<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>
<!-- edited with XMLSPY v5 rel. 4 U (http://www.xmlspy.com) by Fred Baker (private) --> encoding="UTF-8"?>

<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd" [
<!-- One method to get references from the online citation libraries.
     There has to be one entity for each item to be referenced.
     An alternate method (rfc include) is described in the references. -->
<!ENTITY RFC2119 SYSTEM "http://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml">
  <!ENTITY RFC2784 SYSTEM "http://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2784.xml"> nbsp    "&#160;">
  <!ENTITY RFC8174 SYSTEM "http://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8174.xml"> zwsp   "&#8203;">
  <!ENTITY RFC8200 SYSTEM "http://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8200.xml"> nbhy   "&#8209;">
  <!ENTITY RFC8250 SYSTEM "http://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8250.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC5036 SYSTEM "http://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5036.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC4193 SYSTEM "http://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4193.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC1772 SYSTEM "http://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.1772.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC9197 SYSTEM "http://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9197.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC4302 SYSTEM "http://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4302.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC9098 SYSTEM "http://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9098.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC9326 SYSTEM "http://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9326.xml"> wj     "&#8288;">
]>
<?rfc toc="yes"?>
<?rfc tocompact="no"?>
<?rfc tocdepth="3"?>
<?rfc symrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc sortrefs="yes"?>

<rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" submissionType="IETF" category="std" consensus="true" docName="draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-ipv6-options-12"
     ipr="trust200902"> number="9486" ipr="trust200902" obsoletes="" updates="" xml:lang="en" tocInclude="true" tocDepth="3" symRefs="true" sortRefs="true" version="3">

  <front>
    <title abbrev="In-situ OAM IPv6 encapsulation">In-situ OAM abbrev="IOAM IPv6
    Options</title> Options">IPv6 Options for In Situ Operations,
    Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM)</title>
    <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9486"/>
    <author fullname="Shwetha Bhandari" initials="S." surname="Bhandari" role="editor">
      <organization abbrev="Thoughtspot">Thoughtspot</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
	              <street>3rd
	  <extaddr>3rd Floor, Indiqube Orion, 24th Orion</extaddr>
          <street>24th Main Rd, Garden Layout, HSR Layout</street>
		      <city>Bangalore, KARNATAKA 560 102</city>
          <city>Bangalore</city>
	  <region>Karnataka</region>
	  <code>560 102</code>
          <country>India</country>
        </postal>
        <email>shwetha.bhandari@thoughtspot.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author fullname="Frank Brockners" initials="F." surname="Brockners" role="editor">
      <organization abbrev="Cisco">Cisco Systems, Inc.</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>Hansaallee 249, 3rd Floor</street>

          <!-- Reorder these if your country does things differently -->

          <city>DUESSELDORF</city>
          <city>Duesseldorf</city>
          <code>40549</code>
          <country>Germany</country>
        </postal>
        <email>fbrockne@cisco.com</email>

        <!-- uri and facsimile elements may also be added -->
      </address>
    </author>
    <date day="7" month="May" month="September" year="2023"/>

