EXTRA
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) K. Murchison
Internet-Draft
Request for Comments: 9590 B. Gondwana
Intended status:
Category: Standards Track Fastmail
Expires: 5 October 2024 3 April
ISSN: 2070-1721 May 2024
IMAP4
IMAP Extension for Returning Mailbox METADATA in Extended LIST
draft-ietf-extra-imap-list-metadata-05
Abstract
This document defines an extension to the to IMAP Internet Message Access
Protocol (IMAP) LIST command that allows the client to request
mailbox annotations (metadata), along with other information
typically returned by the LIST command.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents an Internet Standards Track document.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list It represents the consensus of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid the IETF community. It has
received public review and has been approved for a maximum publication by the
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on
Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841.
Information about the current status of six months this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents obtained at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 5 October 2024.
https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9590.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info)
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the
Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described
in the Revised BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Conventions Used in This Document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
3. METADATA Return Option to LIST Command . . . . . . . . . . . 3
4. Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
5. Formal Syntax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
7. Privacy Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
8. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
8.1. Registration of IMAP capability Capability LIST-METADATA . . . . . . 5
8.2. Registration of LIST-EXTENDED option Option METADATA . . . . . . 5
9. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
9.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
9.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Appendix A. Change History (To be removed by RFC Editor before
publication) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1. Introduction
IMAP clients sometimes fetch mailbox metadata (e.g. (e.g., color) to
augment the display of mailboxes to for the logged-in user. In order to
do that, the client is forced to issue a LIST or LSUB command to list
all available mailboxes, followed by a GETMETADATA command for each
mailbox found. This document defines an extension to the to IMAP LIST
command that is identified by the capability string "LIST-
METADATA". "LIST-METADATA".
The LIST-METADATA extension allows the client to request annotations
on available mailboxes, along with other information typically
returned by the LIST command.
2. Conventions Used in This Document
In examples, "C:" indicates lines sent by a client that is connected
to a server. "S:" indicates lines sent by the server to the client.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
Long lines in examples are wrapped using "The Single Backslash
Strategy" described in [RFC8792].
3. METADATA Return Option to LIST Command
[RFC5464] defines the GETMETADATA command which that is used by an IMAP
client to retrieve mailbox annotations. Sometimes, a client will
have to look up the metadata for some or all of the mailboxes
returned by the LIST command. Doing so in multiple GETMETADATA
commands wastes bandwidth and can degrade performance if the client
does not pipeline the requests.
This document extends the LIST command with a new return option,
"METADATA", which allows the client to request all of the desired
information in a single command. For each listable mailbox matching
the list pattern and selection options, the server MUST return an
untagged LIST response response, followed by one or more untagged METADATA
responses containing the mailbox annotations requested by the client.
The untagged METADATA responses to an extended LIST command have the
same syntax and semantics as those that would be returned by
GETMETADATA commands on the same set of listable mailboxes (see
Section 4.4.1 of [RFC5464]). As per Section 4.4 of [RFC5464], the
server may return all requested annotations in a single METADATA
response for each mailbox, or it may split the requested annotations
into multiple METADATA responses for each mailbox.
If the server is unable to look up the annotations for given mailbox,
it MAY drop the corresponding METADATA response. In such a
situation, the LIST command would still return a tagged OK reply.
4. Examples
The following are examples of fetching metadata of from only the top top-
level hierarchies of the mailbox hierarchies with using different sets of selection
criteria (see Section 6.3.9 of [RFC9051]).
In this example:
* The "color" annotation for the "foo" mailbox has not been set, so
the METADATA response has a value of "NIL" (has (i.e., has no value).
* "bar" has children, but isn't an actual mailbox itself, so it has
no METADATA response.
========== NOTE: '\' line wrapping per [RFC8792] RFC 8792 ===========
C: A00 CAPABILITY
S: * CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 IMAP4rev2 \
LIST-EXTENDED LIST-METADATA METADATA
S: A00 OK Completed.
C: A01 LIST "" % \
RETURN (METADATA ("/shared/vendor/cmu/cyrus-imapd/color"))
S: * LIST () "." "INBOX"
S: * METADATA INBOX ("/shared/vendor/cmu/cyrus-imapd/color" "#b71c1c")
S: * LIST () "." "foo"
S: * METADATA "foo" ("/shared/vendor/cmu/cyrus-imapd/color" NIL)
S: * LIST (\NonExistent) "." "bar"
S: A01 OK List completed.
In this example example, the LIST response for the "foo" mailbox is returned
because it has matching children, but no METADATA response is
returned because "foo" itself doesn't match the selection criteria.
