rfc9655v2.txt | rfc9655.txt | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) D. Rathi, Ed. | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) D. Rathi, Ed. | |||
Request for Comments: 9655 Nokia | Request for Comments: 9655 Nokia | |||
Category: Standards Track S. Hegde, Ed. | Category: Standards Track S. Hegde, Ed. | |||
ISSN: 2070-1721 Juniper Networks Inc. | ISSN: 2070-1721 Juniper Networks Inc. | |||
K. Arora | K. Arora | |||
Individual Contributor | Individual Contributor | |||
Z. Ali | Z. Ali | |||
N. Nainar | N. Nainar | |||
Cisco Systems, Inc. | Cisco Systems, Inc. | |||
September 2024 | November 2024 | |||
Egress Validation in Label Switched Path Ping and Traceroute Mechanisms | Egress Validation in Label Switched Path Ping and Traceroute Mechanisms | |||
Abstract | Abstract | |||
The MPLS ping and traceroute mechanisms described in RFC 8029 and the | The MPLS ping and traceroute mechanisms described in RFC 8029 and the | |||
related extensions for Segment Routing (SR) defined in RFC 8287 are | related extensions for Segment Routing (SR) defined in RFC 8287 are | |||
highly valuable for validating control plane and data plane | highly valuable for validating control plane and data plane | |||
synchronization. In certain environments, only some intermediate or | synchronization. In certain environments, only some intermediate or | |||
transit nodes may have been upgraded to support these validation | transit nodes may have been upgraded to support these validation | |||
skipping to change at line 425 ¶ | skipping to change at line 425 ¶ | |||
+-------+------------+-----------+ | +-------+------------+-----------+ | |||
Table 1: TLVs Registry | Table 1: TLVs Registry | |||
6.2. New Return Code | 6.2. New Return Code | |||
IANA has added the following entry to the "Return Codes" registry | IANA has added the following entry to the "Return Codes" registry | |||
within the "Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Paths | within the "Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Paths | |||
(LSPs) Ping Parameters" registry group [IANA-MPLS-LSP]: | (LSPs) Ping Parameters" registry group [IANA-MPLS-LSP]: | |||
+=======+===================================+===========+ | +=======+==================================+===========+ | |||
| Value | Meaning | Reference | | | Value | Meaning | Reference | | |||
+=======+===================================+===========+ | +=======+==================================+===========+ | |||
| 36 | Replying router is an egress for | RFC 9655 | | | 36 | Replying router is an egress for | RFC 9655 | | |||
| | the address in the Egress TLV for | | | | | the address in the Egress TLV | | | |||
| | the FEC at stack depth <RSC>> | | | | | for the FEC at stack depth <RSC> | | | |||
+-------+-----------------------------------+-----------+ | +-------+----------------------------------+-----------+ | |||
Table 2: Return Codes Registry | Table 2: Return Codes Registry | |||
7. Security Considerations | 7. Security Considerations | |||
This document defines an additional TLV for MPLS LSP ping and | This document defines an additional TLV for MPLS LSP ping and | |||
conforms to the mechanisms defined in [RFC8029]. All the security | conforms to the mechanisms defined in [RFC8029]. All the security | |||
considerations defined in [RFC8287] apply to this document. This | considerations defined in [RFC8287] apply to this document. This | |||
document does not introduce any additional security challenges to be | document does not introduce any additional security challenges to be | |||
considered. | considered. | |||
8. References | 8. References | |||
skipping to change at line 496 ¶ | skipping to change at line 496 ¶ | |||
[IANA-MPLS-LSP] | [IANA-MPLS-LSP] | |||
IANA, "Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switched | IANA, "Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switched | |||
Paths (LSPs) Ping Parameters", | Paths (LSPs) Ping Parameters", | |||
<http://www.iana.org/assignments/mpls-lsp-ping- | <http://www.iana.org/assignments/mpls-lsp-ping- | |||
parameters>. | parameters>. | |||
[SR-POLICY-BGP] | [SR-POLICY-BGP] | |||
Previdi, S., Filsfils, C., Talaulikar, K., Ed., Mattes, | Previdi, S., Filsfils, C., Talaulikar, K., Ed., Mattes, | |||
P., and D. Jain, "Advertising Segment Routing Policies in | P., and D. Jain, "Advertising Segment Routing Policies in | |||
BGP", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-idr-sr- | BGP", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-idr-sr- | |||
policy-safi-06, 26 July 2024, | policy-safi-10, 7 November 2024, | |||
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-idr-sr- | <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-idr-sr- | |||
policy-safi-06>. | policy-safi-10>. | |||
Acknowledgements | Acknowledgements | |||
The authors would like to thank Stewart Bryant, Greg Mirsky, | The authors would like to thank Stewart Bryant, Greg Mirsky, | |||
Alexander Vainshtein, Sanga Mitra Rajgopal, and Adrian Farrel for | Alexander Vainshtein, Sanga Mitra Rajgopal, and Adrian Farrel for | |||
their careful review and comments. | their careful review and comments. | |||
Authors' Addresses | Authors' Addresses | |||
Deepti N. Rathi (editor) | Deepti N. Rathi (editor) | |||
End of changes. 5 change blocks. | ||||
11 lines changed or deleted | 11 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. |