    <area>Transport Area</area>
    <area>tsv</area>
    <workgroup>ippm</workgroup>

<keyword></keyword>

    <abstract>
      <t>In-situ
      <t>In situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) records
      operational and telemetry information in the packet while the packet
      traverses a path between two points in the network. This document
      outlines how IOAM data fields Data-Fields are encapsulated in IPv6.</t>
    </abstract>
  </front>
  <middle>
    <section title="Introduction">
      <t>In-situ numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Introduction</name>
      <t>In situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) records
      operational and telemetry information in the packet while the packet
      traverses a path between two points in the network. IOAM concepts and
      associated nomenclature, nomenclature as well as IOAM data fields Data-Fields are defined in <xref target="RFC9197"/>.
      target="RFC9197" format="default"/>.  This document outlines how IOAM data fields
      Data-Fields are encapsulated in IPv6 <xref
      target="RFC8200"/> target="RFC8200"
      format="default"/> and discusses deployment requirements for networks
      that use IPv6-encapsulated IOAM data fields.</t> Data-Fields.</t>
     <t>The terms "encapsulation" and "decapsulation" are used in this
     document in the same way as in <xref target="RFC9197"/>: target="RFC9197" format="default"/>:
     An IOAM encapsulating node incorporates one or more IOAM-Option-Types IOAM Option-Types
     into packets. An packets that IOAM decapsulating node removes IOAM-Option-Type(s)
      from packets.</t> is enabled for.</t>
    </section>
    <section title="Conventions"> numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Conventions</name>
      <section title="Requirements Language">
        <t>The numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>Requirements Language</name>
        <t>
    The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
        "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", "<bcp14>MUST</bcp14>", "<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL
    NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>NOT RECOMMENDED</bcp14>",
    "<bcp14>MAY</bcp14>", and
        "OPTIONAL" "<bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14>" in this document are to be interpreted as
    described in BCP
        14 BCP&nbsp;14 <xref target="RFC2119"/> <xref target="RFC8174"/>
    when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.</t> here.
        </t>

      </section>
      <section title="Abbreviations"> numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>Abbreviations</name>
        <t>Abbreviations used in this document:</t>

        <t><list hangIndent="11" style="hanging">
            <t hangText="E2E:">Edge-to-Edge</t>

            <t hangText="IOAM:">In-situ
        <dl newline="false" spacing="normal" indent="11">
          <dt>E2E:</dt>
          <dd>Edge-to-Edge</dd>
          <dt>IOAM:</dt>
          <dd>In situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance as defined in <xref target="RFC9197"/></t>

            <t hangText="OAM:">Operations, target="RFC9197"
          format="default"/></dd>
          <dt>OAM:</dt>
          <dd>Operations, Administration, and Maintenance</t>

            <t hangText="POT:">Proof Maintenance</dd>
          <dt>POT:</dt>
          <dd>Proof of Transit</t>
          </list></t> Transit</dd>
        </dl>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section title="In-situ numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>In situ OAM Metadata Transport in IPv6"> IPv6</name>
      <t>IOAM in IPv6 is used to enhance diagnostics of IPv6 networks.  It
      complements other mechanisms designed to enhance diagnostics of IPv6
      networks, such as the IPv6 "IPv6 Performance and Diagnostic Metrics (PDM)
      Destination Option Option" described in <xref target="RFC8250"/>.</t> target="RFC8250"
      format="default"/>.</t>
      <t> At the time this document was written, several implementations of
      IOAM for IPv6 exist, e.g., IOAM for IPv6 in the Linux Kernel (supported
      from Kernel version 5.15 onwards onward,
      <eref target="https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/7c804e91df523a37c29e183ea2b10ac73c3a4f3d">
      IPv6 IOAM in Linux Kernel</eref>), Kernel</eref>) and
      <eref target="https://docs.fd.io/vpp/17.04/ioam_ipv6_doc.html">
      IOAM for IPv6 in VPP </eref>. Vector Packet Processing (VPP)</eref>.
      </t>
      <t>IOAM data fields Data-Fields can be encapsulated with two types of extension
      headers in IPv6 packets - -- either the hop-by-hop options header or the
      destination options header.  Multiple options with the same option type MAY
      <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> appear in the same hop-by-hop options or destination
      options header, header with distinct content.</t>
      <t>An IPv6 packet carrying IOAM data in an extension header can have
      other extension headers, compliant with <xref target="RFC8200"/>.</t>

      <t>IPv6 hop-by-hop target="RFC8200" format="default"/>.</t>
    <figure>
      <name>IPv6 Hop-by-Hop and destination option format Destination Option Format for carrying Carrying
      IOAM data fields:<figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[ Data-Fields</name>
      <artwork name="" type="" align="center" alt=""><![CDATA[
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|  Option Type  Option-Type  |  Opt Data Len |   Reserved    | IOAM-Opt-Type IOAM Opt-Type |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+<-+
|                                                               |  |
.                                                               .  I
.                                                               .  O
.                                                               .  A
.                                                               .  M
.                                                               .  .
.                          Option Data                          .  O
.                                                               .  P
.                                                               .  T
.                                                               .  I
.                                                               .  O
.                                                               .  N
|                                                               |  |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+<-+
]]></artwork>
        </figure></t>