========== NOTE: '\' line wrapping per [RFC8792] RFC 8792 ===========
C: A02 LIST (SUBSCRIBED RECURSIVEMATCH) "" % \
RETURN (METADATA ("/shared/vendor/cmu/cyrus-imapd/color"))
S: * LIST (\Subscribed) "." "INBOX"
S: * METADATA INBOX ("/shared/vendor/cmu/cyrus-imapd/color" "#b71c1c")
S: * LIST () "." "foo" (CHILDINFO ("SUBSCRIBED"))
S: A02 OK List completed.
5. Formal Syntax
The following syntax specification uses the augmented Augmented Backus-Naur
Form (BNF) (ABNF) as described in [RFC5234]. Note that "return-option" is
defined in [RFC5258] and "entry" is defined in [RFC5464].
return-option =/ "METADATA" SP "(" entry *(SP entry) ")"
6. Security Considerations
This specification does not introduce any additional security
concerns beyond those described in [RFC5258] and [RFC5464].
7. Privacy Considerations
This specification does not introduce any additional privacy concerns
beyond those described in [RFC5464].
8. IANA Considerations
8.1. Registration of IMAP capability Capability LIST-METADATA
This document defines
Per this document, IANA has added the "LIST-METADATA" IMAP capability
to be added
to the "IMAP Capabilities" registry located at https://www.iana.org/assignments/imap-
capabilities/imap-capabilities.xhtml.
<https://www.iana.org/assignments/imap4-capabilities/>.
8.2. Registration of LIST-EXTENDED option Option METADATA
This section registers
Per this document, IANA has registered the "METADATA" LIST-EXTENDED
option to be
added to in the "LIST-EXTENDED options" registry located at https://www.iana.org/assignments/
imap-list-extended/imap-list-extended.xhtml#imap-list-extended-1.
<https://www.iana.org/assignments/imap-list-extended/>.
LIST-EXTENDED option name:
METADATA
LIST-EXTENDED option type:
RETURN
LIST-EXTENDED option description:
Causes the LIST command to return METADATA responses in addition
to LIST responses.
Published specification:
RFC XXXX, 9590, Section 3
Security considerations:
RFC XXXX, 9590, Section 6
Intended usage:
COMMON
Person and email address to contact for further information:
Kenneth Murchison <murch@fastmailteam.com>, <murch@fastmailteam.com> and Bron Gondwana
<brong@fastmailteam.com>
Owner/Change controller:
IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
9. References
9.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC5234] Crocker, D., Ed. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5234, January 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5234>.
[RFC5258] Leiba, B. and A. Melnikov, "Internet Message Access
Protocol version 4 - LIST Command Extensions", RFC 5258,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5258, June 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5258>.
[RFC5464] Daboo, C., "The IMAP METADATA Extension", RFC 5464,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5464, February 2009,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5464>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[RFC9051] Melnikov, A., Ed. and B. Leiba, Ed., "Internet Message
Access Protocol (IMAP) - Version 4rev2", RFC 9051,
DOI 10.17487/RFC9051, August 2021,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9051>.
9.2. Informative References
[RFC8792] Watsen, K., Auerswald, E., Farrel, A., and Q. Wu,
"Handling Long Lines in Content of Internet-Drafts and
RFCs", RFC 8792, DOI 10.17487/RFC8792, June 2020,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8792>.
Appendix A. Change History (To be removed by RFC Editor before
publication)
Changes from draft-ietf-extra-imap-list-metadata-04:
* Added CAPABILITY command/response to example.
* Reference IANA registries by their URLs.
Changes from draft-ietf-extra-imap-list-metadata-03:
* Clarified why "bar" is returned in the first example.
Changes from draft-ietf-extra-imap-list-metadata-02:
* Used RFC 8792 '\' folding of the examples.
Changes from draft-ietf-extra-imap-list-metadata-01:
* Updated Security Considerations to also reference RFC 5464.
Changes from draft-ietf-extra-imap-list-metadata-00:
* Added missing SP in ABNF.
Changes from draft-murchison-imap-list-metadata-02:
* Renamed as a WG document.
* Clarified that the METADATA response with values is used.
* Miscellaneous editorial changes.
Changes from draft-murchison-imap-list-metadata-01:
* None.
Changes from draft-murchison-imap-list-metadata-00:
* Updated Keywords boilerplate.
* Changed RFC 3501 reference to RFC 9051.
Authors' Addresses
Kenneth Murchison
Fastmail US LLC
1429 Walnut Street -
Suite 1201
Philadelphia, PA 19102
United States of America
Email: murch@fastmailteam.com
Bron Gondwana
Fastmail Pty Ltd
Level 2, 114 William Street
Melbourne VIC 3000
Australia
Email: brong@fastmailteam.com