rfc9675.original.xml | rfc9675.xml | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?> | <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?> | |||
<!-- pre-edited by ST 04/30/24 --> | ||||
<!DOCTYPE rfc [ | <!DOCTYPE rfc [ | |||
<!ENTITY nbsp " "> | <!ENTITY nbsp " "> | |||
<!ENTITY zwsp "​"> | <!ENTITY zwsp "​"> | |||
<!ENTITY nbhy "‑"> | <!ENTITY nbhy "‑"> | |||
<!ENTITY wj "⁠"> | <!ENTITY wj "⁠"> | |||
]> | ]> | |||
<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='rfc2629.xslt' ?> | ||||
<?rfc strict="yes" ?> | <rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" category="info" ipr="trust200902 | |||
<?rfc toc="yes"?> | " docName="draft-ietf-dtn-dtnma-14" number="9675" consensus="true" submissionTyp | |||
<!-- generate a ToC --> | e="IETF" xml:lang="en" obsoletes="" updates="" tocInclude="true" symRefs="true" | |||
<?rfc symrefs="yes"?> | sortRefs="true" version="3"> | |||
<!-- use symbolic references tags, i.e, [RFC2119] instead of [1] --> | ||||
<?rfc sortrefs="yes" ?> | ||||
<!-- sort the reference entries alphabetically --> | ||||
<?rfc compact="no" ?> | ||||
<!-- do not start each main section on a new page --> | ||||
<?rfc subcompact="no" ?> | ||||
<rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" category="info" ipr="trust200902 | ||||
" docName="draft-ietf-dtn-dtnma-14" submissionType="IETF" xml:lang="en" obsolete | ||||
s="" updates="" tocInclude="true" symRefs="true" sortRefs="true" version="3"> | ||||
<!-- xml2rfc v2v3 conversion 3.13.0 --> | ||||
<!-- ***** FRONT MATTER ***** --> | ||||
<front> | <front> | |||
<!-- The abbreviated title is used in the page header - it is only necessary | <title abbrev="DTNMA">Delay-Tolerant Networking Management Architecture (DTNM | |||
if the | A)</title> | |||
full title is longer than 39 characters --> | ||||
<title abbrev="DTNMA">DTN Management Architecture</title> | <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9675"/> | |||
<seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-dtn-dtnma-14"/> | <author fullname="Edward J. Birrane, III" initials="E." surname="Birrane, III | |||
<author fullname="Edward J. Birrane" initials="E.J." surname="Birrane"> | "> | |||
<organization>Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory</organization> | <organization abbrev="JHU/APL">The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physic | |||
s Laboratory</organization> | ||||
<address> | <address> | |||
<email>Edward.Birrane@jhuapl.edu</email> | <email>Edward.Birrane@jhuapl.edu</email> | |||
</address> | </address> | |||
</author> | </author> | |||
<author fullname="Sarah E. Heiner" initials="S.E." surname="Heiner"> | <author fullname="Sarah Heiner" initials="S." surname="Heiner"> | |||
<organization>Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory</organization> | <organization abbrev="JHU/APL">The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physic | |||
s Laboratory</organization> | ||||
<address> | <address> | |||
<email>Sarah.Heiner@jhuapl.edu</email> | <email>Sarah.Heiner@jhuapl.edu</email> | |||
</address> | </address> | |||
</author> | </author> | |||
<author fullname="Emery Annis" initials="E." surname="Annis"> | <author fullname="Emery Annis" initials="E." surname="Annis"> | |||
<organization>Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory</organization> | <organization abbrev="JHU/APL">The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physic s Laboratory</organization> | |||
<address> | <address> | |||
<email>Emery.Annis@jhuapl.edu</email> | <email>Emery.Annis@jhuapl.edu</email> | |||
</address> | </address> | |||
</author> | </author> | |||
<date/> | <date month="November" year="2024"/> | |||
<area>INT</area> | ||||
<workgroup>dtn</workgroup> | ||||
<!-- Meta-data Declarations --> | ||||
<area>General</area> | ||||
<workgroup>Delay-Tolerant Networking</workgroup> | ||||
<keyword>DTN</keyword> | <keyword>DTN</keyword> | |||
<keyword>Network Management</keyword> | <keyword>Network Management</keyword> | |||
<abstract> | <abstract> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The Delay-Tolerant Networking (DTN) architecture describes a type of | The Delay-Tolerant Networking (DTN) architecture describes a type of | |||
challenged network in which communications may be significantly | challenged network in which communications may be significantly | |||
affected by long signal propagation delays, frequent link disruptions, | affected by long signal propagation delays, frequent link disruptions, | |||
or both. The unique characteristics of this environment require a | or both. The unique characteristics of this environment require a | |||
unique approach to network management that supports asynchronous | unique approach to network management that supports asynchronous | |||
transport, autonomous local control, and a small footprint (in both | transport, autonomous local control, and a small footprint (in both | |||
resources and dependencies) so as to deploy on constrained devices. | resources and dependencies) so as to deploy on constrained devices. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
This document describes a DTN management architecture (DTNMA) suitable | This document describes a DTN Management Architecture (DTNMA) suitable | |||
for managing devices in any challenged environment but, in | for managing devices in any challenged environment but, in | |||
particular, those communicating using the DTN Bundle Protocol (BP). | particular, those communicating using the DTN Bundle Protocol (BP). | |||
Operating over BP requires an architecture that neither presumes | Operating over BP requires an architecture that neither presumes | |||
synchronized transport behavior nor relies on query-response mechanisms. | synchronized transport behavior nor relies on query-response mechanisms. | |||
Implementations compliant with this DTNMA should expect to successfully | Implementations compliant with this DTNMA should expect to successfully | |||
operate in extremely challenging conditions, such as over uni-directiona l | operate in extremely challenging conditions, such as over unidirectional | |||
links and other places where BP is the preferred transport. | links and other places where BP is the preferred transport. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</abstract> | </abstract> | |||
</front> | </front> | |||
<middle> | <middle> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Introduction</name> | <name>Introduction</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
This document describes a logical, informational DTN management | This document describes a logical, informational Delay-Tolerant Networki | |||
architecture (DTNMA) suitable for operating devices in a | ng Management Architecture (DTNMA) suitable for operating devices in a | |||
challenged architecture - such as those communicating | challenged architecture, such as those communicating | |||
using the DTN Bundle Protocol (BPv7) <xref target="RFC9171"/>. | using the DTN Bundle Protocol version 7 (BPv7) <xref target="RFC9171"/>. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Challenged networks have certain properties that differentiate them | Challenged networks have certain properties that differentiate them | |||
from other kinds of networks. These properties, outlined in | from other kinds of networks. These properties, outlined in | |||
Section 2.2.1 of <xref target="RFC7228"/>, include lacking | <xref target="RFC7228" sectionFormat="of" section="2.2.1"/>, | |||
include lacking | ||||
end-to-end IP connectivity, having "serious interruptions" | end-to-end IP connectivity, having "serious interruptions" | |||
to end-to-end connectivity, and exhibiting delays longer than can be | to end-to-end connectivity, and exhibiting delays longer than can be | |||
tolerated by end-to-end synchronization mechanisms (such as TCP). | tolerated by end-to-end synchronization mechanisms (such as TCP). | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
These challenged properties can be caused by a variety of factors | These challenged network properties can be caused by a variety of factor s | |||
such as physical constraints (e.g., long signal propagation delays | such as physical constraints (e.g., long signal propagation delays | |||
and frequent link disruptions), administrative policies (e.g., | and frequent link disruptions), administrative policies (e.g., | |||
quality-of-service prioritization, service-level agreements, and | quality-of-service prioritization, service-level agreements, and | |||
traffic management and scheduling), and off-nominal behaviors | traffic management and scheduling), and off-nominal behaviors | |||
(e.g., active attackers and misconfigurations). Since these | (e.g., active attackers and misconfigurations). Since these | |||
challenges are not solely caused by sparseness, instances of | challenges are not solely caused by sparseness, instances of | |||
challenged networks will persist even in increasingly connected | challenged networks will persist even in increasingly connected | |||
environments. | environments. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The Delay-Tolerant Networking (DTN) architecture, described in | The DTN architecture, described in | |||
<xref target="RFC4838"/>, has been designed for data exchange | <xref target="RFC4838"/>, has been designed for data exchange | |||
in challenged networks. Just as the DTN architecture requires new | in challenged networks. Just as the DTN architecture requires new | |||
capabilities for transport and transport security, special consideration | capabilities for transport and transport security, special consideration | |||
is needed for the operation of devices in a challenged network. | is needed for the operation of devices in a challenged network. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Purpose</name> | <name>Purpose</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
This document describes how challenged network properties | This document describes how challenged network properties | |||
affect the operation of devices in those networks. This | affect the operation of devices in such networks. This | |||
description is presented as a logical architecture | description is presented as a logical architecture | |||
formed from a union of best practices for operating | formed from a union of best practices for operating | |||
devices deployed in challenged environments. | devices deployed in challenged environments. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
One important practice captured in this document is the concept of sel f-operation. Self-operation involves operating | One important practice captured in this document is the concept of sel f-operation. Self-operation involves operating | |||
a device without human interactivity, without system-in-the-loop | a device without human interactivity, without system-in-the-loop | |||
synchronous function, and without a synchronous underlying | synchronous functions, and without a synchronous underlying | |||
transport layer. This means that devices determine | transport layer. This means that devices determine | |||
their own schedules for data reporting, their own | their own schedules for data reporting, determine their own | |||
operational configuration, and perform their own error | operational configuration, and perform their own error | |||
discovery and mitigation. | discovery and mitigation. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Scope</name> | <name>Scope</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
This document includes the information necessary to document | This document includes the information necessary to document | |||
existing practices for operating devices in a challenged network in | existing practices for operating devices in a challenged network in | |||
skipping to change at line 164 ¶ | skipping to change at line 154 ¶ | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Logical architectures are not functional architectures. Therefore, | Logical architectures are not functional architectures. Therefore, | |||
any functional design for achieving desired behaviors is out of | any functional design for achieving desired behaviors is out of | |||
scope for this document. The set of architectural principles presented here is not meant to completely specify interfaces between components. | scope for this document. The set of architectural principles presented here is not meant to completely specify interfaces between components. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The selection of any particular transport or network layer is outside | The selection of any particular transport or network layer is outside | |||
of the scope of this document. The DTNMA does not require the use of | of the scope of this document. The DTNMA does not require the use of | |||
any specific protocol such as IP, BP, TCP, or UDP. In particular, the | any specific protocol such as IP, BP, TCP, or UDP. In particular, the | |||
DTNMA design does not presume the use of BPv7, IPv4 or IPv6. | DTNMA design does not presume the use of BPv7, IPv4, or IPv6. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<aside> | <aside> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
NOTE: As BPv7 is the preferred transport for networks conforming to the DTN architecture, the DTNMA should be considered for any BPv7 network deploy ment. However, the DTNMA may also be used in other networks that have similar ne eds for this particular style of self-operation. For this reason, the DTNMA does not require the use of BPv7 to transport management information. | NOTE: As BPv7 is the preferred transport for networks conforming to the DTN architecture, the DTNMA should be considered for any BPv7 network deploy ment. However, the DTNMA may also be used in other networks that have similar ne eds for this particular style of self-operation. For this reason, the DTNMA does not require the use of BPv7 to transport management information. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</aside> | </aside> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Network features such as naming, addressing, routing, and | Network features such as naming, addressing, routing, and | |||
communications security are out of scope of the DTNMA. It is | communications security are out of scope for the DTNMA. It is | |||
presumed that any operational network communicating DTNMA | presumed that any operational network communicating DTNMA | |||
messages would implement these services for any payloads carried | messages would implement these services for any payloads carried | |||
by that network. | by that network. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The interactions between and amongst the DTNMA and other management | The interactions between and amongst the DTNMA and other management | |||
approaches are outside of the scope of this document. | approaches are outside of the scope of this document. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Organization</name> | <name>Organization</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The remainder of this document is organized into the following | The following nine sections provide details regarding the DTNMA. | |||
nine sections, described as follows. | ||||
</t> | </t> | |||
<dl> | <dl> | |||
<dt>Terminology:</dt> | <dt>Terminology:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
This section identifies terms fundamental to | <xref target="terms"/> identifies terms fundamental to | |||
understanding DTNMA concepts. Whenever possible, these terms | understanding DTNMA concepts. Whenever possible, these terms | |||
align in both word selection and meaning with their use in | align in both word selection and meaning with their use in | |||
other management protocols. | other management protocols. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Challenged Network Overview:</dt> | <dt>Challenged Network Overview:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
This section describes important | <xref target="challenged-net-overview"/> describes important | |||
aspects of challenged networks and necessary approaches for their | aspects of challenged networks and necessary approaches for their | |||
management. | management. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Desirable Design Properties:</dt> | <dt>Desirable Design Properties:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
This section defines those properties of the DTNMA needed to opera te within the constraints | <xref target="desired-name-properties"/> defines those properties of the DTNMA needed to operate within the constraints | |||
of a challenged network. These properties are similar to the | of a challenged network. These properties are similar to the | |||
specification of system-level requirements of a DTN management | specification of system-level requirements of a DTN management | |||
solution. | solution. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Current Remote Management Approaches:</dt> | <dt>Current Remote Management Approaches:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
This section provides a brief | <xref target="current-remote-mgmt"/> provides a brief | |||
overview of existing remote management approaches. Where possible, | overview of existing remote management approaches. Where possible, | |||
the DTNMA adopts concepts from these approaches. | the DTNMA adopts concepts from these approaches. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Motivation for New Features:</dt> | <dt>Motivation for New Features:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
This section provides an overall | <xref target="motivation-for-new-features"/> provides an overall | |||
motivation for this work, to include explaining why a management | motivation for this work. It also explains why a management | |||
architecture for challenged networks is useful and necessary. | architecture for challenged networks is useful and necessary. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Reference Model:</dt> | <dt>Reference Model:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
This section defines a reference model that can | <xref target="reference-model"/> defines a reference model that ca | |||
be used to reason about the DTNMA independent of an | n | |||
be used to analyze the DTNMA independently of an | ||||
implementation or implementation architecture. | implementation or implementation architecture. | |||
This model identifies the logical components of the system and | This model identifies the logical components of the system and | |||
the high-level relationships and behaviors amongst those | the high-level relationships and behaviors amongst those | |||
components. | components. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Desired Services:</dt> | <dt>Desired Services:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
This section identifies and defines the | <xref target="desired-services"/> identifies and defines the | |||
DTNMA services provided to network and mission operators. | DTNMA services provided to network and mission operators. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Logical Autonomy Model:</dt> | <dt>Logical Autonomy Model:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
This section provides an exemplar data | <xref target="autonomy_model"/> provides an example data | |||
model that can be used to reason about DTNMA control and data flow | model that can be used to analyze DTNMA control and data flows. | |||
s. | ||||
This model is based on the DTNMA reference model. | This model is based on the DTNMA reference model. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Use Cases:</dt> | <dt>Use Cases:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
This section presents multiple use cases accommodated | <xref target="use-cases"/> presents multiple use cases accommodate | |||
by the DTNMA architecture. Each use case is presented as a | d | |||
by the DTNMA. Each use case is presented as a | ||||
set of control and data flows referencing the DTNMA reference mode l | set of control and data flows referencing the DTNMA reference mode l | |||
and logical autonomy model. | and logical autonomy model. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
</dl> | </dl> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section anchor="terms" numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Terminology</name> | <name>Terminology</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
This section defines terminology that either is unique to the DTNMA or | This section defines terminology that is either unique to the DTNMA or | |||
is necessary for understanding the concepts defined in this specificatio | necessary for understanding the concepts defined in this specification. | |||
n. | ||||
</t> | </t> | |||
<dl> | <dl> | |||
<dt>Timely Data Exchange:</dt> | <dt>Timely Data Exchange:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
The ability to communicate information between two (or more) | The ability to communicate information between two (or more) | |||
entities within a required period of time. In some cases, a 1-second e xchange may not | entities within a required period of time. In some cases, a 1-second e xchange may not | |||
be timely and in other cases 1-hour exchange may be timely. | be timely; in other cases, a 1-hour exchange may be timely. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Local Operation:</dt> | <dt>Local Operation:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
The operation of a device by an application co-resident on that device . | The operation of a device by an application co-resident on that device . | |||
Local operators are applications running on a device, and there | Local operators are applications running on a device, and there | |||
might be one or more of these applications working independently or as one | might be one or more of these applications working independently or as one | |||
to perform the local operations function. Absent error conditions, loc al | to perform the local operations function. Absent error conditions, loc al | |||
operators are always expected to be available to the devices they mana ge. | operators are always expected to be available to the devices they mana ge. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Remote Operation:</dt> | <dt>Remote Operation:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
The operation of a device by an application running on a separate | The operation of a device by an application running on a separate | |||
device. Remote operators communicate with operated devices over a netw ork. | device. Remote operators communicate with operated devices over a netw ork. | |||
Remote operators are not always expected to be availabe to the devices they | Remote operators are not always expected to be available to the device s they | |||
operate. | operate. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>DTN Management:</dt> | <dt>DTN Management:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
The management, monitoring, and control of a device that does not depe nd on stateful connections, timely data exchange of management messages, | The management, monitoring, and control of a device that does not depe nd on stateful connections, timely data exchange of management messages, | |||
or system-in-the-loop synchronous functions. DTN management is accompl ished as | or system-in-the-loop synchronous functions. DTN management is accompl ished as | |||
a fusion of local operation and remote operation techniques; remote op erators manage the configuration of local operators who | a fusion of local operation and remote operation techniques; remote op erators manage the configuration of local operators who | |||
provide monitoring and control of their co-resident devices. | provide monitoring and control of their co-resident devices. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>DTNMA Agent (DA):</dt> | <dt>DTNMA Agent (DA):</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
A role associated with a managed device, | A role associated with a managed device | |||
responsible for reporting performance data, accepting policy | responsible for reporting performance data, accepting policy | |||
directives, performing autonomous local control, error-handling, and | directives, performing autonomous local control, error handling, and | |||
data validation. DAs exchange information with DMs operating either | data validation. DAs exchange information with DTNMA Managers (DMs) op | |||
erating | ||||
on the same device and/or on remote devices in the network. A DA is | on the same device and/or on remote devices in the network. A DA is | |||
a type of local operator. | a type of local operator. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>DTNMA Manager (DM):</dt> | <dt>DTNMA Manager (DM):</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
A role associated with a managing device | A role associated with a managing device | |||
responsible for configuring the behavior of, and eventually receiving | responsible for configuring the behavior of, and eventually receiving | |||
information from, DAs. DMs interact with one or more DAs located on | information from, DAs. DMs interact with one or more DAs located on | |||
the same device and/or on remote devices in the network. A DM is a | the same device and/or on remote devices in the network. A DM is a | |||
type of remote operator. | type of remote operator. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Controls:</dt> | <dt>Controls:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
Procedures run by a DA to change the behavior, | Procedures run by a DA to change the behavior, | |||
configuration, or state of an application or protocol managed by | configuration, or state of an application or protocol managed by | |||
that DA. This includes procedures to manage the DA itself, such as | that DA. These include procedures to manage the DA itself, such as | |||
to have the DA produce performance reports or to apply new | having the DA produce performance reports or applying new | |||
management policies. | management policies. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Externally Defined Data (EDD):</dt> | <dt>Externally Defined Data (EDD):</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
Typed information made available to a | Typed information made available to a | |||
DA by its hosting device, but not computed directly by the | DA by its hosting device but not computed directly by the | |||
DA itself. | DA itself. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Data Reports:</dt> | <dt>Data Report:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
Typed, ordered collections of data values gathered | A typed, ordered collection of data values gathered | |||
by one or more DAs and provided to one or more DMs. Reports comply | by one or more DAs and provided to one or more DMs. Reports comply | |||
to the format of a given Data Report Schema. | with the format of a given data report schema. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Data Report Schemas:</dt> | <dt>Data Report Schema:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
Named, ordered collection of data elements | A named, ordered collection of data elements | |||
that represent the schema of a Data Report. | that represent the schema of a data report. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Rules:</dt> | <dt>Rule:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
Unit of autonomous specification that provides a | Unit of autonomous specification that provides a | |||
stimulus-response relationship between time or state on a DA | stimulus-response relationship between time or state on a DA | |||
and the actions or operations to be run as a result of that time or | and the actions or operations to be run as a result of that time or | |||
state. | state. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
</dl> | </dl> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section anchor="challenged-net-overview" numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Challenged Network Overview</name> | <name>Challenged Network Overview</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The DTNMA provides network management services able to operate in a | The DTNMA provides network management services able to operate in | |||
challenged network environment, such as envisioned by the DTN | challenged network environments for which the DTN | |||
architecture. This section describes what is meant by the term | architecture was created. This section describes what is meant by the te | |||
rm | ||||
"challenged network", the important properties of such a network, and | "challenged network", the important properties of such a network, and | |||
observations on impacts to management approaches. | observations on impacts to management approaches. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<section> | <section> | |||
<name>Challenged Network Constraints</name> | <name>Challenged Network Constraints</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Constrained networks are defined as networks where "some of the | Constrained networks are defined as networks where "some of the | |||
characteristics pretty much taken for granted with link layers in | characteristics pretty much taken for granted with link layers in | |||
common use in the Internet at the time of writing are not attainable." | common use in the Internet at the time of writing are not attainable" | |||
<xref target="RFC7228"/>. This broad definition captures a variety of | <xref target="RFC7228"/>. This broad definition captures a variety of | |||
potential issues relating to physical, technical, and regulatory | potential issues relating to physical, technical, and regulatory | |||
constraints on message transmission. Constrained networks | constraints on message transmission. Constrained networks | |||
typically include nodes that regularly reboot or are otherwise turned | typically include nodes that regularly reboot or are otherwise turned | |||
off for long periods of time, transmit at low or asynchronous bitrates , | off for long periods of time, transmit at low or asynchronous bitrates , | |||
and/or have very limited computational resources. | and/or have very limited computational resources. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Separately, a challenged network is defined as one that "has serious | Separately, a challenged network is defined as one that "has serious | |||
skipping to change at line 406 ¶ | skipping to change at line 395 ¶ | |||
networking stacks associated with the end-to-end IP model. This | networking stacks associated with the end-to-end IP model. This | |||
means that devices might not include support for certain | means that devices might not include support for certain | |||
transport protocols (TCP/QUIC/UDP), web protocols (HTTP), or | transport protocols (TCP/QUIC/UDP), web protocols (HTTP), or | |||
internetworking protocols (IPv4/IPv6). | internetworking protocols (IPv4/IPv6). | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</aside> | </aside> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
By these definitions, a "challenged" network is a special type of | By these definitions, a "challenged" network is a special type of | |||
"constrained" network, where constraints prevent timely end-to-end | "constrained" network, where constraints prevent timely end-to-end | |||
data exchange. As such, "all challenged networks are | data exchange. As such, "All challenged networks are | |||
constrained networks ... but not all constrained networks are | constrained networks ... but not all constrained networks are | |||
challenged networks ... Delay-Tolerant Networking (DTN) has been | challenged networks ... Delay-Tolerant Networking (DTN) has been | |||
designed to cope with challenged networks" <xref target="RFC7228"/>. | designed to cope with challenged networks" <xref target="RFC7228"/>. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Solutions that work in constrained networks might not be solutions | Solutions that work in constrained networks might not be solutions | |||
that work in challenged networks. In particular, challenged networks | that work in challenged networks. In particular, challenged networks | |||
exhibit the following properties that impact the way in which the | exhibit the following properties that impact the way in which the | |||
function of network management is considered. | function of network management is considered. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<ul spacing="normal"> | <ul spacing="normal"> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