      <t><list style="hanging">
          <t hangText="Option Type:">8-bit
    </figure>

      <dl newline="false" spacing="normal">
        <dt>Option-Type:</dt>
        <dd>8-bit option type identifier as defined
          in <xref target="IANA"/>.</t>

          <t hangText="Opt target="IANA" format="default"/>.</dd>
        <dt>Opt Data Len:">8-bit Len:</dt>
        <dd>8-bit unsigned integer. Length of this
          option, in octets, not including the first 2 octets.</t>

          <t hangText="Reserved:">8-bit octets.</dd>
        <dt>Reserved:</dt>
        <dd>8-bit field MUST <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be set to zero
          by the source.</t>

          <t hangText="IOAM-Option-Type:"> Abbreviated source.</dd>
        <dt>IOAM Option-Type:</dt>
        <dd>Abbreviated to "IOAM-Opt-Type" "IOAM Opt-Type"
	  in the diagram above: 8-bit field as defined in section 4.1 of <xref target="RFC9197"/>.</t>

          <t hangText="Option Data:">Variable-length target="RFC9197" section="4.1" sectionFormat="of"/>.</dd>
        <dt>Option Data:</dt>
        <dd><t>Variable-length field.
          Option-Type-specific data.</t>
        </list></t>

      <t>IOAM Option
          The data is inserted specific to the Option-Type, as follows:<list style="numbers">
          <t>Pre-allocated detailed below.</t>

      <dl newline="false" spacing="normal">
	  <dt>Pre-allocated Trace Option: The Option:</dt>
	  <dd>
	    <t>The IOAM Preallocated Pre-allocated Trace
          Option-Type Option-Type, defined in Section 4.4 of <xref target="RFC9197"/>
	    target="RFC9197" section="4.4" sectionFormat="of"/>, is represented
	    as an IPv6 option in the hop-by-hop extension header: <list
              style="hanging">
              <t hangText="Option Type:">TBD_1_1 8-bit header:</t>
            <dl newline="false" spacing="normal">
              <dt>Option-Type:</dt>
              <dd>0x31 (8-bit identifier of the IPv6 Option Type Option-Type for IOAM.</t>

              <t hangText="IOAM Type:">IOAM
              IOAM).</dd>
            <dt>IOAM Type:</dt>
            <dd>IOAM Pre-allocated Trace Option-Type.</t>
            </list></t>

          <t>Proof Option-Type.</dd>
	    </dl>
           </dd>
          <dt>Proof of Transit Option: The Option-Type:</dt>
	  <dd>
	    <t>The IOAM POT Option-Type Option-Type, defined in
          Section 4.5 of <xref target="RFC9197"/> target="RFC9197"
	    section="4.5" sectionFormat="of"/>, is represented as an IPv6
	    option in the hop-by-hop extension header: <list style="hanging">
              <t hangText="Option Type:">TBD_1_1 8-bit header:</t>
            <dl newline="false" spacing="normal">
              <dt>Option-Type:</dt>
              <dd>0x31 (8-bit identifier of the IPv6 Option Type Option-Type for IOAM.</t>

              <t hangText="IOAM Type:">IOAM
              IOAM).</dd>
              <dt>IOAM Type:</dt>
              <dd>IOAM POT Option-Type.</t>
            </list></t>

          <t>Edge to Edge Option: The Option-Type.</dd>
            </dl>
	  </dd>
          <dt>Edge-to-Edge Option:</dt>
	  <dd>
	    <t>The IOAM E2E option Option, defined in Section 4.6 <xref target="RFC9197"/> target="RFC9197"
	    section="4.6" sectionFormat="of"/>, is represented as an IPv6
	    option in destination extension header: <list style="hanging">
              <t hangText="Option Type:">TBD_1_0 8-bit </t>
          <dl newline="false" spacing="normal">
            <dt>Option-Type:</dt>
            <dd>0x11 (8-bit identifier of the IPv6 Option Type Option-Type for IOAM.</t>

