this set of requirements will greatly increase the likelihood that these applications will function properly.  This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="127"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="4787"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC4787"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC5382">
          <front>
            <title>NAT Behavioral Requirements for TCP</title>
            <author fullname="S. Guha" initials="S." role="editor" surname="Guha">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="K. Biswas" initials="K." surname="Biswas">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="B. Ford" initials="B." surname="Ford">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="S. Sivakumar" initials="S." surname="Sivakumar">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="P. Srisuresh" initials="P." surname="Srisuresh">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="October" year="2008"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document defines a set of requirements for NATs that handle TCP that would allow many applications, such as peer-to-peer applications and online games to work consistently.  Developing NATs that meet this set of requirements will greatly increase the likelihood that these applications will function properly.  This document specifies  an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community,  and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="142"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5382"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC5382"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="QUIC-APPLICABILITY"> anchor="RFC9308" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9308">
          <front>
            <title>Applicability of the QUIC Transport Protocol</title>
            <author fullname="Mirja Kuehlewind"> Kühlewind">
              <organization>Ericsson</organization>
            </author>
            <author fullname="Brian Trammell">
              <organization>Google</organization>
              <organization>Google Switzerland GmbH</organization>
            </author>
            <date day="11" month="July" month="September" year="2022"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>   This document discusses the applicability of the QUIC transport
   protocol, focusing on caveats impacting application protocol
   development and deployment over QUIC.  Its intended audience is
   designers of application protocol mappings to QUIC, and implementors
   of these application protocols.

              </t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-quic-applicability-17"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="DOTS-ARCH">
          <front>
            <title>DDoS Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Architecture</title>
            <author fullname="A. Mortensen" initials="A." role="editor" surname="Mortensen">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="T. Reddy.K" initials="T." role="editor" surname="Reddy.K">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="F. Andreasen" initials="F." surname="Andreasen">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="N. Teague" initials="N." surname="Teague">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="R. Compton" initials="R." surname="Compton">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="August" year="2020"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes an architecture for establishing and maintaining Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) within and between domains. The document does not specify protocols or protocol extensions, instead focusing on defining architectural relationships, components, and concepts used in a DOTS deployment.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8811"/> value="9308"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8811"/> value="10.17487/RFC9308"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC4937">
          <front>
            <title>IANA Considerations for PPP over Ethernet (PPPoE)</title>
            <author fullname="P. Arberg" initials="P." surname="Arberg">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="V. Mammoliti" initials="V." surname="Mammoliti">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="June" year="2007"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes the IANA considerations for the PPP over Ethernet (PPPoE) protocol.  This memo provides information for the Internet community.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="4937"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC4937"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="QUIC-RETRY">
          <front>
            <title>QUIC Retry Offload</title>
            <author fullname="Martin Duke">
              <organization>Google</organization>
            </author>
            <author fullname="Nick Banks">
              <organization>Microsoft</organization>
            </author>
            <date day="28" month="March" year="2022"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>   QUIC uses Retry packets

        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9287.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3168.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4787.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5382.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8811.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4987.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.ietf-quic-retry-offload.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2475.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.1812.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4443.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8899.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.1191.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8201.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8504.xml"/>
      </references>
    </references>
<section numbered="false" anchor="acknowledgments">
      <name>Acknowledgments</name>
      <t>Special thanks to reduce load on stressed servers, last call reviewers <contact fullname="Elwyn
      Davies"/>, <contact fullname="Barry Leiba"/>, <contact fullname="Al
      Morton"/>, and <contact fullname="Peter Saint-Andre"/>.</t>
      <t>This work was partially supported by
   forcing the client to prove ownership of its address before the
   server commits state.  QUIC also has an anti-tampering mechanism to
   prevent the unauthorized injection of Retry packets into a
   connection.  However, a server operator may want to offload
   production of Retry packets to an anti-Denial-of-Service agent or
   hardware accelerator.  "Retry Offload" is a mechanism for
   coordination between a server European Commission under
      Horizon 2020 grant agreement no. 688421 Measurement and an external generator of Retry
   packets that can succeed despite the anti-tampering mechanism.