Timely end-to-end data exchange cannot be guaranteed to exist at any given time | Timely end-to-end data exchange cannot be guaranteed to exist at any given time | |||
between any two nodes. | between any two nodes. | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
Latencies on the order of seconds, hours, or days must be tolerated. | Latencies on the order of seconds, hours, or days must be tolerated. | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
Managed devices cannot be guaranteed to always be powered so as to r eceive ad-hoc management requests (even requests with artificially extended time out values). | Managed devices cannot be guaranteed to always be powered so as to r eceive ad hoc management requests (even requests with artificially extended time out values). | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
Individual links may be uni-directional. | Individual links may be unidirectional. | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
Bi-directional links may have asymmetric data rates. | Bidirectional links may have asymmetric data rates. | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
The existence of external infrastructure, services, systems, | The existence of external infrastructure, services, systems, | |||
or processes such as a Domain Name Service (DNS) or a Certificate | or processes such as a Domain Name System (DNS) or a Certificate | |||
Authority (CA) cannot be guaranteed. | Authority (CA) cannot be guaranteed. | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
</ul> | </ul> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Topology and Service Implications</name> | <name>Topology and Service Implications</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The set of constraints that might be present in a challenged network | The set of constraints that might be present in a challenged network | |||
impact both the topology of the network and the services active | impacts both the topology of the network and the services active | |||
within that network. | within that network. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Operational networks handle cases where nodes join and leave the | Operational networks handle cases where nodes join and leave the | |||
network over time. These topology changes may or may not be planned, t hey | network over time. These topology changes may or may not be planned, t hey | |||
may or may not represent errors, and they may or may not impact networ k | may or may not represent errors, and they may or may not impact networ k | |||
services. Challenged networks differ from other networks not in | services. Challenged networks differ from other networks not in | |||
the presence of topological change, but in the likelihood that impacts | the presence of topological change but in the likelihood that impacts | |||
to topology result in impacts to network services. | to topology result in impacts to network services. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The difference between topology impacts and service impacts can be | The difference between topology impacts and service impacts can be | |||
expressed in terms of connectivity. Topological connectivity usually | expressed in terms of connectivity. Topological connectivity usually | |||
refers to the existence of a path between an application message | refers to the existence of a path between an application message | |||
source and destination. Service connectivity, alternatively, refers | source and destination. Service connectivity, alternatively, refers | |||
to the existence of a path between a node and one or more services | to the existence of a path between a node and one or more services | |||
needed to process (often just-in-time) application messaging. | needed to process -- often just in time -- application messaging. | |||
Examples of service connectivity include access to infrastructure | Examples of service connectivity include access to infrastructure | |||
services such as a Domain Name System (DNS) or a Certificate | services such as a Domain Name System (DNS) or a CA. | |||
Authority (CA). | ||||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
In networks that might be partitioned most of the time, it is less | In networks that might be partitioned most of the time, it is less | |||
likely that a node would concurrently access both an application | likely that a node would concurrently access both an application | |||
endpoint and one or more network service endpoints. For this reason, | endpoint and one or more network service endpoints. For this reason, | |||
network services in a challenged network should be designed to allow | network services in a challenged network should be designed to allow | |||
for asynchronous operation. Accommodating this use case often | for asynchronous operation. Accommodating this use case often | |||
involves the use of local caching, pre-placing information, and | involves the use of local caching, pre-placing information, and | |||
not hard-coding message information at a source that might change when a | not hard-coding message information at a source that might change when a | |||
message reaches its destination. | message reaches its destination. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<aside> | <aside> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
NOTE: One example of rethinking services in a challenged network | NOTE: One example of rethinking services in a challenged network | |||
is the securing of BPv7 bundles. The BPSec <xref target="RFC9172"/> | is the securing of BPv7 bundles. The Bundle Protocol Security (BPSec | |||
security extensions to BPv7 do not encode security destinations when | ) <xref target="RFC9172"/> security extensions to BPv7 | |||
do not encode security destinations when | ||||
applying security. Instead, BPSec requires nodes in a network to | applying security. Instead, BPSec requires nodes in a network to | |||
identify themselves as security verifiers or acceptors when receivin g | identify themselves as security verifiers or acceptors when receivin g | |||
and processing secured messages. | and processing secured messages. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</aside> | </aside> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Tiered Management</name> | <name>Tiered Management</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
skipping to change at line 531 ¶ | skipping to change at line 519 ¶ | |||
first tier is the management of the local operator configuration | first tier is the management of the local operator configuration | |||
using any one of a variety of standard mechanisms, models, and | using any one of a variety of standard mechanisms, models, and | |||
protocols. The second tier is the operation of the local device | protocols. The second tier is the operation of the local device | |||
through the local operator. | through the local operator. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The DTNMA defines the DTNMA Manager (DM) as a remote operator applic ation and the | The DTNMA defines the DTNMA Manager (DM) as a remote operator applic ation and the | |||
DTNMA Agent (DA) as an agent acting as a local operator application. | DTNMA Agent (DA) as an agent acting as a local operator application. | |||
In this model, which is illustrated in <xref target="two_tiered_mode l"/>, the | In this model, which is illustrated in <xref target="two_tiered_mode l"/>, the | |||
DM and DA can be viewed as applications with the DM producing new co nfigurations | DM and DA can be viewed as applications, with the DM producing new c onfigurations | |||
and the DA receiving those configurations from an underlying managem ent mechanism. | and the DA receiving those configurations from an underlying managem ent mechanism. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t keepWithNext="true">Two-Tiered Management Architecture</t> | ||||
<figure anchor="two_tiered_model"> | <figure anchor="two_tiered_model"> | |||
<name>Two-Tiered Management Architecture</name> | ||||
<artwork align="center" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[ | <artwork align="center" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[ | |||
_ | _ | |||
/ | / | |||
/ +------------+ +-----------+ Local +---------+ | / +------------+ +-----------+ Local +---------+ | |||
TIER / | DM (Remote | | DA (Local | Operation | Managed | | TIER / | DM (Remote | | DA (Local | Operation | Managed | | |||
2 \ | Operator) | | Operator) | <---------> | Apps | | 2 \ | Operator) | | Operator) | <---------> | Apps | | |||
MGMT \ +------------+ +-----------+ +---------+ | MGMT \ +------------+ +-----------+ +---------+ | |||
\_ ^ ^ | \_ ^ ^ | |||
| configs | configs | | configs | configs | |||
_ | | | _ | | | |||
/ V V | / V V | |||
/ +------------+ Remote +------------+ | / +------------+ Remote +------------+ | |||
TIER / | Management | Management | Management | | TIER / | Management | Management | Management | | |||
1 \ | Client | <----------> | Server | | 1 \ | Client | <----------> | Server | | |||
MGMT \ +------------+ +------------+ | MGMT \ +------------+ +------------+ | |||
\_ | \_ | |||
]]></artwork> | ]]></artwork> | |||
</figure> | </figure> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
In this approach, the configurations produced by the DM are | In this approach, the configurations produced by the DM are | |||
based on the DA features and associated data model. How those | based on the DA features and associated data model. How those | |||
configurations are transported between the DM and the DA, and | configurations are transported between the DM and the DA, and | |||
how results are communicated back from the DA to the DM, can | how results are communicated back from the DA to the DM, can | |||
be accomplished using whatever mechanism is most appropriate | be accomplished using whatever mechanism is most appropriate | |||
for the network and the device platforms. For example, the | for the network and the device platforms -- for example, the | |||
use of a NETCONF, RESTCONF, or SNMP server on the managed device | use of a Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF), RESTCONF, or Sim | |||
ple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) server on the managed device | ||||
to provide configurations to a DA. | to provide configurations to a DA. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Remote and Local Manager Associations</name> | <name>Remote and Local Manager Associations</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
In addition to disconnectivity, topological change can alter the | In addition to disconnectivity, topological change can alter the | |||
skipping to change at line 585 ¶ | skipping to change at line 573 ¶ | |||
devices might be active in a network at different times or in | devices might be active in a network at different times or in | |||
different partitions. Managed devices might communicate with some, a ll, | different partitions. Managed devices might communicate with some, a ll, | |||
or none of these managing devices as a function of their own local | or none of these managing devices as a function of their own local | |||
configuration and policy. | configuration and policy. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<aside> | <aside> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
NOTE: These concepts relate to practices in conventional networks. | NOTE: These concepts relate to practices in conventional networks. | |||
For example, supporting multiple managing devices is similar to | For example, supporting multiple managing devices is similar to | |||
deploying multiple instances of a network service -- such as a DNS | deploying multiple instances of a network service such as a DNS | |||
server or CA node. Selecting from a set of managing devices is | server or CA node. Selecting from a set of managing devices is | |||
similar to a sensor node practice of electing cluster heads to act | similar to a sensor node's practice of electing cluster heads to a ct | |||
as privileged nodes for data storage and exfiltration. | as privileged nodes for data storage and exfiltration. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</aside> | </aside> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Therefore, a network management architecture for challenged networks | Therefore, a network management architecture for challenged networks | |||
should: | should: | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<ol> | <ol> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
Support a many-to-many association amongst managing and managed | Support a many-to-many association amongst managing and managed | |||
devices, and | devices, and | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
Allow "control from" and "reporting to" managing devices to functi on | Allow "control from" and "reporting to" managing devices to functi on | |||
independent of one another. | independently of one another. | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
</ol> | </ol> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Management Special Cases</name> | <name>Management Special Cases</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The following special cases illustrate some of the operational | The following special cases illustrate some of the operational | |||
situations that can be encountered in the management of devices in | situations that can be encountered in the management of devices in | |||
a challenged network. | a challenged network. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<dl> | <dl> | |||
<dt>One-Way Management:</dt> | <dt>One-Way Management:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
A managed device can only be accessed via a | A managed device can only be accessed via a | |||
uni-directional link, or a via a link whose duration is shorter | unidirectional link or via a link whose duration is shorter | |||
than a single round-trip propagation time. Results of this managemen t may come back at a different time, over a | than a single round-trip propagation time. Results of this managemen t may come back at a different time, over a | |||
different path, and/or as observable from out-of-band changes to | different path, and/or as observable from out-of-band changes to | |||
device behavior. | device behavior. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Summary Data:</dt> | <dt>Summary Data:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
A managing device might only receive summary data of | A managing device might only receive summary data regarding | |||
a managed device's state because a link or path is constrained by | a managed device's state because a link or path is constrained by | |||
capacity or reliability. | capacity or reliability. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Bulk Historical Reporting:</dt> | <dt>Bulk Historical Reporting:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
A managing device receives a large volume | A managing device receives a large volume | |||
of historical report data for a managed device. This can occur when | of historical report data for a managed device. This can occur when | |||
a managed device rejoins a network or has temporary access to a high | a managed device rejoins a network or has temporary access to a | |||
capacity link (or path) to the managed device. | high-capacity link (or path) between itself and the managing device. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Multiple Managers</dt> | <dt>Multiple Managers:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
A managed device tracks multiple managers in | A managed device tracks multiple managers in | |||
the network and communicates with them as a function of time, | the network and communicates with them as a function of time, | |||
local state, or network topology. This includes challenged | local state, or network topology. This scenario would also apply to challenged | |||
networks that interconnect two or more unchallenged networks such | networks that interconnect two or more unchallenged networks such | |||
that managed and managing devices exist in different networks. | that managed and managing devices exist in different networks. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
</dl> | </dl> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
These special cases highlight the need for managed devices to operate | These special cases highlight the need for managed devices to operate | |||
without presupposing a dedicated connection to a single managing | without presupposing a dedicated connection to a single managing | |||
device. Managing devices in a challenged | device. Managing devices in a challenged | |||
network might never expect a reply to a command, and communications fr om | network might never expect a reply to a command, and communications fr om | |||
managed devices may be delivered much later than the events being repo rted. | managed devices may be delivered much later than the events being repo rted. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section> | <section anchor="desired-name-properties"> | |||
<name>Desirable Design Properties</name> | <name>Desirable Design Properties</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
This section describes those design properties that are desirable when | This section describes those design properties that are desirable when | |||
defining a management architecture operating across challenged | defining a management architecture operating across challenged | |||
links in a network. These properties ensure that network management | links in a network. These properties ensure that network management | |||
capabilities are retained even as delays and disruptions in the | capabilities are retained even as delays and disruptions in the | |||
network scale. Ultimately, these properties are the driving design | network scale. Ultimately, these properties are the driving design | |||
principles for the DTNMA. | principles for the DTNMA. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<aside> | <aside> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
NOTE: These properties may influence the design, construction, and | NOTE: These properties may influence the design, construction, and | |||
adaptation of existing management tools for use in challenged | adaptation of existing management tools for use in challenged | |||
networks. For example, the properties of the DTN architecture | networks. For example, the properties of the DTN architecture | |||
<xref target="RFC4838"/> resulted in the development of BPv7 | <xref target="RFC4838"/> resulted in the development of BPv7 | |||
<xref target="RFC9171"/> and BPSec <xref target="RFC9172"/>. The | <xref target="RFC9171"/> and BPSec <xref target="RFC9172"/>. | |||
DTNMA may result in the construction of new management data models, | Implementing the DTNMA model may result in the construction of new man | |||
agement data models, | ||||
policy expressions, and/or protocols. | policy expressions, and/or protocols. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</aside> | </aside> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Dynamic Architectures</name> | <name>Dynamic Architectures</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The DTNMA should be agnostic of the underlying physical topology, | The DTNMA should be agnostic to the underlying physical topology, | |||
transport protocols, security solutions, and supporting infrastructure | transport protocols, security solutions, and supporting infrastructure | |||
of a given network. Due to the likelihood of operating in a frequently | of a given network. Due to the likelihood of operating in a frequently | |||
partitioned environment, the topology of a network may change | partitioned environment, the topology of a network may change | |||
over time. Attempts to stabilize an architecture around individual | over time. Attempts to stabilize an architecture around individual | |||
nodes can result in a brittle management framework and the creation | nodes can result in a brittle management framework and the creation | |||
of congestion points during periods of connectivity. | of congestion points during periods of connectivity. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The DTNMA should not prescribe any association between a | The DTNMA should not prescribe any association between a | |||
DM and a DA other than those defined in this document. | DM and a DA other than those defined in this document. | |||
There should be no logical limitation to the number of DMs | There should be no logical limitation on the number of DMs | |||
that can control a DA, the number of DMs that a DA should report to, | that can control a DA, the number of DMs that a DA should report to, | |||
or any requirement that a DM and DA relationship implies a pair. | or any requirement that a DM and DA relationship imply a pair. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<aside> | <aside> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
NOTE: Practical limitations on the relationships between and | NOTE: Practical limitations on the relationships between and | |||
amongst DMs and DAs will exist as a function of the capabilities of | amongst DMs and DAs will exist as a function of the capabilities of | |||
networked devices. These limitations derive from processing and stor age | networked devices. These limitations derive from processing and stor age | |||
constraints, performance requirements, and other engineering factors . | constraints, performance requirements, and other engineering factors . | |||
While this information is vital to the proper engineering of a manag | Implementors of managed and managing devices must account for these | |||
ed | limitations in their device designs. | |||
and managing device, they are implementation considerations, and not | ||||
otherwise design constraints on the DTNMA. | ||||
</t> | </t> | |||
</aside> | </aside> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name> Hierarchically Modeled Information</name> | <name> Hierarchically Modeled Information</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The DTNMA should use data models to define the syntactic and | The DTNMA should use data models to define the syntactic and | |||
semantic contracts for data exchange between a DA and a DM. A given | semantic contracts for data exchange between a DA and a DM. A given | |||
model should have the ability to "inherit" the contents of other | model should have the ability to "inherit" the contents of other | |||
models to form hierarchical data relationships. | models to form hierarchical data relationships. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<aside> | <aside> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
NOTE: The term data model in this context refers to a schema that | NOTE: The term "data model" in this context refers to a schema that | |||
defines a contract between a DA and a DM for how information is | defines a contract between a DA and a DM regarding how information i | |||
s | ||||
represented and validated. | represented and validated. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</aside> | </aside> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Many network management solutions use data models to specify the | Many network management solutions use data models to specify the | |||
semantic and syntactic representation of data exchanged between | semantic and syntactic representation of data exchanged between | |||
managed and managing devices. The DTNMA is not different in | managed and managing devices. The DTNMA is not different in | |||
this regard - information exchanged between DAs and DMs should | this regard; information exchanged between DAs and DMs should | |||
conform to one or more pre-defined, normative data models. | conform to one or more predefined, normative data models. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
A common best practice when defining a data model is to make it cohesi ve. | A common best practice when defining a data model is to make it cohesi ve. | |||
A cohesive model is one that includes information related to a single | A cohesive model is one that includes information related to a single | |||
purpose such as managing a single application or protocol. When | purpose such as managing a single application or protocol. When | |||
applying this practice, it is not uncommon to develop a large number | applying this practice, it is not uncommon to develop a large number | |||
of small data models that, together, describe the information needed | of small data models that, together, describe the information needed | |||
to manage a device. | to manage a device. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
skipping to change at line 769 ¶ | skipping to change at line 757 ¶ | |||
from another data model. This ability to include a data model avoids | from another data model. This ability to include a data model avoids | |||
repeating information in different data models. When one data | repeating information in different data models. When one data | |||
model includes information from another data model, there is an | model includes information from another data model, there is an | |||
implied model hierarchy. | implied model hierarchy. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Data models in the DTNMA should allow for the construction of both | Data models in the DTNMA should allow for the construction of both | |||
cohesive models and hierarchically related models. These data models | cohesive models and hierarchically related models. These data models | |||
should be used to define all sources of information that can | should be used to define all sources of information that can | |||
be retrieved, configured, or executed in the DTNMA. This includes | be retrieved, configured, or executed in the DTNMA. These actions woul d include | |||
supporting DA autonomy functions such as parameterization, | supporting DA autonomy functions such as parameterization, | |||
filtering, and event driven behaviors. These models will be used to bo th | filtering, and event-driven behaviors. These models will be used to bo th | |||
implement interoperable autonomy engines on DAs and define | implement interoperable autonomy engines on DAs and define | |||
interoperable report parsing mechanisms on DMs. | interoperable report parsing mechanisms on DMs. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<aside> | <aside> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
NOTE: While data model hierarchies can result in a more concise | NOTE: While data model hierarchies can result in a more concise | |||
data model, arbitrarily complex nesting schemes can also result in | data model, arbitrarily complex nesting schemes can also result in | |||
very verbose encodings. Where possible, data identification | very verbose encodings. Where possible, data identification | |||
schemes should be constructed that allow for both hierarchical | schemes should be constructed that allow for both hierarchical | |||
data and highly compressible data identification. | data and highly compressible data identification. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</aside> | </aside> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Adaptive Push of Information</name> | <name>Adaptive Push of Information</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
DAs in the DTNMA architecture should determine when to push | DAs in the DTNMA should determine when to push | |||
information to DMs as a function of their local state. | information to DMs as a function of their local state. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Pull management mechanisms require a managing device to send a query | "Pull" management mechanisms require a managing device to send a query | |||
to a managed device and then wait for a response to that specific | to a managed device and then wait for a response to that specific | |||
query. This practice implies some knowledge synchronization between | query. This practice implies some knowledge synchronization between | |||
entities (which may be as simple as knowing when a managed device migh t be powered). However, challenged networks | entities (which may be as simple as knowing when a managed device migh t be powered). However, challenged networks | |||
cannot guarantee timely round-trip data exchange. For this reason, | cannot guarantee timely round-trip data exchange. For this reason, | |||
pull mechanisms should be avoided in the DTNMA. | pull mechanisms should be avoided in the DTNMA. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Push mechanisms, in this context, refer to the ability of DAs to | "Push" mechanisms, in this context, indicate the ability of DAs to | |||
leverage local autonomy to determine when and what information | leverage local autonomy to determine when and what information | |||
should be sent to which DMs. The push is considered adaptive | should be sent to which DMs. The push is considered adaptive | |||
because a DA determines what information to push (and when) as | because a DA determines what information to push (and when) as | |||
an adaptation to changes to the DA's internal state. Once pushed, | an adaptation to changes to the DA's internal state. Once pushed, | |||
information might still be queued pending connectivity of the DA | information might still be queued, pending connectivity of the DA | |||
to the network. | to the network. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<aside> | ||||
<t> | <t> | |||
NOTE: Even in cases where a round-trip exchange can occur, pull | Even in cases where a round-trip exchange can occur, pull | |||
mechanisms increase the overall amount of traffic in the network | mechanisms increase the overall amount of traffic in the network | |||
and preclude the use of autonomy at managed devices. So even when | and preclude the use of autonomy at managed devices. So, even when | |||
pull mechanisms are feasible they should not be considered a | pull mechanisms are feasible, they should not be considered a | |||
pragmatic alternative to push mechanisms. | pragmatic alternative to push mechanisms. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</aside> | ||||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Efficient Data Encoding</name> | <name>Efficient Data Encoding</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Messages exchanged between a DA and a DM in the DTNMA should be | Messages exchanged between a DA and a DM in the DTNMA should be | |||
defined in a way that allows for efficient on-the-wire encoding. | defined in a way that allows for efficient on-the-wire encoding. | |||
DTNMA design decisions that result in smaller message sizes | DTNMA design decisions that result in smaller message sizes | |||
should be preferred over those that result in larger message sizes. | should be preferred over those that result in larger message sizes. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
There is a relationship between message encoding and message | There is a relationship between message encoding and message | |||
processing time at a node. Messages with little or no encodings may | processing time at a node. Messages with few or no encodings may | |||
simplify node processing whereas more compact encodings may require | simplify node processing, whereas more compact encodings may require | |||
additional activities to generate/parse encoded messages. Generally, | additional activities to generate/parse encoded messages. Generally, | |||
compressing a message takes processing time at the sender and | compressing a message takes processing time at the sender and | |||
decompressing a message takes processing time at a receiver. | decompressing a message takes processing time at a receiver. | |||
Therefore, there is a design tradeoff between minimizing message | Therefore, there is a design trade-off between minimizing message | |||
sizes and minimizing node processing. | sizes and minimizing node processing. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
There is a significant advantage to smaller DTNMA message sizes | There is a significant advantage to smaller DTNMA message sizes | |||
in a challenged network. Smaller messages require smaller periods of | in a challenged network. Smaller messages require shorter periods of | |||
viable transmission for communication, they incur less | viable transmission for communication, they incur less | |||
re-transmission cost, and they consume less resources when | retransmission cost, and they consume fewer resources when | |||
persistently stored en-route in the network. | persistently stored en route in the network. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<aside> | <aside> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