              <t hangText="IOAM Type:">IOAM
            IOAM).</dd>
            <dt>IOAM Type:</dt>
            <dd>IOAM E2E Option-Type.</t>
            </list></t>

          <t>Direct Option-Type.</dd>
          </dl>
	  </dd>
            <dt>Direct Export (DEX) Option: The Option:</dt>
	    <dd>
	      <t>The IOAM Direct Export Option-Type Option-Type, defined in
          Section 3.2 of <xref target="RFC9326"/>
	      target="RFC9326" section="3.2" sectionFormat="of"/>, is
	      represented as an IPv6 option in the hop-by-hop extension header:
          <list style="hanging">
              <t hangText="Option Type:">TBD_1_0 8-bit
	      header:</t>
              <dl newline="false" spacing="normal">
		<dt>Option-Type:</dt>
		<dd>0x11 (8-bit identifier of the IPv6 Option Type Option-Type for IOAM.</t>

              <t hangText="IOAM Type:">IOAM
		IOAM).</dd>
		<dt>IOAM Type:</dt>
		<dd>IOAM Direct Export (DEX) Option-Type.</t>
            </list></t>

        </list>All Option-Type.</dd>
              </dl>
	    </dd>
	  </dl>
	</dd>
      </dl>

      <t>All the IOAM IPv6 options defined here have alignment
      requirements. Specifically, they all require 4n alignment. alignment on multiples of 4
      bytes. This ensures that fields specified in <xref target="RFC9197"/> target="RFC9197"
      format="default"/> are aligned at a multiple-of-4 offset from the start
      of the hop-by-hop and destination options header.</t>
      <t>IPv6 options can have a maximum length of 255 octets. Consequently,
      the total length of IOAM Option-Types including all data fields is also
      limited to 255 octets when encapsulated into IPv6.</t>
    </section>
    <section title="IOAM numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>IOAM Deployment In in IPv6 Networks">
      <t/> Networks</name>
      <section anchor="v6_requirement"
               title="Considerations numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>Considerations for IOAM deployment Deployment and implementation Implementation in IPv6 networks">
        Networks</name>
        <t>IOAM deployments in IPv6 networks MUST <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> take the following
        considerations and requirements into account:<list style="hanging">
            <t hangText="C1"> account.</t>
	<ol type="C%d:">
	  <li>
          IOAM MUST <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be deployed in an IOAM-Domain. An
          IOAM-Domain is a set of nodes that use IOAM. An IOAM-Domain is
          bounded by its perimeter or edge. The set of nodes forming an
          IOAM-Domain may be connected to the same physical infrastructure
          (e.g., a service provider's network). They may also be remotely
          connected to each other (e.g., an enterprise VPN or an overlay).  It
          is expected that all nodes in an IOAM-Domain are managed by the same
          administrative entity. Please refer to <xref target="RFC9197"/>) target="RFC9197"
          format="default"/> for more details on IOAM-Domains.
	    </t>
            <t hangText="C2">Implementations
	  </li>
	  <li>
          Implementations of IOAM MUST <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> ensure that the
          addition of IOAM data fields Data-Fields does not alter the way routers forward
          packets or the forwarding decisions they make.  Packets with added
          IOAM information must follow the same path within the domain as an
          identical packet without IOAM information would, even in the
          presence of Equal-Cost Multi-Path Multipath (ECMP).  This behavior is
          important for deployments where IOAM data fields Data-Fields are only added
          "on-demand".  Implementations of IOAM MUST <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> ensure
          that ECMP behavior for packets with and without IOAM data fields Data-Fields is
          the same.  In order for IOAM to work in IPv6 networks, IOAM MUST
          <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be explicitly enabled per interface on every
          node within the IOAM domain. IOAM-Domain.  Unless a particular interface is
          explicitly enabled (i.e., explicitly configured) for IOAM, a router MUST
          <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> ignore IOAM Options. </t>