              </t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-duke-quic-retry-offload-00"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC2475">
          <front>
            <title>An Architecture for Differentiated Services</title>
            <author fullname="S. Blake" initials="S." surname="Blake">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="D. Black" initials="D." surname="Black">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="M. Carlson" initials="M." surname="Carlson">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="E. Davies" initials="E." surname="Davies">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="Z. Wang" initials="Z." surname="Wang">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="W. Weiss" initials="W." surname="Weiss">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="December" year="1998"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document defines an architecture for implementing scalable service differentiation in the Internet.  This memo provides information for the Internet community.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2475"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC2475"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC1812">
          <front>
            <title>Requirements for IP Version 4 Routers</title>
            <author fullname="F. Baker" initials="F." role="editor" surname="Baker">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="June" year="1995"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This memo defines and discusses requirements for devices that perform the network layer forwarding function of the Internet protocol suite. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="1812"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC1812"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC4443">
          <front>
            <title>Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMPv6) for the Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Specification</title>
            <author fullname="A. Conta" initials="A." surname="Conta">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="S. Deering" initials="S." surname="Deering">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="M. Gupta" initials="M." role="editor" surname="Gupta">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="March" year="2006"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes the format of
      a set of control messages used in ICMPv6 (Internet Control Message Protocol).  ICMPv6 is the Internet Control Message Protocol for Middleboxed Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6).  [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="STD" value="89"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="4443"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC4443"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="DPLPMTUD">
          <front>
            <title>Packetization Layer Path MTU Discovery for Datagram Transports</title>
            <author fullname="G. Fairhurst" initials="G." surname="Fairhurst">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="T. Jones" initials="T." surname="Jones">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="M. Tüxen" initials="M." surname="Tüxen">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="I. Rüngeler" initials="I." surname="Rüngeler">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="T. Völker" initials="T." surname="Völker">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="September" year="2020"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document specifies Datagram Packetization Layer Path MTU Discovery (DPLPMTUD). This is a robust method for Path MTU Discovery (PMTUD) for datagram Packetization Layers (PLs). It allows a PL, or a datagram application that uses a PL, to discover whether a network path can support the current size of datagram.  This can be used to detect (MAMI), and reduce the message size when a sender encounters a packet black hole. It can also probe a network path to discover whether the maximum packet size can be increased.  This provides functionality for datagram transports that is equivalent to the PLPMTUD specification for TCP, specified in RFC 4821, which it updates. It also updates by the UDP Usage Guidelines to refer to this method Swiss State Secretariat for use with UDP datagrams
      Education, Research, and updates SCTP.</t> Innovation under contract no. 15.0268. This
      support does not imply endorsement.</t>
    </section>
<section numbered="false" anchor="contributors">
      <name>Contributors</name>
      <t>The document provides implementation notes for incorporating Datagram PMTUD into IETF datagram transports or applications that use datagram transports.</t>
              <t>This specification updates RFC 4960, RFC 4821, RFC 6951, RFC 8085, and RFC 8261.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8899"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8899"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC1191">
          <front>
            <title>Path MTU discovery</title>
            <author fullname="J.C. Mogul" initials="J.C." surname="Mogul">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="S.E. Deering" initials="S.E." surname="Deering">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="November" year="1990"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This memo describes a technique for dynamically discovering the maximum transmission unit (MTU) of an arbitrary internet path.  It specifies a small change following people have contributed significant text to the way routers generate one type of ICMP message.  For a path that passes through a router that has not been so changed, and/or
      feedback on this technique might not discover the correct Path MTU, but it will always choose a Path MTU as accurate as, and in many cases more accurate than, the Path MTU that would be chosen by current practice.  [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="1191"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC1191"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8201">
          <front>
            <title>Path MTU Discovery for IP version 6</title>
            <author fullname="J. McCann" initials="J." surname="McCann">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="S. Deering" initials="S." surname="Deering">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="J. Mogul" initials="J." surname="Mogul">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="R. Hinden" initials="R." role="editor" surname="Hinden">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="July" year="2017"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes Path MTU Discovery (PMTUD) for IP version 6. It is largely derived from RFC 1191, which describes Path MTU Discovery for IP version 4.  It obsoletes RFC 1981.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="STD" value="87"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8201"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8201"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8504">
          <front>
            <title>IPv6 Node Requirements</title>
            <author fullname="T. Chown" initials="T." surname="Chown">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="J. Loughney" initials="J." surname="Loughney">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="T. Winters" initials="T." surname="Winters">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="January" year="2019"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document defines requirements for IPv6 nodes.  It is expected that IPv6 will be deployed in a wide range of devices and situations. Specifying the requirements for IPv6 nodes allows IPv6 to function well and interoperate in a large number of situations and deployments.</t>
              <t>This document obsoletes RFC 6434, and in turn RFC 4294.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="220"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8504"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8504"/>
        </reference>
      </references>
    </references> document:</t>
      <contact fullname="Chris Box"/>
      <contact fullname="Dan Druta"/>
      <contact fullname="David Schinazi"/>
      <contact fullname="Gorry Fairhurst"/>
      <contact fullname="Ian Swett"/>
      <contact fullname="Igor Lubashev"/>
      <contact fullname="Jana Iyengar"/>
      <contact fullname="Jared Mauch"/>
      <contact fullname="Lars Eggert"/>
      <contact fullname="Lucas Purdue"/>
      <contact fullname="Marcus Ihlar"/>
      <contact fullname="Mark Nottingham"/>
      <contact fullname="Martin Duke"/>
      <contact fullname="Martin Thomson"/>
      <contact fullname="Matt Joras"/>
      <contact fullname="Mike Bishop"/>
      <contact fullname="Nick Banks"/>
      <contact fullname="Thomas Fossati"/>
      <contact fullname="Sean Turner"/>
    </section>
 </back>
  <!-- ##markdown-source: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-->
</rfc>