NOTE: Naive approaches to minimizing message size through general | NOTE: Naive approaches to minimizing message size through | |||
purpose compression algorithms do not produce minimal encodings. | general-purpose compression algorithms do not produce minimal encodi | |||
ngs. | ||||
Data models can, and should, be designed for compact encoding from | Data models can, and should, be designed for compact encoding from | |||
the beginning. Design strategies for compact encodings involve | the beginning. Design strategies for compact encodings involve | |||
using structured data, hierarchical data models, and common | using structured data, hierarchical data models, and common | |||
sub-structures within data models. These strategies allow for | substructures within data models. These strategies allow for | |||
compressibility beyond what would otherwise be achieved by | compressibility beyond what would otherwise be achieved by | |||
computing large hash values over generalized data structures. | computing large hash values over generalized data structures. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</aside> | </aside> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Universal, Unique Data Identification</name> | <name>Universal, Unique Data Identification</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Data elements within the DTNMA should be uniquely identifiable so that | Data elements within the DTNMA should be uniquely identifiable so that | |||
they can be individually manipulated. Further, these identifiers | they can be individually manipulated. Further, these identifiers | |||
should be universal - the identifier for a data element should be the | should be universal -- the identifier for a data element should be the | |||
same regardless of role, implementation, or network instance. | same, regardless of role, implementation, or network instance. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Identification schemes that would be relative to a specific DA or | Identification schemes that would be relative to a specific DA or | |||
specific system configuration might change over time and should be avo ided. Relying on relative identification schemes would require resynchronizing r elative state when nodes in a challenge network reconnect after periods of parti tion. This type of resynchronization should be avoided whenever possible. | specific system configuration might change over time and should be avo ided. Relying on relative identification schemes would require resynchronizing r elative state when nodes in a challenged network reconnect after periods of part ition. This type of resynchronization should be avoided whenever possible. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<aside> | <aside> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
NOTE: Consider a common management technique for approximating an | NOTE: Consider a common management technique for approximating an | |||
associative array lookup. If a managed device | associative array lookup. If a managed device | |||
tracks the number of bytes passed by multiple named interfaces, | tracks the number of bytes passed by multiple named interfaces, | |||
then the number of bytes through a specific named interface | then the number of bytes through a specific named interface | |||
("int_foo"), would be retrieved in the following way: | ("int_foo") would be retrieved in the following way: | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<ol> | <ol> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
Query a list of ordered interface names from an agent. | Query a list of ordered interface names from an agent. | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
Find the name that matches "int_foo" and infer the agent's ind | Find the name that matches "int_foo", and infer the agent's in | |||
ex of "int_foo" from the ordered interface list. In | dex of "int_foo" from the ordered interface list. In | |||
this instance, assume "int_foo" is the 4th interface in the li | this instance, assume that "int_foo" is the fourth interface i | |||
st. | n the list. | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
Query the agent (again) to now return the number of bytes pass ed through the 4th interface. | Query the agent (again) to now return the number of bytes pass ed through the fourth interface. | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
</ol> | </ol> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Ignoring the inefficiency of two round-trip exchanges, this | Ignoring the inefficiency of two round-trip exchanges, this | |||
mechanism will fail if an agent implementation changes its index | mechanism will fail if an agent implementation changes its index | |||
mapping between the first and second query. | mapping between the first and second queries. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The desired data being queried, "number of bytes through int_foo" | The desired data being queried, "number of bytes through 'int_foo'", | |||
should be uniquely and universally identifiable and independent | should be uniquely and universally identifiable and independent | |||
of how that data exists in any agent's custom implementation. | of how that data exists in any agent's custom implementation. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</aside> | </aside> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Runtime Data Definitions</name> | <name>Runtime Data Definitions</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The DTNMA allows for the addition of new data elements to a | The DTNMA allows for the addition of new data elements to a | |||
data model as part of the runtime operation of the management system. | data model as part of the runtime operation of the management system. | |||
These definitions may represent custom data definitions that are | These definitions may represent custom data definitions that are | |||
applicable only for a particular device or network. Custom | applicable only for a particular device or network. Custom | |||
definitions should also be able to be removed from the system during | definitions should also be able to be removed from the system during | |||
runtime. | runtime. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The goal of this approach is to dynamically add or remove data element s to the local runtime schemas as needed - such as the definition of new counter s, new reports, or new rules. | The goal of this approach is to dynamically add or remove data element s to the local runtime schemas as needed, such as the definition of new counters , new reports, or new rules. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The custom definition of new data from existing data (such as through | The custom definition of new data from existing data (such as through | |||
data fusion, averaging, sampling, or other mechanisms) provides the | data fusion, averaging, sampling, or other mechanisms) provides the | |||
ability to communicate desired information in as compact a form as | ability to communicate desired information in as compact a form as | |||
possible. | possible. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<aside> | <aside> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
NOTE: A DM could, for example, define a custom data report that | NOTE: A DM could, for example, define a custom data report that | |||
includes only summary information around a specific operational | includes only summary information about a specific operational | |||
event or as part of specific debugging. DAs could then produce | event or as part of specific debugging. DAs could then produce | |||
this smaller report until it is no longer necessary, at which | this smaller report until it is no longer necessary, at which | |||
point the custom report could be removed from the management | point the custom report could be removed from the management | |||
system. | system. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</aside> | </aside> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Custom data elements should be calculated and used both as | Custom data elements should be calculated and used both as | |||
parameters for DA autonomy and for more efficient reporting | parameters for DA autonomy and for more efficient reporting | |||
to DMs. Defining new data elements allows for DAs to perform | to DMs. Defining new data elements allows for DAs to perform | |||
local data fusion and defining new reporting templates allows | local data fusion, and defining new reporting templates allows | |||
for DMs to specify desired formats and generally save on link | for DMs to specify desired formats and generally save on link | |||
capacity, storage, and processing time. | capacity, storage, and processing time. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Autonomous Operation</name> | <name>Autonomous Operation</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The management of applications by a DA should be achievable using | The management of applications by a DA should be achievable using | |||
skipping to change at line 987 ¶ | skipping to change at line 973 ¶ | |||
or to support semi-autonomous behavior in determining when to run | or to support semi-autonomous behavior in determining when to run | |||
tasks and how to configure or parameterize tasks when they are run. | tasks and how to configure or parameterize tasks when they are run. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Important features provided by the DA are listed below. These | Important features provided by the DA are listed below. These | |||
features work together to accomplish tasks. As such, there is | features work together to accomplish tasks. As such, there is | |||
commonality amongst their definitions and nature of their benefits. | commonality amongst their definitions and nature of their benefits. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<dl> | <dl> | |||
<dt>Stand-alone Operation:</dt> | <dt>Standalone Operation:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
Pre-configuration allows DAs to operate | Preconfiguration allows DAs to operate | |||
without regular contact with other nodes in the network. Updates | without regular contact with other nodes in the network. Updates | |||
for configurations remain difficult in a challenged network, but t | for configurations remain difficult in a challenged network, but t | |||
his approach removes the requirement that a DM be in-the-loop during regular ope | his approach removes the requirement that a DM be in the loop during regular ope | |||
rations. | rations. | |||
Preconfiguring stimuli-and-responses on a DA during periods of | Preconfiguring stimuli and responses on a DA during periods of | |||
connectivity allows DAs to self-manage during periods of | connectivity allows DAs to self-manage during periods of | |||
disconnectivity. | disconnectivity. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Deterministic Behavior:</dt> | <dt>Deterministic Behavior:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
Operational systems might need to act | Operational systems might need to act | |||
in a deterministic way even in the absence of an operator | in a deterministic way, even in the absence of an operator | |||
in-the-loop. Deterministic behavior allows an out-of-contact DM to | in the loop. Deterministic behavior allows an out-of-contact DM to | |||
predict the state of a DA and to determine how a DA got into | predict the state of a DA and to determine how a DA got into | |||
a particular state. | a particular state. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Engine-Based Behavior:</dt> | <dt>Engine-Based Behavior:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
Operational systems might not be able to | Operational systems might not be able to | |||
deploy "mobile code" <xref target="RFC4949" format="default"/> | deploy "mobile code" solutions | |||
solutions due to network bandwidth, memory or processor loading, | <xref target="RFC4949" format="default"/> due to network bandwidth | |||
, memory or processor loading, | ||||
or security concerns. Engine-based approaches provide configurable | or security concerns. Engine-based approaches provide configurable | |||
behavior without incurring these concerns. | behavior without incurring these concerns. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Authorization and Accounting:</dt> | <dt>Authorization and Accounting:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
The DTNMA does not | The DTNMA does not | |||
require a specific underlying transport protocol, network | require a specific underlying transport protocol, a specific netwo | |||
infrastructure, or network services. Therefore, mechanisms for | rk | |||
infrastructure, or specific network services. Therefore, mechanism | ||||
s for | ||||
authorization and accounting need to be present in | authorization and accounting need to be present in | |||
a standard way at DAs and DMs to provide these functions if the | a standard way at DAs and DMs to provide these functions if the | |||
underlying network does not. This is particularly true in cases | underlying network does not. This is particularly true in cases | |||
where multiple DMs may be active concurrently in the network. | where multiple DMs may be active concurrently in the network. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
</dl> | </dl> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
To understand the contributions of these features to a common | To understand the contributions of these features to a common type of | |||
behavior, consider the example of a managed device coming online | behavior, consider the example of a managed device coming online | |||
with a set of pre-installed configuration. In this case, | with a set of preinstalled configurations. In this case, | |||
the device's stand-alone operation comes from the pre-configuration | the device's standalone operation comes from the preconfiguration | |||
of its local autonomy engine. This engine-based behavior allows | of its local autonomy engine. This engine-based behavior allows | |||
the system to behave in a deterministic way and any new configuration s | the system to behave in a deterministic way, and any new configuratio ns | |||
will need to be authorized before being adopted. | will need to be authorized before being adopted. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Features such as deterministic processing and engine-based | Features such as deterministic processing and engine-based | |||
behavior are separate from (but do not preclude the use of) other | behavior are separate from (but do not preclude the use of) other | |||
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) approaches | Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) approaches | |||
for device management. | for device management. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section anchor="current-remote-mgmt" numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Current Remote Management Approaches</name> | <name>Current Remote Management Approaches</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Several remote management solutions have been developed for both local-a | Several remote management solutions have been developed for both local a | |||
rea and wide-area networks. Their capabilities range from simple configuration a | rea networks and wide area networks. Their capabilities range from simple config | |||
nd report generation to complex modeling of device settings, state, and behavior | uration and report generation to complex modeling of device settings, state, and | |||
. | behavior. | |||
Each of these approaches are successful in the domains for which they ha | All of these approaches are successful in the domains for which they hav | |||
ve been built, but are not all equally functional when deployed in a challenged | e been built but are not all equally functional when deployed in a challenged ne | |||
network. | twork. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
This section describes some of the well-known protocols for remote manag ement and contrasts their purposes with the desirable properties of the DTNMA. | This section describes some of the well-known protocols for remote manag ement and contrasts their purposes with the desirable properties of the DTNMA. | |||
The purpose of this comparison is to identify parts of existing approach es that can be adopted or adapted for use in challenged networks and where new c apabilities should be created specifically for this environment. | The purpose of this comparison is to identify parts of existing approach es that can be adopted or adapted for use in challenged networks and where new c apabilities should be created specifically for such environments. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<section> | <section> | |||
<name>SNMP and SMI Models</name> | <name>SNMP and SMI Models</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
An early and widely used example of a remote management protocol is the Simple N | An early and widely used example of a remote management protocol is SNMP, which | |||
etwork Management Protocol (SNMP) currently at Version 3 <xref target="RFC3410"/ | is currently at version 3 <xref target="RFC3410"/>. | |||
>. | SNMP utilizes a request-response model to get and set data values within an arbi | |||
The SNMP utilizes a request/response model to get and set data values within an | trarily deep object hierarchy. | |||
arbitrarily deep object hierarchy. | ||||
Objects are used to identify data such as host identifiers, link utilization met rics, error rates, and counters between application software on managing and man aged devices <xref target="RFC3411"/>. | Objects are used to identify data such as host identifiers, link utilization met rics, error rates, and counters between application software on managing and man aged devices <xref target="RFC3411"/>. | |||
Additionally, SNMP supports a model for unidirectional push messages, called eve nt notifications, based on agent-defined triggering events. | Additionally, SNMP supports a model for unidirectional push messages, called eve nt notifications, based on agent-defined triggering events. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
SNMP relies on logical sessions with predictable round-trip latency to support i ts "pull" mechanism but a single activity is likely to require many round-trip e xchanges. | SNMP relies on logical sessions with predictable round-trip latency to support i ts pull mechanism, but a single activity is likely to require many round-trip ex changes. | |||
Complex management can be achieved, but only through careful orchestration of re al-time, end-to-end, managing-device-generated query-and-response logic. | Complex management can be achieved, but only through careful orchestration of re al-time, end-to-end, managing-device-generated query-and-response logic. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
There is existing work that uses the SNMP data model to support | There is existing work that uses the SNMP data model to support | |||
some low-fidelity Agent-side processing, to include the Distributed | some low-fidelity agent-side processing; this work includes using | |||
Management Expression MIB <xref target="RFC2982"/> and Definitions | "<xref target="RFC2982" format="title"/>" <xref target="RFC2982" format="default | |||
of Managed Objects for the Delegation of Management Scripts | "/> and | |||
<xref target="RFC3165"/>. However, Agent autonomy is not an SNMP | "<xref target="RFC3165" format="title"/>" <xref target="RFC3165" format="default | |||
"/>. | ||||
However, agent autonomy is not an SNMP | ||||
mechanism, so support for a local agent response to an initiating | mechanism, so support for a local agent response to an initiating | |||
event is limited. In a challenged network where the delay between | event is limited. In a challenged network where the delay between | |||
a managing device receiving an alert and sending a response can be | a managing device receiving an alert and sending a response can be | |||
significant, SNMP is insufficient for autonomous event handling. | significant, SNMP is insufficient for autonomous event handling. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<section anchor="sec-mgmt-snmp-smi"> | <section anchor="sec-mgmt-snmp-smi"> | |||
<name>The SMI Modeling Language</name> | <name>The SMI Modeling Language</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
SNMP separates the representations for managed data models from Manager--Agent m | SNMP separates the representations for managed data models from messaging, seque | |||
essaging, sequencing and encoding. | ncing, and encoding between managers and agents. | |||
Each data model is termed a Management Information Base (MIB) <xref target="RFC3 | Each data model is termed a "Management Information Base" (or "MIB") <xref targe | |||
418"/> and uses the Structure of Management Information (SMI) modeling language | t="RFC3418"/> and uses the Structure of Management Information (SMI) modeling la | |||
<xref target="RFC2578"/>. | nguage <xref target="RFC2578"/>. | |||
Additionally, the SMI itself is based on the ASN.1 Syntax <xref target="ASN.1"/> | Additionally, the SMI itself is based on the ASN.1 syntax <xref target="ASN.1"/> | |||
which is used not just for SMI but for other, unrelated data structure specific | , which is used not just for SMI but for other, unrelated data structure specifi | |||
ation such as the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) <xref target="RFC5652"/>. | cations such as the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) <xref target="RFC5652"/>. | |||
Separating data models from messaging and encoding is a best practice in remote management protocols and is also necessary for the DTNMA. | Separating data models from messaging and encoding is a best practice in remote management protocols and is also necessary for the DTNMA. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Each SNMP MIB is composed of managed object definitions each of which is associa | Each SNMP MIB is composed of managed object definitions, each of which is associ | |||
ted with a hierarchical Object Identifier (OID). | ated with a hierarchical Object Identifier (OID). | |||
Because of the arbitrarily deep nature of MIB object trees, the size of OIDs is | Because of the arbitrarily deep nature of MIB object trees, the size of OIDs is | |||
not strictly bounded by the protocol (though may be bounded by implementations). | not strictly bounded by the protocol (though it may be bounded by implementation | |||
s). | ||||
</t> | </t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section> | <section> | |||
<name>SNMP Protocol and Transport</name> | <name>SNMP and Transport</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The SNMP protocol itself, which is at version 2 <xref target="RFC3416"/>, can op erate over a variety of transports, including plaintext UDP/IP <xref target="RFC 3417"/>, SSH/TCP/IP <xref target="RFC5592"/>, and DTLS/UDP/IP or TLS/TCP/IP <xre f target="RFC6353"/>. | SNMPv2 <xref target="RFC3416"/> <xref target="RFC3417"/> and SNMPv3 <xref target ="RFC3414"/> can operate over a variety of transports, including plaintext UDP/I P <xref target="RFC3417"/>, SSH/TCP/IP <xref target="RFC5592"/>, and DTLS/UDP/IP or TLS/TCP/IP <xref target="RFC6353"/>. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
SNMP uses an abstracted security model to provide authentication, integrity, and confidentiality. | SNMP uses an abstracted security model to provide authentication, integrity, and confidentiality. | |||
There are options for user-based security model (USM) of <xref target="RFC3414"/ >, which uses in-message security, and transport security model (TSM) <xref targ et="RFC5591"/>, which relies on the transport to provide security functions and interfaces. | There are options for the User-based Security Model (USM) <xref target="RFC3414" />, which uses in-message security, and the Transport Security Model (TSM) <xref target="RFC5591"/>, which relies on the transport to provide security functions and interfaces. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section> | <section> | |||
<name>XML-Infoset-Based Protocols and YANG Models</name> | <name>XML-Infoset-Based Protocols and YANG Data Models</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Several network management protocols, including NETCONF <xref target="RFC6241"/> , RESTCONF <xref target="RFC8040"/>, and CORECONF <xref target="I-D.ietf-core-co mi"/>, share the same XML information set <xref target="xml-infoset"/> for its h ierarchical managed information and <xref target="XPath"/> expressions to identi fy nodes of that information model. | Several network management protocols, including NETCONF <xref target="RFC6241"/> , RESTCONF <xref target="RFC8040"/>, and the Constrained Application Protocol (C oAP) Management Interface (CORECONF) <xref target="CORE-COMI"/>, share the same XML Information Set <xref target="xml-infoset"/> for the information set's hiera rchical managed information and XPath expressions <xref target="XPath"/> to iden tify nodes of that information model. | |||
Since they share the same information model and the same data manipulation opera tions, together they will be referred to as "*CONF" protocols. | Since they share the same information model and the same data manipulation opera tions, together they will be referred to as "*CONF" protocols. | |||
Each protocol, however, provides a different encoding of that information set an d its related operation-specific data. | Each protocol, however, provides a different encoding of that information set an d its related operation-specific data. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The YANG modeling language of <xref target="RFC7950"/> is used to define the dat a model for these management protocols. | The YANG modeling language as defined in <xref target="RFC7950"/> is used to def ine the data model for these management protocols. | |||
Currently, YANG represents the IETF standard for defining managed information mo dels. | Currently, YANG represents the IETF standard for defining managed information mo dels. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<section> | <section> | |||
<name>The YANG Modeling Language</name> | <name>The YANG Modeling Language</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The YANG modeling language defines a syntax and modular semantics for organizing and accessing a device's configuration or operational information. | The YANG modeling language defines a syntax and modular semantics for organizing and accessing a device's configuration or operational information. | |||
YANG allows subdividing a full managed configuration into separate namespaces de fined by separate YANG modules. | YANG allows subdividing a full managed configuration into separate namespaces de fined by separate YANG modules. | |||
Once a module is developed, it is used (directly or indirectly) on both the clie nt and server to serve as a contract between the two. | Once a module is developed, it is used (directly or indirectly) on both the clie nt and server to serve as a contract between the two. | |||
A YANG module can be complex, describing a deeply nested and inter-related set o f data nodes, actions, and notifications. | A YANG module can be complex, describing a deeply nested and interrelated set of data nodes, actions, and notifications. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Unlike the separation in <xref target="sec-mgmt-snmp-smi"/> between ASN.1 syntax and module semantics from higher-level SMI data model semantics, YANG defines b oth a text syntax and module semantics together with data model semantics. | Unlike the separation between ASN.1 syntax and module semantics from higher-leve l SMI data model semantics as discussed in <xref target="sec-mgmt-snmp-smi"/>, Y ANG defines both a text syntax and module semantics together with data model sem antics. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The YANG language provides flexibility in the organization of model objects to t | The YANG modeling language provides flexibility in the organization of model obj | |||
he model developer. | ects to the model developer. | |||
The YANG supports a broad range of data types noted in <xref target="RFC6991"/>. | YANG supports a broad range of data types as noted in <xref target="RFC6991"/>. | |||
YANG supports the definition of parameterized Remote Procedure Calls (RPCs) and | YANG also supports the definition of parameterized Remote Procedure Calls (RPCs) | |||
actions to be executed on managed devices as well as the definition of event not | and actions to be executed on managed devices as well as the definition of even | |||
ifications within the model. | t notifications within the model. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<aside><t> | ||||
Current *CONF notification logic allows a client to subscribe to the delivery of | ||||
specific containers or data nodes defined in the model, either on a periodic or | ||||
"on change" basis <xref target="RFC8641"/>. | ||||
These notification events can be filtered according to XPath <xref target="XPath | ||||
"/> or subtree <xref target="RFC6241"/> filtering as described in <xref section= | ||||
"2.2" target="RFC8639"/>. | ||||
</t></aside> | ||||
<t> | <t> | |||
The use of YANG for data modeling necessarily comes with some side-effects, some | Current *CONF notification logic allows a client to subscribe to the delivery of | |||
of which are described here. | specific containers or data nodes defined in the model, on either a periodic or | |||
"on-change" basis <xref target="RFC8641"/>. | ||||
These notification events can be filtered according to XPath or subtree filterin | ||||
g <xref target="XPath"/> <xref target="RFC6241"/> as described in <xref section= | ||||
"2.2" target="RFC8639"/>. | ||||
</t> | ||||
<t> | ||||
The use of YANG for data modeling necessarily comes with some side effects, some | ||||
of which are described here. | ||||
</t> | </t> | |||
<dl> | <dl> | |||
<dt>Text Naming:</dt> | <dt>Text Naming:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Data nodes, RPCs, and notifications within a YANG model are named by a namespace -qualified, text-based path of the module, sub-module, container, and any data n odes such as lists, leaf-lists, or leaves, without any explicit hierarchical org anization based on data or object type. | Data nodes, RPCs, and notifications within a YANG data model are named by a name space-qualified, text-based path of the module, submodule, container, and any da ta nodes such as lists, leaf-lists, or leaves, without any explicit hierarchical organization based on data or object type. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Existing efforts to make compressed names for YANG objects, such as the YANG Sch | Existing efforts to make compressed names for YANG objects, such as the YANG Sch | |||
ema Item iDentifiers (SID) from <xref section="3.2" target="RFC9254"/>, allow a | ema Item iDentifiers (SIDs) as discussed in <xref section="3.2" target="RFC9254" | |||
node to be named by an globally unique integer value but are still relatively ve | />, allow a node to be named by a globally unique integer value but are still re | |||
rbose (up to 8 bytes per item) and still must be translated into text form for t | latively verbose (up to 8 bytes per item) and still must be translated into text | |||
hings like instance identification (see below). | form for things like instance identification (see below). | |||
Additionally, when representing a tree of named instances the child elements can | Additionally, when representing a tree of named instances, the child elements ca | |||
use differential encoding of SID integer values as "delta" integers. | n use differential encoding of SID integer values as "delta" integers. | |||
The mechanisms for assigning SIDs and the lifecycle of those SIDs are still in d | The mechanisms for assigning SIDs and the lifecycle of those SIDs are discussed | |||
evelopment <xref target="I-D.ietf-core-sid"/>. | in <xref target="RFC9595"/>. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Text Values and Built-In Types:</dt> | <dt>Text Values and Built-In Types:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Because the original use of YANG with NETCONF was to model XML information sets, | Because the original use of YANG with NETCONF was to model XML Information Sets, | |||
the values and built-in types are necessarily text based. | the values and built-in types are necessarily text based. | |||
The JSON encoding of YANG data <xref target="RFC7951"/> allows for optimized rep | JSON encoding of YANG data <xref target="RFC7951"/> allows for optimized represe | |||