            <t hangText="C3">
          </li>
	  <li>
          In order to maintain the integrity of packets in an IOAM domain, IOAM-Domain,
          the Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU) of transit routers and switches
          must be configured to a value that does not lead to an ICMP "ICMP Packet
          Too Big Big" error message being sent to the originator and the packet
          being dropped.  The PMTU tolerance range must be identified identified, and
          IOAM encapsulation operations or data field insertion must not
          exceed this range.  Control of the MTU is critical to the proper
          operation of IOAM.  The PMTU tolerance must be identified through configuration
          configuration, and IOAM operations must not exceed the packet size
          beyond PMTU.</t>

            <t hangText="C4"> PMTU.
        </li>
          <li>
          <xref target="RFC8200"/> target="RFC8200" format="default"/> precludes insertion of
          IOAM data directly into the original IPv6 header of in-flight
          packets.  IOAM deployments which that do not encapsulate/decapsulate IOAM
          on the host but desire to encapsulate/decapsulate IOAM on transit
          nodes
            MUST <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> add an additional IPv6 header to the
          original packet.  IOAM data is added to this additional IPv6 header.
            </t>

          </list></t>
	  </li>
        </ol>
      </section>
      <section title="IOAM domains bounded numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>IOAM-Domains Bounded by hosts"> Hosts</name>
        <t>For deployments where the IOAM domain IOAM-Domain is bounded by hosts, hosts
        will perform the operation of IOAM data field Data-Field encapsulation and
        decapsulation, i.e., hosts will place the IOAM data fields Data-Fields
        directly in the IPv6 header or remove the IOAM data fields Data-Fields directly
        from the IPv6 header. IOAM data is carried in IPv6 packets as hop-by-hop or
        destination options as specified in this document.</t>
      </section>
      <section title="IOAM domains bounded numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>IOAM-Domains Bounded by network devices"> Network Devices</name>
        <t>For deployments where the IOAM domain IOAM-Domain is bounded by network
        devices, network devices such as routers form the edge of an IOAM
        domain.
        IOAM-Domain. Network devices will perform the operation of IOAM data field
        Data-Field encapsulation and decapsulation. Network devices will
        encapsulate IOAM data fields Data-Fields in an additional, outer, IPv6 header which that
        carries the IOAM data fields.</t> Data-Fields.</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section title="Security Considerations"> numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Security Considerations</name>
      <t>This document describes the encapsulation of IOAM data fields Data-Fields in
      IPv6. For general IOAM security considerations, see <xref target="RFC9197"/>.
      target="RFC9197" format="default"/>. Security considerations of the
      specific IOAM data fields Data-Fields for each case (i.e., Trace, Proof of Transit, POT, and E2E) are
      also described and defined in <xref target="RFC9197"/>.</t> target="RFC9197"
      format="default"/>.</t>
      <t>As this document describes new options for IPv6, the
      security considerations of <xref target="RFC8200"/> target="RFC8200" format="default"/> and
      <xref target="RFC8250"/> target="RFC8250" format="default"/> apply.</t>
      <t>From a network-protection perspective, there is an assumed trust
      model such that any node that adds IOAM to a packet, removes IOAM from a
      packet, or modifies IOAM data fields Data-Fields of a packet is assumed to be
      allowed to do so.  By default, packets that include IPv6 extension
      headers with IOAM information MUST NOT <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be leaked through
      the boundaries of the IOAM-Domain.</t>
      <t>IOAM-Domain boundary routers MUST <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> filter any incoming
      traffic from outside the IOAM-Domain that contains IPv6 extension
      headers with IOAM information. IOAM-Domain boundary routers MUST
      <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> also filter any outgoing traffic leaving the
      IOAM-Domain that contains IPv6 extension headers with IOAM
      information.</t>
      <t>In the general case, an IOAM node only adds, removes, or modifies
        an IPv6 extension header with IOAM information, if the
        directive to do so comes from a trusted source and the directive
        is validated.</t>
      <t>Problems may occur if the above behaviors are not implemented
      or if the assumed trust model is violated (e.g., through a security
      breach). In addition to the security considerations discussed in
      <xref target="RFC9197"/>, target="RFC9197" format="default"/>, the security considerations associated
      with IPv6 extension headers listed in <xref target="RFC9098"/> target="RFC9098" format="default"/> apply.</t>
      <section title="Applicability numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>Applicability of AH"> Authentication Header (AH)</name>
        <t> The network devices in an IOAM-Domain are trusted to add, update update,
        and remove IOAM options according to the constraints specified in
        <xref target="RFC8200"/>.
      IOAM domain target="RFC8200" format="default"/>.  IOAM-Domain does not rely
        on the Authentication Header (AH) AH as defined in <xref target="RFC4302"/> target="RFC4302" format="default"/> to
        secure IOAM options.  The use of IOAM options with AH and its
        processing is are not defined in this document. Future documents may
        define the use of IOAM with AH and its processing.</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="IANA" title="IANA Considerations">
      <t>This draft requests numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>IANA Considerations</name>
      <t>IANA has assigned the following IPv6 Option Type assignments Option-Types from
      the destination options "Destination Options and hop-by-hop options sub-registry Hop-by-Hop Options" subregistry of Internet
      "Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Parameters.</t>