resentations of many built-in types, and similarly the CBOR encoding <xref targe | ntations of many built-in types; similarly, Concise Binary Object Representation | |||
t="RFC9254"/> allows for different optimized representations. | (CBOR) encoding <xref target="RFC9254"/> allows for different optimized represe | |||
ntations. | ||||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
In particular, the YANG built-in types natively support a fixed range of decimal | In particular, the YANG built-in types support a fixed range of decimal fraction | |||
fractions (<xref section="9.3" target="RFC7950"/>) but purposefully do not supp | s (<xref section="9.3" target="RFC7950"/>) but purposefully do not support float | |||
ort floating point numbers. | ing-point numbers. | |||
There are alternatives, such as the type <tt>bandwidth-ieee-float32</tt> from <x | There are alternatives, such as the type <tt>bandwidth-ieee-float32</tt> <xref t | |||
ref target="RFC8294"/> or using the "binary" type with one of the IEEE-754 encod | arget="RFC8294"/> or using the "binary" type with one of the IEEE-754 encodings. | |||
ings. | ||||
</t> | </t> | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Deep Hierarchy:</dt> | <dt>Deep Hierarchy:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
YANG allows for, and current YANG modules take advantage of, the ability to deep ly nest a model hierarchy to represent complex combinations and compositions of data nodes. | YANG allows for, and current YANG modules take advantage of, the ability to deep ly nest a model hierarchy to represent complex combinations and compositions of data nodes. | |||
When a model uses a deep hierarchy of nodes this necessarily means that the qual ified paths to name those nodes and instances is longer than a flat hierarchy wo uld be. | When a model uses a deep hierarchy of nodes, this necessarily means that the qua lified paths to name those nodes and instances are longer than they would be in a flat namespace. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Instance Identification:</dt> | <dt>Instance Identification:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
The node instances in a YANG module necessarily use XPath expressions for identi fication. | The node instances in a YANG module necessarily use XPath expressions for identi fication. | |||
Some identification is constrained to be strictly within the YANG domain, such a | Some identification is constrained to be strictly within the YANG domain, such a | |||
s "must" "when", "augment", or "deviation" statements. | s "must", "when", "augment", or "deviation" statements. | |||
Other identification needs to be processed by a managed device, such as in "inst | Other identification needs to be processed by a managed device -- for example, v | |||
ance-identifier" built-in type. | ia | |||
This means any implementation of a managed device must include XPath processing | the "instance-identifier" built-in type. | |||
and related information model handling of <xref section="6.4" target="RFC7950"/> | This means that any implementation of a managed device must include XPath proces | |||
and its referenced documents. | sing and related information model handling per <xref section="6.4" target="RFC7 | |||
950"/> and its referenced documents. | ||||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Protocol Coupling:</dt> | <dt>Protocol Coupling:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
A significant amount of existing YANG tooling or modeling presumes the use of YA NG data within a management protocol with specific operations available. | A significant amount of existing YANG tooling or modeling presumes the use of YA NG data within a management protocol with specific operations available. | |||
For example, the access control model of <xref target="RFC8341"/> relies on thos e operations specific to the *CONF protocols for proper behavior. | For example, the access control model defined in <xref target="RFC8341"/> relies on those operations specific to the *CONF protocols for proper behavior. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The emergence of multiple NETCONF-derived protocols may make these presumptions less problematic in the future. | The emergence of multiple NETCONF-derived protocols may make these presumptions less problematic in the future. | |||
Work to more consistently identify different types of YANG modules and their use has been undertaken to disambiguate how YANG modules should be treated <xref ta rget="RFC8199"/>. | Work to more consistently identify different types of YANG modules and their use has been undertaken to disambiguate how YANG modules should be treated <xref ta rget="RFC8199"/>. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Manager-Side Control:</dt> | <dt>Manager-Side Control:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
YANG RPCs and actions execute on a managed device and generate an expected, stru ctured response. | YANG RPCs and actions execute on a managed device and generate an expected, stru ctured response. | |||
RPC execution is strictly limited to those issued by the manager. | RPC execution is strictly limited to those issued by the manager. | |||
skipping to change at line 1197 ¶ | skipping to change at line 1186 ¶ | |||
</dl> | </dl> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The YANG modeling language continues to evolve as new features are needed by ado pting management protocols. | The YANG modeling language continues to evolve as new features are needed by ado pting management protocols. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section> | <section> | |||
<name>NETCONF Protocol and Transport</name> | <name>NETCONF Protocol and Transport</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
NETCONF is a stateful, XML-encoding-based protocol that provides a syntax to ret rieve, edit, copy, or delete any data nodes or exposed functionality on a server . | NETCONF is a stateful, XML-encoding-based protocol that provides a syntax to ret rieve, edit, copy, or delete any data nodes or exposed functionality on a server . | |||
It requires that underlying transport protocols support long-lived, reliable, lo w-latency, sequenced data delivery sessions. | It requires that underlying transport protocols support long-lived, reliable, lo w-latency, sequenced data delivery sessions. | |||
A bi-directional NETCONF session needs to be established before any data transfe r (or notification) can occur. | A bidirectional NETCONF session needs to be established before any data transfer (or notification) can occur. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The XML exchanged within NETCONF messages is structured according to YANG module s supported by the NETCONF agent, and the data nodes reside within one of possib ly many datastores in accordance with the Network Management Datastore Architect ure (NMDA) of <xref target="RFC8342"/>. | The XML exchanged within NETCONF messages is structured according to YANG module s supported by the NETCONF agent, and the data nodes reside within one of possib ly many datastores in accordance with the Network Management Datastore Architect ure (NMDA) <xref target="RFC8342"/>. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
NETCONF transports are required to provide authentication, data integrity, confi dentiality, and replay protection. | NETCONF transports are required to provide authentication, data integrity, confi dentiality, and replay protection. | |||
Currently, NETCONF can operate over SSH/TCP/IP <xref target="RFC6242"/> or TLS/T CP/IP <xref target="RFC7589"/>. | Currently, NETCONF can operate over SSH/TCP/IP <xref target="RFC6242"/> or TLS/T CP/IP <xref target="RFC7589"/>. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section> | <section> | |||
<name>RESTCONF Protocol and Transport</name> | <name>RESTCONF Protocol and Transport</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
RESTCONF is a stateless, JSON-encoding-based protocol that provides the same ope | RESTCONF is a stateless, JSON-encoding-based protocol that provides the same ope | |||
rations as NETCONF, using the same YANG modules for structure and same NMDA data | rations as NETCONF, using the same YANG modules for structure and the same NMDA | |||
stores, but using RESTful exchanges over HTTP. | datastores, but using RESTful exchanges over HTTP. | |||
It uses HTTP-native methods to express its allowed operations: GET, POST, PUT, P | It uses HTTP methods to express its allowed operations: GET, POST, PUT, PATCH, o | |||
ATCH, or DELETE data nodes within a datastore. | r DELETE data nodes within a datastore. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Although RESTCONF is a logically stateless protocol, it does rely on state withi n its transport protocol to achieve behaviors such as authentication and securit y sessions. | Although RESTCONF is a logically stateless protocol, it does rely on state withi n its transport protocol to achieve behaviors such as authentication and securit y sessions. | |||
Because RESTCONF uses the same data node semantics of NETCONF, a typical activit y can involve the use of several sequential round-trips of exchanges to first di scover managed device state and then act upon it. | Because RESTCONF uses the same data node semantics as NETCONF, a typical activit y can involve the use of several sequential round trips of exchanges to first di scover managed device state and then act upon it. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section> | <section> | |||
<name>CORECONF Protocol and Transport</name> | <name>CORECONF Protocol and Transport</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
CORECONF is an emerging stateless protocol built atop the Constrai | CORECONF is an emerging stateless protocol built atop CoAP <xref t | |||
ned | arget="RFC7252"/> that | |||
Application Protocol (CoAP) <xref target="RFC7252"/> that | ||||
defines a messaging construct developed to operate specifically | defines a messaging construct developed to operate specifically | |||
on constrained devices and networks by limiting message size and | on constrained devices and networks by limiting message size and | |||
fragmentation. CoAP also implements a request/response system and | fragmentation. CoAP also implements a request-response system and | |||
methods for GET, POST, PUT, and DELETE. | methods for GET, POST, PUT, and DELETE. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section> | <section> | |||
<name>gRPC Network Management Interface (gNMI)</name> | <name>gRPC Network Management Interface (gNMI)</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Another emerging but not-IETF-affiliated management protocol is the gRPC Network Management Interface (gNMI) <xref target="gNMI"/> which is based on gRPC messag ing and uses Protobuf data modeling. | Another emerging, but not IETF-affiliated, management protocol is the gRPC Netwo rk Management Interface (gNMI) <xref target="gNMI"/>, which is based on gRPC mes saging and uses Google protobuf data modeling. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The same limitations of RESTCONF listed above apply to gNMI because of its relia | The same limitations as those listed above for RESTCONF apply to gNMI because of | |||
nce on synchronous HTTP exchanges and TLS security for normal operations, as wel | its reliance on synchronous HTTP exchanges and TLS for normal operations, as we | |||
l as the likely deep nesting of data schemas. | ll as the likely deep nesting of data schemas. gNMI is capable of transpor | |||
There is a capability for gNMI to transport JSON-encoded YANG-modeled data, but | ting JSON-encoded YANG-modeled data, but how to compose such data is not yet ful | |||
this composing is not fully standardized and relies on specific tool integration | ly standardized. | |||
s to operate. | ||||
</t> | </t> | |||
<section> | <section> | |||
<name>The Protobuf Modeling Language</name> | <name>The Protobuf Modeling Language</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The data managed and exchanged via gNMI is encoded and modeled using Google Prot obuf, an encoding and modeling syntax not affiliated with the IETF (although an attempt has been made and abandoned <xref target="I-D.rfernando-protocol-buffers "/>). | The data managed and exchanged via gNMI is encoded and modeled using Google prot obuf, an encoding and modeling syntax not affiliated with the IETF (although an attempt has been made and abandoned <xref target="PROTOCOL-BUFFERS"/>). | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Because the Protobuf modeling syntax is relatively low-level (around the same as ASN.1 or CBOR), there are some efforts as part of the OpenConfig work <xref tar get="gNMI"/> to translate YANG modules into Protobuf schemas (similar to transla tion to XML or JSON schemas for NETCONF and RESTCONF respectively) but there is no required interoperabilty between management via gRPC or any of the *CONF prot ocols. | Because the protobuf modeling syntax is a relatively low-level syntax (about the same as ASN.1 or CBOR), there are some efforts as part of the OpenConfig work < xref target="gNMI"/> to translate YANG modules into protobuf schemas (similar to translation to XML or JSON schemas for NETCONF and RESTCONF, respectively), but there is no required interoperability between management via gRPC or any of the *CONF protocols. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section> | <section> | |||
<name>gRPC Protocol and Transport</name> | <name>gRPC Protocol and Transport</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The message encoding and exchange for gNMI, as the name implies, is gRPC protoco | The message encoding and exchange for gNMI, as the name implies, is the gRPC pro | |||
l <xref target="gRPC"/>. | tocol <xref target="gRPC"/>. gRPC exclusively uses HTTP/2 <xref target="RF | |||
gRPC exclusively uses HTTP/2 <xref target="RFC9113"/> for transport and relies o | C9113"/> for transport and relies on some aspects specific to HTTP/2 for its ope | |||
n some aspects specific to HTTP/2 for its operations (such as HTTP trailer field | rations (such as HTTP trailer fields). | |||
s). | While not mandated by gRPC, when used to transport gNMI data, TLS is required fo | |||
While not mandated by gRPC, when used to transport gNMI data TLS is required for | r transport security. | |||
transport security. | ||||
</t> | </t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section> | <section> | |||
<name>Intelligent Platform Management Interface (IPMI)</name> | <name>Intelligent Platform Management Interface (IPMI)</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
A lower-level remote management protocol, intended to be used to manage hardware | A lower-level remote management protocol, intended to be used to manage hardware | |||
devices and network appliances below the operating system (OS), is the Intellig | devices and network appliances below the operating system (OS), is the Intellig | |||
ent Platform Management Interface (IPMI) standardized in <xref target="IPMI"/>. | ent Platform Management Interface (IPMI), standardized in <xref target="IPMI"/>. | |||
The IPMI is focused on health monitoring, event logging, firmware management, an | The IPMI is focused on health monitoring, event logging, firmware management, an | |||
d serial-over-LAN (SOL) remote console access in a "pre-OS or OS-absent" host en | d Serial over LAN (SOL) remote console access in a "pre-OS or OS-absent" host en | |||
vironment. | vironment. | |||
The IPMI operates over a companion Remote Management Control Protocol (RMCP) for messaging, which itself can use UDP for transport. | The IPMI operates over a companion Remote Management Control Protocol (RMCP) for messaging, which itself can use UDP for transport. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Because the IPMI and RCMP are tailored to low-level and well-connected devices w ithin a datacenter, with typical workflows requiring many messaging round trips or low-latency interactive sessions, they are not suitable for operation over a challenged network. | Because the IPMI and RCMP are tailored to low-level and well-connected devices w ithin a data center, with typical workflows requiring many messaging round trips or low-latency interactive sessions, they are not suitable for operation over a challenged network. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section> | <section> | |||
<name>Autonomic Networking</name> | <name>Autonomic Networking</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The future of network operations requires more autonomous behavior | The future of network operations requires more autonomous behavior, | |||
including self-configuration, self-management, self-healing, and | including self-configuration, self-management, self-healing, and | |||
self-optimization. One approach to support this is termed Autonomic | self-optimization. One approach to support this is termed "Autonomic | |||
Networking <xref target="RFC7575"/>. | Networking" <xref target="RFC7575"/>. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
There is a large and growing set of work within the IETF | There is a large and growing set of work within the IETF | |||
focused on developing an Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and | focused on developing an Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and | |||
Approach (ANIMA). The ANIMA work has developed a comprehensive | Approach (ANIMA). The ANIMA work has developed a comprehensive | |||
reference model for distributing autonomic functions across multiple | reference model for distributing autonomic functions across multiple | |||
nodes in an autonomic networking infrastructure <xref target="RFC8993" />. | nodes in an Autonomic Networking infrastructure <xref target="RFC8993" />. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
This work, focused on learning the behavior of distributed systems to | This work, focused on learning the behavior of distributed systems to | |||
predict future events, is an emerging network management | predict future events, is an emerging network management | |||
capability. This includes the development of signalling protocols | capability. This includes the development of signaling protocols | |||
such as GRASP <xref target="RFC8990"/> and the autonomic control plane | such as the GeneRic Autonomic Signaling Protocol (GRASP) <xref target= | |||
(ACP) | "RFC8990"/> and the Autonomic Control Plane (ACP) | |||
<xref target="RFC8368"/>. | <xref target="RFC8368"/>. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Both autonomic and challenged networks require similar degrees of | Both autonomic and challenged networks require similar degrees of | |||
autonomy. However, challenged networks cannot provide the complex | autonomy. However, challenged networks cannot provide the complex | |||
coordination between nodes and distributed supporting infrastructure | coordination between nodes and distributed supporting infrastructure | |||
necessary for the frequent data exchanges for negotiation, learning, | necessary for the frequent data exchanges for negotiation, learning, | |||
and bootstrapping associated with the above capabilities. | and bootstrapping associated with the above capabilities. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
There is some emerging work in ANIMA as to how disconnected | There is some emerging work in ANIMA as to how disconnected | |||
devices might join and leave the autonomic control plane over time. | devices might join and leave the ACP over time. | |||
However, this work is addressing a different problem | However, this work is addressing a different problem | |||
than that encountered by challenged networks. | than that encountered by challenged networks. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section> | <section> | |||
<name>Deep Space Autonomy</name> | <name>Deep Space Autonomy</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Outside of the terrestrial networking community, there are existing and establis hed remote management systems used for deep space mission operations. | Outside of the terrestrial networking community, there are existing and establis hed remote management systems used for deep space mission operations. | |||
Examples of two of these are for the New Horizons mission to Pluto <xref target= "NEW-HORIZONS"/> and the DART mission to the asteroid Dimorphos <xref target="DA RT"/>. | Two examples of such systems are the New Horizons mission to Pluto <xref target= "NEW-HORIZONS"/> and the Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART) mission to the asteroid Dimorphos <xref target="DART"/>. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The DTNMA has some heritage in the concepts of deep space autonomy, but each of those mission instantiations use mission-specific data encoding, messaging, and transport as well as mission-specific (or heavily mission-tailored) modeling con cepts and languages. | The DTNMA has some heritage in the concepts of deep space autonomy, but each of those mission instantiations uses mission-specific data encoding, messaging, and transport as well as mission-specific (or heavily mission-tailored) modeling co ncepts and languages. | |||
Part of the goal of the DTNMA is to take the proven concepts from these missions and standardize a messaging syntax as well as a modular data modeling method. | Part of the goal of the DTNMA is to take the proven concepts from these missions and standardize a messaging syntax as well as a modular data modeling method. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section anchor="motivation-for-new-features" numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Motivation for New Features</name> | <name>Motivation for New Features</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Management mechanisms that provide the complete set of DTNMA desirable | Management mechanisms that provide the complete set of DTNMA desirable | |||
properties do not currently exist. This is not surprising since | properties do not currently exist. This is not surprising, since | |||
autonomous management in the context of a challenged networking | autonomous management in the context of a challenged networking | |||
environment is a new and emerging use case. | environment is a new and emerging use case. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
In particular, a management architecture is needed that integrates | In particular, a management architecture is needed that integrates | |||
the following motivating features. | the following motivating features. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<dl> | <dl> | |||
<dt>Open Loop Control:</dt> | <dt>Open-Loop Control:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
Freedom from a request-response architecture, | Freedom from a request-response architecture, | |||
API, or other presumption of timely round-trip communications. This | API, or other presumption of timely round-trip communications. This | |||
is particularly important when managing networks that are not built | is particularly important when managing networks that are not built | |||
over an HTTP or TCP/TLS infrastructure. | over an HTTP or TCP/TLS infrastructure. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Standard Autonomy Model:</dt> | <dt>Standard Autonomy Model:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
An autonomy model that allows for standard | An autonomy model that allows for standard | |||
expressions of policy to guarantee deterministic behavior across | expressions of policy to guarantee deterministic behavior across | |||
skipping to change at line 1354 ¶ | skipping to change at line 1340 ¶ | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Compressible Model Structure:</dt> | <dt>Compressible Model Structure:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
A data model that allows for very | A data model that allows for very | |||
compact encodings by defining and exploiting common structures for | compact encodings by defining and exploiting common structures for | |||
data schemas. | data schemas. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
</dl> | </dl> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Combining these new features with existing mechanisms for message data | Combining these new features with existing mechanisms for message data | |||
exchange (such as BP), data representations (such as CBOR) and data | exchange (such as BP), data representations (such as CBOR), and data | |||
modeling languages (such as YANG) will form a pragmatic approach to | modeling languages (such as YANG) will form a pragmatic approach to | |||
defining challenged network management. | defining challenged network management. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section anchor="reference-model" numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Reference Model</name> | <name>Reference Model</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
This section describes a reference model for reasoning about | This section describes a reference model for analyzing | |||
network management concepts for challenged networks (generally) and | network management concepts for challenged networks (generally) and | |||
those conforming to the DTN architecture (in particular). The goal | those conforming to the DTN architecture (in particular). The goal | |||
of this section is to describe how DTNMA services provide DTNMA | of this section is to describe how DTNMA services provide DTNMA | |||
desirable properties. | desirable properties. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Important Concepts</name> | <name>Important Concepts</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Similar to other network management architectures, the DTNMA draws | Like other network management architectures, the DTNMA draws | |||
a logical distinction between a managed device and a managing | a logical distinction between a managed device and a managing | |||
device. Managed devices use a DA to manage resident applications. | device. Managed devices use a DA to manage resident applications. | |||
Managing devices use a DM to both monitor and control DAs. | Managing devices use a DM to both monitor and control DAs. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<aside> | ||||
<t> | <t> | |||
NOTE: The terms "managing" and "managed" represent logical | The terms "managing" and "managed" represent logical | |||
characteristics of a device and are not, themselves, mutually | characteristics of a device and are not, themselves, mutually | |||
exclusive. For example, a managed device might, itself, also manage | exclusive. For example, a managed device might, itself, also manage | |||
some other device in the network. Therefore, a device may support | some other device in the network. Therefore, a device may support | |||
either or both of these characteristics. | either or both of these characteristics. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</aside> | ||||
<t> | <t> | |||
The DTNMA differs from some other management architectures in | The DTNMA differs from some other management architectures in | |||
three significant ways, all related to the need for a device to | three significant ways, all related to the need for a device to | |||
self-manage when disconnected from a managing device. | self-manage when disconnected from a managing device. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<dl> | <dl> | |||
<dt>Pre-shared Definitions:</dt> | <dt>Pre-Shared Definitions:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
Managing and managed devices should operate | Managing and managed devices should operate | |||
using pre-shared data definitions and models. This implies that | using pre-shared data definitions and models. This implies that | |||
static definitions should be standardized whenever possible and | static definitions should be standardized whenever possible and | |||
that managing and managed devices may need to negotiate definitions | that managing and managed devices may need to negotiate definitions | |||
during periods of connectivity. | during periods of connectivity. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Agent Self-Management:</dt> | <dt>Agent Self-Management:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
A managed device may find itself | A managed device may find itself | |||
skipping to change at line 1420 ¶ | skipping to change at line 1404 ¶ | |||
a regular connection to a managing device. In these cases, DAs manag e | a regular connection to a managing device. In these cases, DAs manag e | |||
themselves by applying pre-shared policies received from managing | themselves by applying pre-shared policies received from managing | |||
devices. | devices. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Command-Based Interface:</dt> | <dt>Command-Based Interface:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
Managing devices communicate with managed | Managing devices communicate with managed | |||
devices through a command-based interface. Instead of exchanging | devices through a command-based interface. Instead of exchanging | |||
variables, objects, or documents, a managing device issues commands | variables, objects, or documents, a managing device issues commands | |||
to be run by a managed device. These commands may create or update | to be run by a managed device. These commands may create or update | |||
variables, change data stores, or impact the managed device in ways | variables, change datastores, or impact the managed device in ways | |||
similar to other network management approaches. The use of commands | similar to other network management approaches. The use of commands | |||
is, in part, driven by the need for DAs to receive updates from | is, in part, driven by the need for DAs to receive updates from | |||
both remote management devices and local autonomy. The use of contro ls for the implementation of commands is discussed in more detail in <xref targe t="ctrl_exec"/>. | both remote management devices and local autonomy. The use of Contro ls for the implementation of commands is discussed in more detail in <xref targe t="ctrl_exec"/>. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
</dl> | </dl> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Model Overview</name> | <name>Model Overview</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
A DTNMA reference model is provided in <xref target="dtnma_ref_model"/> | A DTNMA reference model is provided in <xref target="dtnma_ref_model"/> | |||
below. In this reference model, applications and services on a managing | below. In this reference model, applications and services on a managing | |||
device communicate with a DM which uses pre-shared definitions to create | device communicate with a DM that uses pre-shared definitions to create | |||
a set of policy directives that can be sent to a managed device's DA via | a set of policy directives that can be sent to a managed device's DA via | |||
a command-based interface. The DA provides local monitoring and control | a command-based interface. The DA provides local monitoring and control | |||
(commanding) of the applications and services resident on the managed | (commanding) of the applications and services resident on the managed | |||
device. The DA also performs local data fusion as necessary to synthesiz e data products (such as | device. The DA also performs local data fusion as necessary to synthesiz e data products (such as | |||
reports) that can be sent back to the DM when appropriate. | reports) that can be sent back to the DM when appropriate. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t keepWithNext="true">DTNMA Reference Model</t> | ||||
<figure anchor="dtnma_ref_model"> | <figure anchor="dtnma_ref_model"> | |||
<name>DTNMA Reference Model</name> | ||||
<artwork align="center" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[ | <artwork align="center" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[ | |||
Managed Device Managing Device | Managed Device Managing Device | |||
+----------------------------+ +-----------------------------+ | +----------------------------+ +-----------------------------+ | |||
| +------------------------+ | | +-------------------------+ | | | +------------------------+ | | +-------------------------+ | | |||
| |Applications & Services | | | | Applications & Services | | | | |Applications & Services | | | | Applications & Services | | | |||
| +----------^-------------+ | | +-----------^-------------+ | | | +----------^-------------+ | | +-----------^-------------+ | | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||
| +----------v-------------+ | | +-----------v-------------+ | | | +----------v-------------+ | | +-----------v-------------+ | | |||
| | DTNMA +-------------+ | | | | +-----------+ DTNMA | | | | | DTNMA +-------------+ | | | | +-----------+ DTNMA | | | |||
| | AGENT | Monitor and | | |Commanding | | | Policy | MANAGER | | | | | AGENT | Monitor and | | |Commanding | | | Policy | MANAGER | | | |||
skipping to change at line 1465 ¶ | skipping to change at line 1449 ¶ | |||
| | +------+-------------+ | | | | +-----------+-------+ | | | | | +------+-------------+ | | | | +-----------+-------+ | | | |||
| | |Admin | Data Fusion | | |==========>| | | Reporting | Admin | | | | | | |Admin | Data Fusion | | |==========>| | | Reporting | Admin | | | | |||
| | +------+-------------+ | | Reporting | | +-----------+-------+ | | | | | +------+-------------+ | | Reporting | | +-----------+-------+ | | | |||
| +------------------------+ | | +-------------------------+ | | | +------------------------+ | | +-------------------------+ | | |||
+----------------------------+ +-----------------------------+ | +----------------------------+ +-----------------------------+ | |||
^ ^ | ^ ^ | |||
| Pre-Shared Definitions | | | Pre-Shared Definitions | | |||
| +---------------------------+ | | | +---------------------------+ | | |||
+--------| - Autonomy Model |--------+ | +--------| - Autonomy Model |--------+ | |||
| - Application Data Models | | | - Application Data Models | | |||
| - Runtime Data Stores | | | - Runtime Datastores | | |||
+---------------------------+ | +---------------------------+ | |||
]]></artwork> | ]]></artwork> | |||
</figure> | </figure> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
This model preserves the familiar concept of "managers" resident on | This model preserves the familiar concept of "managers" resident on | |||
managing devices and "agents" resident on managed devices. However, | managing devices and "agents" resident on managed devices. However, | |||
the DTNMA model is unique in how the DM and DA operate. The DM is | the DTNMA model is unique in how the DM and DA operate. The DM is | |||
used to pre-configure DAs in the network with management policies. | used to preconfigure DAs in the network with management policies. | |||
it is expected that the DAs, themselves, perform monitoring and | It is expected that the DAs, themselves, perform monitoring and | |||
control functions on their own. In this way, a properly configured | control functions on their own. In this way, a properly configured | |||
DA may operate without a reliable connection back to a DM. | DA may operate without a reliable connection back to a DM. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Functional Elements</name> | <name>Functional Elements</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The reference model illustrated in <xref target="dtnma_ref_model"/> | The reference model illustrated in <xref target="dtnma_ref_model"/> | |||
implies the existence of certain logical components whose roles and | implies the existence of certain logical components whose roles and | |||
responsibilities are discussed in this section. | responsibilities are discussed in this section. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Managed Applications and Services</name> | <name>Managed Applications and Services</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
By definition, managed applications and services reside on a | By definition, managed applications and services reside on a | |||
managed device. These software entities can be controlled through | managed device. These software entities can be controlled through | |||
some interface by the DA and their state can be sampled as part of | some interface by the DA, and their state can be sampled as part of | |||
periodic monitoring. It is presumed that the DA on the managed | periodic monitoring. It is presumed that the DA on the managed | |||
device has the proper data model, control interface, and | device has the proper data model, control interface, and | |||
permissions to alter the configuration and behavior of these | permissions to alter the configuration and behavior of these | |||
software applications. | software applications. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>DTNMA Agent (DA)</name> | <name>DTNMA Agent (DA)</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
A DA resides on a managed device. As is the case | A DA resides on a managed device. As is the case | |||
with other network management approaches, this agent is responsible | with other network management approaches, this agent is responsible | |||
for the monitoring and control of the applications local to that | for the monitoring and control of the applications local to that | |||
device. Unlike other network management approaches, the agent | device. Unlike other network management approaches, the agent | |||
accomplishes this task without a regular connection to a DTNMA | accomplishes this task without a regular connection to a DM. | |||
Manager. | ||||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The DA performs three major functions on a managed | The DA performs three major functions on a managed | |||
device: the monitoring and control of local applications, | device: the monitoring and control of local applications, | |||
production of data analytics, and the administrative | production of data analytics, and the administrative | |||
control of the agent itself. | control of the agent itself. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Monitoring and Control</name> | <name>Monitoring and Control</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
DAs monitor the status of applications running on their | DAs monitor the status of applications running on their | |||
managed device and selectively control those applications as a | managed device and selectively control those applications as a | |||
function of that monitoring. The following components are used to | function of that monitoring. The following components are used to | |||
perform monitoring and control on an agent. | perform monitoring and control on an agent. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<dl newline="true" spacing="normal" indent="8"> | <dl newline="true" spacing="normal"> | |||
<dt>Rules Database:</dt> | <dt>Rule Database:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
Each DA maintains a database of policy expressions that form | Each DA maintains a database of policy expressions that form | |||
rules of behavior of the managed device. Within this database, | rules regarding the behavior of the managed device. Within this | |||
each rule of behavior is a tuple of a stimulus and a response. | database, | |||
each rule regarding behavior is a tuple of a stimulus and a resp | ||||
onse. | ||||
Within the DTNMA, these rules are the embodiment of | Within the DTNMA, these rules are the embodiment of | |||
policy expressions received from DMs and evaluated at | policy expressions received from DMs and evaluated at | |||
regular intervals by the autonomy engine. The rules database is | regular intervals by the autonomy engine. The rule database is | |||
the collection of active rules known to the DA. | the collection of active rules known to the DA. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Autonomy Engine:</dt> | <dt>Autonomy Engine:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
The DA autonomy engine monitors the state of the managed device | The DA autonomy engine monitors the state of the managed device, | |||
looking for pre-defined stimuli and, when encountered, issuing a | looking for predefined stimuli and, when such stimuli are encoun | |||
pre-defined response. To the extent that this function is driven | tered, issuing a | |||
by the rules database, this engine acts as a policy execution | predefined response. To the extent that this function is driven | |||
by the rule database, this engine acts as a policy execution | ||||
engine. This engine may also be directly configured by | engine. This engine may also be directly configured by | |||
managers during periods of connectivity for actions separate | managers during periods of connectivity for actions separate | |||
from those in the rules database (such as enabling or disabling | from those in the rule database (such as enabling or disabling | |||
sets of rules). Once configured, the engine may function | sets of rules). Once configured, the engine may function | |||
without other access to any managing device. This engine may | without other access to any managing device. This engine may | |||
also reconfigure itself as a function of policy. | also reconfigure itself as a function of policy. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Application Control Interfaces:</dt> | <dt>Application Control Interfaces:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
DAs support control interfaces for all | DAs support control interfaces for all | |||
managed applications. Control interfaces are used to alter | managed applications. Control interfaces are used to alter | |||
the configuration and behavior of an application. These | the configuration and behavior of an application. These | |||
interfaces may be custom for each application, or as provided | interfaces may be custom for each application or as provided | |||
through a common framework such as provided by an operating | through a common framework, protocol, or OS. | |||
system. | ||||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
</dl> | </dl> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Data Fusion</name> | <name>Data Fusion</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
DAs generate new data elements as a function of the | DAs generate new data elements as a function of the | |||
current state of the managed device and its applications. These | current state of the managed device and its applications. These | |||
new data products may take the form of individual data values, | new data products may take the form of individual data values | |||
or new collections of data used for reporting. The logical | or of new collections of data used for reporting. The logical | |||
components responsible for these behaviors are as follows. | components responsible for these behaviors are as follows. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<dl newline="true" spacing="normal" indent="8"> | <dl newline="true" spacing="normal"> | |||
<dt>Application Data Interfaces:</dt> | <dt>Application Data Interfaces:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
DAs support mechanisms by which important state is | DAs support mechanisms by which important state is | |||
retrieved from various applications resident on the managed | retrieved from various applications resident on the managed | |||
device. These data interfaces may be custom for each | device. These data interfaces may be custom for each | |||
application, or as provided through a common framework such | application or as provided through a common framework, | |||
as provided by an operating system. | protocol, or OS. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Data Value Generators:</dt> | <dt>Data Value Generators:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
DAs may support the generation of new data values as a | DAs may support the generation of new data values as a | |||
function of other values collected from the managed device. | function of other values collected from the managed device. | |||
These data generators may be configured with descriptions of | These data generators may be configured with descriptions of | |||
data values and the data values they generate may be included | data values, and the data values they generate may be included | |||
in the overall monitoring and reporting associated with the | in the overall monitoring and reporting associated with the | |||
managed device. | managed device. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Report Generators:</dt> | <dt>Report Generators:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
DAs may, as appropriate, generate collections of data values | DAs may, as appropriate, generate collections of data values | |||
and provide them to whatever local mechanism takes | and provide them to whatever local mechanism takes | |||
responsibility for their eventual transmission (or expiration | responsibility for their eventual transmission (or expiration | |||
and removal). Reports can be generated as a matter of policy | and removal). Reports can be generated as a matter of policy | |||
or in response to the handling of critical events (such as | or in response to the handling of critical events (such as | |||
errors), or other logging needs. The generation of a report is | errors) or other logging needs. The generation of a report is | |||
independent of whether there exists any connectivity between a | independent of whether there exists any connectivity between a | |||
DA and a DM. | DA and a DM. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
</dl> | </dl> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Administration</name> | <name>Administration</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
DAs perform a variety of administrative services in support of | DAs perform a variety of administrative services in support of | |||
their configuration, such as the following. | their configuration, such as the following. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<dl newline="true" spacing="normal" indent="8"> | <dl newline="true" spacing="normal"> | |||
<dt>Manager Mapping:</dt> | <dt>Manager Mapping:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The DTNMA allows for a many-to-many relationship amongst DTNMA | The DTNMA allows for a many-to-many relationship amongst DAs | |||
Agents and Managers. A single DM may configure multiple | and DMs. A single DM may configure multiple | |||
DAs, and a single DA may be configured by multiple | DAs, and a single DA may be configured by multiple | |||
DMs. Multiple managers may exist in a network for at least | DMs. Multiple managers may exist in a network for at least | |||
two reasons. First, different managers may exist to control | the following two reasons. First, different managers may exist to control | |||
different applications on a device. Second, multiple managers | different applications on a device. Second, multiple managers | |||
increase the likelihood of an agent encountering a manager whe n | increase the likelihood of an agent encountering a manager whe n | |||
operating in a sparse or challenged environment. | operating in a sparse or challenged environment. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
While the need for multiple managers is required for operating | While multiple managers are needed for proper operation in | |||
in a dynamically partitioned network, this situation allows fo | a dynamically partitioned network, conflicting information from | |||
r | different managers can result. | |||
the possibility of conflicting information from different mana | ||||
gers. | ||||
Implementations of the DTNMA should consider conflict resoluti on | Implementations of the DTNMA should consider conflict resoluti on | |||
mechanisms. Such mechanisms might include analyzing managed co ntent, | mechanisms. Such mechanisms might include analyzing managed co ntent, | |||
time, agent location, or other relevant information to select | time, agent location, or other relevant information to select | |||
one manager input over other manager inputs. | one manager input over other manager inputs. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Data Verifiers:</dt> | <dt>Data Verifiers:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
DAs might handle large amounts of data produced by various | DAs might handle large amounts of data produced by various | |||
sources, to include data from local managed applications, | sources, to include data from local managed applications, | |||
skipping to change at line 1673 ¶ | skipping to change at line 1655 ¶ | |||
</dl> | </dl> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Managing Applications and Services</name> | <name>Managing Applications and Services</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Managing applications and services reside on a managing device an d | Managing applications and services reside on a managing device an d | |||
serve as the both the source of DA policy statements and the targ et | serve as both the source of DA policy statements and the target | |||
of DA reporting. They may operate with or without an operator in the | of DA reporting. They may operate with or without an operator in the | |||
loop. | loop. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Unlike management applications in unchallenged networks, these | Unlike management applications in unchallenged networks, these | |||
applications cannot exert closed-loop control over any managed | applications cannot exert closed-loop control over any managed | |||
device application. Instead, they exercise open-loop control by | device application. Instead, they exercise open-loop control by | |||
producing policies that can be configured and enforced on | producing policies that can be configured and enforced on | |||
managed devices by DAs. | managed devices by DAs. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<aside> | <aside> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
NOTE: Closed-loop control in this context refers to the | NOTE: Closed-loop control in this context refers to the | |||
practice of waiting for a response from a managed device prior | practice of waiting for a response from a managed device prior | |||
to issuing new commands to that device. These "loops" may be | to issuing new commands to that device. These "loops" may be | |||
closed quickly (in milliseconds) or over much longer periods ( | closed quickly (in milliseconds) or over much longer periods | |||
hours, days, years). The alternative to closed-loop control is | (hours, days, years). The alternative to closed-loop control is | |||
open-loop control, where the issuance of new commands is not | open-loop control, where the issuance of new commands is not | |||
dependent on receiving responses to previous commands. | dependent on receiving responses to previous commands. | |||
Additionally, there might not be a 1-1 mapping between commands | Additionally, there might not be a one-to-one mapping between co mmands | |||
and responses. A DA may, for example, produce a single response | and responses. A DA may, for example, produce a single response | |||
that captures the end state from applying multiple commands. | that represents the end state of applying multiple commands. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</aside> | </aside> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>DTNMA Manager (DM)</name> | <name>DTNMA Manager (DM)</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
A DM resides on a managing device. This manager | A DM resides on a managing device. This manager | |||
provides an interface between various managing applications and | provides an interface between various managing applications and | |||
services and the DAs that enforce their policies. In | services and the DAs that enforce their policies. In | |||
providing this interface, DMs translate between whatever | providing this interface, DMs translate between whatever | |||
native interface exists to various managing applications and the | innate interface exists to various managing applications and the | |||
autonomy models used to encode management policy. | autonomy models used to encode management policy. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The DM performs three major functions on a managing | The DM performs three major functions on a managing | |||
device: policy encoding, reporting, and administration. | device: policy encoding, reporting, and administration. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Policy Encoding</name> | <name>Policy Encoding</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
DMs translate policy directives from managing | DMs translate policy directives from managing | |||
applications and services into standardized policy expressions | applications and services into standardized policy expressions | |||
that can be recognized by DAs. The following logical | that can be recognized by DAs. The following logical | |||
components are used to perform this policy encoding. | components are used to perform this policy encoding. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<dl newline="true" spacing="normal" indent="8"> | <dl newline="true" spacing="normal"> | |||
<dt>Application Control Interfaces:</dt> | <dt>Application Control Interfaces:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
DMs support control interfaces for managing | DMs support control interfaces for managing | |||
applications. These control interfaces are used to receive | applications. These control interfaces are used to receive | |||
desired policy statements from applications. These interfaces | desired policy statements from applications. These interfaces | |||
may be custom for each application, or provided through | may be custom for each application or as provided through | |||
a common framework, protocol, or operating system. | a common framework, protocol, or OS. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Policy Encoders:</dt> | <dt>Policy Encoders:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
DAs implement a standardized autonomy model | DAs implement a standardized autonomy model | |||
comprising standardized data elements. This allows | comprising standardized data elements. This allows | |||
the open-loop control structures provided by managing | the open-loop control structures provided by managing | |||
applications to be represented in a common language. Policy | applications to be represented in a common language. Policy | |||
encoders perform this encoding function. | encoders perform this encoding function. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
skipping to change at line 1769 ¶ | skipping to change at line 1751 ¶ | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Reporting</name> | <name>Reporting</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
DMs receive reports on the status of managed devices | DMs receive reports on the status of managed devices | |||
during periods of connectivity with the DAs on those | during periods of connectivity with the DAs on those | |||
devices. The following logical components are needed to | devices. The following logical components are needed to | |||
implement reporting capabilities on a DM. | implement reporting capabilities on a DM. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<dl newline="true" spacing="normal" indent="8"> | <dl newline="true" spacing="normal"> | |||
<dt>Report Collectors:</dt> | <dt>Report Collectors:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
DMs receive reports from DAs in an asynchronous manner. This | DMs receive reports from DAs in an asynchronous manner. This | |||
means that reports may be received out of chronological order | means that reports may be received out of chronological order | |||
and in ways that are difficult or impossible to associate with | and in ways that are difficult or impossible to associate with | |||
a specific policy from a managing application. DMs collect | a specific policy from a managing application. DMs collect | |||
these reports and extract their data in support of subsequent | these reports and extract their data in support of subsequent | |||
data analytics. | data analytics. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
skipping to change at line 1793 ¶ | skipping to change at line 1775 ¶ | |||
extracting relevant data to communicate with managing | extracting relevant data to communicate with managing | |||
applications. This may include simple data extraction or may | applications. This may include simple data extraction or may | |||
include more complex processing such as data conversion, data | include more complex processing such as data conversion, data | |||
fusion, and appropriate data analytics. | fusion, and appropriate data analytics. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Application Data Interfaces:</dt> | <dt>Application Data Interfaces:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
DMs support mechanisms by which data retrieved | DMs support mechanisms by which data retrieved | |||
from DAs may be provided back to managing devices. These | from DAs may be provided back to managing devices. These | |||
interfaces may be custom for each application, or as | interfaces may be custom for each application or as | |||
provided through a common framework, protocol, or operating | provided through a common framework, protocol, or OS. | |||
system. | ||||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
</dl> | </dl> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Administration</name> | <name>Administration</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Managers in the DTNMA perform a variety of administrative | DMs in the DTNMA perform a variety of administrative | |||
services, such as the following. | services, such as the following. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<dl newline="true" spacing="normal" indent="8"> | <dl newline="true" spacing="normal"> | |||
<dt>Agent Mappings:</dt> | <dt>Agent Mappings:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
The DTNMA allows DMs to communicate with multiple | The DTNMA allows DMs to communicate with multiple | |||
DAs. However, not every agent in a network is expected | DAs. However, not every agent in a network is expected | |||
to support the same set of Application Data Models or | to support the same set of application data models or | |||
otherwise have the same set of managed applications running. | otherwise have the same set of managed applications running. | |||
For this reason, DMs determine individual DA | For this reason, DMs determine individual DA | |||
capabilities to ensure that only appropriate Controls are | capabilities to ensure that only appropriate Controls are | |||
sent to a DA. | sent to a DA. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Data Verifiers:</dt> | <dt>Data Verifiers:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
DMs handle large amounts of data produced by various | DMs handle large amounts of data produced by various | |||
sources, to include data from managing applications and | sources, to include data from managing applications and | |||
DAs. DMs should ensure, when possible, that data values | DAs. DMs should ensure, when possible, that data values | |||
received from DAs over a network have the proper | received from DAs over a network have the proper | |||
syntax and semantic constraints (e.g., data type and ranges) a nd any required authorization. | syntax and semantic constraints (e.g., data type and ranges) a nd any required authorization. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Access Controllers:</dt> | <dt>Access Controllers:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
DMs should only send Controls to agents when the manager | DMs should only send Controls to DAs when the manager | |||
is configured with appropriate access to both the agent and | is configured with appropriate access to both the agent and | |||
the applications being managed. | the applications being managed. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
</dl> | </dl> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Pre-Shared Definitions</name> | <name>Pre-Shared Definitions</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
A consequence of operating in a challenged environment is the | A consequence of operating in a challenged environment is the | |||
potential inability to negotiate information in real-time. For | potential inability to negotiate information in real time. For | |||
this reason, the DTNMA requires that managed and managing devices | this reason, the DTNMA requires that managed and managing devices | |||
operate using pre-shared definitions rather than relying on data | operate using pre-shared definitions rather than relying on data | |||
definition negotiation. | definition negotiation. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | ||||
<t> | ||||
The three types of pre-shared definitions in the DTNMA are the | The three types of pre-shared definitions in the DTNMA are the | |||
DA autonomy model, managed application data models, | DA autonomy model, managed application data models, | |||
and any runtime data shared by managers and agents. | and any runtime data shared by managers and agents. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<dl newline="true" spacing="normal" indent="8"> | <dl newline="true" spacing="normal"> | |||
<dt>Autonomy Model:</dt> | <dt>Autonomy Model:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
A DTNMA autonomy model represents the data elements and | A DTNMA autonomy model represents the data elements and | |||
associated autonomy structures that define the behavior of | associated autonomy structures that define the behavior of | |||
the agent autonomy engine. A standardized autonomy | the agent autonomy engine. A standardized autonomy | |||
model allows for individual implementations of DAs, and DMs | model allows for individual implementations of DAs and DMs | |||
to interoperate. A standardized model also | to interoperate. A standardized model also | |||
provides guidance to the design and implementation of both | provides guidance to the design and implementation of both | |||
managed and managing applications. | managed and managing applications. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Application Data Models:</dt> | <dt>Application Data Models:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
As with other network management architectures, the DTNMA | As with other network management architectures, the DTNMA | |||
pre-supposes that managed applications (and services) define | presupposes that managed applications (and services) define | |||
their own data models. These data models include the data | their own data models. These data models include the data | |||
produced by, and Controls implemented by, the application. | produced by, and Controls implemented by, the application. | |||
These models are expected to be static for individual | These models are expected to be static for individual | |||
applications and standardized for applications implementing | applications and standardized for applications implementing | |||
standard protocols. | standard protocols. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Runtime Data Stores:</dt> | <dt>Runtime Datastores:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
Runtime data stores, by definition, include data that is | Runtime datastores, by definition, include data that is | |||
defined at runtime. As such, the data is not pre-shared prior | defined at runtime. As such, the data is not pre-shared prior | |||
to the deployment of DMs and DAs. Pre-sharing in this | to the deployment of DMs and DAs. Pre-sharing in this | |||
context means that DMs and DAs are able to define and | context means that DMs and DAs are able to define and | |||
synchronize data elements prior to their operational use in | synchronize data elements prior to their operational use in | |||
the system. This synchronization happens during periods of | the system. This synchronization happens during periods of | |||
connectivity between DMs and DAs. | connectivity between DMs and DAs. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
</dl> | </dl> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section anchor="desired-services" numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Desired Services</name> | <name>Desired Services</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
This section describes the services provided by DTNMA | This section describes the services provided by DTNMA | |||
components on both managing and managed devices. Many | components on both managing and managed devices. Most | |||
of the services discussed in this section attempt to provide | of the services discussed in this section attempt to provide | |||
continuous operation of a managed device through periods of | continuous operation of a managed device through periods of | |||
no connectivity with a managing device. | no connectivity with a managing device. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Local Monitoring and Control</name> | <name>Local Monitoring and Control</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
DTNMA monitoring is associated with some DA autonomy engine. The | DTNMA monitoring is associated with some DA autonomy engine. The | |||
term monitoring implies regular access to information such that | term "monitoring" implies regular access to information such that | |||