      <t>http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-parameters/ipv6-
      parameters.xhtml#ipv6-parameters-2</t>

      <t><figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
   Hex Value    Binary Value      Description            Reference
                act chg rest
   ------------------------------------------------------------------
   TBD_1_0      00   0  TBD_1     IOAM                   [This draft]
                                  destination option Parameters" <eref
      target="https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-parameters/"
      brackets="angle"/>.</t>
      <table>
	<thead>
	  <tr>
	    <th rowspan="2">Hex Value</th>
	    <th colspan="3">Binary Value</th>
	    <th rowspan="2">Description</th>
	    <th rowspan="2">Reference</th>
	  </tr>
	  <tr>
	    <th>act</th>
	    <th>chg</th>
	    <th>rest</th>
	  </tr>
	</thead>
	<tbody>
	  <tr>
	    <td>0x11</td>
	    <td>00</td>
	    <td>0</td>
	    <td>10001</td>
	    <td>IOAM Destination Option and IOAM hop-by-hop option
   TBD_1_1      00   1  TBD_1     IOAM                   [This draft]
                                  destination option Hop-by-Hop Option</td>
	    <td>RFC 9486</td>
	  </tr>
	  <tr>
	    <td>0x31</td>
	    <td>00</td>
	    <td>1</td>
	    <td>10001</td>
	    <td>IOAM Destination Option and IOAM hop-by-hop option
]]></artwork>
        </figure></t> Hop-by-Hop Option</td>
	    <td>RFC 9486</td>
	  </tr>
	</tbody>
      </table>

    </section>

  </middle>
  <back>

<displayreference target="I-D.kitamura-ipv6-record-route" to="IPV6-RECORD-ROUTE"/>

    <references>
      <name>References</name>
      <references>
        <name>Normative References</name>
        <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8174.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9197.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9326.xml"/>
      </references>
      <references>
        <name>Informative References</name>
        <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8200.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8250.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4302.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9098.xml"/>

        <xi:include href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.kitamura-ipv6-record-route.xml"/>
      </references>
    </references>