state changes may be acted upon within some response time period. | state changes may be acted upon within some response time period. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Predicate autonomy on a managed device should collect state | Predicate autonomy on a managed device should collect state | |||
associated with the device at regular intervals and evaluate that | associated with the device at regular intervals and evaluate that | |||
collected state for any changes that require a preventative or | collected state for any changes that require a preventative or | |||
corrective action. Similarly, this monitoring may cause the device | corrective action. Similarly, this monitoring may cause the device | |||
to generate one or more reports destined to a managing device. | to generate one or more reports destined to a managing device. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Similar to monitoring, DTNMA control results in actions by the | Like monitoring, DTNMA control results in actions by the | |||
agent to change the state or behavior of the managed | agent to change the state or behavior of the managed | |||
device. All control in the DTNMA is local control. In cases where | device. All control in the DTNMA is local control. In cases where | |||
there exists a timely connection to a manager, received Controls | there exists a timely connection to a DM, received Controls | |||
are still evaluated and run locally as part of local autonomy. In | are still evaluated and run locally as part of local autonomy. In | |||
this case, the autonomy stimulus is the receipt of the Control and | this case, the autonomy stimulus is the receipt of the Control, and | |||
the response is to immediately run the Control. In this way, there | the response is to immediately run the Control. In this way, there | |||
is never a dependency on a session or other stateful exchange with | is never a dependency on a session or other stateful exchange with | |||
any remote entity. | any remote entity. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Local Data Fusion</name> | <name>Local Data Fusion</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
DTNMA Fusion services produce new data products from existing | DTNMA fusion services produce new data products from existing | |||
state on the managed device. These fusion products can be anything | state on the managed device. These fusion products can be anything | |||
from simple summations of sampled counters to complex calculations | from simple summations of sampled counters to complex calculations | |||
of behavior over time. | of behavior over time. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Fusion is an important service in the DTNMA because fusion | Fusion is an important service in the DTNMA because fusion | |||
products are part of the overall state of a managed device. | products are part of the overall state of a managed device. | |||
Complete knowledge of this overall state is important for the | Complete knowledge of this overall state is important for the | |||
management of the device and the predicates of rules on a DA may | management of the device, and the predicates of rules on a DA may | |||
refer to fused data. | refer to fused data. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
In-situ data fusion is an important function as it allows | In situ data fusion is an important function, as it allows | |||
for the construction of intermediate summary data, the reduction | for the construction of intermediate summary data, the reduction | |||
of stored and transmitted raw data, possibly fewer predicates in rule | of stored and transmitted raw data, and possibly fewer predicates in r | |||
definitions, and otherwise insulates the data source from | ule | |||
definitions; this type of data fusion insulates the data source from | ||||
conclusions drawn from that data. | conclusions drawn from that data. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The DTNMA requires fusion to occur on the managed device itself. If | The DTNMA requires fusion to occur on the managed device itself. If | |||
the network is partitioned such that no connection to a managing | the network is partitioned such that no connection to a managing | |||
device is available, then fusion needs to happen locally. Similarly, | device is available, then fusion needs to happen locally. Similarly, | |||
connections to a managing device might not remain active long enough | connections to a managing device might not remain active long enough | |||
for round-trip data exchange or may not have the bandwidth to send | for round-trip data exchange or may not have the bandwidth to send | |||
all sampled data. | all sampled data. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
skipping to change at line 1984 ¶ | skipping to change at line 1964 ¶ | |||
and/or better outcomes. | and/or better outcomes. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</aside> | </aside> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Remote Configuration</name> | <name>Remote Configuration</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
DTNMA configuration services update the local configuration | DTNMA configuration services update the local configuration | |||
of a managed device with the intent to impact the behavior and | of a managed device with the intent of impacting the behavior and | |||
capabilities of that device. | capabilities of that device. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The DTNMA configuration service is unique in that the selection of | The DTNMA configuration service is unique in that the selection of | |||
managed device configurations occurs as a function of | managed device configurations occurs as a function of | |||
the state of the device. This implies that management proxies on | the state of the device. This implies that management proxies on | |||
the device store multiple configuration functions that can be | the device store multiple configuration functions that can be | |||
applied as needed without consultation from a managing device. | applied as needed without consultation from a managing device. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<aside> | ||||
<t> | <t> | |||
This approach differs from other management concepts of selecting | This approach differs from other management concepts of selecting | |||
from multiple datastores. DTNMA configuration functions | from multiple datastores. DTNMA configuration functions | |||
can target individual data elements and can calculate new values | can target individual data elements and can calculate new values | |||
from local device state. | from local device state. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</aside> | ||||
<t> | <t> | |||
When detecting stimuli, the agent autonomy engine supports | When detecting stimuli, the agent autonomy engine supports | |||
a mechanism for evaluating whether application monitoring data | a mechanism for evaluating whether application monitoring data | |||
or runtime data values are recent enough to indicate a change of | or runtime data values are recent enough to indicate a change of | |||
state. In cases where data has not been updated recently, it may | state. In cases where data has not been updated recently, it may | |||
be considered stale and not used to reliably indicate that some | be considered stale and therefore not used to reliably indicate that s ome | |||
stimulus has occurred. | stimulus has occurred. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Remote Reporting</name> | <name>Remote Reporting</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
DTNMA reporting services collect information known to the managed | DTNMA reporting services collect information known to the managed | |||
device and prepare it for eventual transmission to one or more | device and prepare it for eventual transmission to one or more | |||
managing devices. The contents of these reports, and the frequency at | managing devices. The contents of these reports, and the frequency at | |||
which they are generated, occurs as a function of the state of the | which they are generated, occur as a function of the state of the | |||
managed device, independent of the managing device. | managed device, independent of the managing device. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Once generated, it is expected that reports might be queued pending | Once generated, it is expected that reports might be queued, pending | |||
a connection back to a managing device. Therefore, reports need to be | a connection back to a managing device. Therefore, reports need to be | |||
differentiable as a function of the time they were generated. | differentiable as a function of the time they were generated. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<aside> | <aside> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
NOTE: When reports are queued pending transmission, the overall | NOTE: When reports are queued pending transmission, the overall | |||
storage capacity at the queuing device needs to be considered. | storage capacity at the queuing device needs to be considered. | |||
There may be cases where queued reports can be considered expired | There may be cases where queued reports can be considered expired | |||
either because they have been queued for too long, or because | because they have been either queued for too long or | |||
they have been replaced by a newer report. When a report is | replaced by a newer report. When a report is | |||
considered expired, it may be considered for removal and, thus, | considered expired, it may be considered for removal and, thus, | |||
never transmitted. This consideration is expected to be part of | never transmitted. This consideration is expected to be part of | |||
the implementation of the queuing device and not the responsibility of the reporting function within the DTNMA. | the implementation of the queuing device and not the responsibility of the reporting function within the DTNMA. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</aside> | </aside> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
When reports are sent to a managing device over a challenged | When reports are sent to a managing device over a challenged | |||
network, they may arrive out of order due to taking different paths | network, they may arrive out of order due to taking different paths | |||
through the network or being delayed due to retransmissions. A | through the network or being delayed due to retransmissions. A | |||
skipping to change at line 2077 ¶ | skipping to change at line 2055 ¶ | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Authorization services enforce the potentially complex mapping of | Authorization services enforce the potentially complex mapping of | |||
other DTNMA services amongst managed and managing devices in the | other DTNMA services amongst managed and managing devices in the | |||
network. For example, fine-grained access control can determine | network. For example, fine-grained access control can determine | |||
which managing devices receive which reports, and what Controls can | which managing devices receive which reports, and what Controls can | |||
be used to alter which managed applications. | be used to alter which managed applications. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
This is particularly beneficial in networks that either deal with | This is particularly beneficial in networks that deal with either | |||
multiple administrative entities or overlay networks that cross | multiple administrative entities or overlay networks that cross | |||
administrative boundaries. Allowlists, blocklists, key-based | administrative boundaries. Allowlists, blocklists, key-based | |||
infrastructures, or other schemes may be used for this purpose. | infrastructures, or other schemes may be used for this purpose. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="autonomy_model" numbered="true"> | <section anchor="autonomy_model" numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Logical Autonomy Model</name> | <name>Logical Autonomy Model</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
An important characteristic of the DTNMA is the shift in the role | An important characteristic of the DTNMA is the shift in the role | |||
of a managing device. One way to describe the behavior of the agent | of a managing device. One way to describe the behavior of the agent | |||
autonomy engine is to describe the characteristics of the autonomy | autonomy engine is to describe the characteristics of the autonomy | |||
model it implements. | model it implements. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
This section describes a logical autonomy model in terms of the | This section describes a logical autonomy model in terms of the | |||
skipping to change at line 2119 ¶ | skipping to change at line 2097 ¶ | |||
allows for the model to be configured for a wide range of future | allows for the model to be configured for a wide range of future | |||
situations. Determinism allows for the forensic reconstruction of | situations. Determinism allows for the forensic reconstruction of | |||
device behavior as part of debugging or recovery efforts. It | device behavior as part of debugging or recovery efforts. It | |||
also is necessary to ensure predictable behavior. | also is necessary to ensure predictable behavior. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<aside> | <aside> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
NOTE: The use of predicate logic and a stimulus-response | NOTE: The use of predicate logic and a stimulus-response | |||
system does not conflict with the use of higher-level | system does not conflict with the use of higher-level | |||
autonomous function or the incorporation of machine learning. | autonomous functions or the incorporation of Machine Learning (ML) . | |||
Specifically, the DTNMA deterministic autonomy model can | Specifically, the DTNMA deterministic autonomy model can | |||
coexist with other autonomous functions managing applications | coexist with other autonomous functions managing applications | |||
and network services. | and network services. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
An example of such co-existence is the use of the DTNMA model | An example of such coexistence is the use of the DTNMA model | |||
to ensure a device stays within safe operating parameters while | to ensure that a device stays within safe operating parameters whi | |||
a less deterministic machine learning model directs smaller | le | |||
a less deterministic ML model directs other | ||||
behaviors for the device. | behaviors for the device. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</aside> | </aside> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The DTNMA autonomy model is a rule-based model in which individual | The DTNMA autonomy model is a rule-based model in which individual | |||
rules associate a pre-identified stimulus | rules associate a pre-identified stimulus | |||
with a pre-configured response to that stimulus. | with a preconfigured response to that stimulus. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Stimuli are identified using one or more predicate logic expressions | Stimuli are identified using one or more predicate logic expressions | |||
that examine aspects of the state of the managed device. Responses | that examine aspects of the state of the managed device. Responses | |||
are implemented by running one or more procedures on the managed | are implemented by running one or more procedures on the managed | |||
device. | device. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
In its simplest form, a stimulus is a single predicate expression | In its simplest form, a stimulus is a single predicate expression | |||
of a condition that examines some aspect of the state of the | of a condition that examines some aspect of the state of the | |||
managed device. When the condition is met, a predetermined response is | managed device. When the condition is met, a predetermined response is | |||
applied. This behavior can be captured using the construct: | applied. This behavior can be captured using the construct: | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<artwork align="left"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="pseudocode"><![CDATA[ IF <conditi | |||
IF <condition 1> THEN <response 1>; | on 1> THEN <response 1> | |||
]]></artwork> | ]]></sourcecode> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
In more complex forms, a stimulus may include both a common conditio n | In more complex forms, a stimulus may include both a common conditio n | |||
shared by multiple rules and a specific condition for each individua l rule. | shared by multiple rules and a specific condition for each individua l rule. | |||
If the common condition is not met, the evaluation of the specific | If the common condition is not met, the evaluation of the specific | |||
condition of each rule sharing the common condition can be skipped. In | condition of each rule sharing the common condition can be skipped. In | |||
this way, the total number of predicate evaluations can be reduced. | this way, the total number of predicate evaluations can be reduced. | |||
This behavior can be captured using the construct: | This behavior can be captured using the construct: | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<artwork align="left"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="pseudocode"><![CDATA[ IF <common | |||
IF <common condition> THEN | condition> THEN | |||
IF <specific condition 1> THEN <response 1> | IF <specific condition 1> THEN <response 1> | |||
IF <specific condition 2> THEN <response 2> | IF <specific condition 2> THEN <response 2> | |||
IF <specific condition 3> THEN <response 3> | IF <specific condition 3> THEN <response 3> | |||
]]></artwork> | ]]></sourcecode> | |||
<aside> | <aside> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
NOTE: The DTNMA model remains a stimulus-response system, regardle ss | NOTE: The DTNMA model remains a stimulus-response system, regardle ss | |||
of whether a common condition is part of the stimulus. However, | of whether a common condition is part of the stimulus. However, | |||
it is recommended that implementations incorporate a common | it is recommended that implementations incorporate a common | |||
condition because of the efficiency provided by such a bulk | condition because of the efficiency provided by such a bulk | |||
evaluation. | evaluation. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
NOTE: One use of a stimulus "common condition" is to associated th | NOTE: One use of a stimulus "common condition" is to associate the | |||
e | condition with an onboard event such as the expiring of a timer or | |||
condition with an on-board event such as the expiring of a timer o | ||||
r | ||||
the changing of a monitored value. | the changing of a monitored value. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</aside> | ||||
<t> | <t> | |||
NOTE: The DTNMA does not prescribe when to evaluate rule stimuli. | The DTNMA does not prescribe when to evaluate rule stimuli. | |||
Implementations may choose to evaluate rule stimuli at periodic | Implementations may choose to evaluate rule stimuli at periodic | |||
intervals (such as 1Hz or 100Hz). When stimuli include on-board | intervals (such as 1 Hz or 100 Hz). When stimuli include onboard | |||
events, implementations may choose to perform an immediate | events, implementations may choose to perform an immediate | |||
evaluation at the time of the event rather than waiting for a | evaluation at the time of the event rather than waiting for a | |||
periodic evaluation. | periodic evaluation. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</aside> | ||||
<t keepWithNext="true">DTNMA Autonomy Model</t> | <t>The flow of data into and out of the agent autonomy engine is | |||
illustrated in <xref target="dtnma_aut_model"/>.</t> | ||||
<figure anchor="dtnma_aut_model"> | <figure anchor="dtnma_aut_model"> | |||
<name>DTNMA Autonomy Model</name> | ||||
<artwork align="center" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[ | <artwork align="center" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[ | |||
Managed Applications | DTNMA Agent | DTNMA Manager | Managed Applications | DTNMA Agent | DTNMA Manager | |||
+---------------------+--------------------------------+--------------+ | +---------------------+--------------------------------+--------------+ | |||
| +---------+ | | | +---------+ | | |||
| | Local | | Encoded | | | Local | | Encoded | |||
| | Rule DB |<-------------------- Policy | | | Rule DB |<-------------------- Policy | |||
| +---------+ | Expressions | | +---------+ | Expressions | |||
| ^ | | | ^ | | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
| v | | | v | | |||
| +----------+ +---------+ | | | +----------+ +---------+ | | |||
Monitoring Data------>| Agent | | Runtime | | | Monitoring Data------>| Agent | | Runtime | | | |||
| | Autonomy |<-->| Data |<---- Definitions | | | Autonomy |<-->| Data- |<---- Definitions | |||
Application Control<------| Engine | | Store | | | Application Control<------| Engine | | store | | | |||
| +----------+ +---------+ | | | +----------+ +---------+ | | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
| +-------------------------> Reports | | +-------------------------> Reports | |||
| | | | | | |||
]]></artwork> | ]]></artwork> | |||
</figure> | </figure> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The flow of data into and out of the agent autonomy engine is | In the model shown in <xref target="dtnma_aut_model"/>, | |||
illustrated in <xref target="dtnma_aut_model"/>. In this model, | ||||
the autonomy engine stores the combination of stimulus | the autonomy engine stores the combination of stimulus | |||
conditions and associated responses as a set of "rules" in a | conditions and associated responses as a set of "rules" in a | |||
rules database. This database is updated through the execution of | rule database. This database is updated through the execution of | |||
the autonomy engine and as configured from policy statements | the autonomy engine and as configured from policy statements | |||
received by managers. | received by DMs. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Stimuli are detected by examining the state of applications as | Stimuli are detected by examining the state of applications as | |||
reported through application monitoring interfaces and through | reported through application monitoring interfaces and through | |||
any locally-derived data. Local data is calculated in accordance | any locally derived data. Local data is calculated in accordance | |||
with definitions also provided by managers as part of the runtime | with definitions also provided by DMs as part of the runtime | |||
data store. | datastore. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Responses to stimuli may include updates to the rules database, | Responses to stimuli may include updates to the rule database, | |||
updates to the runtime data store, Controls sent to applications, | updates to the runtime datastore, Controls sent to applications, | |||
and the generation of reports. | and the generation of reports. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Model Characteristics</name> | <name>Model Characteristics</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
There are several practical challenges to the implementation of a | There are several practical challenges to the implementation of a | |||
skipping to change at line 2261 ¶ | skipping to change at line 2238 ¶ | |||
data logging and reporting for deterministic offline analysis. Rule differences | data logging and reporting for deterministic offline analysis. Rule differences | |||
across managed devices may lead to oscillating effects. This section | across managed devices may lead to oscillating effects. This section | |||
identifies those characteristics of an autonomy model that might | identifies those characteristics of an autonomy model that might | |||
help implementations mitigate some of these challenges. | help implementations mitigate some of these challenges. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
There are a number of ways to represent data values, and many | There are a number of ways to represent data values, and many | |||
data modeling languages exist for this purpose. When | data modeling languages exist for this purpose. When | |||
considering how to model data in the context of the DTNMA | considering how to model data in the context of the DTNMA | |||
autonomy model there are some modeling features that should be | autonomy model, there are some modeling features that should be | |||
present to enable functionality. There are also some modeling | present to enable functionality. There are also some modeling | |||
features that should be prevented to avoid ambiguity. | features that should be prevented to avoid ambiguity. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Traditional network management approaches favor flexibility in | Conventional network management approaches favor flexibility in | |||
their data models. The DTNMA stresses deterministic behavior | their data models. The DTNMA stresses deterministic behavior | |||
that supports forensic analysis of agent activities "after the | that supports forensic analysis of agent activities "after the | |||
fact". As such, the following statements should be true of all | fact". As such, the following statements should be true of all | |||
data representations relating to DTNMA autonomy. | data representations relating to DTNMA autonomy. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<dl> | <dl> | |||
<dt>Strong Typing:</dt> | <dt>Strong Typing:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
The predicates and expressions that comprise | The predicates and expressions that comprise | |||
the autonomy services in the DTNMA should require strict data | the autonomy services in the DTNMA should require strict data | |||
typing. This avoids errors associated with implicit data | typing. This avoids errors associated with implicit data | |||
conversions and helps detect misconfiguration. | conversions and helps detect misconfigurations. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Acyclic Dependency:</dt> | <dt>Acyclic Dependency:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
Many dependencies exist in an autonomy model, | Many dependencies exist in an autonomy model, | |||
particularly when combining individual expressions or | particularly when combining individual expressions or | |||
results to create complex behaviors. Implementations that | results to create complex behaviors. Implementations that | |||
conform to the DTNMA need to prevent circular dependencies. | conform to the DTNMA need to prevent circular dependencies. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Fresh Data:</dt> | <dt>Fresh Data:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
Autonomy models operating on data values | Autonomy models operating on data values | |||
presume that their data inputs represent the actionable state | presume that their data inputs represent the actionable state | |||
of the managed device. If a data value has failed to be | of the managed device. If a data value has failed to be | |||
refreshed within a time period, autonomy might incorrectly | refreshed within a time period, autonomy might incorrectly | |||
infer an operational state. Regardless of whether a data | infer an operational state. Regardless of whether a data | |||
value has changed, DTNMA implementations should provide some | value has changed, DTNMA implementations should provide some | |||
indicator of whether the data value is "fresh" meaning that | indicator of whether the data value is "fresh", i.e., meaning that | |||
it still represents the current state of the device. | it still represents the current state of the device. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Pervasive Parameterization:</dt> | <dt>Pervasive Parameterization:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
Where possible, autonomy | Where possible, autonomy | |||
model objects should support parameterization to allow for | model objects should support parameterization to allow for | |||
flexibility in the specification. Parameterization allows for | flexibility in the specification. Parameterization allows for | |||
the definition of fewer unique model objects and also can | the definition of fewer unique model objects and also can | |||
support the substitution of local device state when | support the substitution of local device state when | |||
exercising device control or data reporting. | exercising device control or data reporting. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Configurable Cardinality:</dt> | <dt>Configurable Cardinality:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
The number of data values that can | The number of data values that can | |||
be supported in a given implementation is finite. For devices | be supported in a given implementation is finite. For devices | |||
operating in challenged environments, the number of supported | operating in challenged environments, the number of supported | |||
objects may be far fewer than that which can be supported by | objects may be far fewer than the number of objects that can be su pported by | |||
devices in well-resourced environments. DTNMA implementations | devices in well-resourced environments. DTNMA implementations | |||
should define limits to the number of supported objects that | should define limits to the number of supported objects that | |||
can be active in a system at one time, as a function of the | can be active in a system at one time, as a function of the | |||
resources available to the implementation. | resources available to the implementation. | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
<dt>Control-Based Updates:</dt> | <dt>Control-Based Updates:</dt> | |||
<dd> | <dd> | |||
The agent autonomy engine changes the | The agent autonomy engine changes the | |||
state of the managed device by running Controls on the device. | state of the managed device by running Controls on the device. | |||
This is different from approaches where the behavior of | This is different from approaches where the behavior of | |||
a managed device is influenced by updating configuration | a managed device is influenced by updating configuration | |||
values, such as in a table or datastore. Altering behavior via | values, such as in a table or datastore. Altering behavior via | |||
one or more Controls allows checking all pre-conditions before | one or more Controls allows checking all preconditions before | |||
making changes as well as providing more granularity in the | making changes as well as providing more granularity in the | |||
way in which the device is updated. Where necessary, Controls | way in which the device is updated. Where necessary, Controls | |||
can be defined to perform bulk updates of configuration data | can be defined to perform bulk updates of configuration data | |||
so as not to lose that update modality. One important | so as not to lose that update modality. One important | |||
update pre-condition is that the system is not | update precondition is that the system is not | |||
performing an action that would prevent the update (such as | performing an action that would prevent the update (such as | |||
currently applying a competing update). | currently applying a competing update). | |||
</dd> | </dd> | |||
</dl> | </dl> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Data Value Representation</name> | <name>Data Value Representation</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The expressive representation of simple data values is fundamental t o | The expressive representation of simple data values is fundamental t o | |||
the successful construction and evaluation of predicates in the | the successful construction and evaluation of predicates in the | |||
DTNMA autonomy model. When defining such values, there are | DTNMA autonomy model. When defining such values, there are | |||
useful distinctions regarding how values are identified | useful distinctions regarding how values are identified | |||
and whether values are generated internal or external to the | and whether values are generated in a way that is internal or extern al to the | |||
autonomy model. | autonomy model. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
A DTNMA data value should combine a base type | A DTNMA data value should combine a base type | |||
(e.g., integer, real, string) representation with relevant semantic | (e.g., integer, real, string) representation with relevant semantic | |||
information. Base types are used for proper storage and encoding. | information. Base types are used for proper storage and encoding. | |||
Semantic information allows for additional typing, constraint defini tions, | Semantic information allows for additional typing, constraint defini tions, | |||
and mnemonic naming. This expanded | and mnemonic naming. This expanded | |||
definition of data value allows for better predicate construction | definition of data values allows for better predicate construction, | |||
and evaluation and early type checking. | better evaluation, and early type checking. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Data values may further be annotated based on whether their value | Data values may further be annotated based on whether their value | |||
is the result of a DA calculation or the result of some external | is the result of a DA calculation or the result of some external | |||
process on the managed device. For example, operators may with to | process on the managed device. For example, operators may wish to | |||
know which values can be updated by actions on the DA versus which | know which values can be updated by actions on the DA versus which | |||
values (such as sensor readings) cannot be reliably changed because | values (such as sensor readings) cannot be reliably changed because | |||
they are calculated external to the DA. | they are calculated in a way that is external to the DA. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Data Reporting</name> | <name>Data Reporting</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The DTNMA autonomy model should, as required, report on the | The DTNMA autonomy model should, as required, report on the | |||
state of its managed device (to include the state of the | state of its managed device (to include the state of the | |||
model itself). This reporting should be done as a function of | model itself). This reporting should be done as a function of | |||
the changing state of the managed device, independent of the | the changing state of the managed device, independent of the | |||
connection to any managing device. Queuing reports allows for | connection to any managing device. Queuing reports allows for | |||
later forensic analysis of device behavior, which is a | later forensic analysis of device behavior; this feature is a | |||
desirable property of DTNMA management. | desirable property of DTNMA management. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
DTNMA data reporting consists of the production of some | DTNMA data reporting consists of the production of some | |||
data report instance conforming to a data report schema. The use | data report instance conforming to a data report schema. The use | |||
of schemas allows a report instance to identify the schema to which | of schemas allows a report instance to identify the schema to which | |||
it conforms instead of carrying the structure in the report itself. | it conforms instead of carrying the structure in the report itself. | |||
This approach can significantly reduce the size of generated reports. | This approach can significantly reduce the size of generated reports. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<aside> | ||||
<t> | <t> | |||
NOTE: The DTNMA data reporting concept is intentionally distinct | The DTNMA data reporting concept is intentionally distinct | |||
from the concept of exchanging data stores across a network. It is | from the concept of exchanging datastores across a network. It is | |||
envisioned that a DA might generate a data report instance of a | envisioned that a DA might generate a data report instance of a | |||
data report schema at regular intervals or in response to local | data report schema at regular intervals or in response to local | |||
events. In this model, many report schemas may be defined to capture | events. In this model, many report schemas may be defined to capture | |||
unique, relevant combinations of known data values rather than | unique, relevant combinations of known data values rather than | |||
sending bulk data stores off-platform for analysis. | sending bulk datastores off-platform for analysis. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<aside> | ||||
<t> | <t> | |||
NOTE: It is not required that data report schemas be tabular in | NOTE: It is not required that data report schemas be tabular in | |||
nature. Individual implementations might define tabular | nature. Individual implementations might define tabular | |||
schemas for table-like data and other report schemas for more | schemas for table-like data and other report schemas for more | |||
heterogeneous reporting. | heterogeneous reporting. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</aside> | </aside> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
skipping to change at line 2427 ¶ | skipping to change at line 2405 ¶ | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Controls represent parameterized, predefined procedures run by the DA | Controls represent parameterized, predefined procedures run by the DA | |||
either as directed by the DM or as part of a rule response from the | either as directed by the DM or as part of a rule response from the | |||
DA autonomy engine. Macros represent ordered sequences of Controls. | DA autonomy engine. Macros represent ordered sequences of Controls. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Controls are conceptually similar to RPCs in | Controls are conceptually similar to RPCs in | |||
that they represent parameterized functions run on the managed | that they represent parameterized functions run on the managed | |||
device. However, they are conceptually dissimilar from RPCs in that | device. However, they are conceptually dissimilar to RPCs in that | |||
they do not have a concept of a return code because they operate | they do not have a concept of a return code because they operate | |||
over an asynchronous transport. The concept of return code in an RPC | over an asynchronous transport. The concept of a return code in an RPC | |||
implies a synchronous relationship between the caller of the | implies a synchronous relationship between the caller of the | |||
procedure and the procedure being called, which might not be | procedure and the procedure being called, which might not be | |||
possible within the DTNMA. | possible within the DTNMA. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The success or failure of a Control may be handled locally by the | The success or failure of a Control may be handled locally by the | |||
agent autonomy engine. Local error handling is particularly important | agent autonomy engine. Local error handling is particularly important | |||
in this architecture given the potential for long periods of | in this architecture, given the potential for long periods of | |||
disconnectivity between a DA and a DM. The failure | disconnectivity between a DA and a DM. The failure | |||
of one or more Controls is part of the state of the DA and can be used to trigger rules within the DA autonomy engine. | of one or more Controls is part of the state of the DA and can be used to trigger rules within the DA autonomy engine. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The impact of a Control is externally observable via the generation | The impact of a Control is externally observable via the generation | |||
and eventual examination of data reports produced by the managed devic e. | and eventual examination of data reports produced by the managed devic e. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The failure of certain Controls might leave a managed device in an | The failure of certain Controls might leave a managed device in an | |||
undesired state. Therefore, it is important | undesirable state. Therefore, it is important | |||
that there be consideration for Control-specific recovery | that there be consideration for Control-specific recovery | |||
mechanisms (such as a rollback or safing mechanism). When a | mechanisms (such as a rollback or safing mechanism). When a | |||
Control that is part of a macro (such as in an autonomy response) | Control that is part of a macro (such as in an autonomy response) | |||
fails, there may be a need to implement a safe state for the | fails, there may be a need to implement a safe state for the | |||
managed device based on the nature of the failure. | managed device based on the nature of the failure. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<aside> | <aside> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
NOTE: The use of the term Control in the DTNMA is derived in | NOTE: The use of the term "Control" in the DTNMA is derived in | |||
part from the concept of Command and Control (C2) where control | part from the concept of Command and Control (C2), where control | |||
implies the operational instructions undertaken to | implies the operational instructions undertaken to | |||
implement (or maintain) a commanded objective. The DA | implement (or maintain) a commanded objective. The DA | |||
autonomy engine implements controls on a managed device to allow it to fulfill some commanded objective known by a (possibly disconnected) managing device. | autonomy engine implements controls on a managed device to allow it to fulfill some commanded objective known by a (possibly disconnected) managing device. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
For example, a device might be commanded to maintain a safe internal thermal environment. Actions taken by a DA to manage heaters, louvers, and othe r temperature-effecting components are controls taken in service of that command ed objective. | For example, a device might be commanded to maintain a safe internal thermal environment. Actions taken by a DA to manage heaters, louvers, and othe r temperature-affecting components are controls taken in service of that command ed objective. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</aside> | </aside> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Predicate Autonomy Rules</name> | <name>Predicate Autonomy Rules</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
As discussed in <xref target="aut_mod_overview"/>, the DTNMA | As discussed in <xref target="aut_mod_overview"/>, the DTNMA | |||
rule-based stimulus-response system associates stimulus detection with a | rule-based stimulus-response system associates stimulus detection with a | |||
predetermined response. Rules may be categorized based on whether thei | predetermined response. Rules may be categorized based on whether | |||
r | (1) their | |||
stimuli include generic statements of managed device state or whether | stimuli include generic statements of managed device state or | |||
they | (2) they | |||
are optimized to only consider the passage of time on the device. | are optimized to only consider the passage of time on the device. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
State-based rules are those whose stimulus is based on the evaluated | State-based rules are those whose stimulus is based on the evaluated | |||
state of the managed device. Time-based rules are a unique subset of | state of the managed device. Time-based rules are a unique subset of | |||
state-based rules whose stimulus is given only by a time-based event. | state-based rules whose stimulus is given only by a time-based event. | |||
Implementations might create different structures and evaluation | Implementations might create different structures and evaluation | |||
mechanisms for these two different types of rules to achieve more | mechanisms for these two different types of rules to achieve more | |||
efficient processing on a platform. | efficient processing on a platform. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section anchor="use-cases" numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Use Cases</name> | <name>Use Cases</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Using the autonomy model defined in <xref target="autonomy_model"/>, | Using the autonomy model defined in <xref target="autonomy_model"/>, | |||
this section describes flows through sample configurations conforming to the | this section describes flows through sample configurations conforming to the | |||
DTNMA. These use cases illustrate remote configuration, local monitoring and | DTNMA. These use cases illustrate remote configuration, local monitoring and | |||
control, multiple manager support, and data fusion. | control, support for multiple DMs, and data fusion. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Notation</name> | <name>Notation</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The use cases presented in this section are documented with a | The use cases presented in this section are documented with a | |||
shorthand notation to describe the types of data sent between | shorthand notation to describe the types of data sent between | |||
managers and agents. This notation, outlined in | managers and agents. This notation, outlined in | |||
<xref target="uc_notation"/>, leverages the definitions | <xref target="uc_notation"/>, leverages the definitions | |||
of autonomy model components defined in <xref target="autonomy_model "/>. | of the autonomy model components defined in <xref target="autonomy_m odel"/>. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<table anchor="uc_notation" align="center"> | <table anchor="uc_notation" align="center"> | |||
<name>Terminology</name> | <name>Terminology</name> | |||
<thead> | <thead> | |||
<tr> | <tr> | |||
<th align="center">Term</th> | <th align="center">Term</th> | |||
<th align="center">Definition</th> | <th align="center">Definition</th> | |||
<th align="center">Example</th> | <th align="center">Example</th> | |||
</tr> | </tr> | |||
</thead> | </thead> | |||
<tbody> | <tbody> | |||
<tr> | <tr> | |||
<td align="center">EDD#</td> | <td align="center">EDD#</td> | |||
<td align="center">Externally Defined Data - a data value def ined external to the DA. </td> | <td align="center">Externally Defined Data -- a data value de fined in a way that is external to the DA. </td> | |||
<td align="center">EDD1, EDD2</td> | <td align="center">EDD1, EDD2</td> | |||
</tr> | </tr> | |||
<tr> | <tr> | |||
<td align="center">V#</td> | <td align="center">V#</td> | |||
<td align="center">Variable - a data value defined internal t o the DA.</td> | <td align="center">Variable -- a data value defined in a way that is internal to the DA.</td> | |||
<td align="center">V1 = EDD1 + 7</td> | <td align="center">V1 = EDD1 + 7</td> | |||
</tr> | </tr> | |||
<tr> | <tr> | |||
<td align="center">EXPR</td> | <td align="center">EXPR</td> | |||
<td align="center">Predicate expression - used to define a ru le stimulus.</td> | <td align="center">Predicate expression -- used to define a r ule stimulus.</td> | |||
<td align="center">V1 > 5</td> | <td align="center">V1 > 5</td> | |||
</tr> | </tr> | |||
<tr> | <tr> | |||
<td align="center">ID</td> | <td align="center">ID</td> | |||
<td align="center">DTNMA Object Identifier.</td> | <td align="center">DTNMA Object Identifier.</td> | |||
<td align="center">V1, EDD2</td> | <td align="center">V1, EDD2</td> | |||
</tr> | </tr> | |||
<tr> | <tr> | |||
<td align="center">ACL#</td> | <td align="center">ACL#</td> | |||
<td align="center">Enumerated Access Control List.</td> | <td align="center">Enumerated Access Control List.</td> | |||
<td align="center">ACL1</td> | <td align="center">ACL1</td> | |||
</tr> | </tr> | |||
<tr> | <tr> | |||
<td align="center">DEF(ACL,ID,EXPR)</td> | <td align="center">DEF(ACL, ID, EXPR)</td> | |||
<td align="center">Define ID from expression. Allow managers | <td align="center">Define "ID" from expression. Allow DMs in | |||
in ACL to see this ID.</td> | ACL to see this ID.</td> | |||
<td align="center">DEF(ACL1, V1, EDD1 + EDD2)</td> | <td align="center">DEF(ACL1, V1, EDD1 + EDD2)</td> | |||
</tr> | </tr> | |||
<tr> | <tr> | |||
<td align="center">PROD(P,ID)</td> | <td align="center">PROD(P, ID)</td> | |||
<td align="center">Produce ID according to predicate | <td align="center">Produce "ID" according to predicate | |||
P. P may be a time period (1s) or an expression (EDD1 > 10 | P. P may be a time period (1 second, or 1s) or an expression | |||
).</td> | (EDD1 > 10).</td> | |||
<td align="center">PROD(1s, EDD1)</td> | <td align="center">PROD(1s, EDD1)</td> | |||
</tr> | </tr> | |||
<tr> | <tr> | |||
<td align="center">RPT(ID)</td> | <td align="center">RPT(ID)</td> | |||
<td align="center">A report instance containing data named ID .</td> | <td align="center">A report instance containing data named "I D".</td> | |||
<td align="center">RPT(EDD1)</td> | <td align="center">RPT(EDD1)</td> | |||
</tr> | </tr> | |||
</tbody> | </tbody> | |||
</table> | </table> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
These notations do not imply any implementation approach. They | These notations do not imply any implementation approach. They | |||
only provide a succinct syntax for expressing the data flows in | only provide a succinct syntax for expressing the data flows in | |||
the use case diagrams in the remainder of this section. | the use case diagrams in the remainder of this section. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="serial_mgmt" numbered="true"> | <section anchor="serial_mgmt" numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Serialized Management</name> | <name>Serialized Management</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
This nominal configuration shows a single DM interacting with mult iple | This nominal configuration shows a single DM interacting with mult iple | |||
DAs. The control flows for this scenario are outlined in | DAs. The control flow for this scenario is outlined in | |||
<xref target="serial_mgmt_ctrl_flow"/>. | <xref target="serial_mgmt_ctrl_flow"/>. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t keepWithNext="true">Serialized Management Control Flow</t> | ||||
<figure anchor="serial_mgmt_ctrl_flow"> | <figure anchor="serial_mgmt_ctrl_flow"> | |||
<artwork align="center" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[ | <name>Serialized Management Control Flow</name> | |||
+-----------+ +---------+ +---------+ | <artwork align="center" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[+---------- | |||
-+ +---------+ +---------+ | ||||
| DTNMA | | DTNMA | | DTNMA | | | DTNMA | | DTNMA | | DTNMA | | |||
| Manager A | | Agent A | | Agent B | | | Manager A | | Agent A | | Agent B | | |||
+----+------+ +----+----+ +----+----+ | +----+------+ +----+----+ +----+----+ | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
|-----PROD(1s, EDD1)--->| | (1) | |-----PROD(1s, EDD1)--->| | (1) | |||
|----------------------------PROD(1s, EDD1)-->| | |----------------------------PROD(1s, EDD1)-->| | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
|<-------RPT(EDD1)------| | (2) | |<-------RPT(EDD1)------| | (2) | |||
|<----------------------------RPT(EDD1)-------| | |<----------------------------RPT(EDD1)-------| | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
|<-------RPT(EDD1)------| | | |<-------RPT(EDD1)------| | | |||
|<----------------------------RPT(EDD1)-------| | |<----------------------------RPT(EDD1)-------| | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
|<-------RPT(EDD1)------| | | |<-------RPT(EDD1)------| | | |||
|<----------------------------RPT(EDD1)-------| | |<----------------------------RPT(EDD1)-------| | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
]]></artwork> | ]]></artwork> | |||
</figure> | </figure> | |||
<t keepWithPrevious="true"> | <t keepWithPrevious="true"> | |||
In a serialized management scenario, a single DM interacts with mul tiple DAs. | In a serialized management scenario, a single DM interacts with mul tiple DAs. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
In this figure, the DTNMA Manager A sends a policy to DTNMA Agents | In this figure, DM A sends a policy to DAs | |||
A and B to report the value of an EDD (EDD1) every second in (step 1 | A and B to report the value of an EDD (EDD1) every second (step 1). | |||
). | ||||
Each DA receives this policy and configures their respective | Each DA receives this policy and configures their respective | |||
autonomy engines for this production. Thereafter, (step 2) each | autonomy engines for this production. Thereafter (step 2), each | |||
DA produces a report containing data element EDD1 and sends | DA produces a report containing data element EDD1; each such report | |||
those reports back to the DM. | is | |||
then sent back to the DM. | ||||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
This behavior continues without any additional communications | This behavior continues without any additional communications | |||
from the DM. | from the DM. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Intermittent Connectivity</name> | <name>Intermittent Connectivity</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Building from the nominal configuration in <xref target="serial_mgmt"/ >, | Building on the nominal configuration discussed in <xref target="seria l_mgmt"/>, | |||
this scenario shows a challenged network in which connectivity between | this scenario shows a challenged network in which connectivity between | |||
DTNMA Agent B and the DM is temporarily lost. Control flows for this c | DA B and the DM is temporarily lost. The control flow for this case | |||
ase | is outlined in <xref target="challenged_serial_mgmt_ctrl_flow"/>. | |||
are outlined in <xref target="challenged_serial_mgmt_ctrl_flow"/>. | ||||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t keepWithNext="true">Challenged Management Control Flow</t> | ||||
<figure anchor="challenged_serial_mgmt_ctrl_flow"> | <figure anchor="challenged_serial_mgmt_ctrl_flow"> | |||
<artwork align="center" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[ | <name>Challenged Management Control Flow</name> | |||
+-----------+ +---------+ +---------+ | <artwork align="center" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[+---------- | |||
-+ +---------+ +---------+ | ||||
| DTNMA | | DTNMA | | DTNMA | | | DTNMA | | DTNMA | | DTNMA | | |||
| Manager A | | Agent A | | Agent B | | | Manager A | | Agent A | | Agent B | | |||
+----+------+ +----+----+ +----+----+ | +----+------+ +----+----+ +----+----+ | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
|-----PROD(1s, EDD1)--->| | (1) | |-----PROD(1s, EDD1)--->| | (1) | |||
|----------------------------PROD(1s, EDD1)-->| | |----------------------------PROD(1s, EDD1)-->| | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
|<-------RPT(EDD1)------| | (2) | |<-------RPT(EDD1)------| | (2) | |||
|<----------------------------RPT(EDD1)-------| | |<----------------------------RPT(EDD1)-------| | |||
skipping to change at line 2672 ¶ | skipping to change at line 2650 ¶ | |||
| | RPT(EDD1)| (3) | | | RPT(EDD1)| (3) | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
|<-------RPT(EDD1)------| | | |<-------RPT(EDD1)------| | | |||
| | RPT(EDD1)| (4) | | | RPT(EDD1)| (4) | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
|<-------RPT(EDD1)------| | | |<-------RPT(EDD1)------| | | |||
|<----------------RPT(EDD1), RPT(EDD1)--------| (5) | |<----------------RPT(EDD1), RPT(EDD1)--------| (5) | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
]]></artwork> | ]]></artwork> | |||
</figure> | </figure> | |||
<t keepWithPrevious="true"> | <t keepWithPrevious="true"> | |||
In a challenged network, DAs store reports pending a transmit opport unity. | In a challenged network, DAs store reports, pending a transmit oppor tunity. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
In this figure, DTNMA Manager A sends a policy to DTNMA Agents A | In this figure, DM A sends a policy to DAs A | |||
and B to produce an EDD (EDD1) every second in (step 1). Each DA | and B to produce an EDD (EDD1) every second (step 1). Each DA | |||
receives this policy and configures their respective autonomy | receives this policy and configures their respective autonomy | |||
engines for this production. Produced reports are transmitted when | engines for this production. Produced reports are transmitted when | |||
there is connectivity between the DA and DM (step 2). | there is connectivity between the DA and DM (step 2). | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
At some point, DTNMA Agent B loses the ability to transmit in the | At some point, DA B loses the ability to transmit in the | |||
network (steps 3 and 4). During this time period, DA B continues | network (steps 3 and 4). During this time period, DA B continues | |||
to produce reports, but they are queued for transmission. This | to produce reports, but they are queued for transmission. This | |||
queuing might be done by the DA itself or by a supporting | queuing might be done by the DA itself or by a supporting | |||
transport such as BP. Eventually (and before the next scheduled | transport such as BP. Eventually (and before the next scheduled | |||
production of EDD1), DTNMA Agent B is able to transmit in the | production of EDD1), DA B is able to transmit in the | |||
network again (step 5) and all queued reports are sent at that | network again (step 5), and all queued reports are sent at that | |||
time. DTNMA Agent A maintains connectivity with the DM during | time. DA A maintains connectivity with the DM during | |||
steps 3-5, and continues to send reports as they are generated. | steps 3-5 and continues to send reports as they are generated. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Open-Loop Reporting</name> | <name>Open-Loop Reporting</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
This scenario illustrates the DTNMA open-loop control paradigm, where DAs | This scenario illustrates the DTNMA open-loop control paradigm, where DAs | |||
manage themselves in accordance with policies provided by DMs, and pro vide | manage themselves in accordance with policies provided by DMs and prov ide | |||
reports to DMs based on these policies. | reports to DMs based on these policies. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The control flow shown in <xref target="consolidated_mgmt_ctrl_flow"/> , | The control flow shown in <xref target="consolidated_mgmt_ctrl_flow"/> | |||
includes an example of data fusion, where multiple policies configured by a | includes an example of data fusion, where multiple policies configured by a | |||
DM result in a single report from a DA. | DM result in a single report from a DA. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t keepWithNext="true">Consolidated Management Control Flow</t> | ||||
<figure anchor="consolidated_mgmt_ctrl_flow"> | <figure anchor="consolidated_mgmt_ctrl_flow"> | |||
<artwork align="center" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[ | <name>Consolidated Management Control Flow</name> | |||
+-----------+ +---------+ +---------+ | <artwork align="center" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[+-----------+ | |||
+---------+ +---------+ | ||||
| DTNMA | | DTNMA | | DTNMA | | | DTNMA | | DTNMA | | DTNMA | | |||
| Manager A | | Agent A | | Agent B | | | Manager A | | Agent A | | Agent B | | |||
+----+------+ +----+----+ +----+----+ | +----+------+ +----+----+ +----+----+ | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
|-----PROD(1s, EDD1)--->| | (1) | |-----PROD(1s, EDD1)--->| | (1) | |||
|----------------------------PROD(1s, EDD1)-->| | |----------------------------PROD(1s, EDD1)-->| | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
|<-------RPT(EDD1)------| | (2) | |<-------RPT(EDD1)------| | (2) | |||
|<----------------------------RPT(EDD1)-------| | |<----------------------------RPT(EDD1)-------| | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
|----------------------------PROD(1s, EDD2)-->| (3) | |----------------------------PROD(1s, EDD2)-->| (3) | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
|<-------RPT(EDD1)------| | | |<-------RPT(EDD1)------| | | |||
|<--------------------------RPT(EDD1,EDD2)----| (4) | |<-------------------------RPT(EDD1, EDD2)----| (4) | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
|<-------RPT(EDD1)------| | | |<-------RPT(EDD1)------| | | |||
|<--------------------------RPT(EDD1,EDD2)----| | |<-------------------------RPT(EDD1, EDD2)----| | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
]]></artwork> | ]]></artwork> | |||
</figure> | </figure> | |||
<t keepWithPrevious="true"> | <t keepWithPrevious="true"> | |||
A many-to-one mapping between management policy and device state repor ting | A many-to-one mapping between management policy and device state repor ting | |||
is supported by the DTNMA. | is supported by the DTNMA. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
In this figure, DTNMA Manager A sends a policy statement in the form o | In this figure, DM A sends a policy statement in the form of a | |||
f a | rule to DAs A and B, which instructs the DAs to produce a report | |||
rule to DTNMA Agents A and B, which instructs the DAs to produce a rep | for EDD1 every second (step 1). Each DA receives this policy, which is | |||
ort | stored in its respective rule database, and configures its autonomy en | |||
with EDD1 every second (step 1). Each DA receives this policy, which i | gine. | |||
s | ||||
stored in its respective Rule Database, and configures its Autonomy En | ||||
gine. | ||||
Reports are transmitted by each DA when produced (step 2). | Reports are transmitted by each DA when produced (step 2). | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
At a later time, DTNMA Manager A sends an additional policy to | At a later time, DM A sends an additional policy to | |||
DTNMA Agent B, requesting the production of a report for EDD2 every se | DA B, requesting the production of a report for EDD2 every second | |||
cond | (step 3). This policy is added to DA B's rule database. | |||
(step 3). This policy is added to DTNMA Agent B's Rule Database. | ||||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Following this policy update, DTNMA Agent A will continue to produce E | Following this policy update, DA A will continue to produce EDD1, | |||
DD1 | and DA B will produce both EDD1 and EDD2 (step 4). However, | |||
and DTNMA Agent B will produce both EDD1 and EDD2 (step 4). However, D | DA B may provide these values to the DM in a single report rather than | |||
TNMA | as | |||
Agent B may provide these values to the DM in a single report rather t | two independent reports. In this way, there is no direct mapping betwe | |||
han as | en the | |||
2 independent reports. In this way, there is no direct mapping between | consolidated reports sent by DA B (from step 4 onwards) and the two | |||
the | different policies sent to DA B (steps 1 and 3) that produce the infor | |||
single consolidated report sent by DTNMA Agent B (step 4) and the two | mation included in those consolidated reports. | |||
different policies sent to DTNMA Agent B that caused that report to be | ||||
generated (steps 1 and 3). | ||||
</t> | </t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Multiple Administrative Domains</name> | <name>Multiple Administrative Domains</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The managed applications on a DA may be controlled by different | The managed applications on a DA may be controlled by different | |||
administrative entities in a network. The DTNMA allows DAs to | administrative entities in a network. The DTNMA allows DAs to | |||
communicate with multiple DMs in the network, such as in cases | communicate with multiple DMs in the network, such as in cases | |||
where there is one DM per administrative domain. | where there is one DM per administrative domain. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Whenever a DM sends a policy expression to a DA, that policy | Whenever a DM sends a policy expression to a DA, that policy | |||
expression may be associated with authorization information. One | expression may be associated with authorization information. One | |||
method of representing this is an ACL. | method of representing this is an ACL. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<aside> | ||||
<t> | <t> | |||
The use of an ACL in this use case does not imply the DTNMA | The use of an ACL in this use case does not imply that the DTNMA | |||
requires ACLs to annotate policy expressions. ACLs and their | requires ACLs to annotate policy expressions. ACLs and their | |||
representation in this context are for example purposes only. | representation in this context are for example purposes only. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</aside> | ||||
<t> | <t> | |||
The ability of one DM to access the results of policy | The ability of one DM to access the results of policy | |||