    <section title="Acknowledgements"> numbered="false" toc="default">
      <name>Acknowledgements</name>
      <t>The authors would like to thank Tom Herbert, Eric Vyncke, Nalini
      Elkins, Srihari Raghavan, Ranganathan <contact fullname="Tom Herbert"/>,
      <contact fullname="Éric Vyncke"/>, <contact fullname="Nalini Elkins"/>,
      <contact fullname="Srihari Raghavan"/>, <contact fullname="Ranganathan T S, Karthik S"/>, <contact fullname="Karthik Babu Harichandra
      Babu, Akshaya Nadahalli, Stefano Previdi, Hemant Singh, Erik Nordmark,
      LJ Wobker, Mark Smith, Andrew Yourtchenko and Justin Iurman Babu"/>, <contact
      fullname="Akshaya Nadahalli"/>, <contact fullname="Stefano Previdi"/>,
      <contact fullname="Hemant Singh"/>, <contact fullname="Erik Nordmark"/>,
      <contact fullname="LJ Wobker"/>, <contact fullname="Mark Smith"/>,
      <contact fullname="Andrew Yourtchenko"/>, and <contact fullname="Justin
      Iurman"/> for the comments and advice. For the IPv6 encapsulation, this
      document leverages concepts described in <xref target="I-D.kitamura-ipv6-record-route"/>.
      target="I-D.kitamura-ipv6-record-route" format="default"/>.  The authors
      would like to acknowledge the work done by the author
      Hiroshi Kitamura <contact
      fullname="Hiroshi Kitamura"/> and people involved in writing it.</t>
    </section>

    <!---->

    <!-- -->
  </middle>

  <back>
    <references title="Normative References">
      &RFC2119;

      &RFC8174;

      &RFC9197;

      &RFC9326;

    </references>

    <references title="Informative References">
      &RFC8200;

      &RFC8250;

      &RFC4302;

      &RFC9098;

      <reference anchor="I-D.kitamura-ipv6-record-route">
        <front>
          <title>Record Route for IPv6 (PR6) Hop-by-Hop Option
          Extension</title>

          <author fullname="Hiroshi Kitamura" initials="H" surname="Kitamura"/>

          <date month="November" year="2000"/>
        </front>

        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft"
                    value="draft-kitamura-ipv6-record-route-00"/>

        <format target="https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-kitamura-ipv6-record-route-00.txt"
                type="TXT"/>
      </reference>

    </references>

    <section numbered="no" title="Contributors"> numbered="false" toc="default">
      <name>Contributors</name>

      <t>This document was the collective effort of several authors. The text
      and content were contributed by the editors and the co-authors coauthors listed
          below. The contact information of the co-authors appears at the end of
          this document.</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>Carlos Pignataro</t>
            <t>Hannes Gredler</t>
            <t>John Leddy</t>
            <t>Stephen Youell</t>
            <t>Tal Mizrahi</t>
            <t>Aviv Kfir</t>
            <t>Barak Gafni</t>
            <t>Petr Lapukhov</t>
            <t>Mickey Spiegel</t>
            <t>Suresh Krishnan</t>
            <t>Rajiv Asati</t>
            <t>Mark Smith</t>
          </list></t>
    </section>

    <section numbered="no" title="Contributors' Addresses">
          <t><figure>
              <artwork><![CDATA[

   Carlos Pignataro
   Cisco
      below.</t>

      <contact fullname="Carlos Pignataro">
	<organization>Cisco Systems, Inc.
   7200-11 Inc.</organization>
	<address>
	  <postal>
	    <street>7200-11 Kit Creek Road
   Research Road</street>
	    <city>Research Triangle Park, NC  27709
   United Park</city>
	    <region>NC</region><code>27709</code>
	    <country>United States
   Email: cpignata@cisco.com

   Hannes Gredler
   RtBrick Inc.
   Email: hannes@rtbrick.com

   John Leddy
   Email: john@leddy.net

   Stephen Youell
   JP of America</country>
	  </postal>
	  <email>cpignata@cisco.com</email>
	</address>
      </contact>

   <contact fullname="Hannes Gredler">
     <organization>RtBrick Inc.</organization>
     <address>
       <email>hannes@rtbrick.com</email>
     </address>
   </contact>

<contact fullname="John Leddy">
  <address>
    <email>john@leddy.net</email>
  </address>
</contact>

<contact fullname="Stephen Youell">
  <organization>JP Morgan Chase
   25 Chase</organization>
  <address>
    <postal>
      <street>25 Bank Street
   London  E14 5JP
   United Kingdom
   Email: stephen.youell@jpmorgan.com