expressions configured by some other DM will be limited to the | expressions configured by some other DM will be limited to the | |||
authorization annotations of those policy expressions. | authorization annotations of those policy expressions. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
An example of multi-manager authorization is illustrated in | An example of multi-manager authorization is illustrated in | |||
<xref target="multi_mgmt_ctrl_flow"/>. | <xref target="multi_mgmt_ctrl_flow"/>. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t keepWithNext="true">Multiplexed Management Control Flow</t> | ||||
<figure anchor="multi_mgmt_ctrl_flow"> | <figure anchor="multi_mgmt_ctrl_flow"> | |||
<name>Multiplexed Management Control Flow</name> | ||||
<artwork align="center" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[ | <artwork align="center" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[ | |||
+-----------+ +---------+ +-----------+ | +-----------+ +---------+ +-----------+ | |||
| DTNMA | | DTNMA | | DTNMA | | | DTNMA | | DTNMA | | DTNMA | | |||
| Manager A | | Agent A | | Manager B | | | Manager A | | Agent A | | Manager B | | |||
+-----+-----+ +----+----+ +-----+-----+ | +-----+-----+ +----+----+ +-----+-----+ | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
|---DEF(ACL1,V1,EDD1*2)--->|<---DEF(ACL2, V2, EDD2*2)---| (1) | |--DEF(ACL1, V1, EDD1*2)-->|<---DEF(ACL2, V2, EDD2*2)---| (1) | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
|---PROD(1s, V1)---------->|<---PROD(1s, V2)------------| (2) | |---PROD(1s, V1)---------->|<---PROD(1s, V2)------------| (2) | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
|<--------RPT(V1)----------| | (3) | |<--------RPT(V1)----------| | (3) | |||
| |--------RPT(V2)------------>| | | |--------RPT(V2)------------>| | |||
|<--------RPT(V1)----------| | | |<--------RPT(V1)----------| | | |||
| |--------RPT(V2)------------>| | | |--------RPT(V2)------------>| | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
| |<---PROD(1s, V1)------------| (4) | | |<---PROD(1s, V1)------------| (4) | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
| |----ERR(V1 no perm.)------->| | | |---ERR(V1 not permitted)--->| | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
|--DEF(NULL,V3,EDD3*3)---->| | (5) | |--DEF(NULL, V3, EDD3*3)-->| | (5) | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
|---PROD(1s, V3)---------->| | (6) | |---PROD(1s, V3)---------->| | (6) | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
| |<----PROD(1s, V3)-----------| | | |<----PROD(1s, V3)-----------| | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
|<--------RPT(V3)----------|--------RPT(V3)------------>| (7) | |<--------RPT(V3)----------|--------RPT(V3)------------>| (7) | |||
|<--------RPT(V1)----------| | | |<--------RPT(V1)----------| | | |||
| |--------RPT(V2)------------>| | | |--------RPT(V2)------------>| | |||
|<-------RPT(V3)-----------|--------RPT(V3)------------>| | |<-------RPT(V3)-----------|--------RPT(V3)------------>| | |||
|<-------RPT(V1)-----------| | | |<-------RPT(V1)-----------| | | |||
| |--------RPT(V2)------------>| | | |--------RPT(V2)------------>| | |||
]]></artwork> | ]]></artwork> | |||
</figure> | </figure> | |||
<t keepWithPrevious="true"> | <t keepWithPrevious="true"> | |||
Multiple DMs may interface with a single DA, particularly in comple x | Multiple DMs may interface with a single DA, particularly in comple x | |||
networks. | networks. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
In this figure, both DTNMA Managers A and B send policies to DTNMA | In this figure, both DM A and DM B send policies to | |||
Agent A (step 1). DM A defines a variable (V1) whose value is given | DA A (step 1). DM A defines a variable (V1) whose value is given | |||
by the mathematical expression (EDD1 * 2) and is associated with an | by the mathematical expression (EDD1 * 2) and is associated with an | |||
ACL (ACL1) that restricts access to V1 to DM A only. Similarly, DM B | ACL (ACL1) that restricts access to V1 to DM A only. Similarly, DM B | |||
defines a variable (V2) whose value is given by the mathematical | defines a variable (V2) whose value is given by the mathematical | |||
expression (EDD2 * 2) and associated with an ACL (ACL2) that restric ts | expression (EDD2 * 2) and is associated with an ACL (ACL2) that rest ricts | |||
access to V2 to DM B only. | access to V2 to DM B only. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Both DTNMA Managers A and B also send policies to DTNMA Agent A to | Both DM A and DM B also send policies to DA A to | |||
report on the values of their variables at 1 second intervals (step | report on the values of their variables at 1-second intervals (step | |||
2). | 2). | |||
Since DM A can access V1 and DM B can access V2, there is | Since DM A can access V1 and DM B can access V2, there is | |||
no authorization issue with these policies and they are both | no authorization issue with these policies, and they are both | |||
accepted by the autonomy engine on Agent A. Agent A produces | accepted by the autonomy engine on DA A. DA A produces | |||
reports as expected, sending them to their respective managers | reports as expected, sending them to their respective managers | |||
(step 3). | (step 3). | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Later (step 4) DM B attempts to configure DA A to also | Later (step 4), DM B attempts to configure DA A to also | |||
report to it the value of V1. Since DM B does not have | report to it the value of V1. Since DM B does not have | |||
authorization to view this variable, DA A does not include this | authorization to view this variable, DA A does not include this | |||
in the configuration of its autonomy engine and, instead, some | in the configuration of its autonomy engine; instead, some | |||
indication of permission error is included in any regular | indication of a permission error is included in any regular | |||
reporting back to DM B. | reporting back to DM B. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
DM A also sends a policy to Agent A (step 5) that defines a | DM A also sends a policy to DA A (step 5) that defines a | |||
variable (V3) whose value is given by the mathematical expression | variable (V3) whose value is given by the mathematical expression | |||
(EDD3 * 3) and is not associated with an ACL, indicating that any | (EDD3 * 3) and is not associated with an ACL, indicating that any | |||
DM can access V3. In this instance, both DM A and DM B can | DM can access V3. In this instance, both DM A and DM B can | |||
then send policies to DA A to report the value of V3 (step 6). | then send policies to DA A to report the value of V3 (step 6). | |||
Since there is no authorization restriction on V3, these policies | Since there is no authorization restriction on V3, these policies | |||
are accepted by the autonomy engine on Agent A and reports are | are accepted by the autonomy engine on DA A, and reports are | |||
sent to both DM A and B over time (step 7). | sent to both DM A and DM B over time (step 7). | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section numbered="true"> | <section numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Cascading Management</name> | <name>Cascading Management</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
There are times where a single network device may serve as both | There are times when a single network device may serve as both | |||
a DM for other DAs in the network and, itself, as a | a DM for other DAs in the network and, itself, as a | |||
device managed by someone else. This may be the case on nodes | device managed by someone else. This may be the case on nodes | |||
serving as gateways or proxies. The DTNMA accommodates this case by | serving as gateways or proxies. The DTNMA accommodates this case by | |||
allowing a single device to run both a DA and DM. | allowing a single device to run both a DA and a DM. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
An example of this configuration is illustrated in | An example of this configuration is illustrated in | |||
<xref target="fusion_ctrl_flow"/>. | <xref target="fusion_ctrl_flow"/>. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t keepWithNext="true">Cascading Management Control Flow</t> | ||||
<figure anchor="fusion_ctrl_flow"> | <figure anchor="fusion_ctrl_flow"> | |||
<name>Cascading Management Control Flow</name> | ||||
<artwork align="center" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[ | <artwork align="center" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[ | |||
--------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------- | |||
| Node B | | | Node B | | |||
| | | | | | |||
+-----------+ | +-----------+ +---------+ | +---------+ | +-----------+ | +-----------+ +---------+ | +---------+ | |||
| DTNMA | | | DTNMA | | DTNMA | | | DTNMA | | | DTNMA | | | DTNMA | | DTNMA | | | DTNMA | | |||
| Manager A | | | Manager B | | Agent B | | | Agent C | | | Manager A | | | Manager B | | Agent B | | | Agent C | | |||
+---+-------+ | +-----+-----+ +----+----+ | +----+----+ | +---+-------+ | +-----+-----+ +----+----+ | +----+----+ | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||
|--------------DEF(NULL,V0,EDD1+EDD2)-->| | | (1) | |----------DEF(NULL, V0, EDD1 + EDD2)-->| | | (1) | |||
|--------------PROD(1s,V0)------------->| | | | |-------------PROD(1s, V0)------------->| | | | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||
| | |--PROD(1s,EDD1)-->| | | (2) | | | |-PROD(1s, EDD1)-->| | | (2) | |||
| | |---------------------PROD(1s,EDD2)-->| (2) | | | |--------------------PROD(1s, EDD2)-->| (2) | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||
| | |<----RPT(EDD1)----| | | (3) | | | |<----RPT(EDD1)----| | | (3) | |||
| | |<--------------------RPT(EDD2)-------| (3) | | | |<--------------------RPT(EDD2)-------| (3) | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||
|<-------------RPT(V0)------------------| | | (4) | |<-------------RPT(V0)------------------| | | (4) | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||
| | | | | | |||
| | | | | | |||
--------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------- | |||
]]></artwork> | ]]></artwork> | |||
</figure> | </figure> | |||
<t keepWithPrevious="true"> | <t keepWithPrevious="true"> | |||
A device can operate as both a DTNMA Manager and an Agent. | A device can operate as both a DM and a DA. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
In this example, we presume that DA B is able to sample a | In this example, we presume that DA B is able to sample a | |||
given EDD (EDD1) and that DA C is able to sample a different | given EDD (EDD1) and that DA C is able to sample a different | |||
EDD (EDD2). Node B houses DM B (which controls DA C) and DA B | EDD (EDD2). Node B houses DM B (which controls DA C) and DA B | |||
(which is controlled by DM A). DM A must periodically receive | (which is controlled by DM A). DM A must periodically receive | |||
some new value that is calculated as a function of both EDD1 | some new value that is calculated as a function of both EDD1 | |||
and EDD2. | and EDD2. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
First, DM A sends a policy to DA B to define a variable (V0) whose val ue | First, DM A sends a policy to DA B to define a variable (V0) whose val ue | |||
is given by the mathematical expression (EDD1 + EDD2) without a | is given by the mathematical expression (EDD1 + EDD2) without a | |||
restricting ACL. Further, DM A sends a policy to DA B to report on | restricting ACL. Further, DM A sends a policy to DA B to report on | |||
the value of V0 every second (step 1). | the value of V0 every second (step 1). | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
DA B needs the ability to monitor both EDD1 and EDD2. | DA B needs the ability to monitor both EDD1 and EDD2 to produce V0. | |||
DA B is able to sample EDD1, so DM B sends a policy to DA B to report | ||||
on | ||||
the value of EDD1. | ||||
However, the only way to receive EDD2 values is to have them | However, the only way to receive EDD2 values is to have them | |||
reported back to Node B by DA C and included in the Node B | reported back to Node B by DA C and included in the Node B | |||
runtime data stores. Therefore, DM B sends a policy to DA C to | runtime datastores. Therefore, DM B also sends a policy to DA C to | |||
report on the value of EDD2 (step 2). | report on the value of EDD2 (step 2). | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
DA C receives the policy in its autonomy engine and produces | DA B receives the policy in its autonomy engine and produces | |||
reports on the value of EDD2 every second (step 3). | reports on the value of EDD2 every second. Similarly, DA C | |||
receives the policy in its autonomy engine and produces reports on the | ||||
value of EDD2 every second (step 3). | ||||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
DA B may locally sample EDD1 and EDD2 and uses that to compute | DA B may locally sample EDD1 and EDD2 and uses that to compute | |||
values of V0 and report on those values at regular intervals to DM A | values of V0 and report on those values at regular intervals to DM A | |||
(step 4). | (step 4). | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
While a trivial example, the mechanism of associating fusion with | While a trivial example, the mechanism of associating fusion with | |||
the Agent function rather than the Manager function scales with | the DA function rather than the DM function scales with | |||
fusion complexity. Within the DTNMA, DAs and DMs are not required to | fusion complexity. Within the DTNMA, DAs and DMs are not required to | |||
be separate software implementations. There may be a single software | be separate software implementations. There may be a single software | |||
application running on Node B implementing both DM B and DA B roles. | application running on Node B implementing both DM B and DA B roles. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="IANA" numbered="true"> | <section anchor="IANA" numbered="true"> | |||
<name>IANA Considerations</name> | <name>IANA Considerations</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
This document requires no IANA actions. | This document has no IANA actions. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="Security" numbered="true"> | <section anchor="Security" numbered="true"> | |||
<name>Security Considerations</name> | <name>Security Considerations</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Security within a DTNMA exists in at least two layers: security | Security within a DTNMA exists in at least the following two layers: sec urity | |||
in the data model and security in the messaging and encoding of the | in the data model and security in the messaging and encoding of the | |||
data model. | data model. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Data model security refers to the validity and accessibility of data | Data model security refers to the validity and accessibility of data | |||
elements. For example, a data element might be available to certain DAs or DMs in a system, whereas the same data element may be hidden from other DAs o r DMs. Both verification and authorization mechanisms | elements. For example, a data element might be available to certain DAs or DMs in a system, whereas the same data element may be hidden from other DAs o r DMs. Both verification and authorization mechanisms | |||
at DAs and DMs are important to achieve this type of security. | at DAs and DMs are important to achieve this type of security. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
<aside> | <aside> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
NOTE: One way to provide finer-grained application security is | NOTE: One way to provide finer-grained application security is | |||
through the use of Access Control Lists (ACLs) that would be defined | through the use of ACLs that would be defined | |||
as part of the configuration of DAs and DMs. It is expected that | as part of the configuration of DAs and DMs. It is expected that | |||
many common data model tools provide mechanisms for the definition | many common data model tools provide mechanisms for the definition | |||
of ACLs and best practices for their operational use. | of ACLs and best practices for their operational use. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</aside> | </aside> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
The exchange of information between and amongst DAs and DMs in the | The exchange of information between and amongst DAs and DMs in the | |||
DTNMA is expected to be accomplished through some secured messaging | DTNMA is expected to be accomplished through some secured messaging | |||
transport. | transport. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
</middle> | </middle> | |||
<!-- *****BACK MATTER ***** --> | ||||
<back> | <back> | |||
<!-- -<references title="Normative References"> | ||||
</references> --> | ||||
<references> | <references> | |||
<name>Informative References</name> | <name>Informative References</name> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.257 | |||
2578.xml'/> | 8.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.316 | |||
3165.xml'/> | 5.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.298 | |||
2982.xml'/> | 2.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.341 | |||
3410.xml'/> | 0.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.341 | |||
3411.xml'/> | 1.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.341 | |||
3414.xml'/> | 4.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.341 | |||
3416.xml'/> | 6.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.341 | |||
3417.xml'/> | 7.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.341 | |||
3418.xml'/> | 8.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.483 | |||
4838.xml'/> | 8.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.494 | |||
4949.xml'/> | 9.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.635 | |||
6353.xml'/> | 3.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.559 | |||
5591.xml'/> | 1.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.559 | |||
5592.xml'/> | 2.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.565 | |||
5652.xml'/> | 2.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.624 | |||
6241.xml'/> | 1.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.624 | |||
6242.xml'/> | 2.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.699 | |||
6991.xml'/> | 1.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.722 | |||
7228.xml'/> | 8.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.725 | |||
7252.xml'/> | 2.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.911 | |||
9113.xml'/> | 3.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.757 | |||
7575.xml'/> | 5.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.758 | |||
7589.xml'/> | 9.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.795 | |||
7950.xml'/> | 0.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.795 | |||
7951.xml'/> | 1.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.804 | |||
8040.xml'/> | 0.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.819 | |||
8199.xml'/> | 9.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.829 | |||
8294.xml'/> | 4.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.834 | |||
8341.xml'/> | 1.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.836 | |||
8368.xml'/> | 8.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.834 | |||
8342.xml'/> | 2.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.863 | |||
8639.xml'/> | 9.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.864 | |||
8641.xml'/> | 1.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.899 | |||
8990.xml'/> | 0.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.899 | |||
8993.xml'/> | 3.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.917 | |||
9171.xml'/> | 1.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.917 | |||
9172.xml'/> | 2.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC. | <xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.925 | |||
9254.xml'/> | 4.xml'/> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml-ids/refe | ||||
rence.I-D.rfernando-protocol-buffers.xml'/> | <!-- draft-rfernando-protocol-buffers (Expired) | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml-ids/refe | "Long way" to fix date --> | |||
rence.I-D.ietf-core-sid.xml'/> | <reference anchor="PROTOCOL-BUFFERS"> | |||
<xi:include href='http://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml-ids/refe | <front> | |||
rence.I-D.ietf-core-comi.xml'/> | <title>Encoding rules and MIME type for Protocol Buffers</title> | |||
<reference anchor="ASN.1"> | <author initials="S." surname="Stuart" fullname="Stephen Stuart"> | |||
<organization>Google</organization> | ||||
</author> | ||||
<author initials="R." surname="Fernando" fullname="Rex Fernando"> | ||||
<organization>Cisco</organization> | ||||
</author> | ||||
<date month="October" day="8" year="2012" /> | ||||
</front> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-rfernando-protocol-buffers-00" | ||||
/> | ||||
</reference> | ||||
<!-- draft-ietf-core-sid / RFC 9595 (published) --> | ||||
<xi:include href='https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.959 | ||||
5.xml'/> | ||||
<!-- draft-ietf-core-comi (I-D Exists) | ||||
"Long way" to fix one surname and add four "editor" entries --> | ||||
<reference anchor="CORE-COMI"> | ||||
<front> | ||||
<title>CoAP Management Interface (CORECONF)</title> | ||||
<author initials="M." surname="Veillette" fullname="Michel Veillette" role | ||||
="editor"> | ||||
<organization>Trilliant Networks Inc.</organization> | ||||
</author> | ||||
<author initials="P." surname="van der Stok" fullname="Peter van der Stok" | ||||
role="editor"> | ||||
<organization>consultant</organization> | ||||
</author> | ||||
<author initials="A." surname="Pelov" fullname="Alexander Pelov" role="edi | ||||
tor"> | ||||
<organization>IMT Atlantique</organization> | ||||
</author> | ||||
<author initials="A." surname="Bierman" fullname="Andy Bierman"> | ||||
<organization>YumaWorks</organization> | ||||
</author> | ||||
<author initials="C." surname="Bormann" fullname="Carsten Bormann" role="e | ||||
ditor"> | ||||
<organization>Universität Bremen TZI</organization> | ||||
</author> | ||||
<date month="November" day="3" year="2024" /> | ||||
</front> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-core-comi-19" /> | ||||
</reference> | ||||
<reference anchor="ASN.1" target="https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-X.680"> | ||||
<front> | <front> | |||
<title> | <title>Information technology - Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1): | |||
Information processing systems - Open Systems Interconnection - | Specification of basic notation</title> | |||
Specification of Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1) | ||||
</title> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="International Standard" value="8824"/> | ||||
<author> | <author> | |||
<organization>International Organization for Standardization</organi zation> | <organization>ITU-T</organization> | |||
</author> | </author> | |||
<date month="December" year="1987"/> | <date month="February" year="2021"/> | |||
</front> | </front> | |||
<seriesInfo name="ITU-T Recommendation" value="X.680"/> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="ISO/IEC" value="8824-1:2021"/> | ||||
</reference> | </reference> | |||
<reference anchor="DART" target="https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/docu ment/10207457"> | <reference anchor="DART" target="https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/docu ment/10207457"> | |||
<front> | <front> | |||
<title> | <title>The DART Autonomy System</title> | |||
The DART Autonomy System | ||||
</title> | ||||
<author fullname="B. Teresa Tropf"> | <author fullname="B. Teresa Tropf"> | |||
<organization>The Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory</organiza tion> | <organization>The Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory</organiza tion> | |||
</author> | </author> | |||
<author fullname="Musad Haque"> | <author fullname="Musad Haque"> | |||
<organization>The Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory</organiza tion> | <organization>The Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory</organiza tion> | |||
</author> | </author> | |||
<author fullname="Neda Behrooz"> | <author fullname="Neda Behrooz"> | |||
<organization>The Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory</organiza tion> | <organization>The Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory</organiza tion> | |||
</author> | </author> | |||
<author fullname="Christopher Krupiarz"> | <author fullname="Christopher Krupiarz"> | |||
<organization>The Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory</organiza tion> | <organization>The Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory</organiza tion> | |||
</author> | </author> | |||
<date year="2023"/> | <date month="August" year="2023"/> | |||
</front> | </front> | |||
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.1109/SMC-IT56444.2023.00020"/> | ||||
</reference> | </reference> | |||
<reference anchor="NEW-HORIZONS" target="https://www.sciencedirect.com/sci ence/article/pii/S0094576507000604"> | <reference anchor="NEW-HORIZONS" target="https://www.sciencedirect.com/sci ence/article/pii/S0094576507000604"> | |||
<front> | <front> | |||
<title> | <title> | |||
Autonomous safeing and fault protection for the New Horizons mission to Pluto | Autonomous safeing and fault protection for the New Horizons mission to Pluto | |||
</title> | </title> | |||
<author fullname="Robert C. Moore"> | <author fullname="Robert C. Moore"> | |||
<organization>The Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory</organiza tion> | <organization>The Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory</organiza tion> | |||
<address> | <address> | |||
<email>Robert.Moore@jhuapl.edu</email> | <email>Robert.Moore@jhuapl.edu</email> | |||
</address> | </address> | |||
</author> | </author> | |||
<date month="March" year="2007"/> | <date month="August" year="2007"/> | |||
</front> | </front> | |||
<refcontent>Acta Astronautica, Volume 61, Issues 1-6, June-August 2007, | ||||
Pages 398-405</refcontent> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.1016/j.actaastro.2007.01.009"/> | ||||
</reference> | </reference> | |||
<reference anchor="gNMI" target="https://www.openconfig.net/docs/gnmi/gnmi -specification/"> | <reference anchor="gNMI" target="https://www.openconfig.net/docs/gnmi/gnmi -specification/"> | |||
<front> | <front> | |||
<title> | <title>gRPC Network Management Interface (gNMI)</title> | |||
gRPC Network Management Interface (gNMI) | <author initials="P." surname="Borman" fullname="Paul Borman"> | |||
</title> | <organization/> | |||
<author> | </author> | |||
<organization>OpenConfig</organization> | <author initials="M." surname="Hines" fullname="Marcus Hines"> | |||
<organization/> | ||||
</author> | ||||
<author initials="C." surname="Lebsack" fullname="Carl Lebsack"> | ||||
<organization/> | ||||
</author> | ||||
<author initials="C." surname="Morrow" fullname="Chris Morrow"> | ||||
<organization/> | ||||
</author> | ||||
<author initials="A." surname="Shaikh" fullname="Anees Shaikh"> | ||||
<organization/> | ||||
</author> | ||||
<author initials="R." surname="Shakir" fullname="Rob Shakir"> | ||||
<organization/> | ||||
</author> | ||||
<author initials="W." surname="Li" fullname="Wen Bo Li,"> | ||||
<organization/> | ||||
</author> | ||||
<author initials="D." surname="Loher" fullname="Darren Loher"> | ||||
<organization/> | ||||
</author> | </author> | |||
<date month="May" year="2023"/> | <date month="May" year="2023"/> | |||
</front> | </front> | |||
<refcontent>Version 10.0</refcontent> | ||||
</reference> | </reference> | |||
<reference anchor="gRPC" target="https://grpc.io/docs/"> | <reference anchor="gRPC" target="https://grpc.io/docs/"> | |||
<front> | <front> | |||
<title> | <title>gRPC Documentation</title> | |||
gRPC Documentation | ||||
</title> | ||||
<author> | <author> | |||
<organization>gRPC Authors</organization> | <organization>gRPC Authors</organization> | |||
</author> | </author> | |||
<date year="2024"/> | <date year="2024"/> | |||
</front> | </front> | |||
</reference> | </reference> | |||
<reference anchor="IPMI" target="https://www.intel.la/content/dam/www/publ ic/us/en/documents/specification-updates/ipmi-intelligent-platform-mgt-interface -spec-2nd-gen-v2-0-spec-update.pdf"> | <reference anchor="IPMI" target="https://www.intel.la/content/dam/www/publ ic/us/en/documents/specification-updates/ipmi-intelligent-platform-mgt-interface -spec-2nd-gen-v2-0-spec-update.pdf"> | |||
<front> | <front> | |||
<title> | <title>Intelligent Platform Management Interface Specification, Second | |||
Intelligent Platform Management Interface Specification, Second Generation | Generation</title> | |||
</title> | ||||
<author> | <author> | |||
<organization>Intel</organization> | <organization>Intel</organization> | |||
</author> | </author> | |||
<author> | <author> | |||
<organization>Hewlett-Packard</organization> | <organization>Hewlett-Packard</organization> | |||
</author> | </author> | |||
<author> | <author> | |||
<organization>NEC</organization> | <organization>NEC</organization> | |||
</author> | </author> | |||
<author> | <author> | |||
<organization>Dell</organization> | <organization>Dell</organization> | |||
</author> | </author> | |||
<date month="October" year="2013"/> | <date month="October" year="2013"/> | |||
</front> | </front> | |||
<refcontent>Version 2.0</refcontent> | ||||
</reference> | </reference> | |||
<reference anchor="XPath" target="http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xpath-1999 | ||||
1116"> | <reference anchor="XPath" target="https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/REC-xpath-31- | |||
20170321/"> | ||||
<front> | <front> | |||
<title> | <title>XML Path Language (XPath) 3.1 </title> | |||
XML Path Language (XPath) Version 1.0 | <author initials="J." surname="Robie" fullname="Jonathan Robie" role | |||
</title> | ="editor"> | |||
<author> | <organization/> | |||
<organization>World Wide Web Consortium</organization> | </author> | |||
</author> | <author initials="M." surname="Dyck" fullname="Michael Dyck" role="e | |||
<date month="November" year="1999"/> | ditor"> | |||
<organization/> | ||||
</author> | ||||
<author initials="J." surname="Spiegel" fullname="Josh Spiegel" role | ||||
="editor"> | ||||
<organization/> | ||||
</author> | ||||
<date month="March" year="2017"/> | ||||
</front> | </front> | |||
<annotation>Latest version available at <eref target="https://www.w3.org/ TR/xpath-31/" brackets="angle"/>.</annotation> | ||||
</reference> | </reference> | |||
<reference anchor="xml-infoset" target= "https://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xm | ||||
l-infoset-20040204/"> | <reference anchor="xml-infoset" | |||
target="https://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xml-infoset-20040204/"> | ||||
<front> | <front> | |||
<title> | <title>XML Information Set (Second Edition)</title> | |||
XML Information Set (Second Edition) | <author fullname="John Cowan" initials="J." surname="Cowan" role="edi | |||
</title> | tor"> | |||
<author> | <organization></organization> | |||
<organization>World Wide Web Consortium</organization> | </author> | |||
<author fullname="Richard Tobin" initials="R." surname="Tobin" role=" | ||||
editor"> | ||||
<organization></organization> | ||||
</author> | </author> | |||
<date month="February" year="2004"/> | <date month="February" year="2004"/> | |||
</front> | </front> | |||
<refcontent>W3C Recommendation REC-xml-infoset-20040204</refcontent> | ||||
</reference> | </reference> | |||
</references> | </references> | |||
<section numbered="false"> | <section numbered="false"> | |||
<name>Acknowledgements</name> | <name>Acknowledgements</name> | |||
<t> | <t> | |||
Brian Sipos of the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory | <contact fullname="Brian Sipos"/> of the Johns Hopkins University Applie d Physics Laboratory | |||
(JHU/APL) provided excellent technical review of the DTNMA concepts | (JHU/APL) provided excellent technical review of the DTNMA concepts | |||
presented in this document and additional information related to | presented in this document and additional information related to | |||
existing network management techniques. | existing network management techniques. | |||
</t> | </t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
</back> | </back> | |||
</rfc> | </rfc> | |||
End of changes. 374 change blocks. | ||||
731 lines changed or deleted | 803 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. |