   Tal Mizrahi
   Huawei Street</street>
      <city>London</city><code>E14 5JP</code>
      <country>United Kingdom</country>
    </postal>
    <email>stephen.youell@jpmorgan.com</email>
  </address>
</contact>

   <contact fullname="Tal Mizrahi">
     <organization>Huawei Network.IO Innovation Lab
   Israel
   Email: tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com

   Aviv Kfir
   Mellanox Lab</organization>
     <address>
       <postal>
	 <country>Israel</country>
       </postal>
       <email>tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com</email>
     </address>
   </contact>

<contact fullname="Aviv Kfir">
  <organization>Mellanox Technologies, Inc.
   350 Inc.</organization>
  <address>
    <postal>
      <street>350 Oakmead Parkway, Suite 100
   Sunnyvale, CA  94085
   U.S.A.
   Email: avivk@mellanox.com

   Barak Gafni
   Mellanox 100</street>
      <city>Sunnyvale</city> <region>CA</region><code>94085</code>
      <country>United States of America</country>
    </postal>
    <email>avivk@mellanox.com</email>
  </address>
</contact>

<contact fullname="Barak Gafni">
  <organization>Mellanox Technologies, Inc.
   350 Inc.</organization>
  <address>
    <postal>
      <street>350 Oakmead Parkway, Suite 100
   Sunnyvale, CA  94085
   U.S.A.
   Email: gbarak@mellanox.com

   Petr Lapukhov
   Facebook
   1 100</street>
      <city>Sunnyvale</city><region>CA</region><code>94085</code>
      <country>United States of America</country>
    </postal>
    <email>gbarak@mellanox.com</email>
  </address>
</contact>

<contact fullname="Petr Lapukhov">
  <organization>Facebook</organization>
  <address>
    <postal>
      <street>1 Hacker Way
   Menlo Park, CA  94025
   US
   Email: petr@fb.com

   Mickey Spiegel
   Barefoot Way</street>
      <city>Menlo Park</city><region>CA</region><code>94025</code>
      <country>United States of America</country>
    </postal>
    <email>petr@fb.com</email>
  </address>
</contact>

<contact fullname="Mickey Spiegel">
  <organization>Barefoot Networks, an Intel company
   4750 company</organization>
  <address>
    <postal>
      <street>4750 Patrick Henry Drive
   Santa Clara, CA  95054
   US
   Email: mickey.spiegel@intel.com

   Suresh Krishnan
   Kaloom
   Email: suresh@kaloom.com

   Rajiv Asati
   Cisco Drive</street>
      <city>Santa Clara</city><region>CA</region><code>95054</code>
      <country>United States of America</country>
    </postal>
    <email>mickey.spiegel@intel.com</email>
  </address>
</contact>

 <contact fullname="Suresh Krishnan">
   <organization>Kaloom</organization>
   <address>
     <email>suresh@kaloom.com</email>
   </address>
 </contact>

 <contact fullname="Rajiv Asati">
   <organization>Cisco Systems, Inc.
   7200 Inc.</organization>
   <address>
     <postal>
       <street>7200 Kit Creek Road
   Research Road</street>
       <city>Research Triangle Park, NC  27709
   US
   Email: rajiva@cisco.com

   Mark Smith
   PO Park</city><region>NC</region><code>27709</code>
       <country>United States of America</country>
     </postal>
     <email>rajiva@cisco.com</email>
   </address>
 </contact>

<contact fullname="Mark Smith">
  <address>
    <postal>
      <street>PO BOX 521
   HEIDELBERG, VIC  3084
   AU
   Email: markzzzsmith+id@gmail.com
              ]]></artwork>
          </figure></t> 521</street>
      <city>Heidelberg</city><region>VIC</region><code>3084</code>
      <country>Australia</country>
    </postal>
    <email>markzzzsmith+id@gmail.com</email>
  </address>
</contact>

    </section>

  </back>

</rfc>